Labour leader Chris Hipkins has called for an immediate ceasefire between Gaza and Israel. (Photo: Joel MacManus)
Labour leader Chris Hipkins has called for an immediate ceasefire between Gaza and Israel. (Photo: Joel MacManus)

The BulletinNovember 20, 2023

Labour breaks away from caretaker convention calling for ceasefire in Gaza

Labour leader Chris Hipkins has called for an immediate ceasefire between Gaza and Israel. (Photo: Joel MacManus)
Labour leader Chris Hipkins has called for an immediate ceasefire between Gaza and Israel. (Photo: Joel MacManus)

Chris Hipkins has acknowledged that ‘constitutional purists’ may not necessarily welcome the party’s statement but says ‘they cannot stand by any longer’. National has accused them of playing politics, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.

Chris Hipkins calls for immediate ceasefire

As cities in New Zealand hosted now recurrent protests calling for a ceasefire in Gaza yesterday, Labour leader Chris Hipkins made a statement calling for an immediate ceasefire between Gaza and Israel. “We are urgently calling for a ceasefire. Israel and Hamas need to immediately ensure the conditions for a ceasefire are met and to commit to a lasting peace in the region,” he said. “I, and the Labour Party, cannot stand by any longer in the face of the horrific scenes we are witnessing without calling for a ceasefire,” Hipkins said. Hipkins also called for Hamas to release all hostages immediately. A poll conducted by Talbot Mills released last Friday found 60% of New Zealanders want a full ceasefire.

‘The caretaker government did seek agreement from the National Party… and we did not get that’

Hipkins made it clear he was speaking as Labour leader, not as the caretaker prime minister and acknowledged that his decision to make the call was an unusual one, one that “constitutional purists will also probably not necessarily welcome”. He said National rebuffed his offer to make a bipartisan call for a ceasefire. “The caretaker government did seek agreement from the National party to call for a ceasefire, and we did not get that,” he said. National responded by saying the caretaker government had approached the party on Friday about calling for a ceasefire. National wanted to seek advice from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade and received notice about the call Hipkins was about to make four minutes before Hipkins began speaking yesterday. In a statement, a spokesperson for National said, “It is very disappointing that Chris Hipkins is playing politics with such a serious issue.” The spokesperson added that National supports the goal of a ceasefire, however, the conditions haven’t yet been right for one.

Hipkins puts ceasefire call in context of domestic affairs

Hipkins’ comments on foreign affairs did strike something of a domestic tone. Hipkins said that as there was “no end in sight” to negotiations to form a government, he needed to make a statement as Labour leader. As talks continued over the weekend in Auckland, National leader Christopher Luxon said yesterday there are “three or less issues” that require sorting out. Opinion is diverging about whether the talks are taking too long. Writing on his Substack, Philip Crumb, editor of Newstalk ZB Plus, argues the proof of the pudding is in eating. “Time spent now agreeing a fulsome coalition agreement will undoubtedly be time well spent.” Vernon Small says Luxon “looked like a political innocent being played by NZ First leader Winston Peters and has been upstaged with the media by Act leader David Seymour.” The University of Otago’s Michael Swanson points out the time being taken pales in comparison to government negotiation processes around the world.

Negotiations continue on deal to pause conflict and hostage release

Around the same time as Hipkins’ statement, The Washington Post reported that Israel and Hamas had reached a “tentative U.S.-brokered deal” that would pause the conflict in Gaza and allow some women and child hostages to be free. The Post had to walk that back after US National Security Council spokesperson Adrienne Watson clarified that a deal had not been reached but “we continue to work hard to get to a deal.” ReutersAl Jazeera and the BBC all have reports this morning of a deal “being close”. As Israel continues to make its case for its operation at the al-Shifa hospital in Gaza, alleging that Hamas has a command and control centre underneath the hospital, an evacuation has been underway to rescue premature babies from the hospital. Hospital staff have strenuously denied Israel’s claims about the hospital. As Al Jazeera reports, a poll from November 14 has Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s popularity among Israeli Jews at about 4% and both his opponents and traditional allies are calling for him to resign once the current war ends.

