(Image: Archi Banal)
(Image: Archi Banal)

SocietyOctober 8, 2021

What the Ashley Bloomfield fandom says about us

(Image: Archi Banal)
(Image: Archi Banal)

He’s been depicted as a saint, a superhero, a king and more. What do these portrayals say about how we think about gender and ethnicity, and is there any danger in all this?

Ashley Bloomfield, the ever-polite director general of health, has become the recognisable face of our national Covid-19 response. Helped by the 1pm updates that he’s fronted almost daily during outbreaks alongside Jacinda Ardern, he’s been cast into the strange and unprecedented position of being a public servant with a cult-like following across the country.

Dr Shelley Dawson from Te Herenga Waka (Victoria University of Wellington) and Dr Julia de Bres from Massey University started to notice the collective crush on Ashley Bloomfield during our first lockdown in 2020. They watched with interest as the Bloomfield obsession began to be expressed through a multitude of products. Tea towels, bags, earrings, key rings, t-shirts, coasters, mugs, hand towels (one of which is now kept in the Te Papa collection), face masks, posters, figurines, portraits, window displays, a suite of love songs, Chris Parker’s felt hat creation and most recently, an erotic fan fiction.

Aotearoa was obsessed, which inspired the pair, who both have backgrounds in socio-linguistics, to look at how Ashley Bloomfield was being shaped in the public imagination through these commercial and artistic products. Through their research, the two academics identified six key ways that Bloomfield was being portrayed: superhero, love interest and sex symbol, national treasure, saviour, saint, and authority figure. 

Dawson says the urge to purchase Bloomfield products speaks to “a desire for solidarity”. Buying a $35 hand towel with Ashley’s beaming face surrounded by embroidered love hearts, for example, was a way of signalling one’s belonging to, and solidarity with, the team of five million. 

While people likely bought or made these products simply because of their affection for Bloomfield, the products themselves also reinforce other more complex ideas, particularly around norms of gender and ethnicity. More specifically, the pair’s recently published analysis found that “when New Zealanders fear for their lives, they don’t just turn to a specific type of person (a middle-aged, middle-class, Pākehā man), they also turn to a familiar set of dominant discourses (of gender, sexuality, nation, class and ethnicity)”. 

Ashley Bloomfield hand towel and t-shirt (Images: stfabiola.co.nz/fortee.co.nz)

When it comes to our understanding of real life, there’s a power in symbols, explains Dawson. “It’s part of how we construct our social life,” she says. By looking deeper at the symbolism within these representations of Ashley Bloomfield, there’s a whole lot more meaning to be found. 

One observation of note is that Bloomfield has been repeatedly portrayed as an individual hero, even if it’s often been tongue-in-cheek, which is significant because the very idea of a hero has been gendered over time. “We are still working within a structure that values strength and brute force and the idea of an ‘exceptional individual’ rather than vulnerability and the collective,” says Shelley.

Popular culture, from old superhero films to the Marvel heroes of today, has essentially given us a common understanding around our desire for someone to save us. The idea of a hero reinforces certain forms of masculinity.

“Covid-19, in this case, is the villain,” says Dawson. “And there was this very big use of the metaphor of war throughout the Covid-19 reporting in different countries.” She says the idea of a hero makes sense when it feeds into the fight against a “dastardly villain” like Covid-19. 

These ideas of competition, of winning and of power, have all been gendered as masculine traits due to centuries of patriarchal dominance, she says. “Whether we know this consciously or not, it’s still being perpetuated, in often hidden ways.”

During times of crisis, people tend to look to one person as a saviour. Throughout history, that person has tended to be a man. And although Bloomfield himself seemed to actively recoil from these portrayals of himself as a hero, the fact that it happened anyway “speaks to the fact that people love a hero, because the frame of a hero has been so ingrained over time”, says Dawson.

Dawson notes that beyond gender, ethnicity was a crucial part of these representations too. It’s impossible to look at gender alone, it’s always attached to race and ethnicity, social class, able-bodiedness and so on. “It’s when you look at those connections, you can see the privilege that’s been compounded or emphasised in the products.”

