spinofflive
Relics uncovered from Christchurch’s Catholic cathedral (on a blue Chux cloth). (Photo: Oliver Lewis)
Relics uncovered from Christchurch’s Catholic cathedral (on a blue Chux cloth). (Photo: Oliver Lewis)

SocietyApril 26, 2021

Saints in coffee jars: The relics recovered from a Christchurch icon

Relics uncovered from Christchurch’s Catholic cathedral (on a blue Chux cloth). (Photo: Oliver Lewis)
Relics uncovered from Christchurch’s Catholic cathedral (on a blue Chux cloth). (Photo: Oliver Lewis)

Oliver Lewis spends an afternoon exploring an archive of the divine, the mundane and the lightly profane in the ruins of Christchurch’s Catholic cathedral.

Father Kevin Clark is smiling.

The former Catholic Diocese of Christchurch archivist died last September. But here he is, looking down at us in the diocese offices, a nondescript building near the Washington Way skatepark. In the photograph, framed and mounted on the wall, Clark sports an almost mischievous grin – apparently he had a wicked sense of humour.

Almost 50 years ago, on April 26, 1975 – the year Robert Muldoon was first elected to power and Dame Whina Cooper led a hīkoi to parliament protesting the ongoing loss of Māori land – Clark carefully placed a collection of holy relics in a steel box. It was buried under the floor of the Cathedral of the Blessed Sacrament, one of the finest church buildings in Australasia, and sealed over with an inch of concrete.

But he obviously thought there was a chance someone would unearth them because he left a note. In it, Clark says the relics were collected by Bishop John Joseph Grimes SM, the first Catholic bishop of Christchurch and the driving force behind the construction of the cathedral. Grimes, an Englishman, acquired several hundred relics during his lifetime, many during trips to Europe. A contemporaneous and perhaps self-aggrandising document in the diocese archives describes the collection as the richest in the southern hemisphere.

“Nearly three hundred in number, the most precious is a large one of the True Cross. Next in importance are relics of the apostles, the principal martyrs, confessors and virgins of several centuries of the church,” the account reads.

But by the 1970s, relics were no longer considered du jour in the church. A decision was made to bury them, and Clark was the man for the job. The Friday before last, a week after they were retrieved from the demolished cathedral, The Spinoff visited the archives with Dr Chris Jones, an expert on medieval Europe and associate professor at the University of Canterbury (UC). Having previously described the collection as a sort of who’s who of Christianity, Jones was incredibly excited. Our guide was Triona Doocey, a gregarious, wonderful Irishwoman and the current diocese archivist.

“Most people collect postcards,” Doocey said, referring to Grimes. “He collected relics.”

Incredibly, Clark or someone else had made the decision to bury the relics in Gregg’s coffee jars. Coffee jars! Somewhat staggered by the profane nature of the receptacles, Jones joked that even Martin Luther, the German priest and a leading figure in the Reformation movement challenging the Catholic Church, wouldn’t have gone that far. Doocey, who had donned black gloves and was laying out the relics on sheets of blue and white Chux cloth (CSI this was not) said she’d take it up with Clark when they next saw each other in Heaven.

A selection of reliquaries, in an unusual vessel (Photo: Oliver Lewis)

But the jars worked – mostly. The metal box housing them was found encased in concrete and full of water, flooding that almost certainly took place during the demolition process. Doocey had to carefully drain some of the waterlogged containers. Of the two large Gregg’s jars, one was filled with numerous metal reliquaries, ornate little receptacles bearing the names of the holy figures whose relics they supposedly contained. Saint Francis of Assisi was there, as was Mary Magdalene, a witness to the crucifixion.

But the more interesting jar, at least for the morbidly curious, was the one packed full of bones. I had to keep reminding myself that these were human remains; regardless of their veracity as objects of veneration they were clearly from people who once lived. As Doocey opened the jar and began pulling out the fragments, she puckered her nose. The smell was cold and earthy – like wet clay and decay. Jones was enthused, remarking how strange it was to be in the presence of the relics, how close they made him feel to the Middle Ages.

