spinofflive
BadNews_Prisons.png

OPINIONOpinionSeptember 29, 2022

Prisoner numbers are down: let’s not go back to a ‘lock ’em up’ mindset

BadNews_Prisons.png

The past few years saw the steepest drop in prisoners New Zealand’s ever had. Jarrod Gilbert looks at the possible causes of the reduction, and fears that Election 2023 might reverse the trend. 

Few statements have been so telling as when Bill English, a level-headed and conservative minister of finance, said that prisons are a moral and fiscal failure.

It was 2011, a time when prison numbers in New Zealand were continuing their dramatic rise. But that was not the most important back drop. The world was emerging from the global financial crisis and nothing, it seems, tunes the moral compass of a finance minister like an economic crunch.

It’s unfair to say that money was the only thing driving English. When I spoke to him he told me that he’d seen the impacts of prison and the failure of its promise. And in that he’s right.

A large part of the promise of prisons is reform but, with reoffending rates alarmingly high, the vision of prison as a place where people rehabilitate is a difficult case to make.

English did appreciate the moral failures at play, but the numbers drove him. He got Treasury to devise a model that calculated four significant risk factors that predicted serious justice spending on any given individual: CYF (now Oranga Tamariki) reporting abuse or neglect; reliance on a benefit since birth; having a parent in prison or on a corrective sentence; and having a mother without formal qualifications. The more factors present, the greater the cost to the state.

English, then, cracked open a door and slowly the pendulum of public mood swung. Every third paragraph in the media about crime no longer had a forceful sentence or two from Garth McVicar of the Sensible Sentencing Trust, and the public seemed open to new ideas.

Former prime minister Bill English, pictured as finance minister in 2016, knew the high price of prisons. (Photo: Getty Images)

And new ideas were needed. In 2016 the prison population in New Zealand was nearing capacity. And I don’t just mean vaguely in the realm of capacity, I mean bursting at the seams, what-the-hell-are-we-going-to-do capacity.

A new prison was proposed at Waikeria. The cost was an eye-watering $1b.

Nobody thought that was the best way to spend that sum of money, but in the lead up to the 2017 election, National – with Bill English now at the helm – was clearly unconvinced by any public mood shifts. National scarcely talked about the long-term measures English had championed, and instead they went to the hustings banging on about sending young offenders to boot camps. It was a baffling decision and a total misreading of the prevailing public breeze.

Labour, on the other hand, came to power with the promise of reform in the Corrections area, and indeed the justice system more broadly. They had an impressive justice summit and subsequently another one focused exclusively on Māori. They also put together Te Uepū, the Justice Advisory Group, but those moves achieved little other than bringing together the well-known issues.

But that’s not to say nothing has been done or that things haven’t changed. The advent of the Criminal Cases Review Commission is a big development – although it has been rather slow in getting its engine running at top speed. And initiatives around tackling family violence, on paper at least, seem strong.

But a far more intriguing development has been what has happened in New Zealand’s prisons. The numbers have dropped, and dropped dramatically.

After hitting a peak of nearly 11,000 in early March 2018, the prison population now sits comfortably below 8,000. It is the most dramatic reduction in prison numbers in New Zealand’s history.

The key metric here ought be Māori.

Māori overrepresentation in criminal justice is a key indicator of the country’s health. Not because reductions here point to improvements in offending, but because the tributaries that create the river to prison are a plethora of social and economic issues that blight Māori, such as overcrowded housing, intergenerational poverty, state care abuse and failure, drug and alcohol addiction, domestic violence, educational failure, and racism. If we see improvement in criminal justice figures, it will certainly show improvements across healthy community measures.

Wellington protesters at a 2020 rally against Oranga Tamariki’s removal of Māori children from whānau. Inadequate state care has been defined as a key contributor to incarceration. (Photo: RNZ/Ana Tovey)

The good news is the raw number of Māori in prison is down; however their drops have not been as significant as non-Māori, meaning the percentage of Māori in prisons has actually increased. In other words, the drop has impacted on Māori, but along the unequal lines we traditionally see.

What has driven these decreases is difficult to pinpoint exactly. Over the longer term, the number of young people being locked up has dropped. Over the shorter term, Corrections has made efforts to ensure that those eligible for bail or parole are given the best possible chance of getting it (many were denied simply by not having suitable addresses, for example). But perhaps a more significant driver is from the judiciary, who have responded to the shift in the community mood about the lack of efficacy of prisons, meaning less serious offenders are being directed away from prison. The percentage of people imprisoned for violent and sexual crimes has increased but, interestingly, community-based sentences don’t seem to have taken up any great slack of lesser crimes, so perhaps the answers lie in police prosecutions. Or maybe the answer lies altogether elsewhere.

The one elephant in the room is Covid, and it may turn out that the bulk of the drop is something of a mirage.

The leader of the opposition tweets on crime – defined as a key issue of Election 2023.

Time will give us the answers, but in reality, timing is the key. We need to reimagine how we see crime and, rather than just reacting to it, we need to think about preventing it. Prevention of crime needs to be our focus if we are going to make substantial gains. In criminal justice matters, there are all manner of uncertainties, but of that I’m absolutely certain.

Prisons are a huge expense and they will never give us the answers we want. We need to get ahead of the issues.

I rather fear we have blown a real opportunity to seed this idea during a period when the public seemed ready to hear it. With the political drums once again beating a tough-on-crime rhythm, and an election about a year away, the pendulum may be about to swing again.

