spinofflive
Getty Images
Getty Images

OPINIONSocietyMay 14, 2020

While the powerful steer the recovery conversation, others deserve to be heard

Getty Images
Getty Images

Budget 2020: From supermarket workers to machine operators to cleaners, the people at the bottom of the socioeconomic pile deserve to be be part of the post-pandemic conversation – and to be allowed to speak for themselves, writes Stacey Shortall.

While there is an audible sigh of relief in New Zealand that we are now in alert level two, everyone knows economic times are tough and the pain is about to get worse. We have all read the sobering reports and forecasts.

In the wake of Covid-19, thousands of New Zealanders have gone on benefits. With the wage subsidy paid to around 1.7 million workers set to come to an end, our unemployment rate could also skyrocket. Economists predict it could reach 10% by the end of the year.

The government’s debt levels are fast reaching an all-time high, and widespread changes are occurring across all sectors. The Salvation Army’s recently released social impact report shows the demand for food parcels is at an unprecedented level and the uptake of other assistance packages has been massive.

Today’s budget looms particularly large in this new light. No one can predict what the full extent of this economic crisis will be, or what is the right thing to do to combat it. The only certainty we have is that we need to balance short-term economic recovery with long-term sustainable economic growth. This is no easy balance to strike. It is also fraught with significant controversy, and some of those battle lines are already being drawn.

Food parcels at Auckland City Mission in 2017 (Photo: Getty Images)

There are big expectations that somehow Budget 2020 will help ensure we emerge from Covid-19 with a fairer economy, stronger businesses and a cleaner environment. But as some advocate for the government to prioritise certain sectors of the economy for support, others argue that it would be inappropriate to pick winners now. There is similar disagreement about how the budget should weigh the viability of certain industries against the type of post-pandemic economy New Zealand should aspire to achieve. While some are calling for a climate-friendly recovery, others want jobs protected at all costs. Grumblings about a perceived lack of future planning and ambition are likewise being countered by calls for caution. Expecting a budget to respond to all these competing tensions is a big ask.

As we look to revitalise the economy, major public infrastructure projects, new housing developments, more employment programmes and increased public assistance will almost certainly be part of Budget 2020. Packages have already been announced to support workers, businesses, sectors such as health and aviation, enable the re-deployment of some workers, house some homeless, help victims of violence and pay some teachers more.

Plainly much more assistance is coming. We can only hope that it goes to the places where assistance is really needed the most.

To state the obvious, the ability to cope with the Covid-19 economic crisis will vary across our communities. For some of us, the economic fallout will be new, and we may be more resilient. For others, it will just be the latest hardship in a long series of financial struggles.

With sectors like hospitality and tourism in turmoil there is no doubt that poorer families and lower earners will be hit the hardest by the economic shock brought on by Covid-19. Even before the pandemic, our traditional middle class had been eroded as many New Zealanders were being pushed into the ranks of the working poor, where lives are lived pay cheque to pay cheque, and housing security is precarious. In November 2019, a Human Rights Commission study found that 50,000 working households in New Zealand lived in poverty. Images of poverty have long haunted New Zealand and as our economy has largely been shut down by Covid-19, it is not difficult to imagine that these numbers, and images, will now be far worse.

As Budget 2020 is revealed and New Zealand looks to recalibrate our economy, it will simply not be enough for us to say what we think we already know about people living in poverty. It will not be enough to cover off core issues around income, housing, food, education, jobs, physical and mental health, and community safety. We need to hear from those people who are actually living in poverty and are under the threat of ongoing Covid-19-related turmoil.

A supermarket cashier in Rome during the Covid-19 outbreak (Photo: ANDREAS SOLARO / AFP / Getty Images)

Particularly over recent weeks, we have all depended on our essential workers who serve us from behind face-masks and plexi-glass. It is those people we now need to hear from. We need their input on how our economy could operate better for them. We need to hear about the barriers that prevent them from working towards better financial security: fairer wages, affordable and healthy housing, accessible public transportation and readily available childcare.

Economic recovery should not just be something that happens to people. Rather it should be something that happens with them. For that to be a reality, as part of the budget discussion, we need the voices of more supermarket workers, hospitality staff, household and commercial cleaners, tradespeople, machine operators and retail salespeople, to give just a few examples.

We also need to hear from the people who interact with the families of those New Zealanders. Teachers are an obvious starting point. So, too, are the youth and social workers in communities and the frontline providers of food and other support to vulnerable families.

All these voices belong in every single commentary and opinion piece being circulated about the kind of post-pandemic economy New Zealand needs, and they should be in this very piece.

I fear that my voice could never do justice to the issues that need to be addressed in Budget 2020. I worry that because I have represented abused women, worked in disadvantaged communities and advocated for social, and criminal, justice reform, I am somehow seen as a voice for something I am not. I despair that my voice might be listened to when there are others far better qualified to speak the words that matter.

I worry whether I can properly speak to how the budget might address issues of disadvantage and vulnerability when I am not in those circumstances myself, when my only experiences of those challenges is as a lawyer or volunteer. I anguish over whether and what to say, not because I fear criticism (and I know there will be some), but because I might silence those who are more deserving to be heard.

