The pay gap is hurting our workers, and Pacific people are feeling it most (Image: Toby Morris)
The pay gap is hurting our workers, and Pacific people are feeling it most (Image: Toby Morris)

PartnersAugust 8, 2022

Could transparency help fix our pay gap problem?

The pay gap is hurting our workers, and Pacific people are feeling it most (Image: Toby Morris)
The pay gap is hurting our workers, and Pacific people are feeling it most (Image: Toby Morris)

Māori and Pacific people are working for far less pay than their Pākehā counterparts. Mind The Gap is calling for action from both businesses and government to help close that gap.

Shontel is a 24-year-old Sāmoan, Māori and Pākehā woman who lives alone in a South Auckland suburb, where she pays $480 rent per week. She’s bubbly, chatty and hard-working, but she’s also struggling. She earns $21.85 per hour for a weekly nine-hour shift at a fast food chain, and $21.20 per hour for a 23-hour-per-week retail job. Shontel receives the Work and Income accommodation supplement, but even then she’s left without much for food, bills or unexpected costs.

“I’m constantly stressed about work and money. It makes it hard to sleep properly.” 

Sharon is a Māori and Pākehā woman in her 60s who’s worked in the same large hospitality business for more than two decades. She is warm and forthright, and says that while she enjoys her work, it’s clear to her that the Māori and Pasifika people who make up a large number of her colleagues aren’t seeing themselves reflected in the decision-making roles.

“If you want to know anything about the business, we know it,” she says. “[But] if you look at management, it’s mostly Pākehā – and there are Pacific people and Māori quite capable of being up there.”

E Tū union activist and living wage campaigner Mareta Sinoti is a cleaner at the National Library in Wellington. She was relieved when the government’s transition to paying the living wage was announced. Unfortunately, her pay won’t change until after the current DIA contract expires and can be re-tendered, which may not happen until 2023.

Working so close to the halls of power, she says the foot-dragging is frustrating. “I’m sick and tired of seeing those MPs’ faces, since they said things would change in one year.”

Mareta Sinoti (Photo: E Tū)

As the cost of living continues to rise, these women are far from alone in their struggles. And compounding issues like inflation and housing unaffordability is a notable disparity in earnings across different demographics in Aotearoa. Figures shared by the Mind The Gap campaign show that for every dollar a Pākehā man earns, a Pākehā woman earns $0.89 and a Māori man earns $0.86. Asian men and women and Pasifika men are lower still, with Māori and Pasifika women the lowest relative earners at $0.81 and $0.75 respectively.

For Saunoamaali’i Karanina Sumeo, equal employment opportunities commissioner for the Human Rights Commission (HRC), it’s clear that change is needed. “It’s not our choice to be paid unfairly, or treated unequally. It’s not our choice to not be promoted. We’re putting our hands up. But the people making the choices that determine pay are our businesses, employers and recruitment agencies.”

As commissioner, Sumeo is well-versed in the macro-level discussions around pay gaps. But as a Samoan-New Zealander who moved to Aotearoa at 10 and eventually gained her PhD in public policy at AUT, she’s also seen the impacts of the Pacific pay gap first-hand. She says the gap creates intergenerational run-on impacts for Pacific people, owing to the loss of accrued earnings over lifetimes.

A recent HRC report on these pay gaps found that although some could be accounted for by “explained” differences – things like occupation, industry or a worker’s education level – the majority of recognised Pacific-to-Pākehā pay gaps – 73% for men and 61% for women – were in fact “unexplained”. On the report’s release, Sumeo suggested that among these unexplained factors there was likely a non-insignificant level of unconscious bias, structural racism and discriminatory workplace practices.

For Sumeo, this finding belies the common hypothesis that the disparity figures stem from Pacific people doing more manual labour. “It kind of blows up all those myths, or all those excuses that have stopped people taking responsibility for making things right.”

It’s not hard to find examples of that discrimination in action. Shontel describes a situation in a former position where she was repeatedly passed over for a requested promotion, despite management regularly calling on her to assume the duties of that more senior role due to staff shortages. “I just thought that was completely wrong,” she says. “I shouldn’t be treated like that. By the law I should be paid extra.” The experience not only soured her experience with that company, but had wider repercussions. “I genuinely got sick,” she recalls. “And then I started giving up. Because I just didn’t feel valued.”

