spinofflive
shopthefit6.png

PoliticsOctober 4, 2023

Shop the fit: Brooke van Velden

shopthefit6.png

Next in our campaign style series, Act’s deputy opts for quality – and dazzling pink.

Brooke van Velden, the Act deputy leader hoping to flip the “true blue” seat of Tāmaki, has taken Barbie pink – or Act pink if you prefer – as her own this election season. When The Spinoff’s Stewart Sowman-Lund followed her on the campaign trail, he wondered if every item hanging in her wardrobe was a variation of a pink jacket and time has proven him close to correct. The only worthy pairings for van Velden’s prized pink coats are high quality items which she can wear day in and day out. 

Ultra pink maxi coat

Many, maybe too many, people choose black, beige or otherwise boring-coloured coats. Not van Velden. She got her iconic aggressively pink coat from Cue last winter, putting her ahead of the pink wave created by the Barbie movie. It is sadly no longer in stock, but Showpro does have a very similar bright pink long coat for only $95. If you think you’re going to get teased for wearing pink, there is a lovely purple coat at Gorman which will protect you from the haters.

Black leopard print dress

Recently my friend started dating someone and one of the first fun facts she told me about him is that his flat has a leopard print couch. I quickly gave my approval (also because he likes to bake cakes and made me a pie). Not many people are brave enough to wear or sit on leopard print, including me, but I find it very exciting when other people are. 

Van Velden’s fab dress is from Farmers, by the brand Oliver Black – their dresses cost between $50 to $100. She says it travels well in a carry-on suitcase, which makes me think it must be magic or somehow she got it to swallow a sleeping pill. She’s had it for about three years so we really have no chance of finding it in a shop somewhere. I have found one in a similar pattern, but whether it is magic remains a mystery.

Michael Kors handbag

It took me so long to find this exact Michael Kors bag that I started to worry it was a dupe. Van Velden had told me it was a gift from her family for her 30th, and I really didn’t want to break the news that they either got fleeced or fleeced her. It turns out Michael Kors makes a lot of almost identical but slightly different bags. This is one of them, one of the smaller and more practical options. It has become van Velden’s everyday bag, which is great for the family because it makes people very happy when you wear their presents all the time (the inverse is also true).

Small Michael Kors handbags will set you back about $200-300 on Farfetch, which seems very reasonable considering the high regard Michael Kors seemed to hold himself in during the days of Project Runway. 

Blunt umbrella

I like these umbrellas because when I was young my mother instilled a fear in me of other people’s umbrella points stabbing out my eyes. The smallest size, Metro, which van Velden holds here, is $129, so I have not bought one. She bought it “out of necessity” when she forgot her old umbrella in an Uber on the way to a meeting. I like to pretend I have no needs and that getting wet is fine. If you do have needs and you like living lightly but in the fast lane, Blunt thinks this is the umbrella for you. They say the “rigid wing-like surface… withstands all wind conditions” and unpaid spokespeople say that this includes Wellington. Think of my glistening seeing face orbs and buy one.

Benson ankle boot

Van Velden must know the old adage about cheap boots being more expensive than expensive boots (because you keep having to replace them). This pair costs $380 which is 4.75 times as much as a definitely not as nice pair made with “synthetic” from Number One Shoes. Since uni, van Velden has bought her winter boots from Mi Piaci – because they last, she says, and maybe also because Mi Piaci is a fun name to say and some people might think you’ve been to Italy recently.

Verdict: Perhaps having a pink coat you can put over any boring old thing is a one-trick wonder. Perhaps it’s a genius way to attract people to your street corner meetings. Perhaps pink is extra warm and protects you from the elements. In any case I am impressed by van Velden’s ability to stick to it and not wear any other colour of coat, ever. She has worn it so much anyone else who dons one will be assumed to be copying her (Margot who?).

Her fit, assuming she paid full price for the coat, would have cost about $1,660. You could however, put it together for about $775 with the Showpro coat and a decision to ignore your need to keep dry.

