Illustration: Sophie Watson
Illustration: Sophie Watson

The Sunday EssayApril 18, 2021

The Sunday Essay: Cricket with child

Illustration: Sophie Watson
Illustration: Sophie Watson

James Borrowdale bids farewell to a summer of cricket with his oblivious baby daughter.

Made possible thanks to the support of Creative New Zealand

Original illustrations by Sophie Watson

If cricket, at least in its longer forms, can lay claim to something approaching artistic meaning – that is, for its actions to mean something outside of the game itself – some of that meaning is surely entwined in the game’s relationship to time. Time, and time’s constant shadow: change. The way the ball decays over an 80-plus-over life; the way a pitch erodes; the way a mind might over five days, over a series; the way an overburdened shoulder or knee can curtail a career. Time – its passing, its ravages – strikes me as the central fact of long-form cricket.

It was, as spring challenged winter’s tenancy in the sky and New Zealand’s domestic cricket season began, a concept much on my mind. My first child, a little girl, had been born a week into the first lockdown. “Today is a very sad day,” blared the front page of the New Zealand Herald on the morning of her arrival, quoting Jacinda Ardern. It was, somewhat auspiciously, the day of New Zealand’s first Covid death – a reminder of the direction in which time’s flashing neon arrow points us all. Time, and the limited amount of it that a single life allows, seems to me the fundamental concern of the minds that usher us through what we hope will be an 80-plus year life.

I had spent my partner’s pregnancy slogging away at my first book, which was experienced by her, at times, as a mental absence from anything outside its subject. Early on we decided that, book published, baby in the world, and my partner’s maternity leave expended, I would be the parent to stay home with the little one. Suddenly – for somehow it felt sudden – I found myself as a stay-at-home father with hours to fill between my daughter’s naps. Eden Park Outer Oval, the home ground of Auckland’s domestic teams, was to join the geography of the relationship between my daughter and me.

It was a slightly strange addition, as cricket grounds go. The playing oval is nestled in the shadow of Eden Park proper, the rear-facing ugliness of its western stand looming as a brutalist proscenium to the village-green proceedings below. Sandringham Road borders the other boundary, where a gentle embankment does little to hide the noise and traffic of Auckland bustling by.

Illustration: Sophie Watson

By the time we first unfurled our rug on the grass between the old Merv Wallace Stand and the practice wickets, my daughter was five months old, sitting up and infinitely curious about the world outside our little home on the watery edges of West Auckland. Her schedule had formed fortuitously, allowing the 40-minute drive to the ground to account for the day’s first sleep and giving us most of the first session before unconsciousness came calling for her and our homeward journey, the car rumbling her into deep sleep, would commence.

And so, together we whiled away our time just beyond the boundary rope, she in the centre of a circumference of toys that demanded most of her attention, and me with one eye on the cricket. A flask of tea and a novel to dip into completed my happiness; a bottle of milk and her favourite toy wolf did the same for her. Around us were scattered fellow cricket cognoscenti – retired men for the most part, numbering a few dozen, who pointed deck chairs and, when spring’s climate allowed, hirsute bare chests at the action in the middle. My eyes would wander: book, cricket, baby.

One of those books – growing ever more dog-eared at the bottom of the baby bag – was Virginia Woolf’s The Waves. Time, also, is a central concern of that novel, but, elsewhere, it seemed almost to render my own summer, with its sense of hazy unreality caused by the accumulation of unsettled nights, on the page in front of me. “I lie back and regard the stiff-legged figures of the padded batsman through the trembling grasses… Faintly among the soft, white clouds I hear the cry ‘Run’, I hear the cry ‘How’s that?’ The clouds lose tufts of whiteness as the breeze dishevels them. If that blue could stay for ever; if that hole could remain for ever; if this moment could stay for ever—”

