spinofflive
Berhampore Pool, Wellington. Photo: Little Makos Swim School (facebook.com/Littlemakos)
Berhampore Pool, Wellington. Photo: Little Makos Swim School (facebook.com/Littlemakos)

SocietyFebruary 3, 2020

Taking a dive: The life-threatening crisis in New Zealand kids’ swimming

Berhampore Pool, Wellington. Photo: Little Makos Swim School (facebook.com/Littlemakos)
Berhampore Pool, Wellington. Photo: Little Makos Swim School (facebook.com/Littlemakos)

With school swimming pools continuing to close across the country, it’s never been more difficult for a New Zealand child to learn to swim. 

Today many families will stand at the school gates and send their little ones off to school, some for the first time. That mixture of fear, pride, and excitement mixed with anxiety is a feeling familiar to so many parents. We almost take it for granted.

In that moment we know we will do anything to keep our children safe. And yet there’s only so much we can do. And what we can do depends a lot on factors outside of our control.

Nobody knows that better than the families who have lost children to accidents. This year time last year three children under five had already drowned. In December, there were four drowning deaths in just three days. On Christmas Eve a little boy described by his family as “loved and treasured” died in hospital after drowning in his backyard.

Last year there was a total of 72 preventable drowning deaths in New Zealand. Already there have been eight deaths this year. How many more will there be?

I grew up by the beach in Australia and learning to swim just happened. We went to surf lifesaving every Sunday whether we wanted to or not. At school we were all marched down to the beach for PE. When I moved to New Zealand I went to a private school with a pool for a year. I then went to a public school for the next two years with no pool.

I was surprised by how little confidence or sense many of my peers from public school had in the water. At the private school I attended through a scholarship everyone was a swimmer. They were competitive and competent. These were the perks of 24-7 access to an Olympic-sized pool.

It doesn’t take a genius to work out this is an access issue. Former Olympic and national swimming coach Mark Bone now runs the Swimtastic swimming school in Auckland’s eastern suburbs. He says whether a pool stays open or not seems to be increasingly dependent on the decile of the school involved.

“It is a sad indictment of our education system that swimming is not currently compulsory within the school curriculum,” he says. “My concern is that we are reaching a point where access to swimming lessons is driven by the decile level of the school, leaving thousands of our children without the resources to develop a fundamental life skill.”

Former Olympic and national swimming coach Mark Bone at the Henderson High School swimming pool, Auckland. (Photo: supplied)

It will surprise nobody that having money means you have access to facilities that others don’t. Running a school pool is expensive. Estimates suggest around 300 pools around the country have either closed in the past five years or are currently facing closure.

The debate about whose job it is to teach kids to swim is moot given how many of our families live on the poverty line. I was lucky enough that my dad was a surfer so he taught me how to swim.

My husband and I paid for three terms of swimming lessons at $140 each term, then could no longer afford them. But we are lucky enough that our local council pool provides free entry to under-fives and costs just a few dollars for over fives, so we swim there every week. Both of our children, aged five and seven, are now confident swimmers.

But if you live rurally what chance do you have without a school pool? The cost of the pool isn’t the only barrier to access – there’s the cost of togs, towels, petrol to get to the pool. It’s a head-in-the-sand ridiculous argument to just suggest parents must teach their kids to swim. Also, what if a parent can’t swim? Many adults can’t and adult swimming lessons are often even more out of reach than swimming lessons for kids.

Henderson High School recently saved their pool with a grant from The Trusts West Auckland. If the pool had closed, more than 1000 children would have been without access to a pool for lessons and water confidence classes. Newtown School was able to save their pool in 2018 after a $500,000 grant from Wellington City Council but it is sadly now under repair again.

Henderson High School’s swimming pool was saved thanks to a grant from The Trusts West Auckland. (Photo: supplied)

But an innovative partnership model might help change the system if government funding continues to be elusive. Around 12 years ago, Berhampore School partnered with Little Makos Swim School and Harbour City Water Polo Club to repair the school’s pool. Together, they fundraised for two years to upgrade a pool that had not been used in eight years after falling into disrepair.

Today, five schools use the pool – around 1200 a year students a year. It’s an inspirational story, and may serve as a good model to save other school pools.

Sarah Chambers, the founder of Little Makos Swim School, launched the initiative when she was coaching at the polo club. “I was talking to the other coaches and director and there were just so few good swimmers coming through.”

