spinofflive
Some of the interviewees in Transmission. (Photo: BATs Theatre)
Some of the interviewees in Transmission. (Photo: BATs Theatre)

SocietyApril 23, 2021

Review: Transmission tells the story of the humanity behind the Covid headlines

Some of the interviewees in Transmission. (Photo: BATs Theatre)
Some of the interviewees in Transmission. (Photo: BATs Theatre)

A new play about the lead-up to the first lockdown, built from interviews with Jacinda Ardern, Grant Robertson and Michael Baker, is a window into the unfathomable responsibility of political power.

It felt pretty surreal to be sitting in a packed theatre for the opening night of Transmission, Miranda Harcourt and Stuart McKenzie’s new play about the lead-up to New Zealand’s first national lockdown, back in March last year. That’s partly because of the obvious: there are so few places in the world right now where 80-odd people can gather in a small room to watch a live performance without risking a super-spreader event. Even before the lights went down, Transmission was a testament to the government’s Covid-19 response.

But it was also surreal for me, personally, because the lockdown this show is about was not my lockdown. I’ve been in London for the last 12 months, weathering the British government’s blundering, corrupt response. My partner and I celebrated Christmas on FaceTime, attended funerals via livestream. We were able to get back to New Zealand last month, but even after we’d confirmed our return we knew that at any point we might end up trapped in the UK for reasons that were out of our hands: cancelled flights, travel bans, MIQ slots snapped up like tickets to My Chemical Romance.

I (and everyone else in the UK) spent those 12 months watching New Zealand’s pandemic response with a mix of envy and frustration, knowing this was the kind of leadership we wanted but could not have. Transmission picks up on that global obsession, asking its own questions about what it means to be a leader in a time of crisis.

Transmission is a verbatim play, which means it is a work of dramatic non-fiction built from the real words of the people depicted. This particular 90-minute play has been built from over 20 hours of interviews with people who led New Zealand’s Covid-19 response, specifically the prime minister, Jacinda Ardern (played by Sophie Hambleton  of Westside), deputy prime minister Grant Robertson (played by Tom Knowles), and epidemiologist Michael Baker (played by Tim Spite).

For Harcourt and McKenzie, Transmission marks a return to the trails they blazed back in the 1990s. Harcourt co-wrote New Zealand’s landmark 1992 play Verbatim, the story of a burglary gone wrong told by the people who had to live with its consequences. Later, she and McKenzie collaborated on its 1996 follow-up Portraits, a haunting and heart-wrenching investigation into a rape and murder in a small New Zealand town.

Both plays, which were given a long-overdue revival back in 2013, are remarkable for their sensitivity, avoiding the breathless, lurid voyeurism of a lot of true crime storytelling. Harcourt and McKenzie bring that same sensitivity to their questioning here. Rather than trolling for controversy, they mainly ask Baker, Ardern and Robertson about their intentions and reactions, about the ways that the burden of leadership has affected them and the people in their lives.

The responses are often surprisingly candid and provide a valuable insight into the personal cost of this kind of public service. Ardern tells us about the difficulty of being present for her family during the lockdown, even though it was the first time in 11 years that she had stayed in one place for that long, due to the round-the-clock demands of her role. Baker talks frankly and in detail about the toll that being New Zealand’s Covid Cassandra took on his mental health. And Robertson opens up about his father, jailed for embezzlement in the early 1990s, and the complications of loving someone who has hurt you and hurt others.

Transmission weaves in and out of each story, bouncing between each of its “characters” as they talk about the days and weeks leading up to the fateful decision. Rather than using this opportunity to run a victory lap and uncritically celebrate the government’s response, Harcourt and McKenzie work to complicate the popular narrative.

Baker’s uncompromising advocacy for an immediate lockdown is contrasted against the government’s reticence to move too fast or too aggressively, and Harcourt and McKenzie skilfully interrogate the ways that these public communicators actually communicate. At one point, Ardern critiques everything Baker’s been telling us about his experience on the Covid-19 technical advisory group, about how he was banging a drum that the government didn’t want to hear. As a science communicator, she argues, Baker has the luxury of being able to call for action without considering how the public will react; as a politician, she simply cannot be so strident.

