spinofflive
a red tinted photo of a prison with barbed wire (it's mount eden prison I think, all gothic old stone)
Image: Tina Tiller

SocietyOctober 4, 2022

Our prisons are breeding grounds for crime – what needs to change?

a red tinted photo of a prison with barbed wire (it's mount eden prison I think, all gothic old stone)
Image: Tina Tiller

With prisoners leaving the system with a harder mindset than they had going in, change is urgently needed.  A new podcast aims to be the first step in a process to change the way we view the system.  

It was in 2012 that Tommy Doran was first held in prison on remand. At the time he was 18 and addicted to methamphetamine. For the next five years, he was in and out of the system – mostly on remand, but then later sentenced to prison time. 

His memories of the last time he was in prison in 2017 are of being locked in his cell for 23 hours a day without any kind of rehabilitation programme offered. In an overpopulated and understaffed prison, the emergency button in his cell was instead used like “room service” for the basics – “we’d ring that and sometimes we’ll be sitting there for an hour waiting for response,” Doran recalls.

Over those years circling in and out of prison, his experience was of a system that, despite costing New Zealand $1.3 billion this past year, did nothing to address the root cause of his problems. “I always came out of prison and pretty much just went straight back to what I used to do,” he says. In fact, the characteristics he developed to eventually recover from drug and alcohol addiction and to stop committing crime – honesty, vulnerability, openness – were the exact traits he says are rejected within the current prison system. 

Now a criminology student at Victoria University, Doran is hosting a new podcast alongside actress Ana Chaya Scotney (Ngāi Tūhoe, Ngāti Tāwhaki Ki Ngaputahi) called True Justice. The five-part series produced by justice advocacy group JustSpeak shares the stories of people who have been through the prison system, from the point of arrest to life after prison.

Tommy Doran co-hosts a new podcast focusing on stories of people who have been in prison. (Photo: Kirsten Johnstone)

Doran’s experience within the system isn’t an anomaly. In New Zealand recidivism rates are high. Around 70% of people released from prison are reconvicted within two years. And of those who manage to stay out of prison for two years after their release, 49% are eventually re-imprisoned. In this way the current system is comparable to an enormous revolving door. These reoffending rates beg the question – if prison doesn’t deter people from crime, is it time to shift away from this form of punishment and toward something new?

JustSpeak executive director Aphiphany Forward-Taua (Waikato-Tainui, Ngāti Maniapoto,Ngāti Hinerangi, Ngāti Raukawa, Ngāti Porou, Whānau-ā-Apanui) believes real transformation toward a prison-less Aotearoa is necessary. “It’s time to have a discussion about getting rid of prisons, we’re well and truly overdue,” says Forward-Taua. “It’s not going to happen overnight but we need to create a very clear, stepped journey.” 

After hitting a peak of almost 11,000 in 2018, the prison population now hovers below 8,000. That reduction in prison numbers is the most dramatic in New Zealand’s history. Still, the latest figures from corrections show that while just 16% of the general population in New Zealand identify as Māori, 53.4% of people in prison were Māori. We often think about prison numbers as just that, numbers – that’s important, but can often negate the fact that each prison stat is an individual with their own whānau, friends, stories and needs.

The first step in that transformation, Forward-Taua explains, is their aim for the podcast: changing hearts and minds. Despite the system relying entirely on taxpayer dollars, she reckons most of us aren’t entirely cognisant of what it’s really like in prison. “I think part of the reason there isn’t just-ness experienced by those who end up in the criminal justice system or in our prisons, is because lots of people don’t know the additional punishment that prisoners experience when they are in prison,” she says.  

When Doran was in prison he noticed what he felt were injustices beyond being locked up, but believed at the time that was just how prison was meant to be. “It’s the deprivation of people’s liberty that is the punishment,” Forward-Taua explains. Beyond being removed from society, anything else that takes away people’s rights within prisons is additional punishment. Being deprived of medicine or sanitary items, living in unclean conditions, not being fed properly, being housed in unsafe environments or being isolated for extended periods of time (a condition which has been especially exacerbated by the pandemic) are all additional punishments, despite likely being familiar experiences for people in prisons in this country. 

If anything, the pair say the conditions within prison only enhance antisocial behaviour, which leads to reoffending. “For people within prison, rather than challenging those behaviours, you have to be paranoid, you have to be on your toes, you can’t show emotion, you can’t be vulnerable, you can’t be honest, otherwise, you get walked all over,” says Doran. “So, you’re being conditioned into being a cold, hardened sort of person – and you come out like that,” he adds.