Kilbirnie council pool lessons were at capacity, a problem that still exists today. “There was this whole generation of kids who couldn’t access lessons, even if they had money. We were watching these swimming and water confidence skills rapidly deteriorating every year.”

Sarah and her three siblings all attended Berhampore School, back when its pool was first operational. Her mother worked at the decile two school, and her father volunteered his time keeping the pool going. When he was no longer able to keep volunteering, nobody else was able to step up to do the work.

Years later, the answer was found in a community partnership. “Part of the problem schools face is they cannot afford to run pools. We [Little Makos Swim School] pick up the tab for everything, even toilet paper; we clean facilities and pay for the pool. The school was really supportive but they could not assist in any way financially.”

The initiative is now a huge success, with schools all around South Wellington and beyond able to use the pool while minimising huge transport costs. Berhampore School has saved up to $5,000 a year now that they don’t have to transport children to Kilbirnie for lessons. Every day at lunchtime Little Makos provides a lifeguard. For the first time in years, the children have access to recreational swimming every year.

But it’s not just the children who benefit. Every Sunday all year, the pool offers community swimming for free.

“It’s a community asset so we have always believed the community needs to have access. Our changing rooms are white and the walls have only been tagged once in 11 years because the community feel it’s theirs they feel ownership over it, they protect their pool and they love it.”

Most partnerships to keep school pools open rely on businesses to pay rent to a school, and then the school still covers all pool costs. It’s a model that’s hard to make work in 2020. They pay rent to the school – and then the school has to do everything.

Sarah believes community-led and backed projects are the only way to save school pools.

“There has to be a willingness to do this. There are so many working families these days,  people just don’t have the time to do the volunteer work they used to do cleaning the pool. Schools have very little support because the manpower just isn’t there to have someone to put the pool to bed each night. On top of everything else a school has to offer these days, keeping a pool is kind of superfluous thing.”

Sarah is sure that pools will sadly continue to close. And more children will miss out.

“Without community partnership that trend is going to continue.”

Keep going!
Birds of a Feather integration. Photo: Rocket Lab
Birds of a Feather integration. Photo: Rocket Lab

SocietyFebruary 1, 2020

A US spy satellite just launched from NZ. Here’s what you need to know

Birds of a Feather integration. Photo: Rocket Lab
Birds of a Feather integration. Photo: Rocket Lab

The controversial mission, ‘Birds of a Feather’, is the first launch for a US spy agency from NZ. Ollie Neas explains what we know – and even more importantly, what we don’t. 

Last May, The Spinoff reported that New Zealand Space Agency staff had met with officials from a major US intelligence agency, the National Reconnaissance Office or NRO.

The outcome of those discussions is now clear: Rocket Lab’s first launch of 2020 is of a classified NRO satellite – and it took off from the Mahia Peninsula yesterday afternoon.

The mission, which follows a series of launches for US military agencies last year, is both the first launch for a US spy agency from NZ and the first dedicated launch for the NRO from outside the US.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the mission has not been without controversy, with the Green Party voicing concerns in light of the Trump Administration’s recent aggression in the Middle East.

But should we be concerned? What actually is being launched? And why is a spy satellite being launched from NZ in the first place? Here’s what you need to know.

The NR-who?

The National Reconnaissance Office is the US intelligence agency that handles America’s satellite reconnaissance activity.

Although established in 1961, the NRO’s existence was not acknowledged publicly until 1992, and it remains lesser known than its more prominent peers, the CIA and NSA.

But its work is significant: it operates around 50 of the over 150 US military satellites that are publicly known, and it provides data collected from those satellites to both the US military and other intelligence agencies.

The NRO is best known for collecting imagery of the Earth – such as the insanely detailed photo that Trump casually tweeted of an Iranian launch site. But it also collects signals intelligence, which includes intercepted text and voice communications and data collected from other sources like aircraft and missiles.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1167493371973255170

Despite its secrecy, the NRO has looked in recent years to commercial providers for some services, such as Rocket Lab, which won the contract for the NZ launch as part of an NRO initiative to explore launching small satellites with commercial providers.

While the mission will be the first launch from NZ of an NRO-owned satellite, Rocket Lab has already launched a number of commercial satellites that sell data to the intelligence agency, as The Spinoff reported in August.

What does this satellite actually do?

We don’t know – and we’re not allowed to.

On the one hand, it could be an operational spy satellite, collecting intelligence for US military and intelligence agencies. But it also might be undertaking research and development or testing new technology.

