spinofflive
Bronte Bell is the mystery  Shortland Street baby. Image: Tina Tiller
Bronte Bell is the mystery Shortland Street baby. Image: Tina Tiller

Pop CultureFebruary 15, 2024

Exclusive: We found the Shortland Street mystery baby

Bronte Bell is the mystery  Shortland Street baby. Image: Tina Tiller
Bronte Bell is the mystery Shortland Street baby. Image: Tina Tiller

The global hunt is over – Alex Casey talks to Shortland Street’s first ever baby.

Bronte Bell’s first thought was that she was being scammed over Facebook Messenger. “A few people sent me this weird looking link,” she laughs over Zoom. “You know, when you get sent links from multiple people saying ‘is this you’ it definitely seems a bit dodgy, so I didn’t open it.” 

From her home in London she eventually opened the link, and discovered that a global hunt was underway to find her, the mystery baby from Shortland Street’s very first episode back in 1992. “It was just crazy and funny,” she says. “My sister loved it especially, because she knows I don’t want to be the centre of attention. I haven’t even done a post about it.” 

Bell, 31, was just a few days old when she was thrust into the spotlight on what would become our country’s most enduring soap opera. In the climactic scene, Dr Hone Ropata, nurse Carrie Burton and a real life midwife work together to dramatically deliver the baby (Bell) of teenage parents Lisa Stanton and Stuart Neilson (played by a young Martin Henderson). 

A star is born. Image: Youtube

Naturally, she can’t remember the appearance herself, but a text from Bell’s mum sheds more light on the events of the day. “Everyone was really nice, Temuera and Martin and the other actresses were lovely with you,” reads the text seen by The Spinoff. “They did a few takes of the scene, I was right there in front but out of shot of course.” Bell is even reported to have cried on cue.

“I was proud of you being a little star at just a few days old,” her Mum added. 

Being a Shortland Street star earned Bell some crucial social currency during her primary school years. “Whenever I wanted to make a new friend, or just seem a bit cooler, I’d drop it in – I was the first baby on Shortland Street.” She took a hiatus from acting for a decade, returning in the school nativity play in the hallowed role of “an angel holding up a little sign.” 

Like many New Zealand kids, Bell also has memories of watching Shortland Street. “When you grew up watching a show, it’s kind of comforting to come back to,” she says. “The one memory that was quite clear was I think I had a massive crush on one the doctors, Maia. She was so dreamy. That’s a core Shortland Street memory.” 

Having lived in London for the last five years, Bell admits she doesn’t watch much Shortland Street anymore. Still, she says there has been interesting foreshadowing from the soap appearance into her real life. Working every day on Harley Street – “London’s version of Shortland Street” – the skin clinician wears scrubs daily and works with doctors and nurses. 

Bronte Bell, Shortland Street’s mystery baby, in her real life line of work (Photos: Supplied)

Despite her claim to fame, Bell only watched her episode on YouTube for the very first time just last week. “First of all, I didn’t know that the theme tune had words – that was weird,” she laughs. “But watching the scene where I was ‘born’ actually made me really emotional. You see pictures of yourself as a baby, but actually seeing video was crazy.”

“I realised I’ve lived a whole life since then; I almost cried because I’m like a full-on adult now. When you’re in your 30s, you can’t quite pretend to be a little baby anymore.”

Although she has stayed away from the limelight for the last three decades, Bell is open to the idea of returning to Shortland Street for a cameo appearance, perhaps even for an onscreen reunion with her midwife and, if the stars align, Temuera Morrison and Martin Henderson. “It would be so trippy and weird,” she says. “I bet we’d all feel super, super old.” 

Until then, Bell is quite happy with her scrub-wearing life in London, although she says she misses her cats and hearing the New Zealand accent. When asked to impart any advice for aspiring actors out there, she had one final piece of wisdom to share: “Sometimes your acting career peaks at just a few days old, and that’s OK. Life goes on.” 

Watch the 1992 season of Shortland Street on Youtube, and the 2024 season at 7pm weeknights on TVNZ2 or on TVNZ+.

‘Hutt Valley, Kāpiti, down to the south coast. Our Wellington coverage is powered by members.’
Joel MacManus
— Wellington editor
Keep going!
Ambika Mod and Leon Woodall star in One Day (Image: Netflix)
Ambika Mod and Leon Woodall star in One Day (Image: Netflix)

Pop CultureFebruary 15, 2024

Review: You’re not prepared for One Day

Ambika Mod and Leon Woodall star in One Day (Image: Netflix)
Ambika Mod and Leon Woodall star in One Day (Image: Netflix)

A worthy TV adaptation of a bestselling novel that’ll leave you a mess.