“Stay-at-home dad?” a voice asked from behind one morning, breaking a similar reverie. Auckland was in the field against Otago. Martin Guptill’s familiar shape was crouched at second slip; Kyle Jamieson’s towered at the top of his mark. Olly Pringle, a fast-bowler on debut, stood beyond the rope, patrolling the fine-leg boundary. That voice, as it turned out, belonged to his father, Martin, himself a former Auckland batsman. Over the periodic smack of leather on willow from practice pitches next door, he explained that he’d introduced the bowler in front of us, when he had been my daughter’s age, to the game in this exact fashion, at this exact ground – trundling the nascent cricketer home for a nap during the lunch break, and back for the afternoon session. My mind was fixated, for obvious reasons, on infancy, on beginnings. Pringle, at the outset of a first-class career, briefly became a beacon whose progress through the season seemed an omen.

But only briefly: summer flowered and successively shorter forms of cricket were pulled, like a deconstructing Russian doll, from the last. Pringle dropped out of the playing XI. My daughter grew, as did – with no job to make demands on my appearance – my beard. It was soon possible to watch batsmen in the throes of run-rate mania invert the commentators’ favourite expression by hoicking the ball into the stadium, or at least at it – the white ball pinging against Eden Park’s concrete derrière.

Illustration: Sophie Watson

But the cricket highlights – a Jamieson hattrick featuring two of the booming in-swingers that would prove so effective in the international season to come, the electric batting form of William O’Donnell, the success of the Auckland women’s team – were mere accoutrements to the escalating achievements of this tiny child in life’s first bloom. Her teeth emerged, and then kept emerging, and with them came an escalating appetite for food whose preparation soon dominated my days, just as the Tupperware in which it was carted into town soon overwhelmed our cupboard space. She began crawling with a strange gait that dragged one of her shins, its skin soon noticeably coarsened, over the ground. That meant, of course, she was no longer fenced in by a collection of toys just beyond the boundary rope; no more could I dip into a novel as she sat idly beside me.

The men’s team faded quickly from T20 reckoning. The women fared much better, eventually finishing third. Then came the putting back together of the Russian doll, and the brief re-emergence of Covid that locked spectators out of the men’s final List A matches. Canterbury – the team of my youth, before a decade in Auckland and the birth of this little Aucklander had shifted my loyalty north – came to dominate, ticking off the titles. By now, the expanding interests of my daughter – playgroups, out-of-town family to visit – had come to disrupt our attendance, but it was, appropriately enough, Canterbury versus Auckland in the final of the Hallyburton Johnstone Shield, the women’s one-day competition, on the last day of cricket we watched together this summer.

Auckland batted first. A few friends joined us. Captain Lauren Down, whose form had done much to drag Auckland into the final, was out cheaply. Conversation, as wickets continued to regularly fall, turned to the immediate future: my daughter’s first birthday approached, there were job interviews to think about, a beard to shave off, a stalled career to re-establish, daycare to organise. The line into Eden Park that day was divided in two: one for the rugby game in the stadium, the other for the cricket below. Life, as I had recently known it, was ending. Time – measured in increments of cricket – had eaten up the first year of my daughter’s life. Time torn off, and used – to corrupt a phrase from Philip Larkin’s ‘Aubade’. And used well, in the shadow of Eden Park, in the light of a game that has given me so much pleasure. The innings ended, Auckland all out for 185. Unconsciousness called; the homeward journey commenced. Canterbury, unwatched by us, cantered to a resounding eight-wicket victory.

Summer, then, felt truly at its end. The Canterbury men, after the season’s customary soggy end, daylight savings italicising the sense of an ending, were confirmed as first-class champions – Canterbury, across the men’s and women’s competitions, had won four of a possible five titles. But more importantly, for me, stay-at-home fatherhood was almost at its end. Time, to return to Woolf, was about to give “the arrangement another shake”.