The New Zealand Space Agency has been clear that the US military payloads launched so far have been for research and development purposes only. But it’s declined to confirm whether this is the case with the NRO satellite, telling the Gisborne Herald that it “cannot comment on the intended end use of the payload because this information is protected.”

Does that mean the mystery NRO payload is operational then? Not necessarily, as the NRO typically doesn’t disclose details of specific programmes or capabilities anyway. But it is worth noting that in October the Space Agency acknowledged that it does expect “defence and security payloads with operational functions” to be launched at some point.

In the event that the NRO satellite is an operational spy satellite, we can probably rule out some capabilities – such as higher resolution imaging – due to the physical constraints of small satellites. But when placed in a constellation of other satellites, or integrated with other data sources, even small satellites can have powerful effects.

Behold, for example, the NRO’s Sentient programme: a classified AI tool that aims to process huge amounts of data from different sources to predict future events, helping it to automatically point satellites to the most likely areas of interest.

Why is NZ launching a US spy satellite in the first place?

It all starts with Rocket Lab, the private space company founded in 2006 by Peter Beck, who was this week named one of three finalists for New Zealander of the Year.

As The Spinoff reported in 2018, Rocket Lab has worked for US military agencies since its early days – even designing a protective material for Patriot missiles – and its investors include Lockheed Martin and the CIA’s venture capital firm, In-Q-Tel.

But there was little public discussion of these military connections when Rocket Lab inked a deal in 2015 with the Māori incorporation Tawapata South Inc to lease farmland for a launch site, and when Parliament passed a law to allow for launches in 2017.

New Zealand’s role as a launch pad for classified US satellites is made possible by our close security relationship with the US and our place in the secretive Five Eyes intelligence sharing arrangement – a point Peter Beck himself made in a 2018 Financial Times interview.

As part of the Five Eyes arrangement, NZ’s spy agencies share intel with the US and receive data collected by the other Five Eyes countries in return. NZ’s contribution has previously included spying on our Pacific neighbours such as Samoa, Tonga and Kiribati.

As The Spinoff reported earlier this month, the launch of US government payloads from NZ appears to play some role in the Five Eyes network, with advice to the foreign affairs minister Winston Peters describing launches as a “tangible contribution to the broader Five Eyes intelligence network”.

Should we be concerned?

It depends who you ask.

Green Party foreign policy spokeswoman Golriz Ghahraman said last week that her party was “concerned” about the NRO launch.

“We are concerned in this instance, that surveillance and information sharing comes in the context of the American president expressing an intention to launch attacks against Iran, including cultural and civilian targets that would constitute war crimes,” Ghahraman told Stuff.

Outside of Parliament, a number of activist organisations – such as Organise Aotearoa, Auckland Peace Action and the Anti-Bases Campaign – have called for the end of launches for US military and intelligence agencies.

Rocket Lab’s previous military launches have also been criticised by defence and disarmament experts for putting NZ’s national security at risk and for potentially being in tension with NZ’s nuclear free status.

But the government has been clear that it’s comfortable with all launches so far and the Space Agency has on many occasions emphasised the civilian benefits that can come from military technology.

All launches and payloads are signed off by the economic development minister Phil Twyford on the advice of the NZ Space Agency, which assesses payloads against various criteria, including whether the payload is in NZ’s national interest.

Last month the government released new guidelines for the national interest test. These rule out payloads that “contribute to nuclear weapons programmes or capabilities” or that have intended end uses that support or enable “specific defence, security or intelligence operations that are contrary to government policy”.

However, it remains unclear as to which “specific defence, security or intelligence operations” are contrary to government policy and which are not.

NZ’s membership in the Five Eyes and close relationship with the US means that by default government policy is to participate to some degree in US intelligence and security efforts. How you feel about this fact probably shapes how you feel about the NRO launch.

But the space industry does appear to be deepening these ties.

As The Spinoff reported last year, the government has welcomed launches as strengthening NZ’s security relationship with the US, while a recent investigation revealed that the New Zealand Defence Force is becoming increasingly involved in US military plans for space, including by participating in space wargames.

The government is well aware that many New Zealanders won’t be happy with these developments.

“Certain groups are opposed to New Zealand’s security relationship with the US, and it is possible that such groups would be motivated to disrupt launches if they were aware that US Government security payloads were being launched from New Zealand,” one Space Agency briefing obtained by The Spinoff says.

The way forward, the Space Agency recommended, was to develop a joint PR strategy with Rocket Lab to highlight the benefits of the industry while limiting public disclosure of payload details.