As stories like Shontel’s continue to stack up, there’s a growing consensus that the way we value work and workers needs to change. Sumeo points out that we often justify low wages on the basis that certain work doesn’t require formal qualifications. “This is a patronising view we have of essential work, a lot of which is being done by Māori and Pasifika peoples. The way we value work in terms of its worth to society is completely unbalanced.”

It’s an untenable situation, and one which spurred Dr Jo Cribb and Dellwyn Stuart, co-founders of Mind The Gap, into action. Cribb says the conception of the Mind The Gap campaign came from frustration at what they perceived as an institutional-level lack of action.

“It was a strategic decision that really just came from asking ourselves what we could do to make a difference. If we knew we were going to have to put our time and our energy and our souls into this, what would be worth fighting for?”

Jo Cribb, Mind the Gap (Photo: Dean Zillwood for The Spinoff)

The result of that prompt was the Mind The Gap registry – a publicly accessible record of New Zealand companies’ pay gaps, designed to make these issues more visible and to prompt employers to think more proactively about addressing them. The entirely opt-in service launched in early 2022, with more than 160 major New Zealand businesses initially invited to contribute data.

One employer which has voluntarily signed up to the registry is Catapult, an eight-person leadership consultancy focused on culture and system change. Founder and co-director Andrea Thompson says that although her business is much smaller than some of the others invited to participate, its decision was one motivated by underlying ethics.Catapult’s work is about encouraging others to stretch their ambition to be good for the world. So it’s a matter of integrity for us to help lead the way wherever we can.”

For Thompson, the motivation is also personal – she sees the business registry as an opportunity to bring “sunlight” to the issue of pay gaps. But while Catapult and a number of other businesses have willingly engaged with Mind The Gap, a quick inspection of the registry shows that many more of the invited businesses have so far neglected to take part.

There’s broad agreement that ultimately the reporting problem is one which needs a regulatory fix. Dr Minna Cowper-Coles is a research fellow at London’s King’s College and leader of the politics research stream at the Global Institute for Women’s Leadership. She was the project lead for a research report evaluating the effectiveness of pay gap reporting in six different counties, which ultimately found that in order to drive real action, businesses would need to be compelled to produce data.

“Reporting has to be mandatory in order to reach employers and drive home how important this is,” she says. “It would allow the media and employees to have a better grasp of the issue, which in turn would actually make it easier for employers to disclose their pay gaps.”

Cribb agrees, saying that the campaign team expects an announced (albeit not yet timelined) government move towards mandatory pay gap reporting will trigger significant changes in how organisations operate. When asked what she sees as the likely effect of this change, her response is a simple one: “They’ll become more conscious. [And] when you take out the unconscious bias … more Māori and Pasifika women will be promoted into higher paying jobs.”

And though the underlying inequity may seem like a problem without fast or simple solutions, in the pandemic-era economic landscape there’s a clear need for an urgent response. As power bills spike and wages stagnate, Mind The Gap’s #NotAnotherWinter campaign is a direct response to this need, urging New Zealanders to sign a petition demanding immediate action from the government to mandate pay gap reporting.

Union rep Sinoti knows that in the short-term it’s contingent on people like her and organisations like E Tū to keep battling for better, fairer pay and conditions – and she wants to encourage others in similar situations to do the same. 

“I’m not fighting for myself,” says Sinoti, “I fight for the thousands of cleaners all around the country. But they need to fight too.” Hospitality worker Sharon is likewise passionate and optimistic about what collective action could allow for Māori and Pasifika workers in her sector, particularly those who are new to the workforce. “I will speak up and say something. And I say to the young ones: you need to do the same.”

But ultimately, this is a problem that will only be solved by action from those in power. And while Mind The Gap continues to agitate for the change they want enshrined in legislation, Cribb wants businesses to recognise their own power to make a difference.

“If you are a manager, the first thing you should do is look at your team, look at your pay data, and ask are you a part of the problem? And if you are, could the solution start with you?”