Keep going!
Illustration: Gary Venn
Illustration: Gary Venn

The Sunday EssayApril 11, 2021

The Sunday Essay: What to get rid of

Illustration: Gary Venn
Illustration: Gary Venn

Bathroom, kitchen, sitting room, bookshelves, friends, memories – Linda Burgess ponders the decluttering of life. 

Made possible thanks to the support of Creative New Zealand

Original illustrations by Gary Venn

Go to the second drawer down in your bathroom. Open it. In it are countless small bottles of shampoo and skin cream that you brought home from that hotel. Most tragically, they are evidence that you found staying in a hotel unbearably exciting. Along with that, they show that you’re bordering on the edge of being a petty thief. You are someone who assumes that if you’re not meant to take them, well damn them, you’ve paid, they’re yours, aren’t they? They also show that you’ve been taken in by hype: just because the bottle has a double-barrelled ostensibly posh English name on it and the word lavender subtly highlighted, doesn’t mean that the chemical-rich creamy stuff in that bottle won’t give you eczema in your ears. And what were you actually going to do with that skimpy plastic shower hat that makes you look like you work on the production line of a factory in China? Goodbye, impossible-to-unscrew mini tube of toothpaste. 

Move now to the kitchen and open what can only be called the kitchen drawer. Test every one of those biros and throw away every single one that doesn’t work. Also dispose of the really crummy ones, the wobbly ones, the ones that have pale green ink, the ones with the brand name of the shop you don’t recall ever having been to, the ones with a minuscule amount of ink in them, the ones with the broken bit that if you’d been an office worker 45 years ago, you’d have had nonchalantly displayed clipped on the outside of your polyester cotton shirt’s breast pocket. And when did you last use a pencil? Chuck it. After dealing with those, take out those neatly rolled short pieces of string, place the ostensibly useful purple rubber bands that were round the broccolini, the wooden sushi chopsticks and the rip-here sachets of soy sauce, the little sachets of sugar, the receipts that you can no longer read, in the bin. If you don’t know what lock that key is for, why do you still have it? Be aware though that the week after you get rid of it, you’ll suddenly remember why it was there for safe keeping. 

The coin jar that sits on the shelf in the sitting room. Oh dear. Who’s going to treasure the Egyptian coin from 1942 that your father possibly brought back with him from the war? Let’s hope there’s a freakish grandchild who also wants your – actually rather lovely – stamp album. There’s loads of NZ 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 25 and 50 cent pieces. How quaint! Then there’s the French 10 franc coins – an aside: why on earth did they go for the euro when they had such pretty banknotes? – but getting back to the coins in your bowl, there’s the 10 franc coin, now worth nothing more than a fleeting memory that only you have – no one else, just you – of once living in France, and how 10 francs was round about NZ$2 and $2 bought you blah blah blah.  A house in the country? Ten croissants? Then English pounds. Oh, a pound! Once a gift from your richest aunts! Australian dollars. They don’t work in parking meters. Whatever.

Speaking of aunts. Go to your bookshelves. Your husband’s aunt, wondering what the hell to buy him for a birthday, will have got him a book about a cricketer called Glen. All cricketers are called Glen. If you take all of these books – and there will be a lot of them – to a secondhand bookshop they will look pained. They will pull away. You may have to bribe them to take them. Pretend to faint if you have to, and while they’re away getting you a glass of water, dump them and run. They might be slightly keener on Edmund Hillary. Or not. The good news is your husband, who’s argued energetically on their behalf, will actually not notice that they’ve gone. And also he will not notice that you have everything that Margarets Drabble, Forster and Atwood, the Barbaras, the Alices, the Elizabeths, the Penelopes, the Fionas have ever written and that nothing, nothing would induce you. 

Hmm, small silver frames. They’re in the drawer in the spare bedroom. Possibly pewter. Once they were the best birthday present for a friend, the best sort of token gesture. You bought them yourself from that little shop your friend opened. You have dozens of them; tiny tiny wedding photo of your in-laws, that really cute one of your husband and his brothers in their smocked shirts, you with your golliwog, one of your darling baby. So small that no one even looks at them. Always black and white, or possibly, that odd browny yellowy colour that photos in the 70s turned. No one has them displayed on the piano any more. Do whatever you’re going to do with them. Feel no shame. 

