spinofflive
A couple lovingly looks at each other while holding a newborn wrapped in a blanket. Both are smiling, standing closely, with soft lighting creating an intimate atmosphere. The image is in black and white.
Emma and her partner Roy with Jesús Valentino (Photo: Billie Brook)

SocietyMarch 28, 2025

Finding palliative care for our baby in a ‘luck of the draw’ health system

A couple lovingly looks at each other while holding a newborn wrapped in a blanket. Both are smiling, standing closely, with soft lighting creating an intimate atmosphere. The image is in black and white.
Emma and her partner Roy with Jesús Valentino (Photo: Billie Brook)

Amid rising concerns over the state of paediatric palliative care in New Zealand, Emma Gilkison reflects on the short life of her son Jesús Valentino, who died with the people who loved him best, comfortably and with the care he needed – yet this happened in spite of, not because of, the hospital system.

My waters broke during Diwali, the festival of lights celebrated around the world. More than 50 hours later, my first baby arrived on his due date at 6.58 am. He was placed on my chest, a wet, warm, squirmy bundle. Immediately the sharp distress and flailing desperation of labour evaporated. The world became soft and diffuse.

“Hello, my darling, you’re here. It’s so wonderful to see you.”

Nothing had prepared me for the joy of seeing my son’s face and gazing into his eyes. They were like shining black opals, tiny planets from a far-off universe. He had cheeks like plump pillows and hair like lines of black ink.

My partner Roy took off his shirt so he could cradle our baby against his bare skin. “Son, we love you so much,” he wept.

This might have been a typical scene in a delivery suite, except for our baby’s very atypical condition. He had ectopia cordis, which meant his heart had grown outside of his chest. This condition is usually fatal and affects around seven in one million babies. As we’d prepared for our baby’s birth, we’d also had to prepare for his death.

*

The recent news of Starship Children’s Hospital losing its only paediatric palliative care specialist made me reflect again on our experience in New Zealand’s health system in 2014. As a parent with a baby or child with a terminal illness, your utmost priority is their comfort. You would hope that your hospital offered palliative care to reduce the symptoms of pain and suffering for your child – whether they be physical, mental or emotional. You would hope the public health system provided wraparound support, helping you navigate difficult decisions around end-of-life care and deal with your grief. You would hope that you could get on with enjoying the precious time you have left with your baby or child, without having to battle for their right to a dignified death.

*

We learned of our baby’s condition during a routine ultrasound scan. We saw what looked like a tiny ball bouncing on his chest. The tiny ball was his heart. 

“You’re going to be quite the talk around here,” said the sonographer, the words slipping out of her mouth before she could stop them.

We were referred to a maternal foetal medicine team, made up of a neonatologist, obstetrician and specialist midwife. We’d read online that in a handful of cases, surgeons had successfully placed ectopia cordis hearts back inside babies’ chests. I’d found a YouTube video of a little girl called Audrina who’d had this surgery in Texas and survived. She wore pink plastic chest armour while the skin graft over her heart healed.

The specialist team agreed to refer us to a paediatric cardiologist at Starship, to find out if surgery would be possible for our baby. We had to wait until I was almost five months’ pregnant for the appointment, when our baby’s heart was big enough to be assessed by scan. The doctor delivered his findings in a soft voice. “There are other structural problems with your son’s heart. Surgery won’t be possible to fix them all. Your baby will die at birth or shortly after.”

On hearing this news, I felt as if I’d been struck hard with a blunt object. Initially, I thought the rest of my pregnancy would feel like a prolonged sad farewell. However, once I’d come to terms with the prognosis, I decided I wanted to cherish the time I had with my baby, even while he was in the womb. This was a crash course in living in the present moment. 

Like other families with babies or children who are going to die, we got creative with how to do special things with our son. During my pregnancy, Roy would sing to our son inside my belly every morning. We took him to the opera. When I was 35 weeks’ pregnant, I went swimming with whales in Tonga. As I swam in the ocean, my baby swam inside my body. I wasn’t eligible for travel insurance and the specialist team at the hospital advised against the trip, but I wanted to make as many happy memories with my baby as possible.

We met with the specialist team once a month during my pregnancy. These meetings presented some challenges. We had questions about what would happen if our baby was born healthier than expected. I’d read of a case in India where a baby with an ectopia cordis heart lived for a week. This scenario was dismissed as unlikely.

As my due date approached, there was no plan for our baby’s care except to give him morphine if he needed it. “If he’s having trouble breathing, would you give him oxygen?” I asked. I was told there would be no oxygen or resuscitation, no heroics to prolong a life that couldn’t be saved. A palliative care doctor was supposed to come along to one of these meetings, but we never saw them.