It’s highlighted in the portrayal of Bloomfield as an Americanised superhero, European-styled saint or, perhaps most uncomfortably, a colonial hero with a crown.

For non-Pākehā in New Zealand, these are features that will more likely be noticed and seem questionable. Particularly the idea of a king saving us. “It’s very awkward, I would say, for the New Zealand context,” Dawson says.

Jacinda Ardern and Ashley Bloomfield announcing new Covid-19 restrictions at the Beehive on February 14, 2021 (Photo: Mark Tantrum/Getty Images)

Since the beginning of the pandemic there has been a notable lack of diversity in the government’s front-facing response team, something that has been repeatedly criticised. 

While we had a female “hero” in Jacinda Ardern, reinforcing the fact that women can be heroes too, there were certainly no ongoing Māori heroes put forward by the official response, or even within the media. Many Māori have been left wondering, where is our Moko Toa? Where’s our Māui? 

“We can destabilise the idea of a hero in and of itself,” Dawon says, “but at the same time that idea of a hero is not going anywhere very quickly.” That means, in the meantime, there needs to be more representation of different kinds of heroes. It’s important as we expand the meaning of the hero into “new and more inclusive terrain”.

“That idea of representation and seeing yourself mirrored has been shown time and time again to be super important for a sense of wellbeing and belonging,” she says.

The lack of Māori representation has surely been symbolic of the exclusion of Māori within our Covid-19 response, and has potentially added to communication failures that have compounded the crisis for Māori, who are now overrepresented in case numbers and underrepresented in vaccine numbers.

There are of course problems with casting one person, especially a public servant, as an individual hero, especially in a complex global pandemic. And that’s become clear within this latest outbreak, with the much trickier delta variant, says Dawson.

“When you build somebody up to such an extent, especially in the New Zealand ‘tall poppy’ context, there’s a danger that they are going to be knocked off the pedestal, which is probably happening in certain areas at the moment.” There are no more love songs, the fan art has dwindled, and there are certainly no new pairs of Bloomfield earrings for sale this time around.

Keep going!
(Image: Madeleine Chapman)
(Image: Madeleine Chapman)

SocietyOctober 8, 2021

To pee or not to pee: A full timeline of the confusing level three bathroom rule

(Image: Madeleine Chapman)
(Image: Madeleine Chapman)

How one simple question – can I use someone else’s bathroom or not? – inspired a week of urinary confusion.

Monday October 4

4.26pm

The prime minister has just announced that Auckland, which has been in lockdown for seven weeks, will be staying in alert level three, sort of. There will be eased restrictions: two bubbles can gather, outside only, with up to ten people at a time. Distance must be maintained when masks are removed for eating and drinking. Jacinda Ardern is inviting Aucklanders to meet their friends and whānau for a walk or a picnic or a beer.

On the Spinoff work messaging platform, Slack, staffers are reacting to the news. Leonie Hayden (Opinion Writer of the Year at the 2021 Voyager Media Awards) has only one thing on her mind.

“I might be focusing on the wrong thing, but if I go have a beer in a friend’s backyard, can I use their toilet?”

A simple question posed by an award-winning journalist.

Can I use someone else’s bathroom?

4.51pm

The Spinoff has one press gallery reporter, Justin Giovannetti. He is present both at the press conference and on Slack. Amid his helpless colleagues’ speculating, a curmudgeonly Giovannetti cuts through:

“I asked about your bloody toilet.”

And so he has. Back in the Beehive theatrette, Giovannetti asks if a person having a drink in their friend’s backyard is allowed to use their toilet. Director general of health Dr Ashley Bloomfield looks perplexed. He’s not ready for such a specific question. He begins to answer but Ardern speaks over him.

“Keep it outside,” she says, with confidence. “Nice and simple. If you haven’t got a good bladder, don’t stay for long.”

