spinofflive
illegal-avocado-growing-850×637

MediaJune 18, 2016

New Zealand’s absurd gardening ban once again makes us the laughing stock of the Internet

illegal-avocado-growing-850×637

The internet rediscovered New Zealand’s longstanding ban on personal gardens, and it collectively lost its mind. Joshua Drummond argues that the ban has had its day.

Well, it happened again. We should be used to it by now. It’s only a year since the topic of New Zealand’s gardening ban last exploded on the now-infamous “Can you have a garden in New Zealand?” post on the r/newzealand subreddit, which is devoted to all things New Zealandish. The latest kerfuffle was caused by commenters who suggested – correctly – that if we permitted personal gardens we might not have an avocado shortage causing a crime wave. Confused posters poured in from all over the world. How, they asked, is it possible that the New Zealand government continues to punish gardeners as criminals?

Maybe we’re just used to it after a long history of risking jail for the simple act of planting a few plants, but I think it’s high time we asked ourselves the same question. And, in case you’re not already questioning just why New Zealand has banned gardening, here’s a few bloody good reasons to start doing just that.

illegal avocado growing
An anonymous Kiwi mum shows off her illegal avocado tree. Credit: u/DinaDinaDinaBatman

Our justice system is overrun with “criminals” whose only crime was to love plants

reddit 02

Our prisons are bursting with middle-aged white people, who make up a disproportionate number of victims of our punitive and ageist anti-gardening legislation. Only recently a Kaikohe mother and pillar of the community made headlines when she was charged with possesion of just two pot plants and was sentenced to a year in jail for each. Kronic187’s grandma was one of the lucky ones, getting let off with a fine – but shouldn’t we ask ourselves why we think it’s lucky for gardeners to get away with a fine and a warning? Why should they be punished at all?

The anti-gardening legislation is applied inconsistently

reddit 03

reddit 07

I grew up in Kerikeri, and I can attest to the truth of OfficerCHODEMAN’s statement – things really are more lax in some parts of the country than others. Kerikeri has plenty of gardens, tucked away in the backs of quarter-acre sections. I grew up eating fruit from hidden-in-plain-sight orchards. Adults even handed out home-grown navel oranges at school rugby matches at half-time. It was a rare day when the sweet smell of orchard sprays wouldn’t waft over our house.  Sure, as a result of illegal orchard overspraying practically everyone in Kerikeri has cancer, but that’s not the point. The point is that it’s insane that the law could be so lax in one place, and barely half an hour away in Kaikohe a woman could be arrested for having a couple of pot plants. It’s nothing short of corrupt.

Those in support of the ban are bigoted boomers and probably also Stuff.co.nz commenters

reddit 08

“Fruit bludgers.” It’s sad to see those who choose to garden reduced to a horticultural slur, but that’s the state of affairs in New Zealand. If it wasn’t for the need for the New Zealand government to appeal to ill-educated, anti-garden bigots and the powerful farming lobby, we’d have had legalised gardening back in the ’90s.

You shouldn’t need a licence to do an activity that’s fundamentally not that dangerous

reddit 09

Sure, people have died from gardening – from things like Legionnaire’s disease lurking in compost. Or falls from illegal cliff gardens on the East Cape. But if you compare gardening to, say, drinking, all the evidence says that gardening is much less dangerous and is ultimately better for you. And let’s be honest: many of us enjoy a quiet bit of gardening in our spare time. Quite a few of the Spinoff’s own staff have great experience and in-depth knowledge of gardening. Some have even written about their experiences with it. Hell, former MP Nandor Tanczos proudly admitted to regularly gardening on Holmes. Not to mention that many of those politicians who now uphold the ban admit to trying gardening at least once during their wild, misspent youth. The point is: they’ve got no right to force us to be licensed to undertake what is an essentially safe activity.

Foreign films have shown us another way

reddit 06

If Matt Damon can freely garden on Mars, why shouldn’t we be able to do it in New Zealand?

Our gardening implements are treated as more dangerous than Americans treat guns

reddit 11

Even for those who can get a license, it’s nearly impossible to actually do anything worthwhile with it. Sloppy_Twat is right – as long as even licensed gardeners are treated as criminals, forced to lock their implements away in actual safes, we’ll never truly progress as a nation.

