Image: Archi Banal
Image: Archi Banal

BooksJune 13, 2023

We’re at the starting blocks of climate action – here’s what the sprint looks like

Image: Archi Banal
Image: Archi Banal

James Renwick’s new book Under the Weather: A future forecast for New Zealand is an overview of where we, and our neighbours, are at with climate change and what we as a nation could do to lead the world in pushing back the dial. This is an edited excerpt from the chapter ‘Local Action’.

If any country can become carbon-zero, surely it is ours. We’ve got a small population, with a small and agile economy. We are super well-endowed with renewable resources – plenty of wind, sun, water and geothermal energy. We are smart and innovative. We have demonstrated over and over that we can be leaders on the world stage, on terrorism, on the nuclear threat, on social welfare. We can definitely lead the world on climate change as well. 

“But what we do or don’t do makes very little difference to the climate system,” some will say, overlooking the fact that the most powerful thing that every single nation in the world can do right now is get on track towards a zero-carbon future. To put things in stark perspective, in 2021, the world collectively put around 41 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Of that, New Zealand contributed just over 37 million tons. If the global community wants to stop warming at around 1.5°C – the goal at the heart of the 2015 Paris Agreement – we need to make enormous cuts, reining in emissions by 45% by 2030, and getting to zero emissions of carbon dioxide around 2050. If we want to keep warming under 2°C, the upper end of the Paris target, we need to cut emissions by 30% by 2030, and get to zero emissions by around 2070. 

Getting to zero emissions is the only way that we are going to halt global warming. That’s true zero – not just a reduction. To get to zero by 2050 and get halfway there by 2030, we need to be reducing global emissions by around 7% every year, starting right now. Here in New Zealand, we need to reduce our national emissions by around the same amount every year. 

So how long do we have to get started? Well, we definitely don’t have Bowie’s five years left to cry in. We’ve got zero years. The longer we wait to get started, the harder it’s going to get, and the more drastic the emissions cuts we’ll have to make. If the world community doesn’t really get started on emissions reductions until 2030, we’ll be at 1.5°C warming, well on the way to 2°C warming, and we would then have the same race to reduce emissions, just less time to do it. If we’re to have any chance of real success, action has to start immediately – better, it would start yesterday. As it is, we’re already going to see more extreme heat, fires, floods, crop failures as this decade progresses. If we do nothing, we may have 20 or 30 years before things get really ugly. 

James Renwick, author of Under the Weather. (Photo Supplied)

So far, New Zealand has achieved very little in terms of overall emissions reductions. Total emissions are slightly down on a peak in 2005, but total gross emissions and net emissions (after subtracting offsets from tree-planting and other land-use changes) have changed little this century so far. Where we have made progress is in the legal and policy settings. We now have zero net carbon dioxide emissions by 2050 as a legal requirement, with 24–47 per cent reductions in biogenic methane by 2050, under the revised Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Act. And, as mentioned, that Act also set up the Climate Change Commission, which has already delivered a roadmap for emissions reductions through to 2035 and has advised on methane emissions pricing and Emissions Trading Scheme settings. The government has in response published its emissions reduction plan, and has drafted its first national adaptation plan.

So, we are at the starting blocks. Now, we need to see action. In particular, I really want to see national emissions start to come down in 2023. Reductions in carbon dioxide emissions can come mostly from the transport sector, and from industry and energy production.

Here’s what I would love to see happening over the next few years:

Big boosts in renewably powered public transport across the country

That means strongly upgraded bus services in cities, and the introduction of light rail where appropriate. Combine that with big investments to breathe new life into the national rail network, moving people and freight across the country in a network even better than we had when I was a kid hanging out at Springfield Railway Station. We also need to see improvements in the inter-city bus network. Essentially, the aim should be for people to get from wherever they are to wherever they need to be almost exclusively by public and renewably powered transport.

Improved facilities and incentives for active transport

For places not covered by the transport network outlined above, we need to make it easier and more appealing for people to get around by walking, cycling or similar. That means things like dedicated cycleways, clear and safe walking paths, and subsidies for the purchase of non-car vehicles like e-bikes, e-scooters and e-skateboards.

