spinofflive
Photo: Getty Images
Photo: Getty Images

OPINIONSocietyJuly 20, 2023

We need to dismantle the idea of perfect motherhood

Photo: Getty Images
Photo: Getty Images

The gut-wrenching case of Lauren Dickason, the Timaru doctor who murdered her three young children, raises raises questions about our approach to maternal mental illness, writes Dr Eileen Joy.

According to a 2022 report on maternal mental health, 11,000 New Zealand women are estimated to suffer from postnatal depression and/or anxiety every year – an average of 75% of them not meeting the threshold for assistance from providers for the Maternal Mental Health service.

Thanks to the Perinatal and Maternal Mortality Review Committee, we also know that suicide is the leading cause of maternal death in Aotearoa and that this disproportionately affects wāhine Māori, who are 2.91 times more likely to die by suicide.

Maternal mental illness is a nasty beast.

(Getty Images).

In my experience, it came fast and hard, although the warning signs had been evident for months prior. I gave birth to my first child in 2005. I had been living in the UK for over three years, and my partner and I returned to Aotearoa when I was four and a half months pregnant. I was isolated in a tiny, cold flat in Mt Eden without a strong support network around me.

I spent the subsequent months ‘nesting’ in preparation for a birth that would change my life forever. Like many other new parents, my husband and I attended antenatal classes and gained new friends there. We learnt about how to birth a baby but almost nothing about how to be a parent, about the colossal shift that was about to happen in our lives. It should come as no surprise that I was referred to Maternal Mental Health not long after our son’s birth.

In that sense, I was lucky. I got respite care; I had a nurse come in and look after my son while I could take a few short hours as a break, to sleep and to recover. I got therapy. I was suffocating underneath the sheer weight and expectation of motherhood. I did not know who (or where) I was any more.

What I did know from my Plunket nurse was that my depression would harm my child. She urged me to read Sue Gerhardt’s book Why Love Matters which warns of the “danger” of not loving babies “enough”. She cautions that depressed mothers can condition children to “get used to a lack of positive feelings” that “a negative look can also trigger a biochemical response and that “anything that threatens [baby’s] regulation is very stressful because it puts survival at risk.”

A mum holding her baby.
A mother’s mental health matters because she matters. (Photo: File)

This focus on depressed mothers as mothers and the impact it has on their child is not unusual. Indeed, in my doctoral research, I found this idea prevalent in policy and practitioner accounts in child protection work; a mother’s mental health matters insofar as it affects her child, not apparently because she matters.

Statistics and evidence about the adverse impacts on infant wellbeing are regularly listed; that these children of depressed mothers will have emotional, cognitive and behavioural issues, that they’re more likely to grow up to have mental health issues themselves, be criminals, be on welfare, and go on to abuse their children.

And, lest we think this problematic framing only occurs in the context of child welfare, these same child-centric reasons were given primacy in that report I referenced earlier, in answer to the question “why maternal health matters”.

Mothers matter because they are people. No mother ever wants to cause lifelong trauma to their child, and telling any mother that she is damaging her child adds to the stress that she will never be good enough and that she is a bad mother. And, crucially, her only worth now is through being a mother.

We need politicians and policymakers to care about the mental wellbeing of birthing parents not just because of the impact on the child and whether that child will cost the state more money. We need to be cared about because we matter.

Many of us do not feel an instant bond with our babies. Many of us, like Lauren Dickason, have moments when we resent having our children, when we say things to our friends that we know are hyperbole, to vent and because we need to get them out somewhere safe.

Safety nets are essential. We are not meant to parent alone; we need space to be ourselves and learn how to be parents. We need healthy housing, liveable incomes, and a strong mental health system and we need to dismantle the idea of perfect motherhood.

That there’s such a thing as “perfect motherhood” is what keeps us disconnected and quiet.

For wāhine Māori, this fear is compounded with the knowledge that our child protection system disproportionately affects whānau Māori, that it is a colonising system that will judge them against Pākehā models of mothering and parenting, and potentially remove their children. It is the terror of wondering how our words, thoughts, and feelings could be used against us and who is safe to talk to.

No mother wants to be in the position Lauren Dickason is and was in. We can grieve those poor children and hold space for Lauren as a human being, for mothers as human beings.

We need come to a point where we can accept what happened was truly awful and admit that many of us have had similar thoughts. We need to start having courageous conversations with equally courageous listeners about how we can support mothers to find themselves as themselves without adding on the layers of idealised and unrealistic motherhood.

Where to get help

Need to talk? Free call or text 1737 any time for support from a trained counsellor

Plunket. Need free support or advice? Call PlunketLine 24/7 on 0800 933 922

The Postnatal Distress Support Network Trust

PADA (Perinatal Anxiety & Depression Aotearoa)

Health Navigator

Mothers’ Helpers

Depression helpline: Freephone 0800 111 757

Healthline: 0800 611 116 (available 24 hours, 7 days a week and free to callers throughout New Zealand, including from a mobile phone)

Lifeline 0800 543 35

Keep going!
Jonah Hill and some of the messages he allegedly sent his girlfriend (Photo: Getty Images; design by Tina Tiller)
Jonah Hill and some of the messages he allegedly sent his girlfriend (Photo: Getty Images; design by Tina Tiller)

OPINIONOpinionJuly 19, 2023

Those Jonah Hill messages and the weaponisation of mental health

Jonah Hill and some of the messages he allegedly sent his girlfriend (Photo: Getty Images; design by Tina Tiller)
Jonah Hill and some of the messages he allegedly sent his girlfriend (Photo: Getty Images; design by Tina Tiller)

The actor’s controlling demands of his partner through a series of ‘therapy talk’ messages he allegedly sent to her is a reminder of the danger of conflating gender-based violence and men’s mental health issues, argues Alice Black.

