spinofflive
Stewarts-images-7-850×510.jpg

The BulletinJune 5, 2024

Students end rent strike, but call for further action

Stewarts-images-7-850×510.jpg

Attention turns to the Residential Tenancies Act, a piece of legislation that does not cover student accommodation, writes Stewart Sowman-Lund in this extract from The Bulletin. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.

The end of the strike

Back in April, I reported on the start of a “rent strike” among some students in University of Auckland halls of residence. This morning, the group behind the strike, Students for Fair Rent, has announced an end to that action. In a statement, the group criticised undefined “intimidation tactics” by the University of Auckland which contributed to an “unsafe environment for students and strikers to fight for safe, secure, and affordable accommodation”. They said the university had not engaged with the campaign, and claimed the institution had bullied students refusing to pay rent. A spokesperson for the University of Auckland rejected this and told The Bulletin just 16 students had participated in the rent strike as of the end of May. However, while the strike is ending, the campaign for fair rent is not. The group is now turning its attention to the Residential Tenancies Act, a piece of legislation that does not cover halls of residence.

Why the strike was started in the first place

As reported at the time, the strike called for Auckland University students to stop paying weekly accommodation fees beginning on May 1. There are five catered residences for Auckland University students that charge around $470 a week, while self-catered properties (typically for older students) cost around $310-$325 a week. Leonard Powell at RNZ looked at the growing cost of accommodation earlier in the year. Students for Fair Rent spokesperson Matthew Lee told me in April that these costs were well above the average cost for living in Auckland City. In an interview with a rather combative Mike Hosking on Newstalk ZB last week, Lee said the strike was the only way to try and trigger change. “The university should be acknowledging that this is a real problem. We want to sit down with the university and find a solution that works for everyone,” he said. Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick backed the strike and has previously voiced support for updating the Residential Tenancies Act to include student accommodation. “Rent control is within the Residential Tenancies Act [through which] there is a limitation on how much you can increase rent by,” she said at a university debate last year. Penny Simmonds, the tertiary education minister, declined to comment to The Bulletin.

Was a strike the best course of action?

Writing for the Herald last week, Lachlan Rennie reported that some Auckland University students had had their key cards deactivated for participating in the strike, and some students had felt pressured to resume paying for accommodation. The university denied this and told The Bulletin that access cards stopped working “from time to time”. When reactivating a card, staff members would see a note highlighting any outstanding debt and may follow up on this. But, said a spokesperson: “Regardless of whether a student’s account is in arrears, their card is immediately reactivated, and the student again has access to their room.” Citizens Advice Bureau national advisor Sacha Green told the Herald that there was no “legal basis” for the rent strike given students had signed a residential agreement, and this was not protected by law. “The university has the right to decide to terminate the agreement,” said Green, who added that the institute was required to “act in good faith”. Previous student action at other universities has resulted in a backdown, such as at Wellington’s Victoria University during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Time for an update?

Swarbrick made updating the Residential Tenancies Act a key pillar of her reelection bid in Auckland Central last year, as this Newsroom report from the campaign trail examined. It also showed cross-party awareness of the issue of student accommodation, even if Swarbrick was alone in pledging change. Beyond just the issue of affordability, there have been public calls to include student accommodation in the Residential Tenancies Act. The Conversation looked at it in 2021, while this episode of The Detail from the same year honed in on a select committee inquiry into student accommodation prompted by the death of a student. Three years on, the decision to strike and to push for legislative change would suggest there’s more work to be done.

Keep going!
Stewarts-images.png

The BulletinJune 4, 2024

Five news stories you might have missed over the long weekend

Stewarts-images.png

If you’re anything like Stewart Sowman-Lund, you spent King’s Birthday off your phone and away from the news – we absolutely all deserved it. In this extract from The Bulletin, let’s get back up to speed with what’s been going on since Friday. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.