Father Kevin was still above us on the wall, smiling.

Relics are a form of physical memory, a direct and tangible connection to the divine. According to Jones, they are objects that can be considered to be repositories of spiritual power. There are numerous famous fakes and frauds – the multiple foreskins of Christ, for instance, or the Shroud of Turin – but for many relics, the UC scholar believes we would be wrong to be incredulous. It is possible to trace their authenticity and provenance, particularly those from the Middle Ages onwards. Helpfully, a church council in the 13th century mandated that any new relics had to be authenticated before they could be displayed. Along with the items themselves, Bishop Grimes collected authentication certificates in a large, leather-bound ledger. The diocese archives still has it, a catalogue of saints and martyrs written in Latin.

As a journalist, I’m sceptical. But I want to believe.

On the table in front of us is a human jawbone mottled with age. It appears to be labelled with the word “Vincent”. Doocey has laid out all the fragments. To our surprise, many are large – not the humble flakes and scrapings of bone we had imagined. There is a vertebra, and over there part of an arm or leg bone. Along with the archaeologist working on the cathedral demolition, Doocey plans to photograph each of the bones and then, working with the ledger describing the relics, try to identify each one. The diocese has yet to decide what to do with them, but it seems likely that at least some will be buried in the new cathedral. In the meantime, Doocey means to see to it that they are treated with the reverence and respect owed to the dead.

Among them is Peter Chanel, a French missionary who was hacked to death on the island of Futuna in 1841 – the first Oceanic saint. On the table in the diocese offices, Chanel is in a plastic bag. Or, more accurately, one of his bones is. The fragment was ground down, mixed with relics from several other saints, apparently including Thomas Becket – the English archbishop who angered the king and was murdered in his own cathedral in 1170 – and placed in a cavity cut into the new high altar of the Cathedral of the Blessed Sacrament in the 1970s.

That it was recovered at all is more than a little miraculous. During the demolition, tonnes and tonnes of rubble came crashing down into the interior of the cathedral, crushing the high altar to smithereens. The way Doocey tells it, the archaeologist was sifting through the ruins when she came upon its fragments. Incredibly, the piece of marble the relics were interred behind was still whole and identifiable, so she was able to scrape up the fragments and preserve them.

The bones of saints, supposedly (photo: Oliver Lewis)

If you walk down Barbadoes St today, the gap where the cathedral once stood is obvious: a fenced-off, desolate wasteland. The building, once one of the most beautiful in the city if not the country, opened in 1905. For more than a century, it loomed over everything, a spiritual monument erected in creamy Ōamaru stone and decorated with imposing, classical columns. Inscribed above them on the entablature was a command written in Latin, a directive beseeching onlookers to “Look! This is the place where God is among men!”

God has since left the building. For people familiar with the city and the cathedral, walking past you can feel its absence, that sense of disorientation common to Cantabrians who experienced the 2010 and 2011 earthquakes – who saw landmarks erased, the seemingly permanent razed to the ground. The diocese plans to erect a new cathedral on a more central site, but I loved the old building and, biking past most days, I felt I had to write something to commemorate its fate.

At first, I thought it would be about the demolition workers. How must they feel, I thought, to be involved in the destruction of something so beautiful, so resonate with meaning. Last December, I spotted a man in high vis leaning over the fence on a break. So I asked him. “I feel the significance,” he said. It was hard not to, he added, especially when some of the people who came to watch had tears running down their faces. Then he said something that stopped me in my tracks. There were bones somewhere in the building, and they were hundreds of years old. What? I thought he might be talking about the three dead bishops buried in the cathedral, including Grimes. No, not them, he clarified. Holy relics.

How incredible is that?