A 14-part series based on the bestseller from David Nicholls, One Day tracks the 20-year friendship between Emma and Dexter, who meet at their university graduation party and immediately hit it off. The series revisits the pair every year on July 15, an innocuous day that just so happens to be the day after their first meeting. 

Emma (Ambika Mod) is bookish and intelligent, with modest dreams of changing her little corner of the world. Dexter (Leon Woodall) is handsome and rich, and dreams of being rich and famous. The two are chalk and cheese but, like any good romcom, work to balance each other out. 

One Day (the book) was a smash holiday read back in 2009, and two years later a huge flop of a film adaptation starring Anne Hathaway and Jim Sturgess. The show has come at the perfect time, with angsty, will-they-won’t-they romances being all the rage (see: Normal People).

The good

The chemistry! From the beginning, the two friends have something. They’ve got distinctive personalities and perspectives, often at odds with each other, but they work as a pair. And that’s 80% of the work to keep you returning, even as the frustrations set in.

Where the film ultimately failed was in its attempt to cram two decades of character development into 100 minutes. That’s five minutes per year and it showed in the complete lack of character development. The show allows the actors to grow into their characters over nearly seven hours. They’re both great (Woodall does some of the best drunk acting I’ve seen in a while) but Mod is exceptional. Emma is not an easy character to pull off. She’s incredibly smart, independent, self-assured and full of complete yearning for her best friend for years. It’s the yearning that Anne Hathaway never quite nailed in the movie, probably because she didn’t have time to sink into it. But Mod manages to have you cheering her on in her yearning while also wondering if perhaps she should set her sights higher (a b-plot of the whole series). 

Not every year features the two characters interacting, and the best episodes are when they do, but there’s a cleverness in having us watch them reconnect having witnessed their individual lives more intimately than they themselves did. It’s those moments – when they are in conflict for understandable but frustrating reasons – that pull you in as the only one who knows the full story. 

For anyone who’s been missing their angst-ridden hit since Normal People, this is for you.

The not so good

The show spans 20 years, which is a very long time and proves a single movie was never going to do it justice, but I’m not sure it needed 14 episodes. It’s a will-they-won’t-they story which means inevitably there’ll be early episodes of missed opportunities and frustrating misunderstandings. Even so, at about the fourth episode, with 10 more to go, I found myself wishing they’d hurry up a little. Fourteen is quite a strange number of episodes for a limited series, and I think condensing a couple of years into single episodes in the middle would’ve helped move the relationship along without losing any of the tension. In saying that, perhaps I only felt this way because I watched seven hours in one sitting.

On an entirely different and more complicated note: Emma. Emma is Indian and poor. In the book and the movie, she’s white and poor. I loved Mod as Emma and the story was all the better for it, but aside from a very brief mention in the first episode (when Dexter asks her if she’s celibate and if it’s for religious reasons), Emma’s ethnicity or cultural background is never commented on. Her parents never make an appearance and Dexter’s wealthy family and friends in 90s England never allude to it. It’s not necessarily a criticism, as a fictional romance series is hardly the place for cutting class and cultural commentary, but it did feel at times that Emma existed outside of her skin colour in a way that sadly would not have been the case in real life. Sometimes progress requires a bit more thought than simply casting a brown actor to play a role written for a white person.

The same goes for class. Dexter and Emma’s relationship revolves heavily around their different life experiences due to wealth (a lot for Dex, none for Emma). But while their different lives are juxtaposed effectively, there’s never any real acknowledgement of the tension in that dynamic or Emma’s experience of it. Instead, the closest we get to the discomfort many feel when interacting with the lives of their wealthy friends is when Dexter meets someone even richer than him. Those scenes serve as an ironic lesson for Dexter but I’d much rather have seen Emma allowed to show her version of that through Dexter’s family.

Which brings me to my main gripe – a biggie despite me enjoying the show. The ending is not good once you think about it for more than five minutes. It’s powerful, yes. It’ll probably trigger some existential crisis, yes. But it’s abrupt (and was in the book too) and jarring. And in terms of the characters, the ending wholly serves just one, in a way that makes you wonder whether it ever really was a show about two equal people.

The verdict

There are so few good romcoms these days that I have to recommend this rollercoaster of a show. Should you watch One Day in one day? I’d say yes. Start early in the afternoon to give yourself ample time to feel things before you go to sleep. It’s a show that proves chemistry goes a long, long way. Just be prepared to kind of hate it by the end. 

‘Love The Spinoff? Its future depends on your support. Become a member today.’
Madeleine Chapman
— Editor