spinofflive
WorstTweetsFeature

MediaDecember 23, 2019

Decade in review: The worst takes of the 2010s

WorstTweetsFeature

The 2010s will go down in media history as the Take Decade. Hayden Donnell combed through every single take made in New Zealand in the last 10 years to compose this list of the worst ones.

If there’s one overarching media trend from the 2010s, it’s our inexorable move toward a take economy. Look at Duncan Garner, Mike Hosking, Sean Plunket, or Peter Williams. Look at this article. Takes are popular, and, most importantly, cheap. As the media’s business model has disintegrated, opinions have risen like a disgusting Phoenix from the ashes. We’ve been awash in them for 10 years, and if anything they’re getting worse. Still, some stood out below all the rest. I plunged headfirst into the take toilet to fish out the worst efforts from this decade.

Honourable mention: Mike Hosking: The Spinoff TV is crap and a waste of our money

How dare he?

10. Mike Hosking: Don’t waste our money on this cycling madness

Cycling is getting dramatically more popular in Auckland. Cycle trips increased 8.3% from 2018 to 2019, and that trend continued through winter despite the city’s roads still being rank deathtraps. It’s a free way of travelling that makes people healthier and saves the planet.

What’s not to like? According to Mike Hosking, everything. Newstalk ZB’s marquee man has been in a desperate one-man war against bicycles for the better part of a decade. Every week, he slathers himself in engine oil and raps out a column titled something like “four wheels good, two wheels bad” while shouting “broom broom” at anyone in the NZME office who’ll listen. This effort is a particular stinker, railing against, of all things, children biking to school. It’s included here not just for its content, but because it represents an ongoing pattern of take making.

9. Ryan Bridge: Kiwi vegan loonies are treasonous

Magic Talk’s Ryan Bridge is a talkback host who gives the impression of a man impersonating a talkback host. In October, he rummaged around in a bag labelled Provocative Opinions and wrenched out “charge vegans with treason”. “This country was built off the back of farming and agriculture. To not eat the fruits of our labour is economic treason. They’re treasonous,” he said.

On the one hand, it’s doubtful Bridge is 100% serious. On the other, this is easily one of the worst ideas published by a mainstream outlet in New Zealand this decade. Prisons are already crowded enough without having to cage vegans for the crime of not killing enough cows. If Bridge needs a truly provocative opinion that has the upside of being correct, he should consider calling for a ban on golf. I’m available for a brainstorm, Magic Talk. Just call me.

Honourable mention: The entire careers of Garrick Tremain and Al Nisbet.

8. Deborah Hill Cone: Why does Clarke Gayford bug me?

As it turns out, the answer to the question posed in the headline was “for no good reason” and “because I’m being weirdly spiteful”.

7. Rachel Stewart: TERF a derogatory term to shut down debate

Former Herald columnist Rachel Stewart always tiptoed the line between provocateur and unhinged polemic. In this column, she outed herself as a gender-critical feminist TERF, before snorting a full cup of brain worms and talking about trans lobby groups being funded by George Soros and Warren Buffett in a scheme to make money for “Big Pharma”. If those accusations strike you as both ludicrous and potentially worse, well, you’re not an opinion editor for the Herald/haven’t done your research on sites with URLs like trutheagle.com.

Stewart was censured by the Press Council for this column. She now writes for The Daily Blog.

6. Leighton Smith: We need to push back on climate change hoax

Few people have issued more takes than Leighton Smith. Newstalk ZB’s veteran mid-morning host lathered his views on an adoring audience three hours a day, five days a week for 33 years. His show was xenophobic and Islamophobic at times. But most of all, it was scientifically illiterate. He spent hours casting doubt on climate change, railing against the UN, and generally encouraging his listeners to wear polar bear fur and try some fracking in their backyards.

Smith retired recently to spend more time creating blogs like this one on cycle lanes, which begins with the immortal words: “On the cycle lanes, I saw an e-scooter. There was one of the new e-scooters on the cycle lanes.” He also kept up the fight on his favourite topic, confidently shrugging off the verdicts of the world’s scientists in this 11-paragraph tour of his dumbest hits

The last five years were the five hottest ever recorded. Australia is currently on fire. Climate change has already killed and displaced people close to home in the Pacific. Smith has spent years misinforming people about the world’s biggest story. Maybe that’s shameful and irresponsible. But it’s also popular. 

5. Martin van Beynen: Dangerous times for older white males with opinions

Only if you’re the type of older white male who writes stuff like this.

4. Ben Mack: How the far right is poisoning New Zealand

Say what you like about Winston Peters: he’s had some bad opinions about immigration. He’s grumpy with the blameless, beatific men and women of the media. He did this tweet

But any politically literate person would struggle to say Winston Peters is a member of the far right. Ben Mack isn’t one of those people. In an article for The Washington Post, Mack said Peters’ decision to join the coalition government meant the racists were “pulling the strings and continuing to hold the nation hostage”. “What’s happened in New Zealand isn’t just horrifying because of the long-term implications of hate-mongers controlling the country, but also because it represents a blueprint that the far right can follow to seize power elsewhere,” he wrote.