Keep going!
The default position most for rental properties in New Zealand is to prohibit pets. (Image: Archi Banal)
The default position most for rental properties in New Zealand is to prohibit pets. (Image: Archi Banal)

OPINIONSocietySeptember 28, 2022

The absence of rights for renters with pets is just cruel

The default position most for rental properties in New Zealand is to prohibit pets. (Image: Archi Banal)
The default position most for rental properties in New Zealand is to prohibit pets. (Image: Archi Banal)

Being a renter shouldn’t preclude pet ownership, but for a huge number of us that do rent, a pet is out of the question. It’s time the status quo changed, writes Charlotte Muru-Lanning.

According to his adoption records, my cat was rescued, along with the rest of his huddled litter, from under a house in Whangārei before being relocated to a pet shop in Tāmaki Makaurau. When I adopted him three years ago, as a ridiculously minute kitten, I was living with my parents. We drove him home and after a quick discussion, named him Che. 

These days, Che is far less tiny, and most of his waking hours are dedicated to exploring his suburban surroundings and, more importantly, patrolling the driveway. When the rest of us are eating dinner, he sits patiently among the conversation on a spare stool with his tail draped across his feet. I treasure the 597 photographs of him that I have saved on my phone. Even more so because, despite being my cat, I don’t get to see him often. 

The plan was always for my cat to live with me, but the last two rentals I’ve lived in haven’t allowed pets. So Che still lives with my parents. It’s a direct result of the default position when it comes to rental properties in New Zealand: no pets. 

When the Residential Tenancies Amendment Act 2020 was being discussed in parliament, it seemed there was hope for those of us with pets or who were keen on adopting one. Within the reforms – which aimed to better balance security and stability for tenants with the interests of landlords – were proposals to change the law so that more tenants would be able to have pets in rental properties.

Che napping and ready and waiting at the kitchen bench. (Photos: Charlotte Muru-Lanning)

When the final bill was passed, it was one of the significant updates to our rental regulations in years: giving tenants more rights to make minor changes to homes, removing no-cause terminations of tenancies and allowing the Tenancy Tribunal to suppress names of parties in decisions. Glaringly missing from what was served up was any mention of pets of any kind. That’s despite 41% of all New Zealand households owning at least one cat, and 34% owning a dog. And the government’s reason for this omission was that it caused too much debate, and more time was needed to come up with a solution.

There are plenty of examples overseas where tenancy law takes a far more humane approach to pets. In the Australian state of Victoria, for example, following amendments to their tenancies act made in 2020, the default became that pets are allowed in rentals. Since the reforms, landlords have been unable to “unreasonably refuse consent to a renter wishing to keep a pet”, and must gain approval from the tribunal to do so. In Germany, landlords are not allowed to impose a blanket ban on pets of all kinds. Similarly, in the Canadian province of Ontario, landlords cannot evict tenants for pet ownership under most circumstances. 

I can say from experience that even without the addition of having a pet, it’s wildly stressful trying to find a rental in this country. When you start adding up requirements around what you can afford in rent, move-in dates, accessibility needs, proximity to schools or offices, the pool of what’s available starts to shrink very quickly. Having a pet only compounds that uncertainty and instability for those looking for a place to live.

When I surveyed Trade Me rental listings two weeks ago, just 14% of the 9,466 rentals available across the country had checked the option “pets OK”. That percentage was far worse in Northland, where just 5% of the 134 rentals were pet friendly, or in Otago where 6% of the 461 available properties were. If you’re after a rental in Gisborne, you’d be entirely out of luck – not one of the rental properties listed at the time allowed pets. Even in cities with above average numbers of pet-friendly rentals, the options were abysmally limited. Of Canterbury’s 933 rentals, 23% were pet friendly, and around 30% of the 20 rental homes in Marlborough allowed pets. 

For rent sign outside a home
Only a minority of rentals advertised on TradeMe are pet-friendly. (Photo: Getty Images)

By the same token, that struggle to find a home is echoed by a large number of animals in Aotearoa. Animal shelters across the country have reported being at or near capacity this year. It’s not a new issue, but it’s likely being compounded by the cost of living crisis, staffing issues and housing instability. Knowing that, it seems absurd that we wouldn’t do more to remove unnecessary barriers to pet ownership to help alleviate that pressure. It’s good for animals, it’s good for communities and it’s often really great for the person who adopts them – endless studies have shown how having a pet can reduce stress levels, anxiety, insomnia and depression. 

Our lack of tenancy rights for pet owners is often justified as a rational response to niggly insurance requirements, the cap on bond payments and rules around wear and tear. The thinking goes that the onus put on landlords for any potential damage caused by pets would be too high. But when so many people in this country are blocked from owning a home (at the immense benefit of a few), they shouldn’t additionally be locked out of a future with a pet, and all the joy that they can bring. 

As renting in New Zealand morphs from something that was once largely transitional and temporary, to something an increasing number of us wonder if we’ll be doing forever, the status quo around pets in rentals becomes ever more unconscionable. The omission of pet tenancy rights is just one miserable symptom of our attitude toward renters in this country. And as far as I’m concerned, it’s an attitude that’s relentlessly and unnecessarily cruel. 

These days, I see my cat about once a fortnight. I’m lucky that my parents can look after him. And I’m lucky that we live in the same city. Still, most days I miss the ineffable energy that an animal brings to a home, the certainty of a good night’s sleep that comes with a cat curled up at the end of the bed and the cheer of returning home after work to a tiny animal. 

Instead, I arrive home most nights to my animal-less flat and walk past the cat door that was crudely sealed shut with putty before my flatmates and I moved in. 

Rent Week 2022 runs from September 27 to October 2. Read the best of our renting coverage here.