Jacinda Ardern and Ashley Bloomfield at a Beehive briefing in April 2020 (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

That perceived tension between speed and practicality, between consensus-building and decisive leadership, runs through this play like a faultline, always threatening to undermine the government’s response. This is good drama, especially when the disconnected interviews are threaded together to create sharp responses and heated conversations. It’s also great journalism, providing a real insight into the monumental difficulties of devising an all-encompassing public health policy on the fly.

Harcourt and McKenzie fill out their telling of the March lockdown with two other interviewees. In two memorable segments, TVNZ journalist Mei Heron (played by Michelle Ang) discusses the personal cost of taking on an adversarial public role in a crisis. And then there is Moira Sa’imoa – no public figure, rather a woman whose mother, a well-loved figure in Christchurch’s Samoan community, died during the pandemic. Sa’imoa’s story is referred to early and hangs over proceedings like a storm cloud. That cloud breaks near the end, as Sa’imoa, played by Lahleina Feaunati, gives a heartbreaking recollection of her mother’s death and the memorial she deserved but could not have. That recollection is delivered with great power and dignity by Feaunati in the play’s most memorable and most affecting scene.

These stories help us “glimpse the humanity behind the headlines”, to use Harcourt and McKenzie’s own words. But they’re not much more than that, and few other people get name-checked alongside the central trio. When we do hear someone’s name, it’s often because they’re an obstacle (like Siouxsie Wiles, who is mentioned only when she disagrees with Baker about whether schools should be closed) or a vessel for dramatic tension (like James Shaw, who shuttles between cabinet and Baker like a Shakespearean messenger). New Zealand’s been told over and over again that we’re part of a team of five million, but Transmission makes that team feel so much smaller.

The rest of the world is only mentioned in horrified or disparaging terms: grim references to Italy’s death toll, a Newstalk goon blathering on about the Swedish response. If the swift and effective responses by countries like Vietnam, Taiwan, Mongolia and South Korea were ever considered by the advisory group, we don’t hear about it. Instead, we hear about the Plague of Athens in 430BC, as told by ancient Greek historian Thucydides. An extreme metaphor for the timeless violence of a virus like Covid-19, this moment is jarring. It almost feels like the playwrights are wiping the sweat from their brow and saying, “boy, we really dodged a bullet with this one, eh?”

Transmission does make a point of calling out the worst excesses of pandemic parochialism, particularly the political fandom around leaders like Ardern and “Saint” Ashley Bloomfield. But the lack of a real international perspective is disappointing, though, and feels cut from the same Kiwi exceptionalism that has plagued so much of this pandemic. Sitting in that theatre, watching another story about New Zealand’s “unique” success, I recalled every argument I’d had with my family about MIQ charges; every abusive, self-righteous Facebook post I’d seen from proud members of the five million; every time I was told that I “should have come home already” and that I deserved this for being overseas at the wrong time.

What’s most frustrating, though, is Transmission’s narrow focus on the lockdown itself. The politicians, Robertson in particular, give us a lot of stump speech rhetoric about seizing this opportunity to “fix what made normal less than good for people”, but we don’t actually hear a lot about how they’ve seized it. The lockdown stands alone, standing in for the entirety of the government’s pandemic response. We hear about almost no other policy decisions made during this period, some of which were arguably not consistent with the values that Ardern and Robertson express in their interviews, and Harcourt and McKenzie offer little resistance to some of the most self-congratulatory rhetoric.

So what is the purpose of a verbatim play like Transmission? If a play like this is built on the words of politicians and policy-makers, do its devisers have an obligation to challenge their subjects as well as humanise them? If they do, Harcourt and McKenzie don’t seem to have acted on that obligation. Some challenges would have been infinitely preferable to the creaky comedy that we end up getting. I know that I groaned through the opening scene in which Hambleton, Knowles and Spite bicker over who gets to play Ardern, establishing the rules of verbatim with all the energy of an Air New Zealand safety video.