Comprehensive and affordable access to car-sharing schemes

For those who need a car to get around, it needs to be easier to either borrow or share one. By providing this option, along with improving access to public transport, we’d almost do away with the need for anyone to own a car!

Incentives for purchasing electric vehicles and a national charging-station network

I’ve deliberately put this point after the improvements to public and active transport, as the future is not about each of us swapping our petrol-powered cars for electric equivalents. We need to get out of our cars, or the congestion will continue. Cities in many countries have already shown the benefits to be gained by kicking the car habit. We just need to join the trend.

Big investments in solar and wind power

When it comes to solar generation, we need to see both large plants and panels distributed across private home roofs. We also need increases in wind generation. If we set our minds to it, we should be able to turn off the Huntly power station this decade and go to a 100-per-cent-plus renewably powered grid before 2030, one that has even more generating capacity than we have now. Imagine that!

Better home insulation

Part of the future energy equation is saving energy, as well as increased renewable generation. Houses that are insulated properly require far less energy to heat and cool, but New Zealand’s current building standards do not meet the conditions healthy and energy efficient homes require. To improve the standards, the legislation needs to change, and subsidies and incentives for building climate-conscious housing need to be prioritised.

More efficient home appliances

Tighter standards for how much energy home appliances use goes hand in hand with saving energy

Goodbye, coal boilers!

Where they are used – in schools and other facilities, and for industrial heat – coal boilers must be replaced by solar and other zero carbon energy production.

More climate-conscious development

Changes to legislation are needed to encourage increased urban density and the end of suburban sprawl. We also need to find new ways to encourage infrastructure that allows adaptation to climate change, as well as facilitating the reduction of emissions.

More climate-conscious land-use

We need to change the way we use the land to work with regional climates more than we currently do. In my opinion, for instance, the dry country in the eastern South Island would be better used for growing grain than for dairy farming supported by massive irrigation schemes. Moreover, it would be great for our agriculture sector to move to supplying a more plant based diet, raising less meat and more vegetation, grains, pulses, vegetables and so on.

That should do for a start! 

I know it will take many years to realise some of the things on this wish list, so the sooner we get started, the better. Dealing with climate change is a long-term commitment but it has real urgency up front. If we can make these changes over the next decade, it will put us in a good position for the future. And it will give us things to export – our technologies, our policy and planning processes, our philosophy generally. 

If we can use what we do to help and inspire other countries, even better. 

One of the most rewarding aspects of my career over the last two decades has been contributing as a lead author to the IPCC’s Assessment Reports. These massive reports involve many, many hours of work on the part of thousands of scientists from around the world, and they have become a vital tool for building the case for action now. 

Assessment reports are released every six or seven years and are, by nature, very technical and thousands of pages long. Crucially, each one is accompanied by a Summary for Policymakers, a document that usually runs to no more than 30 pages or so, and distils the central messages of all those observations and scientific analyses in order for senior policy  advisors the world over to understand the bare essentials. This important summary is what’s used to brief politicians – those who have the power, if not always the will, to speed up the process of decarbonising the world’s economies.

A diagram from the Summary for Policymakers from the IPCC Report called ‘AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023’

However, as useful as the summary has been in guiding policy decisions here in New Zealand, there was, until recently, a disconnect between the scientific advice and actual on-the-ground decision-making. Various government departments took responsibility for providing climate related advice on everything from the Emissions Trading Scheme to public transport and fisheries, but no one body or agency was tasked with taking a big-picture view, considering the evidence and – most importantly of all – outlining pathways to a low-carbon world. The establishment of the Climate Change Commission has started to change that, and has restored some of my hope that New Zealand may actually be able to step up to the immense challenge facing us and our world. 

Some might say it’s not our job to get to zero, that we’re doing fine. “What can we do? Globally, we are small players.” But, being small players has never stopped us on the sports field, so why should it stop us when it comes to climate change? Just as we do in the sporting arena, we have a chance here to play a key role in leading the change. We can set the trend, just by providing leadership – thought leadership, political leadership, social leadership.