Christchurch is far removed from the significant figures and events of Christianity. But by an incredible series of coincidences – or not, if the items are fraudulent – bits of them have washed up on our shores, crossing oceans and changing hands countless times to end up buried in a box off Barbadoes St. Even if the objects aren’t the real thing, in a way it doesn’t matter. For more than a hundred years, people have venerated them as if they were, establishing chains of belief that, in the way transubstantiation turns bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ, has transformed fragments of bone into physical representations of the saints.

To be a saint is, usually, to suffer. As we were looking over the relics, another diocese employee walked in to take a look. He had spent time in Boston and told us about a relic there, hair from the head of Saint Maximilian Kolbe. Kolbe was a Polish priest. After the Nazis invaded, he and his fellow friars provided shelter to thousands of refugees, including Jews, at their monastery outside Warsaw. Eventually, Kolbe was arrested and taken to Auschwitz, the notorious death camp. Here he volunteered to die in place of a stranger, joining a group of men selected to starve to death in a bunker as a deterrent after another prisoner ran away. After two weeks without food and water, Kolbe, who had led the other prisoners in prayer, was the only one left alive. Wanting the space emptied, the Nazis killed him with chemicals. Kolbe reportedly met his death with grace, calmly lifting his left arm to receive the injection.

It was a sobering story, and the diocese employee told it well. A few days after we had visited the relics, I sent Jones an email asking him to reflect on our visit. He came back within a few hours. While many people might consider the recovery of a bunch of old bones and broken jewellery to be irrelevant, Jones wrote, for believers and non-believers alike the collection was still an astounding sight offering a vibrant and tangible connection to the past.

“Laid out on jay cloths are one of Aotearoa New Zealand’s most important connections to nearly 2,000 years of European history, and to the story of Christianity.”

And then there was the joke played on us by Father Kevin.

When we visited, among the relics containers was an old Schweppes bottle that had been recovered, full of water, from the flooded metal box. Inside was what looked like a scroll of parchment or leather, stained dark brown and with faint text visible on the outside. It looked significant. This could be something like the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, Jones and I joked, the revelation of a fascinating historical document.

Moving carefully, Doocey tried to extract the scroll using tweezers. But it was too thick to pull through the mouth of the bottle without ripping. She went to get a hammer. Each dull thwack reverberated through the room like a countdown, ratcheting up the tension. Finally the bottle, covered by a cloth to prevent the shards from exploding everywhere, shattered. For almost 50 years, this document had been buried underground. What would it say? As Doocey gingerly started to unroll it, the lettering slowly came into view. “Kiwi Jackpot Lottery.” Clark had buried three Lotto tickets along with the two coffee jars of holy relics. Pointing to his smiling portrait, Doocey, Jones and I erupted in laughter. Well played, Father Kevin. And while the chances of them being winning tickets seems about as unlikely as the incredible series of coincidences that led to the relics being unearthed in Christchurch in the first place, Doocey still plans to check.

Reflecting afterwards, Jones said this:

“I felt privileged to have been present at a remarkable and unique occasion, one very few historians or archaeologists will ever experience. And to have been the butt of a rather good joke.”

Keep going!
bird jail

Pet WeekApril 26, 2021

The birds taking on Auckland Council

bird jail

The Parrot Society of New Zealand has won a battle, but it hasn’t won the war. Three species have won a temporary reprieve, but Auckland Council’s pest management plan continues to roll out.

Last year, Auckland Council announced its 2020-2030 pest management plan and incurred the wrath of parrot and reptile lovers across the region. On the list of animals the council wanted phased out, starting from next year, were six species of parrot, five species of lizard, and two species of turtle.

After a long and expensive legal battle that ended up settling out of court, three species of parrot have now been exempted from the list until 2025. Vice-president of the Parrot Society of New Zealand, Hayden Van Hooff, calls it a win. “We didn’t achieve what we wanted to achieve but we got as far as we could with the funds that we have, and fighting a Goliath like Auckland Regional Council.”

