leahmcfall

BooksOctober 18, 2018

Book of the Week: ‘Karori Confidential’ by Leah McFall

leahmcfall

The always hilarious and brilliant Leah McFall, who releases her new book of selected columns this week, pays her respects to five of the most hilarious and brilliant women writers of all time – Jane Austen, Nancy Mitford, Sue Townsend, Erma Bombeck, and Nora Ephron.

If humour writing is a craft, then I’m apprenticed to five dead women. Between them they had millions of readers, and still do. Novels, columns, articles and plays – every detail of their lives went in, nothing too small to overlook. Everyone needs a path to follow – a glimmering line of tea-lights, zig-zagging toward the future. Each of these writers is a friendly candle.

1 Jane Austen

She wrote the greatest rom-com of all time, and I’m not even that into Colin Firth. There’s no finer balance of character and plot in the English novel than Pride and Prejudice. All loose ends are tied up; there are dozens of lines you could stitch on a cushion.

Respect her art, but don’t overlook what a hustler Austen was. She had to be. She wasn’t married and lived in a borrowed house. It’s such a crock when critics dismiss her confined point of view and obsession with money, matchmaking and the price of love: she’d have written brilliantly about public life if she’d been allowed to have one.

Her best-loved heroine Elizabeth Bennet is romantic but knows the price of everything. It’s why Wickham (hot, but broke) is never a real option. It’s why the hero is rolling in notes, with an enormous country estate. Darcy’s assets are lovingly picked over in the novel – Austen includes a detailed shopping list of his art and furniture, down to the trout in his stream.

This materialism gleams in my favourite line. When Elizabeth is asked when she fell for Darcy, she says: “It has been coming on so gradually, that I hardly know when it began. But I believe I must date it from my first seeing his beautiful grounds at Pemberley.”

It’s implied she’s joking, but I like to think she isn’t. Despite the skipping tone in her books, there’s a crackle of injustice underneath: get a load of these fucking people.

2 Nancy Mitford

Take your pick of the Mitford sisters – the Nazi, the Commie, the Duchess – but for my money, Nancy takes the tea-cake. Long-necked, pinched at the waist in her Dior gowns, she represented a faded aristocratic society which was gone by peacetime. She and her young sisters had every refinement – vast country homes, debutante balls and powerful friends – but her parents were basically nuts. Benign neglect and boredom drove the girls all over the dial – notoriously, towards fascism.

None of that nonsense for Nancy. She had a gift for writing about her ridiculous life in dancing, quite odd English, and the hit comic novels began to pile up. She wrote how she spoke, and her speech was off-the-hook.

You can hear her arch, thin-sounding drawl in online recordings – a 1930s vocal fry more preposterous than any Kardashian. This way of speaking may have emerged among high-born girls, so they could be heard at noisy parties. “Ayab-solutely,” Nancy would say. The style of it was startling, even in her own lifetime. People thought her a terrible snob. “But I gave them cause to, I suppose.”

Her comedy hallmark was persistent understatement. Nothing seemed to ruffle her – not bombs falling on London, nor her sister marrying the British fascist Oswald Mosley. Nancy felt the pair were a danger to national security, so she coolly reported them to the authorities and they were locked up. It didn’t stop her jokes – she published the pocket masterpiece The Pursuit of Love in 1945, the year they were released.

L-R: Jane Austen, Nancy Mitford, Erma Bombeck, Sue Townsend, Nora Ephron

3 Sue Townsend

In Thatcher’s Britain – bleak, post-industrial, threadbare of hope – there was one person everyone could agree on, and that was Adrian Mole. I remember his Secret Diary being passed around my primary school half a world away, in the bright sunlight of 1980s Taranaki. Why was Adrian’s talk of spots and measuring his thing so exhilarating to read? Why was it all so funny, his yearning to be middle-class and his angry mother’s neglect of the housework? As kids we didn’t quite get it, but we loved it.

Sue Townsend was a national treasure well before her death. But she was angry, too – simmering with working-class rage. That energy aerates her writing and made me sit up: this is what can happen when a woman kicks her assigned social place in the nuts.

She proved that an apparently unskilled mother-of-three – surviving on tinned peas and small change after divorce – could do it as well as Wodehouse, Waugh or the bloody Pythons. The Mole series is an enduring, brilliant satire, written at a kitchen table in a dull town in the dark, once the kids were in bed.

Thanks to Sue, it no longer mattered that you never went to Oxford or Cambridge or ran with a smart set in London. However colourless or small your daily life, you could still bend it into light and make a country laugh.

4 Erma Bombeck

The 1950s was the age of a Frigidaire in every home, Mom in an apron and dinner on the table at six. And along came Erma, a midwestern housewife turned comic sensation whose newspaper columns were loved by millions.

Today, her writing seems dated. Meat-lockers and ice-machines are things of the past, and her droll gags about husbands or housework feel out of step with our times.

But to dismiss her as a happy housewife who fell into writing overlooks her gritty ambition. She hustled for her first column, aged 37. “I wanted success,” Erma said. “I wanted to be one of those people who appeared on the Carson Show in blue jeans and left early.”

Her one-liners came thick, fast and relentlessly for 30 years, but it’s not the gags that make her writing special. Anyone can riff about lost socks and empty toilet rolls. It’s her warm recognition that an ordinary life inside a family can be as redemptive as any larger, public one. When she writes, “There’s nothing sadder in this world than to awaken on Christmas morning and not be a child,” Erma reminds us we don’t need to leave the house to experience the full sweep of our humanity. It’s all there, under the roof.

