Screen Shot 2017-09-18 at 8.27.23 AM (1)

Pop CultureSeptember 18, 2017

‘All silent, all done’: The Block and the end of a New Zealand housing era

Screen Shot 2017-09-18 at 8.27.23 AM (1)

Duncan Greive reflects on the shambolic end to The Block 2017, and what the show has revealed to us about our housing market and crisis over that time.

For the last six years – or two parliamentary terms, if you prefer to measure time in that unit – The Block NZ has been both New Zealand’s most successful reality franchise, and the most illuminating cultural artefact of this era. The show features four teams racing to complete a renovation or build of adjacent houses, with each retaining the profit from the sale, while those who get the largest profit also get a $100,000 cash prize.

The cast of The Block NZ 2017

For five years the show rode the surging Auckland housing market ever higher. Back in 2012 houses in bourgie Takapuna went for between $789,000 and $961,000 – figures which seem almost quaint today. Gradually the median lifted: it was $983,000 the following year, rocketing to $1,429,000 on moving to Pt Chev in 2014, before posting $1,327,500 and $1,425,000 in Sandringham and Meadowbank respectively.

Every year the show’s contestants profits grew a little fatter, rising like the market from a little over $300,000 combined in year one to peak last year with the four teams splitting a Lotto-like $1,081,000. And, for mystifying reasons which can be known only to the contestants, Mediaworks, the IRD and our legislators, all that money was tax-free.

Which is to say that The Block NZ functioned as a perfect advertisement for our housing market: vastly expensive but only going up; everyone made tonnes of money; no one paid tax. To be fair, it wasn’t all jolly: the contestants slept on mattresses in damp and drafty unfinished homes and worked ridiculous hours in what looked like very unsafe conditions – truly, this reality TV captured our era better than any big budget drama could ever dream of doing.

Until, last night, it all broke down. We’ve been told the market will crash or stall since before 2012, but last night we watched it happen on live TV. It was gruesome viewing. Auctioneers in bright yellow ties, coated in sweat looking out at motionless audiences. We watched three-part tragedies unfolding before our eyes: “Think about what you’re getting here”; “too light to sell at the level team”; “I’m going to pass the property in.”

The final analysis reveals a combined pre-bonus profit of just $65,000 across the four teams and eight contestants, by far the lowest in the show’s history. The cruellest part was watching Stace and Yanita, two absolute sweethearts, win the event, only to have Andy and Nate’s passed-in property re-auctioned and take the prize. It was wrenching television, watching “people not make much money”, as host Shelley Ferguson put it, and no one on screen was in any mood to celebrate.

Stace and Yanita after Andy and Nate’s sale.

Except for Mark Richardson. The show’s host has been grinning since day one, and launched into a desperate speech: “Forget what the profit margins are – you guys, by virtue of who you are and how you behave has made this the most successful season in Block history”.

What he was selling was even less popular than the Block houses this year, and the show fizzled to a solemn conclusion, with Richardson telling us that the show would return in 2018.

Only, will it? There were predictable errors here, which is both something inevitable in making live television, and somewhat indicative of a franchise going stale near the end of its natural life (repeat, there are no political parallels).

Most prominently, staging the finale the week of an election now looks naive. The result was preordained when shooting commenced; now the drag race has induced enough uncertainty to have becalmed the market.

Ling and Zing and their profits.

With the show over for another year, can it recover from this disaster? It’s been such a ratings juggernaut for Three that it’s hard to see it being abandoned entirely. It frequently beat perennial 25-54 dominator Shortland St this winter, takes up hours each week, and groans with opportunities for commercial exploitation.

Yet competitions require contestants, and while you might be able to contractually allow people to work for months for $500 a piece, as Ling and Zing did this year, it’s hard to imagine anyone TV-worthy looking at that number and thinking they’ll give it a crack next season.