Follow Bernard Hickey’s economics podcast When the Facts Change on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or your favourite podcast provider

 

Keep going!
a person walking with a basket through the supermarket
Some supermarket products are now labelled compostable, but there’s no clarity about what that means Image: The Spinoff/Getty Images

PartnersAugust 3, 2022

We’re spending more, but that doesn’t mean the economy is improving

a person walking with a basket through the supermarket
Some supermarket products are now labelled compostable, but there’s no clarity about what that means Image: The Spinoff/Getty Images

Credit card spending in the last three months may have rebounded, but the gap between actual and inflated spending is widening. Kiwibank economist Mary Jo Vergara explains what’s going on.

As borders open and the pandemic begins to have less of a hold on Aotearoa than it once did, New Zealanders are starting to spend again. After an unprecedented two years, hotels, cinemas, restaurants and the wider travel industry have recently seen a much-needed consumer spending rebound. 

Covid-19 continues to offer an explanation for this rebound – Kiwibank electronic card spend rose 7.1% in the June quarter, bouncing back from the 9% drop in the omicron-riddled March quarter. The rebound was supported by Aotearoa moving into the orange setting of the Covid traffic light system in April, just in time for the mid-year run of public holidays, which this year included Matariki for the first time. As a result, restaurant spending rose 16%, spending on hotels and accommodation increased by nearly a quarter and money spent at the movies and on events rose by the same amount.

But the easing of pandemic restrictions doesn’t fully explain the bounce back. Inflation is also working behind the scenes distorting spending data and artificially propping up the value of transactions. Behind that data is insight on just how expensive it has become to live in Aotearoa – everything from the price of cheese to the cost of petrol has had an impact on New Zealanders’ wallets, and the cost of living doesn’t look to be dropping any time soon.

Adjusting for the rise in consumer prices in the June quarter, consumer spending rose by 5.7%. The gap between nominal and real spend is widening, and the slower rise in New Zealanders’ actual spending may suggest they are tightening their purse strings. Kiwibank credit card data shows the growth in dollars spent is outpacing the rise in the volume of transactions made – in other words, New Zealanders spent more money in the last three months but they tapped, swiped and inserted their cards fewer times.

In the June quarter the spend on petrol rose 5.6%. However, the number of visits to the petrol station dropped 7.5%, compared to the previous three months. In contrast, more New Zealanders chose to catch the bus, train or ferry to get around – public transport spend jumped 21%. Given the sky-high petrol prices, and the government’s half-price discount on public transport fares (now extended to January 31, 2023), it’s not surprising people are substituting their vehicles for a cheaper alternative.

What New Zealanders did spend more money on was services rather than goods – a reversal of the situation in 2020 when locked-down people with a bunch of savings in hand and access to cheap money spent up large on renovations, home furnishings, devices and gadgets. As the economy has reopened, services are being brought back to life. Take travel, for instance – New Zealanders have taken advantage of the open borders. Compared to a year ago, flight booking spend rose 107%, a decent chunk of which seems to be on international travel, based on a rebound in credit card spending overseas. The idea that New Zealanders are booking one-way tickets out of the country was right. 

That’s not to say we aren’t spending money on goods – retail spend still rose nearly 6% in the quarter – but there’s less appetite among consumers to spend large on big-ticket items (hardware spending fell 5%, housing-related spend dropped 1.5%, for example). Especially when there are more immense forces dampening consumer confidence.

A cooling housing market, with prices down 6% from their November peak, and tighter lending rules don’t foster increased borrowing and spending. The official cash rate sits at an almost seven-year high of 2.5%, and yet further rate hikes are forecast, meaning mortgage rates have further to climb. Add into the mix the expectation that living costs, from food to fuel, health to housing, will keep rising in the near-term. Grocery lists will shorten, household budgets will tighten and people will start cutting out nice-to-haves as a result. 

The effects of inflation – now at a 32-year high of 7.3% – shone through in the June quarter, confirming assumptions about how the economy is changing. Given inflation should remain elevated, the artificial boost in numbers should also remain. But it wouldn’t be a surprise if people started substituting out their barista-made long black for a homemade coffee in the morning.


The content was created in partnership with Kiwibank.

Kiwibank’s team of economists can help you make smarter decisions for your business. With their expert insights and forecasts your business is in safe hands with Kiwibank.

To get tailored business advice you can trust, try Kiwibank’s Business Banking. Find out more here.