When Harry Met Sally (1989), written by Nora Ephron

5 Nora Ephron

After years of telling us “everything is copy” and to take notes, it turns out that America’s funniest woman disregarded her own advice.

We all believed that Nora Ephron put herself into everything she wrote. She was Sally in When Harry Met Sally: the way Meg Ryan neurotically orders salad is how Nora always ordered salad.

Her first hit magazine story – ‘A Few Words About Breasts’ – is unbelievably frank. “If I had had them,” she wrote, “I would have been a completely different person.” This was 1972 – wanting bigger boobs was not what woke women wrote about. Too bad, decided Nora. If you want the truth, here it is.

Her novel Heartburn was so true to life that her ex-husband slapped restrictions on the screenplay. Jack Nicholson played him in the movie, but even he couldn’t make us like him. Nora hung everybody out to dry, but she always pegged herself out first. Right?

Well, no. When she died in 2012, it was a shock – but she’d been seriously ill for a long time. She kept this to herself, except to leave the lightest of clues in her final collection, I Remember Nothing. Meryl Streep, Tom Hanks and all the other stars at her memorial were disbelieving. We didn’t know, they said. She always told us everything. Why not this?

Nora is a masterclass in humour writing. There are dozens of lessons in her work. But her final, and most startling one? Know when to put down the pen. Hold it back.


Karori Confidential by Leah McFall (Luncheon Sausage Books, $25) is available at Unity Books.

Keep going!
slam poetry feature

BooksOctober 17, 2018

Roses are red, violets are fucken blue: Poetry Slam is coming to a stage near you

slam poetry feature

Slam poetry! It’s raw, it’s rough, and it’s also a wildly popular live entertainment, writes Ben Fagan, who is masterminding slam events across the country this month.

One of my favourite poetry moments happened a few years ago. I was at a slam in Wellington. It was packed. Someone had just finished performing and there was a lull while scores were tallied. The host Travis was speaking to the audience when, near the front, a young woman’s hand shot up.

“Yes?”

“I’ve got a poem.”

“Is it a short one?”

“Yup.”

Travis invited her to the stage. She announced, “This poem is for John.” And then she delivered the immortal lines:

 

Roses are red,

violets are blue.

You are a cunt

and I don’t fuck with you.

 

It was a masterclass of style over substance. Without a backwards look she bounced offstage and into the night. The audience took a collective breath and whispered to each other that they were glad they came. John had performed a love poem earlier in the evening; word went around at the halftime break that it wasn’t about his then-girlfriend, who had been sitting in the audience.

Wellington Slam. Image: Supplied.

Years before hearing “The Destruction of John”, I attended my first poetry slam by accident. A friend of mine from back in the day was competing and asked if I’d come along to support. I was surprised to be handed a set of Olympic style scorecards on arrival.

Poetry slam is a competitive event, I learned, where random audience judges assign points to performances. There are rounds and eliminations until a Slam Champion remains. The poetry I witnessed was smart and funny and moving. I found the crowd raucously supportive, so much so that in the following months I kept turning up. Wrote my first poem. Then another.

Handing out scorecards introduced a competitive element that interested the plus-ones and pint-drinkers as much as the poets. Since the first Chicago slams in the 1980s there are now national competitions in over 50 countries, with smaller events running in many more.

In America, slam is serious business. Winning the Women of the World Poetry Slam or the Individual World Poetry Slam might lead to a book deal, while Europe invites poets to Paris every year for the equally serious Coupe du Monde de Slam Poésie. As I became a regular slam-attender, I realised that the scoring was a clever trick to draw in normies. Every “I really think she should have won” and “That score was too low” revealed an engagement with the writing. As all good slam hosts say: the point is not the points, the point is the poetry.

I never liked poetry at high school, common story. Like many Kiwi kids we were required to read and dissect aging pieces, even the occasional Baxter photocopy was too far from my 16-year-old experience to relate. Despite a passing interest in writing, I would never have taken myself to a “reading”.

But Aotearoa is well suited to slam. Māori and Pasifika oral tradition is a natural friend to contemporary spoken word (and if I don’t mention Sam Hunt now, someone else will). The first slams happened in NZ around the new millennium. A coordinated effort in 2011 gathered competitors from across the country to find a New Zealand Slam Champion. Every year since, there have been national events.

Chap on stage is Toby Newberry at the National Youth Drama School Poetry Slam. Image: Supplied.

This year there are regional finals in Auckland, Hamilton, Hawke’s Bay, Wellington, Nelson, Christchurch, Dunedin and Queenstown, mostly over the next month. Slam in New Zealand is a widespread but still fragile pastime. Whole communities rise and fall on the enthusiasm or energy of a few. Sometimes it only takes one person moving out of town for a scene to disappear.

The winners of our national competition are a diverse bunch, with vastly different stories and voices. While there is influence here of the American spoken word style, Kiwi audiences often pull towards the more quirky or interesting; those obviously sharing their own experience. I hear Queenstown’s 2018 rep is a bush balladeer.

There is a trend of viral poetry videos filmed on phones, at slams and in classrooms. These share a voyeuristic quality, a sense you’re getting a glimpse into a private moment. Like how sharing a secret brings people closer together, good writing lets us see ourselves in someone else’s story.

That young woman’s angrily improvised poem for John had clear intent, but was a bit light on imagery. If the judges had a chance to score her, I imagine that would have been reflected in the points. She did bring us together though. We were united in the message of not fucking with John. Which is a good start.

Slam events are being held in Hastings on October 19, Auckland on October 24, and Wellington on October 27; for details, and events elsewhere, visit http://www.newzealandpoetryslam.com/