Currently, there is a lot of talk about living up to the Paris Agreement limits, about becoming carbon-neutral, but no country has actually demonstrated those things in real life yet – and that can make it hard to believe in. It can be hard to believe that a zero-carbon future is a real possibility. As the old saying goes, “We can’t be what we can’t see.” But, all we need is for someone to show us the way. Once that happens, I think it’ll open the floodgates. Every country will want to join the parade. If any country can become 100 per cent carbon-neutral, surely it’s Aotearoa. And just imagine if we did manage it! Imagine if we did it before any other developed nation!

We could even do it before 2050 … We’d win the zero carbon world cup, and we’d also garner international attention and investment. We could become a global hub for green technology and innovation, for innovative policy, for sustainable urban design, for sustainable low-carbon agriculture. The sky is the limit. There is no reason at all why New Zealand couldn’t be the country to show the rest of the world how it is done. We have already demonstrated that kind of leadership before, with our responses to Covid-19, the Christchurch terror attacks, nuclear testing. Why not be that brave little country yet again, at this time when the world needs inspiration more than ever before?

Keep going!
(Image: Tina Tiller)
(Image: Tina Tiller)

BooksJune 10, 2023

The magic of mushies: an excerpt from Fungi of Aotearoa by Liv Sisson

(Image: Tina Tiller)
(Image: Tina Tiller)

Fungi of Aotearoa: A curious forager’s field guide stormed the bestseller charts upon its release, clearly serving a local interest in the mushrooms around us. The following is an edited excerpt, along with some of the eye-poppingly beautiful photos you’ll find throughout the book.

Fungi are medicine for us

Fungi may help us heal the Earth, reduce our impact on her, and could be a key collaborator in another, more intimate environment too – our own bodies. Superbugs are scary-as. They resist almost every kind of antibiotic, and they’re on the rise in Aotearoa as well as the rest of the world. They cause staph infections and other gnarly health complications, and by some estimates could kill more frequently than cancer by 2050. But there’s good news: fungi may be able to fight superbugs. Fungi are one of the foundations of modern medicine. Penicillin, the first mass-produced antibiotic, came from Penicillium fungi. Antibiotics alone have added 23 years to the average human life expectancy.

Before we had them, one in every nine skin infections led to death. Penicillin ushered in a roaring period of antibiotic discovery. This period produced drugs like cyclosporin, which suppresses the immune system and makes things like organ transplants possible. Cyclosporin was found when a pharmaceutical company encouraged employees to bring soil samples from their holidays back to the lab, to see if they contained any useful fungal strains. Fungi have actually been used as medicine for a lot longer than antibiotics have been around. Māori used fungi as medicine as well as kai. Pūtawa were cut into strips and used to dress wounds. Puffballs were used to stop bleeding and to treat burns and scalds. Tawaka was given to expectant mothers and to people suffering from fevers. It was also used to treat karaka and tutu poisonings. Angiangi and other lichens were collected and used to dress wounds and slow bleeding.

In China, fungi have been used as medicine for thousands of years. Medicinal mushrooms first appeared in Taoist art around 1400 ad, around the same time that the first Polynesian peoples may have arrived in Aotearoa. Superbugs, however, pose a scary question — are we in a post-antibiotic era? Antibiotic-resistant superbugs, like MRSA, have become more resistant and harder to fight each year. In 2014 the World Health Organization warned that within a decade, antibiotic-resistant bacteria could make routine surgeries really risky and write the end of modern medicine. In Aotearoa, our geographical isolation has offered a slight superbug buffer. 

Birds nest fungi. And the cover of the book featuring Werewere-kōkako, photo by by Paula Vigus.

But in 2009, the first case of a carbapenem-resistant organism (CRO) was identified here. Carbapenems are a high-powered group of antibiotics used to treat infections that other drugs can’t. Every year, more patients with CROs are identified in Aotearoa. Our current antibiotics have got us this far, but we need new ones. The good news is that there’s still loads of potentially useful fungi out there – we just haven’t had enough time to get to know them all yet. But we’re working on it. Siouxsie Wiles and her bright pink locks graced our TV screens almost daily during the Covid lockdowns. She kept us up to date on the facts, breaking down the jargon so that Kiwis everywhere could better understand what the heck was going on. Since 2015, Siouxsie has been working with Bevan Weir to investigate local fungi for potential antibiotic applications. Our flora and fauna are wildly different compared with those in the rest of the world, and the same is true of our fungi. What we have here is unique, and could hold what we need to make some new medications.