The column left most New Zealanders saying “wtf” and “how did this get published in The Washington Post?” While the far right is definitely a problem, saying it’s in charge of the country, and that Peters is a member of it, may be the most borderline deranged bit of political analysis published in the 2010s. Congratulations to both Mack and Jeff Bezos for this achievement.

Honourable mention: Patrick Gower on recovering bodies from an active volcano

This from The New York Times on the SAS operation to recover bodies from Whakaari: “It took two hours for the troops to collect the six bodies, trudging through knee-deep sludge, drawing labored breaths and constantly thinking about the volcano rumbling over their shoulder.” The Times goes on to quote operation leader, Colonel Rian McKinstry: “They’ve gone to the depths of their endurance and past it… They wouldn’t say it, but it was obvious to me as their boss.”

3. Duncan Garner: Dear NZ, how do we want to look in 20 years?

Imagine the worst thought that’s entered your mind. You probably tried to scrub it from your brain immediately, like cat vomit from your carpet. Made an effort to bury it in better arguments.

Now imagine having to share that thought with the world every day. For your professional success to be judged on how many people you enrage or, even worse, affirm with that thought. 

Hold that image. Really embrace it. You’re experiencing what it’s like to be Duncan Garner.

This column is a good introduction to Garner’s oeuvre. It begins with him travelling through a K-Mart before seeing something that makes him shart and hallucinate simultaneously. At the checkout, there’s a line that includes some people of Asian descent.

Garner doesn’t see people trying to buy cushions and artificial plants, though. He sees a snake. A huge snake! “It snaked and snaked and snaked. The snake was massive,” he wrote. “I looked around, it could have been anywhere in South East Asia.” Despite Garner saying he wasn’t being xenophobic, the Press Council and others affirmed he was in fact being quite xenophobic.

It wasn’t Garner’s only brainfart this decade, or even this month, but this list only has room for 10 entries. A true master of the bad take craft.

2. Dave Witherow: Haere mai? Everything is far from ka pai!

Second place goes to the second-most racist take of the decade. Number one goes to…

1. Paul Holmes: Waitangi Day a complete waste

… the most racist take of the decade.

There were bad takes before Paul Holmes wrote his 2012 screed on Waitangi Day (see John Roughan on transport, Leighton Smith on everything), but this feels somehow formative. Written in 2012, it was like the decade’s ur bad take. A prominent white, male broadcaster tapped into a rich vein of bigotry and exploited it for clicks. He was admonished for it by the Press Council, but the model was proven. The article was talked about by his detractors and racists alike.

You probably have a vague recollection of the column. It’s even worse than you remember. Here’s one paragraph: “Well, it’s a bullshit day, Waitangi. It’s a day of lies. It is loony Maori fringe self-denial day. It’s a day when everything is addressed, except the real stuff. Never mind the child stats, never mind the national truancy stats, never mind the hopeless failure of Maori to educate their children and stop them bashing their babies. No, it’s all the Pakeha’s fault. It’s all about hating whitey. Believe me, that’s what it looked like the other day.”

The rest are similar. 

Holmes died in 2013. For his faults, he could be a skilled, warm interviewer. The people that followed in his wake have often lacked his humanity. Hosking, his literal and spiritual successor, gives the impression he would be wearing human skin within days of the apocalypse. Paul Henry doesn’t have his streak of kindness. Neither does Garner. Holmes doesn’t deserve all the blame for the people that succeeded him in shit takes, but this column helped blaze a trail. In the years since, many men have walked down it. Maybe, just maybe, the future will be brighter.

Keep going!
New Star Wars, new cacophony of endless opinions on the internet. Here’s another one!
New Star Wars, new cacophony of endless opinions on the internet. Here’s another one!

MediaDecember 19, 2019

Thoughts on Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker from a lifelong fan

New Star Wars, new cacophony of endless opinions on the internet. Here’s another one!
New Star Wars, new cacophony of endless opinions on the internet. Here’s another one!

The latest Star Wars film is out, and a lot of people have a lot of opinions about it, including culture editor Sam Brooks who saw a midnight screening last night. These are his fast reckons.

Spoilers for Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker, obviously. Did you read the headline?

Look. Nobody wants a review of the latest Star Wars film. You’ll see it and have your own thoughts about it, and you should be allowed to have those. For better or worse, Star Wars is a franchise now, and like any other franchise, we should be allowed to have our own opinions about it, free from harassment. Star Wars is basically like Subway now. It feels good to consume it, and then you start thinking about all the problems and start feeling a bit gross.

But, I did pay my own human dollars to see Episode IX (too many episodes) in Event Cinemas Gold Class (flex) last night, so here’s a few thoughts. For clarity, I enjoy more or less every Star Wars film I’ve ever seen, and I’m a big fan of the Expanded Universe, at least as far as video games go.

If that makes you disregard my opinion, I can happily direct you to a blank internet tab. For the rest of you, here we go!