Transmission provides us with remarkable access into the inner lives of Baker, Ardern and Robertson, and it is sensitive and frank about the challenges of being responsible for the lives of five million people. At its best, it is a window into the unfathomable responsibility of political power, humane and complex and difficult. 

But these three “dreamers” are not the only people who helped New Zealand navigate this nightmare. From the policy-makers to the community leaders, from the good neighbours to the essential workers, there are many voices missing from this document. Some pointed slideshows and occasional digressions do not make up for their omission. Our lockdown is not just the government’s lockdown; it is every individual lockdown experienced by the five million people in this country, and by another million New Zealanders overseas. The humanity behind the headlines is more than the humanity of our leaders. We cannot truly understand our lockdown without understanding that.

Transmission runs at until May 2 at BATs Theatre in Wellington. A livestream performance on April 27 will be available here.

Keep going!
Image: Getty Images
Image: Getty Images

SocietyApril 23, 2021

Auckland’s new school zones: ‘We feel like we’re being kicked out of our community’

Image: Getty Images
Image: Getty Images

Catherine Woulfe’s son’s school is nothing fancy. But it’s theirs. Auckland’s new zoning rules will mean her daughter, when she turns five, will have to go to a different one – and that’s heartbreaking.

I just saw a map that puts us 100 metres out of zone for the primary school my son’s been at for two years. It’s an absolutely stock-standard state school. Diverse, with a roll of about 460. Decile four back when we still talked about deciles. Nothing wrong with it, nothing fancy either. But this is our school. It’s right next to kindy and daycare. It’s the school my son loves, the school my daughter toddles through cooing “skoo”, the school we assumed she would be part of, in a few years. But now we’re all but certain: she won’t. 

Right now this school is not zoned. It takes all comers. But it is already overflowing and that’s without counting the huge development going in just down the road. 

When the zoning kicks in later this year the first spots will go to families who live inside the magic lines on the map. Those kids get first dibs – even over siblings of current students. If the school doesn’t fill up then siblings might squeak in through a ballot system. But if the school does fill up – as we expect it to – then sorry, that’s it. 

So the map I saw this morning is a map that says to our little girl: no. You can not come here. Your brother can stay, if he likes, but not you. And what that feels like is a message to the whole family: you are not welcome. 

*

When you join a school you join a community. Or you follow one. We chose this school because Ben’s little gang of mates from kindy were headed there. We wanted to stick with their families, too – these are the parents we’ve been with since our kids were tiny, through Playcentre sessions and kindy drop-offs and vomiting bugs and first steps. These women have rubbed my back as I miscarried. They’ve held my sobbing boy. We’re well past the small talk, and thank god.

So we chose this school. And it’s nothing fancy, but it has kind receptionists, the sort who make you feel totally fine about fucking up all the paperwork or not knowing you were meant to buy a bookbag. It’s not fancy, but one day I stumbled into the office with my screaming new baby and they all but tucked me in for a nap; I remember breastfeeding on the couch and looking at the steamed-up windows and feeling so happy we’d found a good place for my boy. It’s not fancy, but I can’t describe what it felt like when Ben’s teachers dressed up and danced like twits to ‘Don’t Worry Be Happy’, and sent the video out on the hardest, scariest day of lockdown. 

When we joined this school we joined a community, and although what’s happening is not the school’s fault, it is a very primal thing to be kicked out of it. 

I am emotional. I am entertaining wild ideas. Maybe we sell the home we’ve been in for 10 years, the place with the huge willow and my cat’s ashes and my boy’s whenua, and buy in-zone, ie across the road? Maybe we pull a Grammar and pretend the kids now live in-zone with their granny? Maybe we switch Ben into the perfectly good school we’re about to be zoned for? But I can’t see how pulling a six-year-old away from his friends is any kind of solution. Especially after the disruption they all went through last year. 