Our approach to justice revolves around the commonsense saying, if you do the crime, you do the time. With rising rhetoric around crimes dubbed catchy names like “smash-and-grabs” or “ram raids” there’s a growing pressure on decision makers to respond with a tough on crime approach. That’s counterproductive, though, says Doran. “Most people are going to get out one day,” he says. “If they’ve done no rehabilitation, just been treated like caged animals for the past however-many years, they’re gonna get out, and act no different, if not worse than they were before they went in.”

JustSpeak executive director Aphiphany Forward-Taua. (Image: Supplied)

For the taxpayers footing the bill, Forward-Taua questions why we wouldn’t “want that money to be invested in a system that actually fosters and nurtures long lasting and meaningful rehabilitation, so that whatever the harm is that they’ve caused victims, never happens again to anyone else.”

“We need to fix society so that people don’t even need to get to this place where they’re in prison,” Forward-Taua says. Whether that be housing, food, education, healthcare, rehabilitation or  mental health support. “Don’t do the bottom-of-the- cliff approach, go to the top of the cliff and make sure everyone has everything that they need.” 

Our high reoffending rates are because the issues that caused the person to offend aren’t addressed, says Doran. “I feel like people who don’t understand what prison abolition is, when they hear that word, they just start freaking out, because what’s going to happen to the people who are a genuine risk to the public?” says Doran. Those types of offenders shouldn’t necessarily be released to the public, he explains, but there still should be attempts to rehabilitate. At the same time, lower level offenders shouldn’t be treated the same way as higher-level offenders, as they are in our current one-size-fits-all approach to justice.

The evolution away from prisons means an alternative vision of justice that revolves around dealing with the source of harm at its very core. “I’ve seen people that you did not want to cross paths with: gang members, serious recidivists, violent offenders rehabilitate and become functioning members of society,” he says. “I saw that take place in the community.” He points to the incarceration approach taken by Norway where community rehabilitation and restorative justice for offenders is emphasised, and putting people in an institution is an absolute last resort. They also have one of the lowest recidivism rates in the world. That kind of approach here would see a redirection of the billions of dollars a year that go to prisons, to community providers and supporting people to make sure their basic needs are met.

“As a society, we’re so wedded to this system and the idea that if we let go of it, we might lose something,” says Forward-Taua. “Actually, the only thing we would lose is a system that oppresses and continues to subjugate people.”

Keep going!
Once there were traffic jams. Europe has changed and we can too. (Photo: Getty Images)
Once there were traffic jams. Europe has changed and we can too. (Photo: Getty Images)

OPINIONSocietyOctober 3, 2022

European cities were once as car-choked as ours – let’s learn from them

Once there were traffic jams. Europe has changed and we can too. (Photo: Getty Images)
Once there were traffic jams. Europe has changed and we can too. (Photo: Getty Images)

Recent changes to planning legislation in New Zealand have enabled quite major changes to our urban landscape. What will we do with this opportunity and what can we learn from Europe?

Every New Zealand urbanist knows that all European cities are great because everyone in Europe is urbane, sophisticated and law-abiding. They’re particularly gracious behind the wheel, if they drive, which they don’t because cycling is in the European’s DNA and everyone cycles everywhere every day. All streets are shared spaces. Trams abound – they have been universally retained since the 1920s – while road-building has had no impact on cities. Unsightly warehousing and heavy industry simply do not exist. Nor does shift work.

Our fantasy Europe is a peaceful place. Centuries of choosing cooperation over conflict means people are robustly altruistic, even choosing to rent rather than own a home; there’s none of that ugly property speculation and anyway, there’s no such thing as a rotten European rental. Continent-wide socialism keeps public transport flush with cash and any cars that do exist are pocket-sized. Our picture of “Europe” is a weird amalgam of Scandinavian design, French trains, Dutch bicycles and Swiss chocolatiers.

While that picture is clearly nonsense, it has a powerful hold on our subconscious, and it gets invoked whenever we try to improve New Zealand’s cities. “European people are different”, we are told. “This won’t work here.” We humans are impulsively suspicious of the unknown; this helps to keep us alive, but it can stymie almost any good idea. Micro-scooters? Nope, too dangerous. Public cycle hire? Too complicated. City Rail Link? Well yes… but 100 years after the idea was first mooted.

How long will we have to rely on artist’s impressions of Auckland train stations like this one?

Above all, we love to forget that European cities were rebuilt for cars just as ours were, leading to suburban sprawl, parking problems and traffic jams. Look at Madrid’s motorway network for example. Or the bizarre Corbusian cityscape around Lyon’s Perrache station.