‘Help keep The Spinoff funny, smart, tall and handsome – become a member today.’
Gabi Lardies
— Staff writer
Keep going!
Image: Archi Banal
Image: Archi Banal

OPINIONPoliticsOctober 4, 2023

Why I’m voting for climate as a disabled person

Image: Archi Banal
Image: Archi Banal

For disabled voters, voting for climate is an act of trust. One I think we have to make anyway.

The conversation starts out the way I expect when I’m out being disabled in public. The guy – non-disabled – has sat down opposite me in the cafe because there was no space anywhere and I’m alone. I said it was fine and it was. He wants to introduce himself. Fine. He wants to ask about my wheelchair, about getting around in this city. OK. So far just questions that fall into the usual satisfaction-of-curiosity category.

No, I say, I don’t think this city is easily accessible. Maybe I tell him about the small number of taxis able to take a wheelchair that mean we have to plan our lives to the letter? Maybe mention the inconsistency of paving and curb cuts you have to hunt for? Maybe that for the past two years on my birthday another wheelchair user friend and I have taken the bus home together and considered it a birthday gift from the universe that one of us doesn’t have to wait in the cold alone for the next ride? 

There are many choice examples and many conversations like this. I can’t remember what I say this time. Whichever answer I give him, he is sympathetic and now this seems like a mutual discussion on how to get change. He mentions the cycleway. Terrible idea to have one around here, he thinks, particularly for disabled people. 

I see his point about the difficulty of crossing a bike lane safely in a wheelchair. I see his point about limited space for mobility car parks. But I’m pro-planet, pro-climate action and this is one part of changing the ecosystems of our cities. It is not the whole picture but part of it. I clarify that even though I can’t use them, I’m pro-cycleway. The conversation stalls like a car with a drained battery. He gets up and walks out. I blink, sip my coffee, unrecruited, and realise he never shared his name. 

I have failed to fit into the disabled archetype he needs.The abrupt end to this conversation is a failure of nuance. What frustrates me is I want the conversation about accessible cities he was trying to have. I want action for our climate too. I also want disabled dignity. In my life these things can’t simply be pitted against each other; they belong together. 

I have seen this happen before. Disabled people asking to be considered in political discussion only to find their needs and political views simplified to fit either side of the debate. I have seen us portrayed as victims of moving toward a less car dependent world as well as seen our reliance on cars being under-acknowledged and similarly the saviours of plastic straws. As we did away with Covid restrictions, the impact on our lives was underplayed while those of us who couldn’t mask for medical reasons were vilified and lumped in with those people calling for freedom for freedom’s sake. 

It is frustrating to find your daily needs being righteously debated by people who can choose to opt in and out of the fight for accessibility overall as on an issue by issue basis. It puts disabled people in a reactionary position, reminding the systems around us to remember us but unable to set an agenda. 

Our electoral system itself has accessibility issues, privacy issues around voting independently as a blind person on a paper ballot, physical access barriers to polling stations, the need for more accessible information about voting processes, through to a small number of disabled members of parliament in our representative democracy. Without being seen as a strong constituency our needs are earmarked “nice-to-have”. 

The failure to centre accessibility as a mainstream political issue means that disabled people become convenient illustrative examples of  “good” and “bad” on any given issue rather than people with complex and competing needs. If we had access we could have these conversations. 

In this reality, where access is consistently under-prioritised, I can see why disabled people who have voting access might look to policies that meet their immediate survival needs rather than long term change. I can see where this might look like not including climate change as the issue to vote on. For disabled voters, voting for climate is an act of trust. One I think we have to make anyway. 

I will be voting for climate because disabled people are already being hit by the impacts of climate change. One clear example for me is the man whose wheelchair was damaged in the Auckland flooding and then found himself reclassified under Ministry guidelines, no longer qualifying for a replacement. I worry that disabled people will continue to face a double struggle like this as we continue to be left out of thinking around the climate crisis. In the wake of climate disasters, we will also have to fight for our basic disability needs to be met. 

Those we vote in on this basis will need to remember this, remember us and the diversity of our lives in the action they take. 

‘Become a member and help us keep local, independent journalism thriving.’
Alice Neville
— Deputy editor

Politics