Into the bedroom. Your wardrobe, oh no, your wardrobe. Beware. You’ve read that article about putting your clothes on hangers at the back of your wardrobe and if they’re still there unworn in say three to six months’ time, get rid of them. But hang on – there’s that cardigan, the beige one that makes you look like your cousin, the one who looked like a nun, the one who actually wanted to be a nun, the cardigan that the dog gnaws in a slightly salacious way if he gets half a chance, and there it sits until you think “bugger it”, and take it to the hospice shop. Two weeks later, you go out somewhere at night and it would have been perfect. Cosy, practical, unassuming. Warm! What were you thinking of? 

What you need to come to terms with at a certain age is only buying and keeping a certain type of clothes. Now, I go into a shop and say, “I already have something exactly like that”. So yes please, I’ll buy it. If they look like your other clothes, keep them. If they’re colourful, quirky, fun, have got hemlines that look like a fault line, ask yourself why the hell you ever bought them in the first place. You know you don’t do turquoise, bold flowers, you know you’re not a good sport, you know you don’t work for the Ministry of Something Serious, so shove them in the last plastic bag you got from the supermarket. (Hey! That’s collectable!) But goodbye quirky garment. I won’t miss you for a second.

Your husband’s wardrobe. Deep breath. Trousers with pockets on the sides, for when he’s out being David Attenborough. Elderly corduroys that swarm around his knees. Shirts that look like ones either of the Bushes might wear. Give thanks for the t-shirts from Ata Rangi and MOMA, the yellow trousers. And close the door. You are not anyone else’s keeper.

You’re nearly there, but let’s look at what you’ve been caught up in lately. Oh please don’t say you have words on your kitchen wall. On any wall. I ask you to remember you’re not Ralph Hotere. You’re not Bill Manhire. So then, is your house on the market? Are those cushions smothering your bed? Is that why you’ve got the soppiest sentimental words to do with food and family displayed? If not, I need to quote my son, who said, after having older family members to stay, that the only words he wanted on his kitchen wall were these: Don’t Hover. Give the cushions to the hospice shop. The words back to someone who doesn’t value them.

Sit down and make yourself a cup of something, or pour a glass of something nice. You’re in the mood now, you’re on a roll. Turn on your computer, click on Facebook. Click on friends. Declutter, declutter, declutter. You have 1,394 friends. Now this is a conundrum. What if you decide to delete everyone you’ve never met in person? That leaves you… say, 100. Or what say you decide to delete everyone who has ever posted anything on the sentimental side? Something cute about an animal? A photo of themselves in a frame which says I Am..? Something homophobic, racist, right wing, humble-bragging, misspelt? You’d have no one left. 

It comes to your attention that you’re sitting down. You’d forgotten how nice it feels, sitting down, compared with pulling out drawers and flinging open the doors of cupboards. Something is draining from you. It could well be the will to reorganise. Turn off that computer. Push those drawers back in, kick the cupboards closed. Ignore the bags of stuff that you’re passing on to become someone else’s clutter. That could well sit by the back door for quite some time. That could actually start gnawing their way into your conscience. Why did you own so much to start with? Why are we filling the world with so much rubbish?

By your bed you have that pile of books, the ones you’ve bought, borrowed from a friend, borrowed from the library. Walk over to your bed. Lying down is even better than sitting down. You have a choice: the sofa, or, what the hell, that bed. Who cares what time of day it is, daylight saving has already stuffed everything up. Choose randomly from the pile. Turn to the page that you’ve folded over, even though you know that this drives some people nuts. To you, it’s a sign: a reader has had this book. A reader has loved this book for what it says. These aren’t words to enhance your kitchen wall. These are words that matter.