In the wake of the Jonah Hill situation (if you miraculously managed to avoid this screenshot saga last week, this Sopranos meme covers it off nicely) and increased media discussion of “therapy talk”, I’d like to delve into the social factors that enable and excuse male violence against women in the context of mental illness.   

In short, Jonah Hill is an American actor and comedian whose ex-partner, Sarah Brady, recently shared a number of  screenshots of alleged conversations between herself and Hill throughout their relationship and for some time afterwards while they remained friends. The conversations show Hill allegedly asking Brady (a professional surfer) to comply with a list of demands in order to align with his “boundaries”. These included requests not to surf with men, post photos of herself wearing a bathing suit, engage in modelling work, or have “friendships with women who are in unstable places” (this one still baffles me: if he’s referring to actual tectonic plate movement, I guess he has a point?) 

I admit I was a little late to this story, only stumbling across it during my nightly intake of Reels (I’m 31, so I can’t legally download TikTok). The parodies were horrifyingly accurate, and I, like many of those who have worked in the field of intimate partner violence, am not averse to using dark humour to cope with the harrowing everyday realities that this work so relentlessly presents. 

The backlash against Hill following the alleged conversations was swift, brutal, and completely warranted. There has been ample coverage of the dangers of “therapy talk”. Essentially, terms such as “boundaries,” “trauma”, and “self-care” have become popularised ad nauseam in recent years and amalgamated into the cesspool that is commercialised wellness culture. Naturally, as they have become increasingly used, they have become increasingly misused. Boundaries, for example, are not about making demands, but about communicating your feelings and needs transparently and respectfully. While pop psychology filtered through the lens of social media is riddled with inaccuracies and problematic implications (my pet peeve is when people misuse the word “trauma”, for example), that’s not what concerned me about this situation.

As Natalie Thorburn, principal policy adviser for Women’s Refuge in Auckland, recently stated, Hill’s alleged behaviour is a textbook case of coercive control (more on that term later). But the problem runs even deeper than that.   

In recent years, (white middle-class) male violence against women has frequently been implicitly excused by the media because of the perpetrator’s alleged experience of depression or other mental health concerns. There are countless examples of this, particularly in Australian cases of familicide (where a perpetrator murders their partner and children), but thankfully this problem is increasingly being recognised (see: here, here, and here). 

You may be thinking about the current Christchurch triple homicide trial of Lauren Anne Dickason, who has admitted to killing her three daughters on September 16, 2021. Her mental health is a key focus of the trial, given she has pleaded not guilty with the defence to argue insanity and infanticide. While this is a horrifying case, familicide is almost exclusively committed by men, and it is the ongoing conflation of this (and other gender-based violence) with mental health issues that I wish to discuss. 

It’s difficult to know where to start when men who have committed premeditated familicide are glorified and excused following the murder of their loved ones. The contradiction is blatant. As Helen McGrath pointed out in a 2018 article, “A lovely guy does not shoot his young daughter in the face as she cowers on a bed… They say he was such a good father and a good parent… he must have been mentally ill.” She goes further in her book, Mind Behind the Crime, stating, “The fact is, most fathers who kill their children do so deliberately and while unaffected by psychosis or any other kind of mental illness.”  

One more time for the people in the back: violence against women and children is not a symptom of ANY mental illness and it is incredibly harmful and stigmatising to conflate the two.  

Importantly, men who kill their wives and children are not aberrant monsters either, as claimed in media elsewhere. Like many realms in life, this artificial dichotomy serves no one (except the perpetrators) and fails to address the social structures that enable endemic violence against women. However, the focus on men’s mental health in this specific context implicitly justifies gendered violence and obscures the underlying cause. 

Violence against women (psychological or otherwise) is fundamentally about power and control, with Evan Stark’s groundbreaking work on coercive control particularly pertinent here. While significantly harmful in and of itself, controlling behaviour is also a significant predictor of physical violence and ultimately homicide.  

 This story is about much more than the dangers of “therapy talk”. It sits within a broader context where women who leave their abusive partners are framed as the problem and where, in the men’s rights activism world, women’s rights are perceived as somehow contributing to men’s mental health problems.  

When I briefly discussed the pitch for this story with a friend, she immediately disclosed her experience of this exact phenomenon with her former husband. Throughout their relationship, she found his violence was categorically downplayed and excused by those around her because he lived with schizophrenia. She once accompanied him to the hospital, for example, while he was experiencing a psychotic episode. The doctors and nurses determined that his episode had likely been triggered by her trying to break up with him and her behaviour subsequently became the focus. There was no consideration of her own wellbeing, the reason she wanted to leave, or the broader context of violence against women in Aotearoa. She ended up staying with him for much longer than she wanted to because she felt consumed by guilt and on many occasions when she did try to leave, he threatened to take his own life. This is an alarmingly common experience, with threats of suicide a frequent tactic of psychological abuse when women attempt to leave (alongside an escalation in violence and an increased risk of fatality).  

Improving men’s access to and uptake of mental health services is vital work in Aotearoa and conformity to traditional masculine norms is part of this problem. But we cannot fall into the trap of conflating symptoms of mental illness with any kind of justification for violence against women. At the end of the day, Hill’s mental health status or experience of trauma is immaterial to how he behaved. This is simply another high-profile case of something that occurs every day in Aotearoa and often follows a tragic trajectory. 

Note: The views expressed in this article are the author’s own.

If you or someone you know is living with violence, there is a range of community organisations you can contact for support.

‘Become a member to help us deliver news and features that matter most to Aotearoa.’
Lyric Waiwiri-Smith
— Politics reporter