HMH_FeatureImage-5.png

SocietyApril 10, 2025

Help Me Hera: Should I get a new tattoo?

HMH_FeatureImage-5.png

I have three awful tattoos I got as a teenager. Now in my 50s, I really want a new one – but I’m scared I’m going to change my mind again.

Want Hera’s help? Email your problem to helpme@thespinoff.co.nz

Dear Hera,

For the last couple of years, I’ve been thinking about getting a tattoo on my lower arm. A beautiful, fine-line piece of art from a tattooist whose work I really love. The problem is I have three tattoos I got as a young bogan teenager that mean nothing to me (and are actually pretty awful).  I know that this one would be different cause I’ve given it lots of thought, and it would be meaningful. But taste still changes, and this one will be visible every day – my others are able to be hidden, thank god! I keep going to book the appointment as I really do want it, but something is holding me back. What if in 10 years time, when I’m 60, I’ve changed again and it doesn’t fit my vibe?

Warmly,

Skin Deep 

Dear SD,

If you were writing to me from your 20s and wanted to get a photorealistic Pirates of the Caribbean sleeve, I would advise you to hold off for a couple of years while you grow a little more frontal lobe. But in your 50s, you’ve earned the right to make a few irreversible decisions about your corporeal form with a higher degree of confidence. 

I can see that getting three regrettable tattoos as a bogan teenager has made you understandably cautious about making the same mistake again. But you’re not a teenager anymore. You know yourself. You’ve had 50 years to develop your sense of personal style and taste. You love the artist’s work and have been thinking about this for several years. When it comes to permanent bodily alteration, there is no such thing as a future-proof decision. But you’re about as close to certain as it’s possible to be. I think you should say fuck it, and just go for it.  

‘Like a thousand-piece jigsaw puzzle, each member is vital to the whole picture. Join today.’
Calum Henderson
— Production editor

In a way, I think having already made a few bad choices frees you up a little because it’s not as if you’re starting with a pristine canvas. Mistakes have already been made, and you know what it’s like to live with them. I don’t mean that you’re so far gone you couldn’t possibly make it any worse. But regrettable tattoos are a dime a dozen, and unless you’re in a prestigious Finnish sauna, or vying for a role in a costume drama, you probably don’t spend that much time thinking about them. They’re just another part of your body, like your janky elbow and appendectomy scar. I would argue that it’s better to have three dubious tattoos and one you’re proud of than three dubious tattoos. 

I personally think there’s something sort of charming about having some ugly art on your body, like a funky Minions letterbox on an otherwise picturesque street or some hideous 1970s wallpaper inside a rarely-used wardrobe. Those old tattoos might not reflect who you are now, but they’re a good proof of the rich and occasionally ill-advised life you have led. They don’t have to reflect your current taste to be meaningful – it’s fine to think of them as a living memorial to the person you were, even if that person was an idiot. 

If you really hate the old ones, you could always think about having them covered up or even lasered off, depending on how large and ostentatious the initial design was. There are plenty of creative ways to improve or camouflage old work. And if you’re nervous about the new one, you could discuss different placement options with the tattoo artist so that you don’t have to resort to wearing long-sleeve tops for the rest of your life if you change your mind. 

There is no way to protect yourself from future regret. But when you die, you can’t take your body with you. If our bodies are temples, they’re badly constructed and ultimately disposable ones, made of haunted meat, so it doesn’t pay to be too precious. You’ve spent the last few decades living with your teenage mistakes. I think your adult self has earned the right to make a few mistakes of her own!   

Good luck

Keep going!
A police car with blue and yellow checkered patterns is parked on the side of an empty street. The background is blurred, showing trees and street signs. The image has a blue overlay.
Image: The Spinoff

OPINIONSocietyApril 10, 2025

The police withdrawal from mental health callouts has to stop in its tracks

A police car with blue and yellow checkered patterns is parked on the side of an empty street. The background is blurred, showing trees and street signs. The image has a blue overlay.
Image: The Spinoff

Moving from a police response to a health response to mental health crises is good in theory. But without anything to fill the gap, it’s irresponsible and dangerous, argues Mental Health Foundation head Shaun Robinson.