Importantly, we also have the International Collection of Microorganisms from Plants (ICMP). Located in Auckland, this collection holds 23,000 living cultures – strains of fungi, bacteria and other microorganisms stored frozen in tanks of liquid nitrogen. This collection is the product of 70-plus years of work and is one of the best in the world. It contains more than 10,000 fungi species from Aotearoa and all over the Pacific and could well be an untapped trove of useful compounds. In one of Siouxsie’s lab’s early findings, 35 out of 36 fungi samples from the collection showed some kind of activity against mycobacteria, a family of superbugs that includes Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which causes TB. The lab has also identified a fungal strain with some activity against the hospital superbug methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, better known as MRSA. So what does this mean? Have we got a new wonder drug, a penicillin 2.0? Not quite. The scientific process is rigorous and thorough, and so it’s normally quite slow. Identifying potential candidates is just step one, with many steps between that and actually using something in a drug trial. Our Covid-19 vaccines were developed quickly, but only on the back of decades of research into mRNA vaccines.

Now, why do fungi “work” for us as medicine? To start with, fungi can’t “run away” from threats like pathogens, so they have evolved clever counter-strategies – an entire arsenal of chemical responses to fight off whatever bacteria or other nasties come their way. And their defence strategies often work really well for us too. But why? At the core of things, we’re not that different. We are genetically quite similar to fungi and are pestered by many of the same viruses. Fungi produce many chemical compounds to protect themselves, but the best understood are the beta-glucans, which have been shown to stimulate weak immune systems. Many of the most treasured mushrooms in traditional medicine, like Ganoderma species, are high in these compounds. Our shared history with fungi is another key part of this puzzle. 

Animals, including humans, that have been able to identify and use fungi as food and medicine have gained physiological benefits in the short term. And evolutionary benefits in the long term. Along the way we have evolved to have receptor sites where we can process and use what fungi provide. As a result, when we consume medicinal fungi they trigger healing, nourishment, defence – or all three.

Left: Black earth tongues growing alongside waxgill mushrooms. Right: Cruentomycena viscidocruenta on a pinecone; Gliophorus lilacipes. Photos by Paula Vigus.

Fungi are magic

Every so often, magic mushroom spores end up in a council woodchipper. Once that woodchip is spread, warm rain coaxes curious fungi into being on library lawns and along police station sidewalks. These fungal blooms fire up furtive Facebook groups and bring out a different kind of forager. Magic mushrooms contain psilocybin, a mind-altering (psychoactive) substance that is a Class A drug in Aotearoa. It’s illegal, as are the mushrooms themselves.

They pose a high risk of harm to humans. So how does this happen on council’s watch? There isn’t anything dodgy going on — magic mushrooms grow up and down Aotearoa, all of their own accord. We even have a few native and endemic species. Their spores are often dispersed by the wind and, when those spores come to land on woody debris, and that woody debris comes to land in the woodchipper, councils can end up being co-conspirators in the spread.

Humans and other animals are known to seek out altered states of mind. Kererū, our native wood pigeons, eat fermented miro berries and sometimes fall out of trees when they overindulge. Kids spin around to get dizzy. Adults use caffeine to dial in, and alcohol to wind down. In his book How to Change Your Mind, American author Michael Pollan writes, “There is not a culture on earth that doesn’t make use of certain plants to change the contents of the mind whether as a matter of healing, habit, or spiritual practice.”

This got Dr Mitchell Head (Tainui, Ngāti Mahuta, Ngāti Naho) thinking. Did, or does, rongoā Māori — traditional healing — make use of the mind-altering substances that naturally occur in the ngāhere? Were early Māori aware of endemic, psychedelic mushroom species such as Psilocybe weraroa? Mitchell is a neuroscientist whose research sits at the intersection of science and mātauranga Māori (Māori knowledge). He’s looking into how Psilocybe weraroa could be used as a medicinal product to treat addiction in conjunction with a cultural therapeutic framework. This fungus contains psilocybin and is a taonga (sacred) species. Now, an illegal substance . . . that might be used for therapy? At first glance it doesn’t add up. But there are incredibly strong signals, both current and historical, that substances like psilocybin magic mushrooms can be used as powerful additions to our mental health toolkit.