Meanwhile, a kind priest we knew had introduced us to a paediatric surgeon who had offered to volunteer his time and be on call when our baby was born. He would apply a special dressing to protect his heart. He wanted to try using an enclosed plastic surgical bag to protect it, something which as far as he knew, hadn’t been tried before.

Through another chance encounter, my mother met the president of SANDS, an organisation that supports families through baby loss. SANDS volunteers then met with me every month or two and offered a wealth of information to help prepare for our baby’s birth and death.

A smiling woman and man admire a newborn wrapped in a cream-colored blanket. The baby sleeps peacefully. Colourful flowers and a few items are blurred in the background.
Emma and Roy with Jesús Valentino (Photo: Billie Brook)

Given what we had been told by the neonatologist, I had prepared myself for my son to die shortly after delivery. Yet one hour turned to two hours, two hours turned into a whole day, and the next morning our baby was still with us. To the amazement of everyone, he was doing all the usual things babies do. Guzzling down milk, drifting into deep slumbers, crying in protest when his nappy was changed. 

Because no interventions were being carried out, he was not in an incubator or neonatal ward, he was with us in an ordinary postnatal room. No one knew exactly why he was doing so well, when his heart shouldn’t have been able to effectively pump oxygenated blood around his body. It was thought he was using a heart vessel to transport oxygenated blood that usually only functions when babies are in the womb. Perhaps the plastic surgical bag dressing was also helping to maintain his heart’s condition.

My partner Roy hails from Peru and wanted to call our son Jesús, a common name in South America. I worried that people would think we were declaring our son to be the messiah. I liked the name Valentino because I’d found out I was pregnant on Valentine’s Day. Eventually Roy talked me around and we agreed on Jesús Valentino (JV for short). An exceptional name for a boy with an exceptional heart.

On the second day of our son’s life, we met Tisha, a community neonatal nurse. She had a warm, friendly presence and we liked her immediately. She began telling us about symptoms to look out for if our baby was in distress and needed pain relief. As crying is normal behaviour for babies, I’d been worried I wouldn’t know how to read the signs. I wanted nothing more than for our baby to be comfortable and as nobody else had talked to us about this, I felt Tisha was an ally.

She then asked if we’d thought about going home in the next day or so. I was taken aback. Nothing we’d been told in our specialist meetings had suggested we prepare for taking JV home and we had none of the things we’d need. No bassinet or bedding or baby bath. Most of all, I didn’t want to be far away from the midwives and neonatologist who could help us with his care. I didn’t want the responsibility of knowing when and how much morphine to administer. My knee-jerk reaction was a firm no.

I would later read in the hospital notes, we had been expected to leave. Perhaps in other circumstances, or if I had been less assertive about my wishes, we would have been made to.

Instead, we were allowed to stay on in hospital. Tisha took our family under her wing and offered to volunteer her time on the weekend so we could take JV on outings. We needed her as a medical escort in case he died while we were not in hospital. We needed a special letter from the hospital to say that JV couldn’t be strapped in a carseat, in case we were stopped by police.

On our “big day out” when JV was one week old, we visited my Buddhist centre for chanting, then attended a Catholic mass for All Souls Day. On another outing, we walked in a blissful daze in the home of compassion gardens, profuse with flowers, vegetables, bumble bees, birds, butterflies, rabbits even. Another day, we met a tuatara at the wildlife sanctuary Zealandia. Tisha also happened to be a great amateur photographer. She photographed our excursions and later presented us with a beautiful album.

These were days of miracle and wonder. The opportunity to do things we’d never dreamed of with our baby was incredibly special. Our wider community was able to meet JV too. They would all be the keepers of his memory.

When JV was a week old, our neonatologist had a stroke of genius and requested that JV be admitted to Mary Potter Hospice. This was a much better environment for us to be in than the hospital. We had a bigger room, a proper bed for Roy to sleep in, French doors that opened out onto a sunny deck. There was even a massage therapist, a music therapist and staff were always knocking on our door asking if we’d like a slice of chocolate cake or a cup of tea.

I hadn’t realised it at the time, but JV was the first baby to ever have been admitted to this hospice and it had taken quite a lot of wrangling behind the scenes to make it happen. Currently, whether a baby or child is able to be cared for in a hospice in New Zealand varies around the country and depends on a paediatric team being available to work alongside hospice staff.

As JV neared his second week of life, we noticed a change in his health as his heart struggled to keep performing the clever tricks it was using to sustain him. His skin was sometimes tinged with blue, sometimes red and blotchy, a sign that oxygen wasn’t circulating properly around his body. He seemed fussier. He needed morphine in higher doses.

The last day of JV’s life was sunny. The air was sweet with the smell of spring blossom. Roy and I were alone with our son, which was unusual as there had been a constant stream of people with us. He died peacefully in my arms aged 15½ days old. The doctor who came shortly after commented on how beautifully he’d died.