All this is as much about who gets to speak as it is what gets said. I have certainly been on calls and online meetings over the past weeks where people at the frontline of the poverty and despair caused by Covid-19 have talked about what would matter for them: The higher wage that might have enabled them to scrape together some savings to buffer their family when their job was lost. The warmer home that might have been more inviting when they could go nowhere else. The access to a stable and reliable source of food that might have caused them not to worry over what would be put on empty dinner plates that evening. The availability of learning activities and toys that might have better occupied their children. The underlying good physical and mental health that could have meant they less feared fatal sickness. I know first-hand that these matters are all far more compelling coming from the people at the frontline than filtered and interpreted through me.

This pandemic has laid plain just how much health, job stability, safe housing, quality education and resilient communities really matter. The recession it will cause will make these things only matter more. They are the cornerstone issues that must feature in Budget 2020. But you do not need me to tell you that.

Toby Morris
Toby Morris

SocietyMay 14, 2020

Siouxsie Wiles & Toby Morris: Simple rules to play it safe at alert level two

Toby Morris
Toby Morris

Siouxsie explains the state of Covid-19 in New Zealand, the risks we face in alert level two, and some simple ways we can keep safe.


The Spinoff’s coverage of the Covid-19 crisis is made possible thanks to the support of members. If you can, please consider joining Spinoff Members here (and score a Toby Morris tea-towel)


Today Aotearoa New Zealand wakes up in alert level two. It’s no secret that I would have preferred for us to stay at level three for another week or so. That’s because I’m worried we don’t quite yet know how effective level three has been at keeping us on our path to eliminate Covid-19. But the government has had the unenviable task of balancing this risk with keeping the “team of five million” together. This has become especially important as protests against lockdowns and restrictions ripple troublingly around the world. So what are the risks at level two and how can we “play it safe”?

Just how many hidden transmission chains might there be in New Zealand?

Let’s start with the thing I’m worried about – the potential for unknown cases or chains of transmission to still be out there. As we’ve seen all around the world, if countries loosen their restrictions too soon or too quickly cases start to rise again. And because of the incubation period of the SARS-CoV-2 virus responsible and the resultant “lag”, it can take a couple of weeks before this becomes apparent. I don’t want that to happen here.

First for the really good news. As of now, we’ve had 1,147 confirmed and 300 probable cases of Covid-19. This means that when compared to many other countries in the world New Zealand has had relatively few cases. We’re what is known as a low prevalence country. Because we went hard and early, Covid-19 is not common in New Zealand. This is in complete contrast to many other countries that still have widespread transmission of the virus and a large number of new cases being reported each day, many they can’t trace back to other cases. Again, we know where almost all of our cases come from. Just 4% are listed as being of unknown source. These are the ones that concern me. Thankfully, they are a small number. But they could point to some unknown chains of transmission. So how can we flush them out?

One way is through widespread testing of people with no symptoms. If someone has or has had Covid-19 they should test positive for the genetic material of the virus for a few weeks, even if they are no longer unwell or infectious. According to the Ministry of Health’s website, as of May 9, 173,671 people in New Zealand had been tested for Covid-19. Remember, the test we are using here is only the one that looks for the genetic material of the virus. 1,147 confirmed cases from over 170,000 people tested means the vast majority of people presenting for testing didn’t have Covid-19. This isn’t because the test isn’t good enough. It’s very good. It’s because there isn’t much Covid-19 around here.

But, in the beginning, there was a very narrow case definition so our testing may well have missed some cases. As testing ramped up and the case definition was widened this should have happened less and less. Now any missed cases are more likely to reflect people who didn’t think their symptoms were worth getting tested, and it’s hard to put a number on that. But there’s been some random testing done at supermarkets which all came back negative so that’s comforting.

The Ministry of Health has released a document outlining their testing strategy for alert levels three and two. It’s good. It includes targeted testing of people with no symptoms if they work in health care and aged residential care facilities, quarantine hotels, or the tourism industry, as well as international travellers and airline crew, police, and migrant workers.

In summary, there may be some hidden chains of transmission out there, but they should be very few in number. Probably 10 at most. But recall Toby Morris’s animation, which shows how quickly transmission chains can end up growing out of control.

Cinemas vs churches: What are the risks at level two?

Before we get to how I think we should be playing it safe at alert level two, let’s quickly look at the risks around those hidden transmission chains. The first thing we know from the data so far is that people are infectious for a few days before they develop symptoms and for a few days after symptoms start. In other words, you can feel perfectly healthy and spread Covid-19.

The second thing we know is that what you are doing and how long you are doing it for matters. Lots of focus has been on coughing and sneezing being one way the virus spreads. There have been some very sad examples of people being deliberately coughed, sneezed, or spat on and then dying from Covid-19. So: no coughing, sneezing, or spitting on anyone, deliberately or otherwise. And if you do find yourself about to cough or sneeze, make sure you catch in a tissue or elbow. Using a high-speed camera, Dr Lydia Bourouiba recently showed that a vigorous sneeze can travel as far as seven or eight metres.