Eastern rosellas, galahs and sulphur-crested cockatoos will be allowed three more years until phase-out, but rainbow lorikeets, quaker parrots (also known as monk parrots), and Indian ringnecks are staring down the barrel of retirement. The 2022 phase-out plan means no more buying, breeding, selling or distribution of any kind. The birds will not be culled, but they will also not be replaced when they meet their natural end.

The pest management plan describes several species of animal as “sustained control pest animals” including the aforementioned parrots, lizard species including eastern water dragons and bearded dragons, and assorted turtles, ants, fish and geese. The three chosen parrots are the only species on the list to be exempted, and even then it’s only temporary.

a sulphur crested cockatoo, an eastern rosella, and a galah against a blue sky background
Free as a bird (for three years). From left: Sulphur-crested cockatoo, eastern rosella, galah.

The council’s stance on these animals is clear: they have pest potential. Reptiles and birds, in particular, have long lifespans and, if released into the wild, could damage native habitats, spread disease, and compete with or even kill native species.

Auckland Council’s biosecurity principal adviser, Dr Imogen Bassett, said the pest management plan is taking a precautionary approach. “Most biosecurity issues are best responded to early,” she said. “Imagine if we could go back to 1858 and prevent possums from being introduced for the fur trade. We can’t do that, but we do have an opportunity to prevent new species becoming problems in the future.”

Bassett said the birds – in particular Indian ringneck parakeets and monk parakeets have a history of becoming pests overseas, and Auckland Council doesn’t want to take that risk. 

Van Hooff acknowledged that birds do occasionally get out. “But we’re talking ones and twos,” he said. Furthermore, he pointed out, at least one species on the list is already established in the wild. “Sulphur-crested cockatoos have had a population in New Zealand for well over a hundred years,” he said. “There’s even records of them being blown over from Australia.”

A lot of the Parrot Society’s ire, Van Hooff said, stems from the fact the bylaw was passed without consulting bird owners. “We were all blindsided,” he said. “There are people out there who’ve had their pets for 10 or 15 years. I do know a few people that are saying if they can’t get vet care, if they can’t breed them, they may end up moving [out of Auckland].”

He was set to move to Auckland from Taupō this month, but has decided to stay put. “I want to keep a few of these species and Auckland’s just not going to work,” he said. “I only have amazons, but I’ve kept and bred galahs, sulphur-crested cockatoos, quakers, rainbow lorikeets everything on the list, basically. The species that they’re trying to ban are fairly common as pets and breeding birds.”

Vice-president of the Parrot Society, Hayden Van Hooff, and some friendly galahs (Photo: Hayden Van Hooff)

There has been concern from breeders that the ban on distribution means birds will need to get on a boat and do a circuit of the Hauraki Gulf just to get from Northland to the Waikato. “Technically they’re not even meant to drive through [Auckland],” said Van Hooff. “I’m not saying they’re going to have police checks for Indian ringnecks and rainbow lorikeets.”

The pest management plan doesn’t explicitly mention travel restrictions, at least to the vet. However, Van Hooff claims he got an email from the lawyer suggesting otherwise. “We actually received an email from the lawyer stating that the council was looking at, basically, throwing us a bone and potentially allowing people to take their birds to the vet. I was like, really? You’re talking about a humane issue.”

One Auckland-based exotic vet said rabbits were the most commonly seen “exotic”, but parrots and budgies were next on the list. The phase-out would certainly mean fewer patients for exotic vet care specialists.

When asked for clarification around vet access, Bassett confirmed the bylaw would not impact pre-existing exotic pet owners. “Pet owners will still be able to take pets to the vet when the new rules come into effect, however affected parrots and reptiles will need to be properly contained at all relevant times to prevent escape.”

For now, Van Hooff’s fight is over – although he remains sympathetic to the plight of reptile owners who haven’t seen any species exempt from the ban. “I’ve kept and bred reptiles as well, and it is a shame for that to happen but we’ve had no support from the reptile side of things. For us to try to get an exemption on those it would have been a whole other level of paperwork.”

“There’s not really much they can do unless they go down the same route and spend $180,000 on lawyers, which is what we’ve done.”