I can’t stop thinking about how hard it was for us to have Leo, how the age gap of nearly five years was always going to make it harder for our kids to be friends, but being at different schools … we knew that zoning was coming, but naively we assumed siblings would get automatic access. We only just realised that in a city under pressure that’s not how it works. We feel blindsided. How did we end up with a school system, with a social infrastructure, that splits up siblings when they’re five and nine? 

As the hurt wears off I will start to be properly pissed off about the pragmatics. Two logins for the clumsy app that schools use to keep in touch. Two sets of teacher-only days to work around; two sets of assemblies and prize-givings, school plays and dances, dress-up days to remember, fun runs, two school galas (gaaaah). Two sets of school drop-off and pick-up. 

Our house is smack in the middle of the two schools. Each one is about a 15-minute walk up a hill. There’s no way you’d walk that loop with two kids in tow. This is a small thing, but also not: I really, really wanted to be able to walk my kids to school each day. They’re knackered by the afternoon. That morning walk is a chance to hang out when everyone’s at their sweetest. For them to hang out together. 

*

The more I think about it the more I’m convinced that what’s about to happen across Auckland (while well overdue, logistically) is a kind of societal carnage. New zones are getting dropped on schools – on families – all over the place. Communities are about to be carved up and that will blow back on schools, which can only work well when their whānau feel engaged, as well as on families. Because these changes simply have to happen consultation is likely to be piecemeal, a hollering into the wind. Many families, like us, won’t have had to deal with zoning until now: this is not simply a matter of tweaking lines on a map, it’s borders thumping down where there were none before. 

So many parents will be left running the what-if maths: will my rent go up? How do I stretch the petrol budget? What if my landlord kicks me out so his kids can get in-zone? How do I possibly manage two full sets of uniform? 

More visible will be the never-ending story about what zoning is doing to house prices. Hottest new streets, revealed. Zoning shock: the house that lost $100,000 overnight. I want to be clear that my reaction to what’s happening in our neighbourhood has nothing to do with what’s happening to the value of our home. If you bought a house 10 years ago in Auckland you do not get to fret about property prices. 

We deliberately bought in an area with no zoning because we were repulsed by the whole scramble, the gross rich-get-richness of it all. So as a crash course, I’ve been reading the guidelines that the secretary for education produced for all the schools trying to get to grips with zoning. The document was only released in December but it reads like a story about somewhere else, a long time ago. What it taught me is that zones and the rules around them are set up for people with the immense privilege of staying put. It’s not a system for those in most need of a welcoming community: those who’ve been buffeted by Covid, by Auckland’s cataclysmically hot property market, by trying to find – and then hang on to – a decent rental, or a job. It’s not set up for fluid families, where children are sent to whoever’s best equipped at the time, or for broken families, unless you’re the kind who break in organised, documented fashion. It’s not set up for families forced to cram into homes with other families, or for those who don’t have the resources to navigate what’s now going to be an acutely stressful enrolment process. 

Seriously, brace for things to get invasive. “Schools have found documents such as power bills, bank statements, rates demands, leases or tenancy agreements and statutory declarations to be useful in the past,” the new guidelines say. “Experience has shown, however, that not even these documents will necessarily provide evidence of ‘genuineness’.”

Further tips for schools: check whether an in-zone house looks “suitable” for a family to really be living in. If a child is living with their grandmother in-zone, find out whether there are “special family circumstances” behind the arrangement – or do they just want into your school? Get in touch with landlords to find out more about their tenants’ circumstances. Say a student has just moved into the zone to live with his dad: check the place out, if it’s a one-bedroom flat, definitely raise an eyebrow. Keep a list of all the families you have “suspicions” about, even if you can’t prove they’re lying. Yet.

So much prying, so much grey, so many judgements that will come down to the character of the poor sod each school puts in charge of gatekeeping. And as I read through all of it, this whole bleak document, I keep picturing walking down our drive with my kids, and waving my son off on his trip to school, and turning to head the other way with my daughter.