While touching contaminated objects like lift buttons and handrails is still considered a potential route for the transmission of Covid-19, it looks like talking, shouting, and singing are more important. Especially if people are indoors. Let me explain with some important examples. First up is this description of Covid-19 from a call centre in South Korea. Over the space of a week, 94 of the 216 people working on the same floor of a high-rise building came down with Covid-19. Most of them worked on the same side of the building.

You can see the floor’s seating plan in the diagram below. The desks of those who got Covid-19 are shown in blue. Despite using the lifts together, there were very few cases in people who worked on other floors of the building. But nearly half of those working in an environment with people constantly speaking on the phone caught Covid-19.

CDC

Another interesting cluster comes from an outbreak centred around a restaurant in China. In January, 10 people from three families who had eaten at the same air-conditioned restaurant came down with Covid-19. The index patient (A1), who wasn’t experiencing any symptoms at the time, went for lunch with three other members of their family. Two other families, B and C, sat at neighbouring tables a metre away. Families A and B overlapped in their time there by just under an hour, and families A and C overlapped by a little more than an hour. In this case the air-conditioning unit is thought to have pushed the virus to the downwind table. A couple of people on the upwind table also become infected. But no one sat at the tables on the other side of the room. Here we have a situation where people are likely chatting away as the virus heads off to other tables with the help of the air-con.

Noisy environments where people are crowded in together are becoming a bit of theme for Covid-19 transmission. Take meat processing plants. The current cluster in one in Melbourne is up to 85 cases, and there have been hundreds of workers affected in the US. What these and the previous examples show is that businesses need to be thinking very carefully about just how many people should be going back to work in indoor spaces, especially if they are noisy and crowded.

These examples also help explain why we can have 100 people apart from each other to watch a movie at the cinema but not to attend a church service. It’s not necessarily about the absolute number, it’s about what people are doing. In general, you need close contact with someone to spread or catch Covid-19. You don’t go to the movies and dash over to aisle J to hug someone. You sit with your friend and watch the film. Attending a church service is completely different. So, sitting in silence watching a movie? Low risk. At church and singing? High risk.

OK, but what about schools? I’ve covered the risks to children here. In general, the evidence to date suggests that children are less likely to come down with Covid-19 and less likely to transmit it. But this applies more to younger children than those in their late teens, so I’d be treating anyone 15 and older like adults who are going back to work.

So, given what we know about how Covid-19 spreads, here are my suggestions for how we can play it safe at alert level two.

Keep at home if sick

Staying home if you have any symptoms is really important for minimising the opportunities for Covid-19 to spread. But this is easier for some of us than others. If you are a business, what does your sick leave policy look like? Does it incentivise people to come in to work when unwell? What would happen if that person had Covid-19 and you ended up with your entire workforce in self-isolation?

Keep it quiet

All the evidence I’ve outlined here suggest that noisy environments, where people need to shout to be heard, are hot spots for the spread of Covid-19. This means we need to keep it quiet at least for the first few weeks of alert level two. If your workplace has music on in the background, keep it low so people can hear each other. I’m looking at you, restaurants and bars. If your workplace is noisy, are there ways to minimise this noise or reduce the number of people working at the same time?

Keeping it quiet also applies to activities like singing. Globally, there have been quite a few clusters centred around choirs, churches, and events with lots of singing and shouting. I think this is another activity that needs to be minimised especially in environments where there are other people not with your group.

Keep washing your hands

This one goes without saying. It is no less important to keep up with good hand hygiene now than when the pandemic started. There may still be droplets of the virus so keep washing your hands and don’t touch your face.

Keep your distance

Now’s still not the time to be shaking hands and kissing and doing all those things that bring your face and body in to contact with lots of other people. No matter how excited you are to see then after all these weeks. If you need some alternative greetings Toby’s got you covered.

Keep yourself covered

Let’s talk briefly about masks. Mass mask-wearing is something I’ve been reluctant to recommend for all sorts of reasons that I discussed here. The most important thing to remember about surgical and cloth masks is that they will likely stop you shedding some virus if you are infected, but they won’t protect you from becoming infected. So, as any one of us could be infectious for a few days before realising we have Covid-19, this is what I recommend for alert level two: that you wear a surgical or cloth mask when you are in badly ventilated spaces and/or are going to come in to close physical contact with people for more than a few minutes.

I’m thinking of scenarios like when using public transport, or if you work in a profession like hairdressing where you can’t maintain physical distance from your clients, or if you need to use a service that will put you in close contact with someone for more than a few minutes. What’s important about masks is that you know how to wear them and dispose of them properly. Check out this article here.

Keep notes

As we move into alert level two, what we need to remember is that we are going to be relying on our health service’s test, trace, and isolate strategy to stamp out any transmission chains that do pop up. So, keep track of where you have been and who with and the minute you experience any of the symptoms that could be Covid-19, call Healthline to organise a test.