spinofflive
Tahana Tippett-Tapsell (Tainui, Ngāti Paoa, Te Arawa and Ngāti Raukawa). (Photo: Supplied; additional design: Archi Banal).
Tahana Tippett-Tapsell (Tainui, Ngāti Paoa, Te Arawa and Ngāti Raukawa). (Photo: Supplied; additional design: Archi Banal).

MoneyMarch 17, 2022

The money man sharing ‘mokopuna decisions’ with Sharesies

Tahana Tippett-Tapsell (Tainui, Ngāti Paoa, Te Arawa and Ngāti Raukawa). (Photo: Supplied; additional design: Archi Banal).
Tahana Tippett-Tapsell (Tainui, Ngāti Paoa, Te Arawa and Ngāti Raukawa). (Photo: Supplied; additional design: Archi Banal).

The homegrown investment platform is welcoming to the board table its inaugural ‘future director’, Tahana Tippett-Tapsell, who says he’s itching to help Māori and Pasifika create wealth for generations to come.

Growing up in east Auckland, surrounded by whānau that “didn’t have much, at all”, Tahana Tippett-Tapsell never knew there were investing opportunities beyond KiwiSaver. But as an investment manager for the Māori investment team at New Zealand Trade and Enterprise, hailing from Tainui, Ngāti Paoa, Te Arawa and Ngāti Raukawa, the 27-year-old thinks homegrown investment platform Sharesies is leading the way on making sharemarkets more accessible to everyday New Zealanders. It’s a mission that sits close to him as he gears up for his first board meeting next week as its inaugural “future director”.

“Sharesies has been one of the fastest-growing New Zealand companies,” he says. “I’m very proud to be a part of that and help it take its next steps into the future.” 

The year-long opportunity, offered by professional directors’ body the Institute of Directors (IOD), was something he couldn’t pass up. Tippett-Tapsell will attend and participate in all board meetings (without the voting rights of a fully-fledged member) and learn from an experienced mentor, while Sharesies’ board will benefit from being exposed to a perspective they might otherwise have lacked.

And his viewpoint is critical – investing is often not a priority for New Zealanders dealing with ballooning living costs including the price of food, which rose almost 7% in the year to February 2022. Meanwhile Māori and Pasifika households struggle the most to meet their everyday needs, hardly surprising when their median disposable incomes are the lowest among the country’s ethnic groups at $38,000 and $37,500 respectively for the year to June 2021. By comparison, median Pākehā disposable income is $46,000, and $44,400 for Asian households.

Even when Māori and Pasifika households do acquire wealth, it’s dwarfed by that of Pākehā. While the median net worth of Pākehā and Māori households both rose $14,000 over the last three years, for Pākehā households that bump took their median net worth to $151,000. For Māori households, it’s now $42,000 – a gap of over $100,000. The wealth gap is even more dramatic for Pasifika households, with a median net worth of just $16,000.

Tippett-Tapsell has first-hand knowledge of those inequities, alongside a perspective rooted in te ao Māori and a background in finance. He attended Te Rumaki Reo o Ngā Puna o Waiōrea, a te reo immersion kura on the same grounds as Western Springs College in Auckland, and for the last seven years has worked as a commercial banker for ASB Bank and more recently at NZTE helping Māori businesses and investors. That made him exactly the kind of person Sharesies was looking for, says co-chief executive Brooke Roberts.

Sharesies co-CEO Brooke Roberts. (Photo: Supplied)

In a bid to help close the wealth gap, Sharesies is starting to draw on the cultural and financial expertise of tangata whenua. In January, it announced Ngāi Tahu Holdings, the investment arm of the South Island iwi, had invested $3 million with a view to creating intergenerational prosperity for whānau members. Sharesies has added to its portfolio Tahito Te Tai o Rehua, considered one of the world’s first indigenous investment funds. The fund uses mātauranga Māori to screen and select NZX and ASX-listed companies against rigorous ethical and sustainable criteria.

Removing barriers to entry and unnecessary financial jargon is crucial to opening access to sharemarkets, says Roberts, as is ensuring communities aren’t excluded from participating in a sector that is still largely made up of men who are Pākehā. “We want to create a space where investing no longer is associated with being wealthy,” she says.

Raising awareness is part of the solution, says Tippett-Tapsell. When he speaks about financial literacy with low-income and isolated Māori and Pasifika communities he tells them there are opportunities out there that don’t require massive amounts of upfront investment. “Even if it’s $5 or $10, at least you’re making a start,” he says. “But hey, there might be people out there who absolutely can’t spare $5 – and I respect that.”

Investing is not enough though, and improving the financial literacy of whānau is key to helping them ride the roller-coaster of wealth creation, he says. Māori generate wealth not for wealth’s sake, but to care for their whānau and to spend time on things that really matter, like mokopuna. In fact, “mokopuna decisions” is how the future director explains intergenerational wealth – for Māori, the financial decisions they make today must benefit not only their grandchildren but their grandchildren’s mokopuna.

Dr Jim Mather (Ngāti Awa, Ngāi Tūhoe). (Photo: Supplied)

It’s this understanding that makes Māori well-suited to governance roles, says Dr Jim Mather (Ngāti Awa, Ngāi Tūhoe), a professional director who chairs the boards of RNZ and Lakes District Health Board. 

Good governance is critical to a company succeeding, failing or staying stagnant. From startups to high-growth businesses, management teams are often busy working in the business, so rely on a group of advisers – most often a board of directors – for help working on the business. Directors are the ones tasked with thinking about the “big picture” questions, like what is the company’s vision, what are its long-term aspirations and what may jeopardise or improve its chances of success. Besides ensuring the business complies with its legal obligations and can pay its debts, directors hold leadership teams to account on performance, because boards are accountable to shareholders for improving or harming the value of their stakes.