  • Is it wild that every opening scroll in this particular trilogy seems to have very little connection to the preceding film in it? Like, they could be setting up films with no relation to each other.
  • People are going to pick this film apart, and lord knows, I do not want to be here for it. No piece of art can survive that and to be frank, no Star Wars film is good enough to survive having its every moment torn apart.
  • Adam Driver is, unfortunately, a very attractive man. Or is he just a big man? The science is inconclusive. He’s had to carry most of the emotional weight of these films, or at least the complexity, and he does a great job at lending specificity to a character who is mostly dark, brooding and tall. There’s always at least one performer in each trilogy who has to bring the depth, and these films are lucky that they’ve got Driver to do that.
  • Keri Russell is in this film, which is a wild reunion for her and JJ Abrams. Where does this fit into the Felicity universe?
Keri Russell as Zori Bliss, a dumb as shit name.
  • But in all seriousness, Keri Russell is quite good in this film, even if it shows her actual face (really just her eyes, framed with impeccable eye makeup) for maybe like a minute and a half. She has a very good acting voice! This is your daily dose of Keri Russell critical analysis.
  • There is a LOT of Force stuff in this film. If you don’t like Force stuff, don’t watch this film. Also, maybe not any Star Wars?
  • Daisy Ridley remains, as always, an alternate universe Keira Knightley. Leela Lightley, you might say. She is fine! I can’t wait to see her give a performance that isn’t Rey.
  • It’s wild that Bill Weasley is in this film. And he gets killed quite easily, quickly and funnily, for someone who has been in all three films.
  • Richard E. Grant is in this film! As General Pryde! Which is not some kind of queer representation, or if it is, then it’s as a slyly coded Nazi general. And I don’t think my community is quite ready for that.
  • This is a more general sort of thing of Star Wars question, but why did the people who made droids not just make them speak English/Basic Galactic? What purpose does it serve to allow them to speak a new language, unless you want to take a robot uprising at some stage? Anyway, R2D2 is a collaborator and nobody talks about this enough.

  • Carrie Fisher is very much in this film, a lot more than some people who were actually alive to film it! I have no strong opinions on this, it’s fairly seamless. I have a lot of opinions on the fact that her mother Debbie Reynolds (Singin’ in the Rain, life in general) died literally the day after her. In my wildest dreams, I cannot imagine a move to upstage someone better. Well done, Debbie. You knew when the jig was up. Anyway, Carrie Fisher is in this film, either by crafty use of old footage or reanimation.
  • Merry from Lord of the Rings is in this film. They don’t give him a name, so I’m sure as shit not going to.
  • Two people who are barely in this film are Kelly Marie Tran and Lupita Nyong’o. Remember that Lupita Nyong’o is in these films, and is a really great, Oscar-winning actress? I’m glad you do, because the people making these things sure don’t.
  • What do you think Calista Flockhart (Ally McBeal, Brothers and Sisters, Harrison Ford’s wife) thinks of Star Wars? Do you think she cares? Harrison Ford has a cameo in this film.
  • Why is Rey the first Jedi to hold a blaster? Some ranged combat capacity seems real helpful for someone who just has a light sword! Please don’t correct me if I’m wrong.
  • Speaking of lightsabers, there’s a lot of them in this film. They are, as always, cool. This is one of the few Star Wars facts not up for debate.

  • Do you think C3PO is gay or just camp?
  • Darth Sidious is in this film, and I hope Ian McDiarmid got paid a lot for it. He’s been playing this role for 40 years, and somehow always manages to play Palpatine as being a couple of centuries old. Which is wild, because McDiarmid can be no older than 117 in real life.
  • Jodie Comer is in this film for like two scenes! She is weirdly famous to be doing these kinds of gigs now!
  • Lando’s back! Billy Dee Williams is cool.
  • I feel like a lot of people will have a lot of problems with this film. I recommend muting ‘Star Wars’ on Twitter. I did it a few days ago, and it’s made my life immeasurably better. I love Star Wars, but I absolutely hate people talking about Star Wars. He says, as he writes one of a million Star Wars takes clogging up the internet.

Look, ultimately, you have to find your own path with this one. It’s the ninth film in the biggest film franchise in the world. Chances are you know what you’re going to think of it before you even buy your ticket, and what you get out of that experience.

Do you generally find Star Wars films delightful? You’ll find this delightful. There’s a lot of moments of wonder, and it wraps up the trilogy in a fairly satisfying way. It probably won’t hold up outside of the big-bang-boom of a cinema, but you won’t hate it if you watch it on TV in a few years’ time.

Do you hate Star Wars films or have no interest in them? You probably won’t like this one! Why are you reading this article? Go read this amazing article about the hidden history of the Dawn Raids at Western Springs College instead.

Are you a super fan of the series and have endless conversations with fellow fans about which films are better, what is canon and what isn’t? You… probably won’t love this one! Or anything, ever again. You are a super fan and have to resign yourself to being consistently disappointed by the thing you love. Thanks for playing!

Oh, also, BB-8 is the best thing about this trilogy. This is not up for discussion.

You can watch Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker at literally any cinema for the forseeable future.