Keep going!
State Highway 16 approaching central Auckland (Photo: Cate Owen/Supplied)
State Highway 16 approaching central Auckland (Photo: Cate Owen/Supplied)

The BulletinNovember 17, 2023

Road charges creep closer for congestion-cursed Aucklanders

State Highway 16 approaching central Auckland (Photo: Cate Owen/Supplied)
State Highway 16 approaching central Auckland (Photo: Cate Owen/Supplied)

Wayne Brown is a fan of congestion pricing and National is too. So when will Auckland drivers start paying to use the city’s busiest roads, asks Catherine McGregor in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.

Wayne Brown goes to war against congestion

Of all the things Aucklanders didn’t have on their 2023 bingo cards, mayor Wayne Brown becoming a hero to leftie-urbanist Twitter is likely way up there. But that’s where we’re at with Brown’s vocal support for congestion pricing – or “time of use” charges, as he prefers to call them – on some of Auckland’s roads. He wants to see charges of $3.50 and $5 a trip for peak-time travel on SH1 between Penrose and Greenlane and SH16 between Lincoln Road and Te Atatū Road, and on Thursday the council’s transport committee voted to proceed. The removal of the regional fuel tax, a National election campaign policy which the mayor says would leave a close to $2 billion hole in the council’s budget, makes congestion pricing a pressing concern, Brown says. When asked by Heather du Plessis Allan about the financial impact on parents, Brown replied that “it isn’t the law you have to get to school in a BMW”, later adding that there was no point building new roads when the existing ones were “empty most of the time”. It was all music to the ears of many on Twitter. Said one: “To the anon person in the ear of Wayne Brown on urbanist policies: I see you and honour you for your great work.”

Equity a key issue

The problems of BMW-driving parents aside, introducing time-of-use charges would bring with them significant equity challenges. Issues raised by councillors yesterday included the effects on disabled people and those on lower-paid jobs without the ability to negotiate time of work or to work from home. Brown says low-income earners, Gold Card holders and motorcycles could be considered for exemptions or discounts. A Helen Clark Foundation report on the fair implementation of congestion pricing – which encompasses both “always on” and time-of-use charges – last year voiced support for its introduction in the Auckland CBD but warned that “a charge outside the CBD is unlikely to be justified due to the lack of public and active transport alternatives”.

A ‘fairer’ kind of road charge attracts bipartisan support

One of the more surprising aspects of congestion charging is the extent of its bipartisan appeal. National is broadly supportive, though transport spokesperson Simeon Brown has said it could take two to three years to introduce congestion charging through an act of parliament – a much longer timeframe than Mayor Brown is proposing. Northern Infrastructure Forum chair Simon Bridges is a big fan (paywalled) and even Kiwiblog’s David Farrar says they’re a fairer form of user pays than a broad-base road user charge. “It is the peak time congestion that requires additional roads and lanes, so motorists should pay more for using a road at peak times.” Despite the bipartisan support, the Labour government chose not to proceed with the legislation, Oliver Lewis reports Businessdesk (paywalled). The draft legislation could have been introduced into the house by April 2023, according to a timeline released to Lewis under an OIA, but both Michael Wood and his successor David Parker decided against it.

Tauranga also considering congestion pricing

Auckland is not the only city grappling with the congestion charging question. Tauranga council is considering them as a replacement for current toll roads around the city, in a scheme that could see motorists pay $3 for a peak-hour 6km trip from Mount Maunganui to the city centre. In one potential scenario being considered, commuting between the CBD and Pāpāmoa in peak hours five days a week could cost more than $2400 a year, the Herald’s Kiri Gillespie reports. Congestion charging could also impact residents of some outer Tauranga suburbs who do not have a local supermarket and would have no non-priced route to one in town. For all their drawbacks, road charges are absolutely necessary, a Waka Kotahi staff member told city commissioners this week. Without them, future Tauranga residents would experience “economic catastrophe and terrible wellbeing”, he said.