Worse than the timing was the constant push to bigger and bigger houses, which mirrors that of the market as a whole. Our house-size has risen over the past few decades from around 100sqm to closer to 200sqm. But the bigger and richer they are, the less liquid, as we saw last night. The opportunity to go accessible and work on apartments – the houses our young people are told to aspire to now – might be the show’s last hope. A smaller, humbler and more accessible Block in 2018 might not sound like a TV exec’s idea of fun. But maybe it’s what we need.


Click here for the rest of our coverage of The Block NZ, and listen to The Real Pod interview with Sam Cable below:

This content, like all television coverage we do at The Spinoff, is brought to you thanks to the excellent folk at Lightbox. Do us and yourself a favour by clicking here to start a FREE 30 day trial of this truly wonderful service.

Keep going!
PicMonkey Collage

Pop CultureSeptember 18, 2017

Our foolproof guide to who will definitely, maybe clean up at The Emmys

PicMonkey Collage

Our friendly TV sponsors at Lightbox have a whole bunch of shows nominated for the Emmy Awards this year, so we got our resident award shows obsessive Sam Brooks to pick which ones might take home the gold.

I love me an awards show. A bunch of people in pretty dresses saying long speeches and thanking people, or going off the rails entirely is my idea of a good time. I watch them every year, even the years when nothing I like is nominated and I hate everybody involved. We all have our own forms of masochism, and this is mine.

As such, I am entirely the right person to carry out this highly scientific* analysis of which Lightbox shows have been nominated for Emmys, and how likely it is that these nominations will transfer to actual gold for the people and/or shows nominated. Check it out below, place your bets** and disagree with me***!

*There is no science to this. The Emmys are essentially random, I’m so sorry.

**Do not place bets based on any information I have given you, on anything.

***Do not disagree with me, I am quite fragile and vulnerable to criticism.

THE JUGGERNAUT SHOWS

The Handmaid’s Tale

Nominations: Outstanding Drama, Lead Actress in a Drama (Elisabeth Moss), Supporting Actress in a Drama (Ann Dowd, Samira Wiley), Guest Actress in a Drama (Alexis Bledel)

Safe Bets: Drama, Elisabeth Moss

Unlikely, But Who Knows: Ann Dowd, Samira Wiley.

Already Happened: Alexis Bledel

The Handmaid’s Tale seems like the safe bet for Drama. It fills the three roles that an Emmy-winning drama should do: it got great reviews, people actually liked it, and it tapped into the zeitgeist of our terrifying post-2016 world.

For a similar reason, Elisabeth Moss is probably a safe bet for Lead Actress in a Drama. She’s never won before – despite being nominated six times for Mad Men and once for Top of the Lake – this is her eighth nomination, people are calling it the best work she’s ever done, and she’s back in the public eye for the second season of Top of the Lake. If you are a crazy person who likes to bet on award shows, I’d consider Elisabeth Moss a safe bet.

Supporting Actress in a Drama Series is notoriously spotty (remember when Blythe Danner kept winning for Huff? No? Don’t you keep obsessive track of who wins the Emmy for Outstanding Actress in a Supporting Actress in a Drama Series? How else do you fill the endless abyss of your spare time?) so either of these women could win. They could also split the vote and lead the way for the glacial pace of Uzo Aduba’s Emmy collection to keep building (she’s got like three now.)

Also, Alexis Bledel already won her Emmy this past weekend! Congratulations, Rory.

Transparent

Nominations: Lead Actor in a Comedy (Jeffrey Tambor), Supporting Actress in a Comedy (Kathryn Hahn, Judith Light)

Safe Bet: Jeffrey Tambor

Unlikely, But Who Knows: Kathryn Hahn, Judith Light

Firstly, it’s insane this wasn’t nominated for Best Comedy. It’s still one of the best, most quietly groundbreaking and progressive shows on televisionHowever, Tambor seems like a safe bet. The work he does as Maura Pfeifferman is gorgeous, layered and sensitive. It’s a career-best for him, and he’s already won here once, and Emmys like to reward people lots and lots for some reason.