People overseas think our stupid, archaic anti-gardening laws are literally as bad as terrorism.

reddit 01

See that, New Zealand? We just got accused of being as bad as the “islamic laws.” This can only be a reference to ISIL, and I’m pretty sure our government – who only recently were freaking out about jihadi brides – wouldn’t want the rest of the world thinking our gardening restrictions were as bad as sharia law. Would you, John Key?

It’s clear what needs to be done. New Zealand’s gardening ban needs to go. The rest of the world has moved on without us. When it comes down to it, there’s nothing all that wrong with gardens, and it’s fine to do a bit of gardening once in a while, in moderation. We should follow expert advice and treat excessive gardening as a health issue, not as a criminal one. The only thing holding us back is the ill-informed anti-gardening lobby before which the Government can’t seem to stop cowering – but if overseas trends are anything to go by, their days are numbered. Soon enough, anyone in New Zealand will be able to have a garden and eat it too.

See also:

A nation in crisis – New Zealand’s catastrophic marijuana shortage

What happens when you appear before a judge you called a c*** on Facebook?

The Spinoff is indebted to Reddit, in particular the denizens of r/newzealand, for their groundbreaking discussion of New Zealand’s illegal gardening situation, without which we would never have had the courage to write this post. For more on New Zealand’s gardening ban, Joshua Drummond has a short history.

Keep going!
Milliennial magazine covers

MediaJune 16, 2016

This article about terrible millennials is quite sexist and dumb

Milliennial magazine covers

On Monday a new North & South came out, with a story as old as time: ‘what the hell is wrong with millennials’? Two millennials had a read and What They Found Inside Will Shock You.

The latest issue of North & South magazine has done the unthinkable, and found a non-millennial to shine a selfie-camera spotlight on millennials. Its cover article, ‘The Narcissism Epidemic’, poses the most important question facing modern New Zealand: “Are we raising a generation of self-obsessed brats?”, under the teaser headline ‘Me! Me! Me!’ Because god knows we need this story, again:

Untitled-2

We’ve taken so many photos of ourselves we don’t know who we are anymore. Plus we’re all too busy snapchatting our Fitbit as we run to find our Uber to meet our Tinder date at the restaurant we found on Yelp where will we eat piping hot hashtags, pay with bitcoins, and then Tumblr into bed to livestream our entire sleep cycle on Periscope to do it ourselves.

The article – written by the usually great feature writer Mike White – is mostly a collection of rheumy-eyed reminiscings for an imaginary bygone age, where men were men, women were nowhere, and every incredible achievement was met with a gruff snort or a brief nod. Back then people suffered silently through life before stoically dying of smallpox. But now, this flimsily-sourced piece of fogey nostalgia alleges, everyone wants to waltz around with their Facebooks and their iComputers, doing unconscionable things like taking pictures of themselves. 

It’s reasonably insufferable, but the most striking thing is its attempt to break the Guinness world record for Biggest Sausage Fest. The article mentions men’s names 107 times, and women’s names three times – the same number of times as it uses the word ‘bloke’. All its paragons of New Zealand’s golden, narcissism-free era are (sports)men. Ed Hillary. Richie McCaw (who is still young, but because he is humble, is named as a throwback to an earlier age), John Wright, moustachioed former All Black Graham Mourie. All the interview subjects are men – the most-quoted being a grouchy Gordon McLauchlan. Who, at 85, is well-placed to judge young people.

If there’s room for women, it’s in the implied criticisms of the so-called iGeneration. The cover of the magazine features a young woman taking a selfie, and the header photo on the article is of a young woman wearing a see-through mesh top. Every other photo in the article is of a man.

womenman
A woman in a state of devilish undress vs the good old days when men were humble.

Call the police, the world is now being run by bra-less brats, all plastic crowns and bloody sparkly high heels. And look at her evil exposed breasts! The world is going to the dogs. Bring back the good old days when the only nipples our country stood for were the modest, number eight wire, Watties bloke nipples.

Could it be that the story’s problem with the “narcissistic” tendencies of the “iGeneration” may actually be a little bit related to “young women” being able to “do things” in “public” these days? Can you blame young girls for wanting to take back control of their image in a world that wants to whip off their bra and dress them up like evil millennial sex queens?