Can I use someone else’s bathroom? No.

4:52pm

Moments after, nay, seconds after Ardern has given what appears to be a definitive answer, Bloomfield continues with his original response: “We haven’t modelled that particular scenario but it’s the gathering of people inside [that’s to be avoided]. I’m assuming they’re not all going to the toilet at the same time.”

He stops talking and Ardern moves on to the next question.

Can I use someone else’s bathroom? Yes.

Tuesday October 5

7.25am

Deputy prime minister Grant Robertson appears on the AM Show to clarify ongoing confusion about the level three, step one rules. Ryan Bridge asks him, first up, whether or not someone visiting a friend for a drink is allowed to use their bathroom. Robertson laughs, makes a joke about being happy to cover the important issues first, then answers.

“As Dr Bloomfield said yesterday, we’re not expecting there to be gatherings of people in the toilet but if people need to go, no doubt they will manage that situation. The critical element here is that the focus of these gatherings is outdoors.”

Can I use someone else’s bathroom? Yes.

Newshub coverage of the issue exercising a weak-bladdered nation

5.00pm

On the final day of alert level three as we know it, there is still confusion in the air about the new “step” system. And still confusion about toilets. Auckland Council releases a statement in an attempt to clear the air.

“Over the coming days we will be working to reopen more of our public toilets and making some of our outdoor facilities available for use once again,” it says. “With so many parks, this will take time so please do bear with us while we work through this”

Can I use someone else’s bathroom if that someone else is a park? Yes.

6.20pm

After being asked for clarification around the residential toilet rule (among others), the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet sends out a final ruling to media via email.

“Visitors cannot go into your house at all. This includes walking through a house to access the backyard or use of bathroom facilities. If you have visitors they can meet in your garden or in an outdoor public space. The golden rule is that your gathering of 10 people is outdoors to reduce the ability of the virus to transmit.”

Can I use someone else’s bathroom? No.

Wednesday October 6

8.00am

The prime minister appears on The Hits morning show with Jono and Ben to once again provide clarity on the toilet rule.

“I’m really clear on this,” she says, speaking on day three of toilet confusion. “Just don’t go inside. Don’t go inside, please. And if you’re really stressed about whether or not this is going to be manageable, just be in a park or a place where this isn’t going to be a dilemma for you.”

Can I use someone else’s bathroom? No.

Does “just be[ing] in a park” mean people magically won’t need to pee? Also no.

1.21pm

Covid-19 response minister Chris Hipkins is running the 1pm press briefing. He does not mention toilet use in his prepared remarks but is of course asked about them when he opens the floor for questions. He’s given a pop quiz on the rules that includes “can you go to the toilet if you go to your friend’s house for a barbecue?”

“No,” he says firmly. It sounds like he’s finished and then he hurriedly adds, “unless it’s an outdoor toilet”.

Can I use someone else’s bathroom? No.

Can I use someone else’s outdoor bathroom? Yes.

3.47pm

An email is sent to multiple media outlets and politicians, including the prime minister, as well as the director general of health and the (director) general info account at the ministry of health with the subject line “denial of access to toilet = torture”. The body of the email doesn’t provide much more information then that but is thought-provoking nonetheless. At time of writing, none of the recipients has “reply-all”ed to the email.

Can I use someone else’s bathroom? No.

Is denying access to a bathroom torture? Maybe?

Thursday October 7

No pee discourse to report.

Friday October 8

8.00am

As at 8.00am, Friday October 8, there has been no further news of toilet-based Covid-19 rules. No reporters have investigated Hipkins’ casual reference to outdoor toilets at people’s homes, despite that being a thing that largely doesn’t exist. Men can pee in bushes (and do so) with ease. Women will, it seems, just figure it out. Or, as Ardern suggested, “just be in a park or a place where this isn’t going to be a dilemma”.

Can I use someone else’s bathroom? No.

 

Correction: this article has been updated to show the deputy prime minister appeared on the AM Show on Tuesday, not Wednesday.