However, Hahn and Light are less safe bets, especially in a season where Saturday Night Live has suddenly become a show we expect to have its finger on the pulse. Light is a goddamned treasure of an actress, and her work on this show is beautiful, and this is somehow Hahn’s first ever Emmy nomination despite being a gem in a smaller role on Parks and Recreation and the lead in the spikily weird I Love Dick. My money would be on Leslie Jones, because I quite like her and she had a great season on SNL.

Better Call Saul

Nominations: Outstanding Drama, Lead Actor in a Drama (Bob Odenkirk), Supporting Actor in a Drama (Jonathan Banks)

I Have No Idea, I’m So Sorry: Drama, Bob Odenkirk, Jonathan Banks.

Better Call Saul is a bizarre blind spot for me. I know it’s great, I know that people with great opinions and taste like it. I would say that it’s probably not going to win Outstanding Drama, because it doesn’t feel like the juggernaut that The Handmaid’s Tale or potentially The Crown is.

It doesn’t feel like Bob Odenkirk’s year, but he’s as likely a bet as any of the other nominees, and probably more likely than Emmy winner Jess from Gilmore Girls. It’s not going to be Jonathan Banks’ year either, because John Lithgow has made some kind of deal with the devil to win awards for playing Winston Churchill.

THE OUTLIERS

Modern Family

Nominations: Outstanding Comedy Series, Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series (Ty Burrell)

Probably Not Going To Happen, But The Emmys Really Like Modern Family: Outstanding Comedy Series

Also Probably Not Going to Happen, But The Emmys Like Ty Burrell A Bit Less Than Modern Family On The Whole: Ty Burrell

Modern Family has won five Emmys for Outstanding Comedy Series. Ty Burrell has won two Emmys for Outstanding Supporting Actor. They have had their share and do not need any more.

The Emmys love to award the same thing over and over again, but this year has some especially buzzy nominees (Silicon Valley, Atlanta, Veep) especially, and the inertia of Modern Family is unlikely to triumph against that undefinable quality ‘buzz’.

Similarly, Ty Burrell is not going to win over Alec Baldwin playing Donald Trump on Saturday Night Live, because if you can think of Trump without thinking of Baldwin’s contorted face, you are a blessed human and I would like to know how you remain that way.

The Americans

Nominations: Lead Actor in a Drama (Matthew Rhys), Lead Actress in a Drama (Keri Russell), Guest Actress in a Drama (Allison Wright)

Could Happen: Matthew Rhys

Probably Can’t Happen: Keri Russell

Already Lost: Alison Wright

The Americans is called by your smartest friend ‘the best show on television’ and they are probably correct. (I’ve watched the first two seasons and they’re damn good, you guys. It’s the best show on television.) Rhys and Russell get tonnes of great reviews for their work on the show, but have yet to win awards.

It could be Rhys’ year, but who knows? It is probably not Russell’s year, but again who knows? It is definitely not Wright’s year, because she already lost and the past is a fact that we cannot change, no matter how much we hope and pray.

Better Things

Nominations: Lead Actress in a Comedy (Pamela Adlon)

Julia Louis-Dreyfus is nominated for Veep: Pamela Adlon

C’mon. Adlon is great, very great on this show, and the rest of the nominees are also bloody great, but Julia Louis-Dreyfus has won five Emmys for Veep and two before that. People love her on this show because she’s really, really good.

Homeland

Nominations: Supporting Actor in a Drama (Mandy Patinkin)

John Lithgow played Winston Churchill: Mandy Patinkin

Mandy does great work on Homeland; he’s a solid foil for Claire Danes’ highly entertaining antics. But he’s not playing Winston Churchill. No need to dust the shelf off this year, Mandy.


Click below to watch The Handmaid’s Tale, Better Things, Better Call Saul, The Americans, Transparent and Modern Family on Lightbox:

This content, like all television coverage we do at The Spinoff, is brought to you thanks to the excellent folk at Lightbox. Do us and yourself a favour by clicking here to start a FREE 30 day trial of this truly wonderful service.