spinofflive
auckland-2160550_1280

AucklandJune 7, 2017

The storm in the port: Why it’s time to get moving

auckland-2160550_1280

It made good sense to develop the port in its current location on the Waitemata Harbour. But, says Urban Auckland’s Julie Stout, it doesn’t make sense to keep the container and mixed-goods operations there now. So what happened to the consensus agreement to find a new location?

Read other contributions to this debate here.

Ports of Auckland’s core business is shifting cargo. It occupies 77 hectares of prime waterfront land – all of which has been reclaimed from our beautiful Waitemata Harbour over the past 150 years. It pays no rent for this manufactured land, and therefore has an artificially low cost base that allows it to operate profitably.

The port has played an important role in Auckland’s development and for many years its close proximity to the CBD was advantageous. But this is no longer the case. The harbour has been increasingly constricted and our connection to the city-centre waterfront is blocked. The noise and pollution from an industrial estate in the middle of our fast-growing city, and the problem of shifting all of Auckland’s freight through residential suburbs and increasingly congested transport corridors, are serious problems with no easy solutions. It is time to think strategically about the future.

Ports of Auckland are very good at reporting their own efficiency but the efficiency of the port actually has little relevance to this discussion. The issues are more profound. Is a rapidly expanding central city the right place for an industrial business with strong growth aspirations? Do the people of Auckland believe a subsidised industrial estate is the best use of their waterfront? Does sea freight needs to arrive and depart in the CBD? Is there a more efficient solution for the future?

The Port Future Study was initiated by Auckland Council after the public furore caused by Ports of Auckland’s proposed expansion of Bledisloe Wharf. The Port Future Study was overseen by a Consensus Working Group incorporating representatives from business, iwi, the community and Ports of Auckland itself. It was charged to investigate the implications of the port’s growth, not just from an economic viewpoint, but also from environmental, cultural and social viewpoints.

The study lasted nine months, cost $1 million and was carried out independently by EY. Stage 1 of the work was reported in the middle of last year.

The number one recommendation by EY and the Consensus Working Group overseeing the report was that Stage 2 of the Ports Future Study be done to establish a future port relocation option.

Photo: Pixabay

While there is broad agreement that the cruise ships are best to remain based in the city centre, the best location of a new port is more contentious. The Port Future Study identified two broad options within the Auckland region:

  • A modern offshore port in the Manukau Harbour, near South Auckland industry and existing transport networks.
  • A modern offshore port in the upper Firth of Thames, with connections to Tauranga, Hamilton’s inland ports and South Auckland industry.

Taking a long-term view with a broad range of criteria including freight growth, city growth and economic, environmental, social and cultural issues, both of these options scored better than the development of Ports of Auckland on its present site. The analysis also took account of capacities at Northport and Tauranga.

Any option we consider will have issues, but we need to confront them head on and for once make decisions that future generations will thank us for. San Francisco has successfully developed a new port within a bird sanctuary. How did they do that? If Manukau is the right place for a new port, should we be investing in heavy rail to the airport rather than the current light rail?

The point is that these alternative location options provide a useful starting point for discussion, but the next stage of the study must look beyond council boundaries to find the solution that will meet the sea freight needs of Auckland and the upper North Island over the next 100 years and beyond.

For now at least, let’s investigate the options and work through the economic, environmental, cultural and social issues. Let’s do it with solid research and consultation, not asserted opinions based on the past. The options need to be investigated now before other land-based development closes them off. This is too big an issue to ignore.

The study recognised that the opportunity for the port or part of its operations to shift would arise when either one of two conditions occur. The first is that the port’s full freight capacity is reached. The second is that the city centre grows to a point where the land is better used for other things, or Aucklanders want the land used for other things.

Both Mayor Phil Goff and Councillor Chris Darby, who chairs the council’s planning committee, recognised this in their election promises to “sort the port”. So let’s do it now and study the Manukau and Firth options before long-term alternatives are foreclosed by bad short-term decisions.

And just imagine the incredible social and economic transformation that would occur in Auckland over the next generations if we replaced a subsidised 77-hectare industrial estate with a city-defining waterfront.

Read other contributions to this debate here.

Julie Stout of Urban Auckland is an architect and was a member of the Consensus Working Group for the Ports Future Study.


The Spinoff Auckland is sponsored by Heart of the City, the business association dedicated to the growth of downtown Auckland as a vibrant centre for entertainment, retail, hospitality and business.

Keep going!
Eleanor Bishop. Photo by Jordan Harrison
Eleanor Bishop. Photo by Jordan Harrison

AucklandJune 6, 2017

Playwright Eleanor Bishop: “To be a young woman is to be harassed”

Eleanor Bishop. Photo by Jordan Harrison
Eleanor Bishop. Photo by Jordan Harrison

An interview with the super-sharp, furious, funny and startlingly creative Eleanor Bishop, whose acclaimed play about campus rape, Jane Doe, is on for two weeks in Auckland.

When she was aged 20, Eleanor Bishop says she was struck by three things. One, she was surrounded by sexual harassment. Two, there was, thank god, feminism. And three, she had not being taught anything about female sexuality.

She’s 32 now, and one of the most exciting and provocative theatre-makers we have. Her show Boys deconstructed Greg McGee’s modern New Zealand classic Foreskins’ Lament to the astonishment and acclaim of audiences at the Auckland Theatre Company’s Waterfront Theatre earlier this year. (You can read about that show in Alex Casey’s interview with her here and a discussion on the show here.)