Peyote, a spineless psychedelic cactus, has been used in Mexico and the American south-west for more than 6000 years. The Navajo, a Native American tribe, have used it to treat alcoholism and in ceremonies designed to connect people with spiritual power, guidance and healing.

Recent research in Aotearoa and abroad has found that psychedelics could be used to treat depression, addiction, and even the sense of dread that comes with terminal diagnoses. Psychedelics, importantly, are not addictive. And the benefits shown in these studies are often not only immediate, but lasting.

These kinds of applications are what Mitchell is interested in. But how do the benefits “work”? The “snow-globe” analogy helps explain this. Imagine going sledding after a fresh fall of snow. At the start of the day, you can choose any path down the hill. But after a few goes, the tracks of the previous runs are bitten into the hillside. After an hour or two, the original tracks are deep and established. Once your sled is on them, it becomes harder and harder to swerve and forge a new path to the bottom. Depression is often fuelled by repetitive ruminative thinking loops; addiction is a repeated behaviour. Both represent deeply rutted thinking patterns that are hard to deviate from.

Experiences, also called “trips”, induced by psychedelics have been likened to “shaking the snow globe”. When you turn the globe upside down and back again, the snow resettles, and this creates an opportunity for new paths to be taken. A psychedelic experience can disrupt unhealthy patterns of thought and create new, flexible ways of thinking and behaving, even if you’re fairly far down a difficult life-track. The benefits of psychedelics used as therapy, Mitchell taught me, can be seen in the way fungi operate in the natural world — they’re great at creating communication pathways. When you put them into the brain, they accelerate the growth of neuronal pathways. Every time we perform a particular behaviour, we create feedback loops and those behaviour pathways get reinforced. Psilocybin allows the brain to follow new pathways rather than staying in the same ruts. It’s all about putting energy into the system and allowing it to take a new path. As many indigenous cultures overseas have a history of using their native psychedelic species, it didn’t seem likely to Mitchell that Māori hadn’t experimented with theirs, too. Through his research and kōrero, he has found that there is indeed such knowledge but things like the Tohunga Suppression Act of 1907 forced discussion underground. During his research, Mitchell has found several accounts of traditional Māori use of magic mushrooms, generally passed on through oral tradition.

Left: Mycena roseoflava. Right: the ngāhere. (Photos: Paula Vigus)

Mitchell is now working with a marae to develop a therapy for their people struggling with addiction. With the help of Manaaki Whenua, the group explored the bush around their marae and found Psilocybe weraroa. No one has yet quantified how much psilocybin these mushrooms contain. Mitchell is hoping to not only do that, but also determine a therapeutic dose that can be  achieved consistently. The second, and equally essential, part of this research is the cultural framework Mitchell is working on. Psychedelics are powerful substances. ‘Set and setting’ are key in producing a generally positive experience. Set refers to the mindset the user brings to the experience, while setting refers to the physical place in which it occurs. 

Indigenous practices, like Navajo peyote ceremonies and the Pacific kava ceremony, provide frameworks for set and setting. When psychedelics are used without this understanding, the experience could be quite scary. People should never look to forage their own magic mushrooms, Mitchell told me — more than a few who have tried in Aotearoa have had negative experiences. And, of course, it’s illegal. Currently we don’t have a framework for psilocybin use in a Māori cultural setting. When you take these substances as medicine, Mitchell explained, they act as catalysts for whatever kind of process you want to undertake. Defining the set and setting, and the intention behind taking the medicine, is really important. To design a cultural therapy to wrap around therapeutic psilocybin use, Mitchell has looked to other sacred ceremonies held on marae, such as tā moko (traditional tattooing), and is working with tohunga (healers) and cultural therapists in the marae setting who are experts in the spiritual space to develop this therapy.

Fungi are far from being just “one thing”. The various forms and definitions they take on know literally no bounds. From feast to famine, magic to malady, they have shaped the world as we know it. They have even shaped us. Our shared history with fungi is wild and wonderful. And it’s only just the beginning.

Fungi of Aotearoa: A curious forager’s field guide by Liv Sisson (Penguin NZ, $45) can be purchased from Unity Books Auckland and Wellington.