David Seymour, Christopher Luxon and Winston Peters (Image: Archi Banal)
David Seymour, Christopher Luxon and Winston Peters (Image: Archi Banal)

The BulletinNovember 7, 2023

Coalition agreement is both near and far (away) but talks will go on

David Seymour, Christopher Luxon and Winston Peters (Image: Archi Banal)
David Seymour, Christopher Luxon and Winston Peters (Image: Archi Banal)

David Seymour says National and Act getting close to draft agreement. Sources say a final deal is still some time away while Labour will meet today to vote on the party’s leadership, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.

Near and far: close to deal, and also no deal near agreement stage

I’m going straight to Céline fan jail for today’s headline, but the Titanic earworm got lodged after reading various progress reports on how coalition talks are going. Act’s David Seymour says talks with National are progressing well, and they are getting close to having a draft agreement, but Seymour is seemingly yet to speak with NZ First leader Winston Peters. Newshub reported last night that sources say there’s no document near the agreement stage but that a document put together by Act has been shared with National. Apparently, that’s more of a progress report and “a final deal is still a way away.” As always, Peters is saying nothing. Filling the void is John Campbell, who muses out loud about the virtues of the interregnum. “It occurs to me, about 90 hours after the special votes told us that Winston Peters would, indeed, be required – that the time between governments isn’t all bad,” he writes.

Unofficial, effective Apec deadline looms

We’re now 24 days on from the election, and the Apec leaders’ forum in San Francisco draws ever nearer. As Newsroom’s Jo Moir writes, Christopher Luxon would really like to be there. While he “has tried to downplay that by saying he won’t go to Apec if government talks aren’t complete, it’s effectively already put an unofficial deadline on talks.” Apec leaders are due to gather in the golden city between November 15-17. Moir reports that coalition talks are slow-going with David Seymour in Auckland and Winston Peters in Wellington, and no meetings in the diary between the two scheduled this week.  The unofficial effective Apec deadline gives Seymour and Peters an advantage in talks, says Moir. While we wait, BusinessDesk’s Pattrick Smellie (paywalled) turns his attention to the fiscal realities awaiting the incoming government, deducing that National’s tax package will have to be recut and that “the staged political approach to doing this would be to make it an outcome of the coalition negotiations.”

Labour to meet today, vote on leadership 

Meanwhile, Labour will continue its post-election reflection today but may steer clear of digging too deep just yet. As Luke Malpass reports for The Post today, a leadership vote is on the agenda, but “today is highly unlikely to be a come-to-Jesus type meeting where Labour finds a hole in its soul that need plugging by some big changes or fights. Everyone is too tired and still too shell-shocked.” Malpass notes you can never say never, but there doesn’t seem to be a strong desire to see Hipkins rolled among Labour’s caucus. The Herald’s Thomas Coughlan reports that while there had been rumblings of a challenge by David Parker, he does not appear to have the numbers.

Reversals and recounts

Despite having said previously that he would quit politics if he lost his seat, Labour’s deputy leader Kelvin Davis has said he will continue his career in politics as a list MP. Davis lost his Te Tai Tokerau seat to Te Pāti Māori’s Mariameno Kapa-Kīngi after special votes were counted. Question marks remain for other Labour MPs. Peeni Henare is mulling a recount in Tāmaki Makaurau where Te Pāti Māori’s Takutai Moana Kemp has a 4-vote majority. National’s Melissa Lee is also likely to seek a recount in Mt Albert, where Helen White has a 20-vote lead and National are calling for one in Nelson, where Blair Cameron lost to Labour’s Rachel Boyack by 29 votes. Applications for recounts must be filed by tomorrow, November 8. The election, it goes on.

Keep going!
Siouxsie Wiles portrait by Toby Morris
Siouxsie Wiles portrait by Toby Morris

The BulletinNovember 6, 2023

Siouxsie Wiles will have her day in court

Siouxsie Wiles portrait by Toby Morris
Siouxsie Wiles portrait by Toby Morris

The leading Covid commentator alleges her employer, the University of Auckland, failed to adequately protect her against a torrent of harassment. The hearing starts today, writes Catherine McGregor in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.

Wiles v University of Auckland finally makes it to court

It was 22 months ago, in January 2022, that academics Shaun Hendy and Siouxsie Wiles filed a claim with the Employment Relations Authority against the University of Auckland (UoA), their employer. The scientists regularly appeared in the media to discuss the ongoing Covid pandemic, and both alleged the university had failed to respond adequately to harassment and threats directed at them as a result of their commentary. Having been quickly moved to the Employment Court, the case slowly wound its way through the legal system, along the way losing Hendy, who resolved his dispute with UoA upon leaving his faculty role in October 2022. This morning, the employment hearing finally commences. Wiles, a microbiologist, New Zealander of the Year and frequent contributor to The Spinoff throughout the pandemic, says she had raised concerns about her safety since April 2020, shortly after the pandemic began. The university either responded inadequately or not at all, she alleges.

‘Critic and conscience of society’

At the heart of the dispute is the concept of academic freedom, which legal columnist Sasha Borissenko defines as “the freedom to question the status quo and put forward new ideas and opinions, irrespective of controversy or popularity” – a freedom that gives academics protections that employees in other fields often do not have. This protection is enshrined in NZ law which states that being “a critic and conscience of society” is one of the defining characteristics of a university. UoA argues that academic freedom does not apply because Wiles’ Covid commentary was done in a personal capacity. In August 2021 the university, apparently after receiving legal advice, sent Wiles and Hendy a letter urging them to keep their public commentary to a minimum and suggesting they take paid leave “to minimise any social media comments”. Wiles is arguing that her Covid commentary was performed in a professional capacity and she was exercising academic freedom while doing so.

Years of ‘vile and despicable’ threats

In a remarkable coincidence of timing, the hearing starts just days after the release of Ms. Information, Gwen Isaac’s documentary about Wiles and her work. Reviewer Graeme Tuckett describes the numerous threatening messages and voicemails received by Wiles in the film as “vile, inhuman and despicable”. Wiles herself wrote in January 2022 that “the abuse, harassment, and threats started almost immediately after I began doing media interviews” and had carried on “on a near-daily basis” ever since. Last week she told the Pacific Media Network that she was still receiving death threats. In their initial complaint, Wiles and Hendy said that as a result of their work they had “suffered vitriolic, unpleasant, and deeply personalised threats and harassment” via email, social media and video sharing platforms which had a “detrimental impact” on their physical safety and their mental health.

Abuse of scientists in the public eye a global issue

While Covid has faded from the discourse, the impact on many of the experts who were thrust into the spotlight during the pandemic is profound. In March 2023 an international survey of scientists who had made media appearances to talk about Covid found more than a fifth had “received threats of physical or sexual violence”, 15% had their lives threatened, and about two-thirds were having second thoughts about sharing their expertise in public again. The issue is not restricted only to Covid. A poll of almost 500 climate scientists found that three-quarters of those regularly in the public eye were subject to online abuse and harassment. Multiple UK scientists told the Guardian that there’s been a huge rise in abuse from climate crisis deniers on Twitter/X since its takeover by Elon Musk last year.