Mather says Māori directors bring an innate understanding of the relational nature of their task. After all, effective, competent governance depends on whanaungatanga, kotahitanga and manaakitanga – Māori concepts commonly found on the marae and in Māori communities. Boards are no different, he says: collaboration requires diverse views, vigorous debate among individuals with decisions made collectively, and mutual respect between members.

Governance is often perceived as a job that executives start doing once they’ve finished leading organisations or in the twilight of their careers. But Mather, a former chief executive of Te Wānanga o Aotearoa and Māori Television, thinks otherwise – it’s a viable career for anyone, including Māori. Tippett-Tapsell has caught the governance bug early – he has his sights set on more directorships in the future – but for now, he’s got enough on his plate.

Keep going!
A tank being used in the conflict. Image: Getty Images; additional design Tina Tiller
A tank being used in the conflict. Image: Getty Images; additional design Tina Tiller

MoneyMarch 15, 2022

The curious role of crypto in the war against Ukraine

A tank being used in the conflict. Image: Getty Images; additional design Tina Tiller
A tank being used in the conflict. Image: Getty Images; additional design Tina Tiller

Cryptocurrency is giving Russians the chance to escape Putin’s sinking ship of an economy, but it’s also being used by savvy Ukrainians to finance the grassroots defence of their country. Nick Blakiston explains.

If, like me, you’ve been endlessly doom-scrolling coverage of the war in Ukraine, you might have seen increasing chatter about the use of cryptocurrencies in this conflict. Cryptocurrency can be hard to wrap your head around even without Covid, inflation and the threat of a nuclear winter hanging over our heads, but its current role in Russia and Ukraine is an opportunity to see how the innovative ideas behind crypto mesh with the archaic behaviour of war.

In Russia the entire finance system is failing. Russian citizens can’t transfer money overseas, some are driving to borders with bags of cash, and the head of the Russian central bank is wearing black at press conferences to mourn the death of her economy. If you’re a wealthy Russian you want your rubles out of the banks, and somewhere where you can shift it quietly, quickly and for cheap. Crypto begins to sound like a pretty good option, right? 

Transaction speed, cost, accessibility, security, privacy. Everything we read about crypto mentions these benefits. But how many of them actually stack up when you have oligarchs with billions of rubles in a failing bank, looking to get them out quick smart? Well, cryptocurrencies aren’t the bastion of anonymity they’re quite often made out to be. Since the blockchain is public, transaction sizes needed to transfer an oligarch’s billions to a crypto account would be red-flagged by money-laundering programmes instantly. Not ideal if you’re trying to hide assets from the pesky west, whose sanction hammer is coming down everywhere you look. 

Additionally, although cryptocurrency is big, with a total market cap of $1.7 trillion, it isn’t nearly as much as what the Russian banking system is dealing with. The scale needed to move such large amounts of money would totally overwhelm the crypto system, ie the liquidity would dry up real fast. 

People queue at a bank in Kyiv on March 3 (Photo: Murat Saka / dia images via Getty Images)

Ordinary Russian citizens, the ones who don’t have super yachts full of rubles ready to be snapped up by the US Department of Justice, however, still can use bitcoin to escape Putin’s sinking ship of an economy. As yet, western sanctions haven’t stopped Russians from using crypto exchanges, with the Coinbase CEO, Brian Armstrong, tweeting “we are not preemptively banning all Russians from using Coinbase. We believe everyone deserves access to basic financial services unless the law says otherwise”. One of the pillars that cryptocurrency is built on is the fact it isn’t really impacted by interference from governments, so I’m sure they’re going to take this stance as long as possible.  

The Ukrainian use of crypto is far more interesting. Something you might not have known about Ukraine is that they’re fourth in the world for cryptocurrency adoption. In fact, the government of Ukraine has spent the past few years building its own crypto currency industry, legalising bitcoin last November. It’s safe to say Ukraine knows how to hodl. This head start has given Ukraine the advantage when it comes to using crypto in the time of war. 

Even before the Russian invasion had started, you could donate bitcoin to the Ukrainian military, and as of March 5, over NZ$22 million had already been spent on military gear (they won’t say exactly what for obvious reasons), out of a total $73 million donated. It’s not just bitcoin flowing in either, with the government of Ukraine now the proud owner of a rare CryptoPunk, an NFT worth around NZ$300,000. UkraineDAO (a decentralised autonomous organisation, basically a buying syndicate on the blockchain – led by Pussy Riot!) auctioned off a Ukraine flag NFT for 2173 ETH (Ethereum), which is nearly NZ$8 million. The proceeds from UkraineDAO will be heading to Come Back Alive, a Ukrainian organisation that helps out the military with training and defensive resources. 

If cryptocurrencies are to be taken seriously as a genuine alternative to traditional currencies, then they can’t only exist in the ideal world of Twitter threads, Discord chatrooms and NFT TikToks. When the shit hits the proverbial, how does the system stand up? 

We see two very different use cases for cryptocurrencies here: one that is trying to save Russians from the financial consequences caused by this generation’s most fragile ego, and one that is using crypto to finance a grassroots defence against tyranny. In either case, it’s a crazy situation we’ve ended up in – where a missile bought with the sale of a jpeg of a man smoking a dart could conceivably be used to blow a Russian helicopter out of the sky. Progress, or just another consequence of the world’s first extremely online war?