spinofflive
Former media minister Melissa Lee (Image: Tina Tiller)
Former media minister Melissa Lee (Image: Tina Tiller)

The BulletinApril 26, 2024

Media industry sheds few tears for minister Lee

Former media minister Melissa Lee (Image: Tina Tiller)
Former media minister Melissa Lee (Image: Tina Tiller)

The sector says it’s hopeful her replacement Paul Goldsmith will be able to throw it a lifeline, after six months with a minister deemed missing in action, writes Catherine McGregor in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.

‘A clear and decisive message’

Almost 48 hours on, reaction to the demotion of ministers Melissa Lee and Penny Simmonds continues to arrive. Both lost their portfolios after performing badly over recent weeks, though PM Chris Luxon would not admit that performance was an issue in either case. Instead he said only that their portfolios had grown “too complex” and he had decided he needed “senior Cabinet ministers considering these issues”. Writing for The Post (paywalled), Kelly Dennett says the sackings “sent a clear and decisive message to [Luxon’s] caucus – that it won’t take a scandal or serious wrongdoing to be sent to the backbenches”. The demotions come less than six months into Luxon’s term in office. By contrast, Jacinda Ardern’s first demotion, of broadcasting minister Clare Curran, took place in August 2018. However Curran held onto her portfolio and was only dismissed from Cabinet. She resigned as minister the following month.

Good riddance, say media insiders

Of the two sackings, it is Lee’s which has been most scrutinised. Newsroom’s Laura Walters reports that her dismissal “came after another failed attempt at presenting a paper to Cabinet Committee” to address the closure of Newshub and the wider crisis in media. It was the third paper Lee had prepared since the announcement of Newshub’s closure in February, and Luxon felt it still “did not adequately deal with the complexities of the issues facing the media industry”. Meanwhile commentators have weighed in on Lee’s brief tenure as media minister. Mark Jennings, the former TV3 head of news and Newsroom founder, tells the Herald’s Adam Pearse the media likely breathed a “collective sigh of relief” at the news of her removal. “I don’t think any of us thought that she has displayed any deep understanding of the issues and challenges facing us.” Q & A host Jack Tame observes that she was also “notably unenthusiastic about being questioned in her role”. After refusing to appear on the show in the run-up to the election, she “declined an additional four separate requests to be interviewed on the show this year. Her reasoning? She didn’t feel there was much she could really say.”

Goldsmith a safe pair of hands

Lee’s replacement in the media portfolio is Paul Goldsmith, already one of the government’s busiest ministers with responsibility for justice, state-owned enterprises, Waitangi Tribunal claims, and arts, culture and heritage. He’s currently in Europe, where he’s due to appear before the UN next week (more on that on Monday), but a spokesperson says he plans to meet with media as soon as possible upon his return. Jennings says Goldsmith is a good choice given his understanding of, and relationship with, the media industry. “He’ll also have the respect of his Cabinet colleagues, so when he puts something forward that is likely to help or solve some of the issues that we’re currently facing, I think it’ll be taken seriously.” Labour leader Chris Hipkins says the early government reshuffle shows the “wheels are falling off already” while bringing up the $4b “fiscal hole” in Goldsmith’s costings when he was finance spokesperson last year.

Climate change reclaims its seat at the Cabinet table

It’s a partial goodbye too to Penny Simmonds, sacked after showing “an apparent lack of attention” to her disabilities issues portfolio, writes Newsroom’s Walters. She also “managed to unify the disability and caring community in collective outrage by placing the blame [for budget shortfalls] on carers for spending up large on haircuts, massages and pedicures”. Simmonds’ replacement is social development minister Louise Upston, while climate change minister Simon Watt has been promoted into Cabinet in Lee’s place. “He was unlucky to miss out on a spot in Cabinet in November… and he’s clearly shown Luxon he’s up to the job,” says RNZ’s Jo Moir. “It will also bring to an end the frustration from climate and environment quarters over the climate change portfolio being outside Cabinet in the first place.”

Keep going!
(Photo: Getty Images)
(Photo: Getty Images)

The BulletinApril 24, 2024

Gloomy vibe from infrastructure sector as RMA changes unveiled

(Photo: Getty Images)
(Photo: Getty Images)

A new survey says ‘outlook not great’ for those charged with building infrastructure, while RMA changes delight farmers and depress environmentalists, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.

First RMA changes announced

Most people are aware that New Zealand has an infrastructure deficit and that accelerated infrastructure investment and removing “red tape” and regulation in the name of economic growth is front and centre for the government. Chris Bishop is the minister for housing, infrastructure, and Resource Management Act reform. In a speech to the Infrastructure Funding & Financing Conference late last month, Bishop said the prime minister views those portfolios as being closely connected. One of the things Bishop named as facilitating infrastructure delivery was RMA reform. Yesterday, the first tranche of changes to the Resource Management Act was announced. They remove some regulatory requirements for farming and mining, among other things. Notably, the requirement to comply with Te Mana o te Wai obligations (best understood as freshwater protections) to obtain resource consent has been removed.

Government ‘ends war on farming’ say Federated Farmers

Farmers seem very happy with the changes, particularly the repeal of intensive winter grazing and stock exclusion regulations. Federated Farmers declared that the government had ended the “war on farming”. The Green party’s environment spokesperson Lan Pham, a freshwater ecologist, said the changes would speed the decline of the natural world and fuel the climate crisis. “The repeal of winter grazing regulations will worsen the pollution in our waterways and increase the level of harm our animals are exposed to,” she said. Winding back freshwater protections would accelerate the demise of rivers and lakes – with 45% of rivers already unsafe to swim in, she said.

‘The vibes aren’t great’ — infrastructure sector

The new law, Resource Management Bill 1 (RM Bill 1), is expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. Bishop says the change will give certainty to councils and economic sectors and consent applicants, and sectors, including farming, mining and other primary industries. Certainty seems to be in demand at the moment, with the infrastructure sector citing a lack of it in a new survey, the upshot of which is surmised by BusinessDesk’s Oliver Lewis as “the vibes aren’t great” (paywalled). Survey respondents cite “the uncertainty created by big changes in political direction.” In the short term, when asked about the ​​government signals to increase infrastructure investment over the next 12 months, only 33% held a highly or somewhat confident view. 49.63% were either highly or somewhat unconfident. The longer term view (three years) is slightly better, with 44.28% saying they are highly or somewhat confident about government investment signals.

Question mark hanging over $6b infrastructure fund

It’s safe to say a lot of people are waiting on certainty signals from the Budget, which will be delivered on May 30. Conveying a sense of certainty for the infrastructure sector wasn’t helped yesterday after a question mark emerged over the $6b National Resilience Plan. As the Herald’s Thomas Coughlan reports (paywalled), the government accidentally released the name of a Treasury paper (“Discontinuation of the National Resilience Plan”), revealing that it received advice on wrapping up the plan in February. The fund was established in the wake of last year’s extreme weather events to “build back better”. $2.8b has already been allocated but as Coughlan writes, there are question marks over what will happen to the remaining $3.2b.