‘Love The Spinoff? Its future depends on your support. Become a member today.’
Madeleine Chapman
— Editor

All babies and children with a terminal illness deserve to die this way – with the people who love them best, comfortable and with the care they need. Yet, the excellent palliative care our baby and family received happened in spite of, not because of, the hospital system. It was mostly thanks to the altruism of some exceptional people who were willing to help.

What if we hadn’t been introduced to the paediatric surgeon who volunteered his time and developed the special dressing for our son’s heart (this was later the subject of a paper in the British medical journal)? What if my mother hadn’t met the president of SANDS and we hadn’t been supported by them to prepare for our baby’s death? What if Tisha hadn’t been our exceptional neonatal nurse who was willing to give up time on her weekend to take us on special outings? What if a request had never been made for our baby to be the first to be admitted to Mary Potter Hospice, where adults are offered gold-standard palliative care? What if we didn’t have all these wonderful memories to counterbalance the grief of losing our first baby? What if, alongside grief, we also had to deal with the stress and trauma of a hospital system that hadn’t supported our baby in his final days and hours?

Luck and privilege should never play a part in the care that a baby or child receives at the end of their life. The family of that baby or child will carry the memories of this time forever, etched in pokerwork on their hearts. A health system with gaping holes in paediatric palliative care can’t show dying babies and children the love they deserve.

Emma has written a book about her baby’s life and death, The Heart of Jesús Valentino, available through Awa Press. You can read an excerpt here.

Keep going!
A man in a blue shirt (Stephen Graham as Ediie in Netflix's Adolescence) appears emotionally distraught, covering his mouth with his hand. The background is dark blue with a wallpaper pattern behind him resembling stars and galaxies.
Stephen Graham as Eddie in Netflix’s Adolescence (Netflix)

OPINIONSocietyMarch 27, 2025

Watching Adolescence made me glad I don’t have kids

A man in a blue shirt (Stephen Graham as Ediie in Netflix's Adolescence) appears emotionally distraught, covering his mouth with his hand. The background is dark blue with a wallpaper pattern behind him resembling stars and galaxies.
Stephen Graham as Eddie in Netflix’s Adolescence (Netflix)

It’s a response that has nothing to do with children and everything to do with adults.

On Sunday, my family had a picnic. We went to Grey Lynn Park, lazed around in the autumn sun, and appreciated the corny, wholesome vibe of being together. My siblings and I are all aged between 39 and 45 years old, and my parents are in their 70s. For the most part, we have moved past aggravating each other and settled into the stage of life where being alive, well, and together is not taken for granted.

We all grew up with our adolescence and young adulthood firmly rooted in an analogue era. While our parents had a lot to contend with, they did not lie awake worrying about whether we were sending pictures of our breasts or genitalia to other kids on Snapchat only to have them shared with everyone else at school.  

Like most people who’ve watched the outstanding new Netflix show, Adolescence, we couldn’t help but discuss it at our picnic. My husband and I watched the first three episodes on Saturday night in total silence. 

The next day in the park, my eight-month-old niece sat on a rug and ate a mandarin, joy flashing across her face at its sweetness. She ate some chicken for the first time and seemed to like it. I held onto her as she tried to climb me, using my hair, glasses and cheeks to grip her way up the top of my head. I blew raspberries on her tummy and was proud as she remained unperturbed by the presence of our two dogs who must look like horses to her. She is a complete delight, and I love her dearly. I also told my brother that his daughter should never, ever have a phone and that I was hopeful a catastrophic event would force us all to live in the bush, where food, shelter, and rebuilding society without wifi or billionaires would occupy our days. According to parents I’ve talked to, the urge to flee to an imagined agrarian bolt hole is not an uncommon response to watching Adolescence.

I watched the fourth episode on Monday night. Tears rolled down my cheeks as it ended, the scale of parental impotence and grief laid bare. I turned to my husband and said, “I am glad we don’t have kids”. 

The show is harrowing to watch, but I am more bothered by what it stirred in me. It’s a reaction I thought unimaginable not long ago, given the grief I’ve nursed about not being able to have children. That lump has diminished over time through a conscious decision to embrace my life as it is. A television show prompting me to say something that sounds more cold and callous each time it rolls around in my head suggests a more existential anxiety. 

I don’t have children, and I imagine that for most people, certainly for the parents of children I know, any sense of life being more straightforward or less frightening without kids is overridden every day. They eat a mandarin for the first time, and it’s joyful. They hug you, make you proud, and sometimes confirm that being a parent might be the most challenging yet rewarding thing you will do. 

My reaction is not an informed point of view. It’s driven by fear, feeling powerless and a frustration at our inability to speak about matters of importance honestly, without malice and with a degree of individual accountability.  