We rely on our police force to keep us safe from harm and danger. It’s a job they largely do well and one we’re grateful for. However, a decision about the sorts of callouts they’ll attend could put tens of thousands of New Zealanders at risk.  

Of all calls made to police, 11% are mental health-related – that’s one mental health callout every seven minutes. Calling 111 is often someone’s first port of call when they, or someone they love, is experiencing a mental health crisis. The other option is the local mental health crisis assessment team who, it has been well documented, are often strained and have limited capacity.   

The police provide a critical role in helping people access mental health support and ensuring their safety during what is often one of the toughest moments in a person’s life, and an incredibly stressful time for their loved ones.    

But from next week, the police will push ahead with the next stage of their planned transition away from this work. Running in parallel, police and health agencies have started to develop a five-year transition plan that began last year. Moving from a police response to a health response to mental health crisis is good in theory, but very little has been done to fill the gap on the ground. There is no alternative to the police yet in place and until there is, police withdrawal is irresponsible. 

I get it. It’s not the police’s core job to respond to most mental health callouts, especially where there is no risk to life or safety. They don’t have the specialist training required, and their presence, however well-intentioned, can frighten people in distress and escalate the trauma they face.  

We’ve been saying for years that the police are not the right people. But, for now, they’re the best we’ve got. 

The government can fix this – specifically, the minister of police, Mark Mitchell, and the minister for mental health, Matt Doocey.  

However, I don’t have confidence in whatever plan these ministers will claim to have. There’s no evidence of a detailed health plan or alternative mental health crisis service, and no funding commitment to support either one.  

Instead, there’s a broad and vague assumption that the mental health system will somehow plug the gaps that the planned police withdrawal will create. This is frankly ridiculous. Health is stretched beyond capacity. Staff vacancies are growing and emergency departments, which will see the next stage of reduced police support, are massively under the pump. The 70,000 New Zealanders and their families who currently call the police when they need support deserve a well-resourced, properly funded mental health response service. These are vulnerable people who deserve our compassion and care.  

Emergency departments, which will see the next stage of reduced police support, are massively under the pump (Photo: Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Replacing police involvement to mental health responses will require a range of funded initiatives. For example, we want a crisis response that involves trained mental health professionals, peer support workers, paramedics, social workers and community-led teams: responders who have specialist training to de-escalate distress and reduce the risk of unnecessary force or restraint.  

We know this approach works. There have been successful trials under way both in Aotearoa and internationally. But it will take at least three to five years of solid investment and training to build this workforce and system nationally. Until it is fully built, it is dangerous and ill-considered for police to be stepping back.   

There’s been a similar move by police in the UK. But there the government invested an extra £1 billion a year to replace police officers, including funding specialist mental health ambulances and crisis cafes where people struggling to cope can drop in for help.  

Without a similar well-documented plan and hefty investment from our government, the risk is too great, the danger too monumental.  

‘If you value The Spinoff and the perspectives we share, support our work by donating today.’
Anna Rawhiti-Connell
— Senior writer

Even talking about police withdrawing is causing confusion and danger. People are calling the police to be told they should call the mental health crisis team to be told they should call the police. Everyone – police, public, mental health services – needs iron-cast clarity before something goes seriously wrong.  

This planned police withdrawal has to stop in its tracks.  

At the Mental Health Foundation, we have launched a petition calling for the minister of police to stop the planned police withdrawal, until an alternative service is in its place. The petition also calls for the minister for mental health to publicly share a fully developed and costed health plan to support this transition, including how this transition will be funded in Budget 2025. Sounds reasonable, doesn’t it?  

Staying safe  

If you or someone you know has immediate safety concerns, please still dial 111, or contact your local mental health crisis assessment team. Helpline numbers are available at www.mentalhealth.org.nz/help