Cast photos from Eleanor Bishop’s Boys, staged in Auckland in April

Now Jane Doe, Bishop’s inventive and immensely confronting play about rape on American college campuses, first seen in Auckland in the Fringe Festival, opens this week in a return season.

Bishop is a fan of Peggy Orenstein, who wrote Girls & Sex and argues that there’s a startling gap between what girls think about the world and their place in it and what they think about sex and their place in that.

“She found that girls lean in,” says Bishop. “They want to be the boss, they want to earn as much, they have ambitions, all those things – but they still expect that until they’re at least 25 sex will be shit. To be a young woman is to be harassed. For many adolescent and young adult women, harassment is a defining characteristic of sex.”

She recommends Orenstein’s TED Talk on the subject and she’s right: it’s unsettling and empowering, in all the right places, and definitely worth watching. Like Orenstein, Bishop has been researching and writing about sexual relations for years. She divides her time between New Zealand and the States, where she studied at Carnegie Mellon University on a clutch of fellowships, and where she created Jane Doe. She’s a bit smart, Eleanor Bishop.

The script of Jane Doe is based on trial transcripts and interviews she did on several campuses. It had a very good run here in the 2017 Fringe Festival and is back this week for a short season, to raise money for an invitation appearance at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival in August.

Eleanor Bishop. Photo by Jordan Harrison

Last month The Spinoff down with Eleanor Bishop for coffee and a few questions.

Why is sex for young women characterised by harassment?

It’s part of what you see everywhere. In almost every movie, the pleasure is male pleasure. There’s such a lack of information on female pleasure. Porn is a part of it but let’s not overstate that or reduce the issue to porn. There’s so much more.

So what are we doing wrong?

We should be talking to young people, early. Age 14. Talking about porn, about “locker room talk” and what that really means, the way it creates a culture of expectations. And about the culture of silence. Silence makes people complicit.

Jane Doe was researched and written in the States. Does it apply directly here?

There’s a fight over sexual relations everywhere. In the States they have a bigger focus on abortion, whereas here it’s more about sexual violence. And the responses are different – we’ve found we have to tone it down here a bit here. During the play we invite the audience to text its responses and those texts appear onstage, on a big screen. American audiences get sad. In New Zealand they’re more stoic, they sit there. You know, that New Zealand thing.

Is this a forever subject or are you seeing change?

I think there’s been a change in understanding of what rape and sexual assault are. I started working on this show three or four years ago in response to a whole lot of assaults on women on campus. That suggests it’s a very long-standing issue, but in the last few years the definition of sexual assault and sexual harm has broadened. In Jane Doe, we look specifically at the question of a woman who’s passed out. It’s a shift for a lot of people.

Karin McCracken in Jane Doe. Photo by Robin Kerr

You’ve been home for a while. Have things changed here?

I think they have. There are so many young people into art and politics. I love that. And it’s not just here, it’s happening everywhere. Social media, the internet, they’re a huge, huge part of it.

What about you? You’ve been doing prestigious study in New York and you live there half the time now. Have you changed?

Apparently I have a New York confidence. Karin [McCracken, who is performing in Jane Doe here] told me I was “so aggressive” when we met. Although when I go back to New York they tell me I’m losing that and I have to get it back.

What do you think?

Probably depends where I am.

Were you happy with the way Boys went?

Really happy. The work was what I’d hoped it would be and the response was much more positive than I expected. But having said that, I have internal measures of success. A good audience response is great, but it’s the icing on the cake.

What about Greg McGee, what does he think?

I don’t know. I wrote to him to ask his permission to revisit the play. I said, Foreskin’s Lament has canonical status, it’s like Shakespeare and Arthur Miller. With their plays, we revisit and reinterpret and reinvent, that’s how we honour them, by renewing them and plumbing their ongoing relevance. Foreskin’s Lament is a classic and I wanted to treat it like that, like a classic. He said yes. But he didn’t go to see the result.

What did the young men in the cast think?

One of the things I really liked was after the show they were all going, “Yeah, we’re feminists!” With a beer in one hand, you know, they went from supportive to loud and drunkenly proud.

There’s some audience participation in Jane Doe, but only for those who want it. Photo by Louis Stein

There are laughs in your work, big generous humour, but still, it’s pretty tough work. How do you relax?

I watch cooking shows. I like Chopped and Cutthroat Kitchen.

Shows with knives.

Well, I guess. I didn’t think of that.

That comment you made before about female pleasure. Are you going to write about it?

Yes! That’s exactly what I’m working on now, a show about pleasure. I’m doing it with Julia Croft [who co-directed Boys] and it’s going to be called Body Double. It’s like we’re making music, this is our first album, we’ve got all this material. It’s so much fun.

Jane Doe is being presented in a kind of double bill, in two theatres, with Julia Croft’s Power Ballad, a hilarious, empowering fantasia on bodies, language, sexual politics and stuff you can do with a microphone. Power Ballad plays at the Basement Theatre and is also raising money to get to the Edinburgh Fringe Festival.  

Jane Doe: Q Theatre Loft, June 6-17. 

Power Ballad: Basement Theatre, June 6-17.


The Spinoff Auckland is sponsored by Heart of the City, the business association dedicated to the growth of downtown Auckland as a vibrant centre for entertainment, retail, hospitality and business.