To be fair to White, he’s probably been betrayed a little by his headline writer, who seemingly hates young people, while the story itself just hates everything that’s happened since Al Gore invented the internet. And towards the end of the feature come interviews with several experts who tend to contradict many of the assertions made in the prior 3000 words.

But it’s still hard to forgive. Here’s a selection of quotes from the story in the print-only publication – a frightening snapshot of what your parents really think about you:

“Of course, there’s no photo of Hillary on Everest’s peak… Can you imagine that today? Someone achieving something so momentous, but shrugging off the chance to immortalise it, not even turning the camera on himself to snap something of the occasion”

To be fair, Sir Ed might have been more willing to take a picture if he had a smartphone on hand, rather than a 14kg hand-wound nightmare box. And let’s not forget, he did later approve his picture being used on the $5 note, AKA the Ultimate Selfie. Note: this story opens with at least 14,000 words on how Edmund Hillary was good.

“Hillary distilled characteristics New Zealanders held dear – hard work and humility… ‘I was just an average bloke’”

This whole section feels like it’s making big conclusions from quite a small sample size.

“When he climbed Everest, there was no hollering, ‘I’m the king of the world’ – just a prosaic ‘we knocked the bastard off’”

Yes, congratulations Sir Ed for refraining from using a movie quote that would famously be uttered atop the Titanic in a mere 44 years time. Legend. 

“We used to be down to earth, now we seem so far up own our arses”

Ridiculous. There’s terrible cellular signal up an arse.

“We surgically nip and tuck ourselves at ever higher rates, use cosmetics and Photoshop to reimagine ourselves… and have email sign-offs with “What I’m wearing/drinking/eating/listening to”

Ah yes, using cosmetics. Very new. Very modern. Very now. As for those email sign-offs, that simply isn’t a thing that anyone under 30 has ever done.

“Social media has allowed provided a portal to self-promotion, allowing us to preen and pout and put ourselves out there for a worldwide audience”

If there’s one thing we can all agree is bad, it’s putting yourself out there. WWSET? (What Would Sir Ed Think)

“[Richie McCaw] is a genuinely nice, old-style New Zealand bloke. He never talks about himself, unless he’s specifically asked. If you were introduced to him in the street he’d say, ‘Gidday mate, how’re you doing? What do you do for a crust’”

WHAT DO YOU DO FOR A CRUST?! Okay, Sir Ed’s humility proves New Zealand society was an ego-free paradise in 1953, while Richie McCaw’s humility also proves New Zealand society was an ego-free paradise in 1953. For what it’s worth, a member of Spinoff staff (Alex) once served Sir Richie McCaw at a cinema and he didn’t offer a “Gidday” nor a “what do you do for a crust?” He bought a ticket to see The Tourist, presumably because he was far too humble to reminisce or talk about his own travel stories, instead choosing to suffer silently through the Depp/Jolie monstrosity in the name of modesty. He also bought a double chocolate ice-cream, which the Spinoff staff member found extremely gratuitous and frankly narcissistic.

“McCollough’s 12-minute rumination was posted on Youtube – alongside all those selfie clips of Beyoncé and Justin Bieber wannabes”

Ah yes, Justin Bieber wannabes. Do you recall New Zealander Parris Goebel, creator of the ‘Sorry’ video that now has over a billion views? Or has she taken too many selfies to join the Ed Hillary hall of reluctant blokes? Or is it that she’s not a bloke at all?

White probably doesn’t know Goebel, because she’s an actual young person, rather than the terrifying hallucinatory vision of a selfie-stick wielding uber-youth tormenting his dreams. This supposed exposé of the degradation of modern society, and young people in particular, is weirdly absent of actual young people. Instead we get Tony Veitch, a 43-year-old domestic abuser, who is criticised for talking about himself too much in his most recent non-apology. Mark Weldon, a 48-year-old former media company CEO and champion swearer, is also evidence of the youth’s plunge into rank narcissism, after reportedly telling his staff that he’s the “smartest guy in the room”.

Neither of those examples – nor the story itself – prove millennials are narcissistic, but they’re definitely a damning indictment of middle-aged men.