It’s the same with car parking. Recently I heard an American planner sigh that “it’s a pity we aren’t an historic European capital, where they don’t need to think about car parking.” I almost spat out my tea in astonishment. Had he ever had a conversation about car parking in Paris, he would have known that parking is the “third [electrified] rail” of urban planning — touch it for a nasty shock. Historic European cities? Yeah. Car-free utopias? Nah.

Since the 1970s, some European cities have chosen to reclaim their streets from traffic engineers in favour of people but this has, in almost every case, required political bravery. A good example is Bordeaux, France’s sixth largest city. Its centre is filled with narrow streets that are, for the most part, completely car-free. A comprehensive tramway network brings people over the bridges and down the avenues, interchanging in tree-lined squares. Streets are filled with life. Cars are parked elsewhere.

Trams, bicycles and bollards in central Bordeaux – all built since 2003. (Photo: Supplied)

“Well,” you say. “That couldn’t happen here! Auckland removed its trams in the 1950s. And shared spaces are always full of parked cars.”

I hate to burst your bubble, but the changes in many European cities are recent. The oldest bits of the Bordeaux tramway system opened in 2003 and it has since been repeatedly extended. Like almost all French cities, trams were ripped out of Bordeaux in the 1950s in favour of buses. Sound familiar? Now remember that France has been a car manufacturing powerhouse since the invention of the car itself; Renault, Citroën, Peugeot, plus Michelin, Elf, Total… there are plenty of vested interests in selling more cars to more people.

Bordeaux reintroduced trams under conservative mayor Alain Juppé, who saw public transport as part of a Haussmann-esque improvement programme to attract more people into the city. The trams aren’t just efficient; they are gorgeous, with a Scalextric style centreline pickup that negates any requirement for overhead wires. When your transport system actively makes a city look more attractive, it’s time to sit up and take notice.

The ancient city of Bordeaux hasn’t always been this pedestrian-friendly. Note: bollards. (Photo: Getty Images)

No one parks a car on the pavement in Bordeaux… because it is physically impossible to do so. Every space that a cheeky parker could occupy is meticulously defended with elegant fixed bollards. A system of rising bollards also keeps through-traffic out of the streets, freeing up more space for wandering, socialising, eating and drinking. Bordeaux’s hot climate means that shade and shelter are vital – avenues and squares of trees keep the streets cool and encourage people to linger.

Such measures are far from Europe-wide, but where they exist, they create more beautiful, liveable, sustainable cities. But, remember, those cities are not “natural law” or some reflection of something innately European, they were hard-won. The car-free core of Slovenia’s capital city Ljubljana was vigorously opposed at its conception; now it is a great success. In Holland, opposition to Groningen’s traffic-free city-centre required police protection for the representative charged with its implementation. In London, Waltham Forest’s “Mini-Holland” opening saw a coffin protest down the high street, but has led to vibrant streets and increasingly strong election victories for the politicians that led it. And so on.

Actual Holland looks quite nice too. The cycling culture of Amsterdam is a direct result of government policy. (Photo: supplied)

European cities are typically larger, more crowded, and more complicated than anything we have here. Think about the tonnage of goods moved into Paris per day, for example. Or the numbers of tourists crowding the streets of Salamanca. Or the logistics of collecting rubbish in central Milan. If we have a problem, chances are somewhere else has had it too… and has worked out how to solve it.

So let’s think about the outcomes. Scooter parking causing clutter? Paris has painted parking corrals linked to GPS systems. Concentric systems of rising bollards? Look at Ljubljana or Bordeaux. How about people who can’t walk far? How about free electric mini-shuttles? Ljubljana again. Railway lines only partly electrified? Hybrid trains are your friend. Street trees and roots? Use a Stockholm tree pit. Think about what success looks like and if the logistics of achieving that seem too hard, then look overseas.

It is all too easy to say “that couldn’t happen here” and put it down to national characteristics. This is lazy; it’s also absurd. Imagine if we said that all Australians drive a road train? Surely every New Zealander goes to work by jetboat? Rather than spiral into tedious cliché and resignation, let’s take a different perspective. People are people. We love to park for free, but don’t want anyone else to. We default to the easiest travel behaviour and are creatures of habit, resistant to change. As the habitat of more than half the world’s population, cities are the nexus of problems… and the source of ways to solve them.

Planning professionals need to recognise the universality of the human condition if we are to have grown-up conversations about urban planning and transport. Humans are infinitely adaptable. We all have hopes, dreams, desires and fears, and it’s up to the urban planning community to shape our environments in a way that best enhances our communal and individual lives.

All artists borrow. Great artists steal. Let’s borrow and steal from the best and aim for cities filled with liveability and joy – we deserve them too.

‘Media is under threat. Help save The Spinoff with an ongoing commitment to support our work.’
Duncan Greive
— Founder