spinofflive
Image: Tina Tiller
Image: Tina Tiller

OPINIONĀteaMay 29, 2024

What the Kāinga Ora review means for Māori housing

Image: Tina Tiller
Image: Tina Tiller

Now the recommendations are in, the next test will be the budget’s commitment to addressing Māori housing disparities, write Annie Te One and Jacqueline Paul.

The recently released Independent Review of Kāinga Ora Homes and Communities has shed some light on the unique housing challenges faced by Māori and the importance of place-based and Māori-led solutions in addressing these disparities. The report briefly points out the Crown’s Treaty obligations to Māori in relation to whenua Māori, and emphasises the need for increased support for Māori housing providers and communities.

Importantly, the review points out the disproportionate impact of housing issues on Māori. Homeownership rates among Māori have fallen to just 50% in 2018, significantly lower than the overall national rate of 65%. This disparity highlights the urgent need for targeted interventions to improve housing outcomes for Māori communities.

The report also identifies specific barriers to building housing on whenua Māori (Māori land), including access to finance and infrastructure. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and Te Puni Kōkiri are currently reviewing these barriers, signalling a recognition of the unique challenges associated with developing housing on whenua Māori. These aspects will not be new to many working across the Māori housing sector.

The place-based approach to housing solutions and investment discussed in the report has been advanced through the Maihi (Māori and Iwi Housing Innovation) Framework for Action. This framework demonstrates the importance of Māori-led solutions in addressing housing challenges and highlights the progress made by housing agencies in partnering with local communities to be more responsive to their needs.

Te Korako Whānau Papakāinga at Rapaki, Ōtautahi Christchurch (Photo: Supplied)

One of the report’s key recommendations is to increase the provision of social housing by community housing providers, including iwi Māori. To this end, the report’s summary of feedback from correspondence suggests direct engagement between Kāinga Ora and Te Matapihi, the national Māori housing advocacy body. This recommendation underscores the importance of enabling Māori organisations to continue to play a central role in providing housing solutions for their communities.

The report also features a case study highlighting a partnership between Kāinga Ora and Te Rūnanga o Toa Rangatira (Ngāti Toa) to provide social housing services and enable the iwi to acquire land for housing development. This partnership serves as a model for how government agencies and Māori organisations can work together to address housing challenges while also recognising the Treaty context and the potential for transferring housing stock and tenancy management to Māori organisations.

Another significant recommendation of the report is the establishment of Community Housing Associations, with iwi identified as potential partners. This recommendation acknowledges the importance of leveraging the expertise and resources of Māori communities in developing and implementing housing solutions.

The report also recognises the need for a dedicated focus on alleviating Māori housing stress and utilising Māori community housing providers to achieve this goal. This acknowledgement underscores the importance of targeted interventions and support for Māori-led housing initiatives.

While the report makes several important recommendations and acknowledges the unique housing challenges faced by Māori, it could potentially provide more detailed analysis and recommendations specifically focused on addressing Māori housing disparities. As the government prepares to release its budget, it will be important to see whether there is continued investment in Māori housing initiatives, building on the record investment made under the former Labour government.

The redirection towards place-based and local solutions, as outlined in the report, will require genuine commitment and increased funding to support Māori housing providers and communities. The upcoming budget will be a critical test of the government’s resolve to address Māori housing disparities and honour its Treaty obligations.

As Aotearoa New Zealand grapples with a housing crisis that disproportionately affects Māori, it is crucial that the insights and recommendations of the Kāinga Ora review are translated into meaningful action. The coalition government should continue to act as an enabler and further invest in Māori-led solutions by Māori housing providers and communities to ensure that Māori have access to safe, affordable, and culturally appropriate housing. Finally, the independent report (albeit briefly) acknowledges the Treaty as being a core consideration in housing decision-making, confirming that in order to address the housing crisis, Treaty partnerships must be continued and strengthened.

Keep going!
Webb’s describes the feather as ‘beautifully preserved, rare and highly coveted’ (Photo: Screenshot)
Webb’s describes the feather as ‘beautifully preserved, rare and highly coveted’ (Photo: Screenshot)

ĀteaMay 20, 2024

The murky past – and unknown future – of a huia feather set to sell to the highest bidder

Webb’s describes the feather as ‘beautifully preserved, rare and highly coveted’ (Photo: Screenshot)
Webb’s describes the feather as ‘beautifully preserved, rare and highly coveted’ (Photo: Screenshot)

A taonga going under the hammer at an Auckland auction house tonight is expected to fetch thousands. But concerns have been raised about its unclear provenance – and about the law that’s meant to protect it. Eda Tang reports.

When Tamatea* received the huia feather they bought from a licensed dealer, it arrived in a vape box. They were shocked. 

“Some might argue that a huia feather is tapu since it is part of an extinct bird, some may consider it noa given that it is traditionally an ornament. Either way, it does not belong in a vape box.” 

Tail feathers of the huia (kōtore huia), the now-extinct bird with glossy white-tipped black feathers and orange wattles, were worn by rangatira as a sign of rank and status. They became sought after by Pākehā too, and after the Duke of York (who later became King George V) was pictured wearing a huia feather in his hat on a visit to New Zealand in 1901, they became popular in Britain. The numbers of the species diminished with targeted hunting, and the last confirmed sighting of a huia in the wild was in 1907.

At the Webb’s auction house in Mount Eden, Auckland, a single, framed huia tail feather is held for its new custodian, attracting public attention and several media stories. It’s the centrepiece of the “Material Culture” auction, featuring alongside other Māori taonga including a taiaha adorned with kurī fur, as well as myriad cultural items from around the Pacific and the world. The live auction is this evening, Monday, May 20, and the huia feather is expected to attract a bid of between $2,000 and $3,000.