Adolescence is fictional, but the influence of Andrew Tate and the manosphere, so cravenly fed by algorithms designed to exploit data points for profit, has been cited in real-world murder cases. In a recent case in the United Kingdom, prosecutors said the convicted killer’s actions of murdering three women with a crossbow were fuelled by the “violent misogyny promoted” by Tate. In March 2023, the UK Ministry of Justice convicted or cautioned almost 18,500 knife-related crimes. Approximately 17.3% of those offenders were between the ages of 10 and 17.

In our own country, it should be made clear that research to date acknowledges evidence gaps in several key areas related to misogyny, both online and offline, as well as gender-based violence. Correlation is not causation. In short, it’s complicated and inevitably, conclusions are drawn along ideological lines. Populist politicians use concerns about free speech and false flags about “wokeness” to spout lines designed to distract us and shore up their chunk of the vote. At the same time, the impact on generations of young men of gleeful and unchecked cancel culture and the rapid, necessary societal change that upended gender roles remains something we seem afraid to talk about.

Andrew Tate (Image: Supplied/ Tina Tiller)

There’s been some backlash to the show and its lack of storytelling about the victim, a young girl named Katie. To be clear, any talk of individual accountability is not aimed at women who have lost their lives at the hands of violent men, nor is being subjected to rapid-fire emoji bullying justification for murder. At the same time, criticisms of the show’s approach to Katie’s story miss the necessary focus on what the hell is going on with young men. As reported by The Spinoff on Monday, the only category that returns a positive net approval rating for Donald Trump in New Zealand is men aged under 40. That’s in step with global trends. The show also glosses over why young women might attempt to assert power in ways that young men view as emasculating.

In the face of tech companies whose accumulated wealth overtakes that of most nation states, talking about individual accountability and behaviour is also akin to haranguing people who have to drive cars to work while the 100 companies responsible for more than 70% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions since 1988 go about their merry way. Two-sidedism isn’t a meritorious argument in that case, nor this one. 

Donald Trump and his acolytes represent nothing good. I will die on that hill. I also think rendering the people who support him or think he might be an answer to their disenfranchisement as “two-dimensional profiles without history, family or feelings”, a description used recently by Canadian author and poet Ian William during a recent lecture, is precisely part of the problem that we often lay at the feet of “the other side”. As William says, we are verbally violent with each other, and this behaviour from adults spans the political and ideological spectrum. 

‘If you value The Spinoff and the perspectives we share, support our work by donating today.’
Anna Rawhiti-Connell
— Senior writer

As the mountains of cravenly accrued power become more challenging to scale and the old norms are set on fire, I increasingly wonder what good comes of hunting out faceless forces to blame. As we become increasingly forced into and comforted by swimming in familiar lanes, gulping at the air shared only by those who agree with us and spitting venom at those who don’t, the commonality we think we’re experiencing increasingly feels false, and the chasm between us wider. The more I think about it, the more this seems to have been by design. The powerlessness I felt watching Adolescence is not a manifestation of anger at governments or global tech titans but a frustration that we’re falling into a well-laid trap and flailing about looking to lay blame.

Thinkpieces about phones, kids, social media, and regulation have started to take on the same appearance as the Spiderman pointing meme. That’s not to say they’re not real solutions and justifiable demands, but they feel increasingly beyond the realms of possibility. In the US, home to most global technology companies, the second-in-command to the president is arguably Elon Musk, a global social media platform owner. Following the election of Trump, social media company CEOs and media moguls have gathered at the feet of the Trump administration to shore up their interests and have dismantled the pretences of caring about their role in civil society. 

Spiderman pointing meme

For me, the show has had the percussive effect of a staccato note in a loud and anxious symphony about concerns about our inability to turn back the tide on the degradation of civil society and discourse and the balancing of culpability, agency and impotence. Perhaps the very notion of civil discourse has withered on the vine already, but of the tools adults have in their arsenals, individual accountability for our behaviour and a belief in the merits of cultivating curiosity, critical thinking and empathy are the keys to maintaining a sense of agency. Agency is what those who are accumulating power and wealth to objectively evil ends want to rob us of. 

Feeling paralysed in the face of the overwhelming systemic challenges Adolescence draws attention to is completely normal. The impulse to point outward – at algorithms, social media, government, and generational shifts – is correct, but perhaps the most radical act of resistance is decidedly internal.

If adults think it’s their god-given right to sling hooks at each other online without questioning whether they’re now just mindlessly participating in a failed experiment, why would we expect more from our kids? If we write off vast swathes of the population because of who they vote for or what they believe, lured into holding pens by the promise of false community and performing like monkeys for small doses of recognition and comfort, why would we expect children not to seek out the same?

Children are growing up in a world bereft of adult behaviour. No one should be off the hook.