The huia feather being auctioned by Webb’s (Photo: Supplied)

A number of huia feathers have been sold at auction at Aotearoa and abroad in recent years, including one in Auckland in 2010 that fetched $8,400, making it at the time “the world’s most expensive feather”. In 2023, a pair of stuffed huia sold to a private collector for £220,000 at auction in the UK, despite calls for the New Zealand government to buy the huia and return them to New Zealand.

But what do we know about this feather? Not much, and nor do the auctioneers. It comes from a “private collection” and the feather is listed as Y-registered under the Protected Objects Act (1975). This means that only registered collectors can bid on the item and Manatū Taonga Ministry for Culture and Heritage should hold a permanent record of it. Only they don’t. The ministry says it’s still awaiting the paper copy from Te Papa. 

Mysteriously, the Y registration number on the listing on Thursday last week was Y16454, which changed to Y16462 by Friday. Caolán McAleer, head of marketing at Webb’s, said this was because the number on the tip of the feather “can be hard to read”. He couldn’t disclose the seller’s identity but said the item was given to Webb’s without documentation or proof of the Y-registration. “The huia feather has come from a private collection in Aotearoa. The vendor has had it for some time and decided it is time to let it go,” McAleer explained.

The original Y registration number on the feather has changed (Photo: Supplied)

James Parkinson, head of valuations in Māori and Oceanic art at competing auction house Dunbar Sloane, said the listing was subject to “considerable conjecture”.

“How can you market something in print and in the media, especially something that is culturally significant, without knowing all the facts? They clearly do not know all the facts about this huia feather. The Y registration number they have in print is wrong. This is also then very problematic for the person who buys this. They don’t really know what they are buying.”

McAleer said, “We believe the feather was first Y-registered in August/September in 2013 when it was offered in a previous auction.” He said it wasn’t uncommon for objects to come in without certificates as collectors misplace them, but Webb’s requests these ahead of the auction. “We do not release taonga until we are provided with a collector’s number.” 

A Y-registered object falls under the legal definition of taonga tūturu, referring to “found” and privately owned objects relating to Māori culture, history or society that are at least 50 years old. It doesn’t take much to be a registered collector taonga tūturu; you need residency and a place to store the items. It’s all here on this one-page form

A vape box was not the waka huia Tamatea expected their taonga to arrive in (Photo: Supplied)

Tamatea was surprised by how easy it was to register. “There is no need to prove your knowledge of conservation or understanding of te ao Māori.” While they were confident in their taha Māori, they felt “lacking in preservation knowledge”, so took it upon themselves to speak to staff at the local museum. “They were able to authenticate the taonga as a huia feather and offered very practical advice to preserve it: everything from ideal temperatures, to the storage and display materials, to the impacts of UV lights and insects.” 

Tamatea’s taonga is currently mounted on acid-free board, behind museum glass with UV protection and in a sealed frame displayed away from direct sunlight. They say the costs associated with preserving the taonga need to be considered before buying. “If the buyer does not intend on taking up the responsibility as a kaitiaki, then they should not bid on these taonga.

“The requirement for registered collectors is a good start, but I think this process needs to be more rigorous, [requiring] a particular level of understanding of conservation, preservation and te ao Māori.” This would make it more accessible for Māori to attain taonga too, as a way of expressing tino rangatiratanga, they added. Under the act, while permission is needed from Manatū Taonga before a taonga tūturu can be taken out of the country, a registered collector can gift or bequest the item to someone who is not registered. 

Aside from curiosity, the main reason for Tamatea’s bidding on the huia feather was to ensure it was being looked after appropriately. “I thought it, more likely than not, would end up in the hands of someone who probably didn’t understand the mana and significance it holds to Māori… its importance to te ao Māori and the roles some of these taonga had in our histories.” 

Other taonga tūturu in the Webb’s Material Culture auction (Photo: Screenshot)

Concerns over taonga being sold at auction are not new. A 2022 University of Otago MA thesis by Claire Louise Thorrold that researched practices of private collectors of taonga tūturu found that community-level work to encourage more Māori cultural understanding had not yet filtered through to “private collectors who are continuing their practices within their isolated world”. Government documents released to The Post last year revealed that a review of the Protected Objects Act was being considered after concerns were raised about its operation.

So what are traders’ responsibilities? Even though Tamatea’s feather came from one of the 14 licensed traders of taonga tūturu, it arrived in a vape box. Becoming a licensed trader is almost as straightforward as becoming a licensed collector, demanding only an added annual licensing fee of $57.50. It doesn’t require proof of an understanding of tikanga Māori, so the act doesn’t do anything to actively ensure the taonga are looked after. Helen McCracken, the ministry’s acting deputy secretary of Māori Crown partnerships, says the act “[monitors] the trade of privately owned taonga tūturu, registration of licensed dealers to trade… and registration of collectors.

“Registered collectors are welcome to contact the ministry or one of the authorised public museums to seek advice on the care of their taonga tūturu collections, including for tikanga Māori where appropriate,” added McCracken.

McAleer said Webb’s has “gone to lengths in order to train staff directly handling taonga about how to do so”. He explained how the auction house used the object’s indigenous names where possible, prohibited eating or drinking near taonga, stored taonga in a locked office, handled them carefully and, if taonga are depicted as figures, staff never lift them by the neck or face. “We take being the temporary kaitiaki of these taonga for the time they are in our care very seriously.

“Many of our bidders already have an understanding of tikanaga [sic] and we speak with them about this,” said McAleer.

*name changed

‘Hutt Valley, Kāpiti, down to the south coast. Our Wellington coverage is powered by members.’
Joel MacManus
— Wellington editor