Budget backlash over failure to fund medicines

It’s not often you’ll read a column from a former government minister and find them criticising their own party in the current government, at least not when it’s someone like Steven Joyce questioning decisions made in this year’s budget. Writing for the Herald over the weekend, the former finance minister was – unsurprisingly – largely in support of Budget 2024, but was critical of the broken promise to fund 13 cancer drugs, calling it an “inexplicable failure” and a “significant blemish that may dog the government”. He wasn’t alone, as this 1News report illustrates. This morning, an open letter to Christopher Luxon, Nicola Willis and David Seymour co-signed by a number of health organisations and charities has called for a swift u-turn on the decision not to fund the drugs. “Unlike other promises, lives will be lost if these medicines are not funded,” reads the letter. As noted by Tracy Watkins in the Sunday Star-Times, budgets are often remembered not for what they hand out, but for what they take away – and the cancer drug fallout threatens to haunt the government. Earlier this morning on RNZ’s First Up, Willis said the government was going to honour the commitment, and the government was giving it the “urgency” it deserved. Watch this space.

King’s honours list released, but has the public holiday outstayed its welcome?

Yesterday saw the release of the King’s Birthday honours list, which can be found here in its entirety. Among the most prominent names recognised this year, Rocket Lab’s Peter Beck and business leader Theresa Gattung. RNZ has a wrap of some of the responses from those honoured, while I particularly enjoyed the interview with service medal recipient Katereina Kaiwai, who told Patrick Gower she thought the award was a prank. Here at The Spinoff we drew up our own honour’s list: 50 kings you need to know. Did your favourite make the list? Meanwhile, The Spinoff’s Liam Rātana has written a scathing, must-read opinion piece questioning the purpose of King’s Birthday more broadly. “Why are we – a purportedly progressive, liberal nation – continuing to celebrate the birth of the figurehead of such a vile establishment? Because we get a holiday?”

Census data investigation

An exclusive report from Andrea Vance in the Sunday Star-Times looked at suggestions a Te Pāti Māori MP and her marae may have used private census data for political campaigning. It’s a bombshell claim, and one that will certainly see further questions asked in the coming weeks. According to Vance, a number of former marae workers have alleged that the Manurewa marae photocopied census forms, with data then provided to the Waipareira Trust run by Te Pāti Māori president John Tamihere. It’s alleged this information was then used to target voters in the Tāmaki Makaurau electorate. Tamihere and Te Pāti Māori have denied the allegations. A whistleblower from the Ministry of Social Development has also laid a police complaint, reported Vance. The marae’s former chief executive, MP Takutai Tarsh Kemp, narrowly beat Labour’s Peeni Henare in the electorate last year. The Electoral Commission has previously investigated concerns raised over the fact the marae acted as a polling place during last election, while Kemp was still chief executive, though determined this was acceptable.

Luxon and Peters head overseas – so who’s in charge?

The prime minister is in the Pacific this week, leaving today to visit Niue before travelling to Fiji. It’s Christopher Luxon’s first tour of the region since becoming prime minister. In a statement, Luxon said the visit was an opportunity to “reaffirm New Zealand’s position as a trusted partner”. Foreign minister Winston Peters, meanwhile, will travel to Asia later today. He’s heading to Vietnam, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Timor-Leste. Writing for Stuff, Glenn McConnell reported that this will leave David Seymour in charge as acting prime minister for the first time since last year’s election (and, well, ever).

More could be done to curb alcohol harm, says police commissioner

RNZ’s Guyon Espiner has reported this morning that alcohol creates 20 times the harm of methamphetamine, but less than 1% of police staff are dedicated to reducing its harm. While police commissioner Andrew Coster defended the police resources devoted to tackling alcohol harm, he questioned whether more could be done to curb it. “The biggest difficulty we have is that you can go to an off-licence premise, which in some areas are more prevalent than corner dairies, and buy a large quantity of very cheap alcohol. There’s no offence in that,” Coster said. According to Espiner’s report, the estimated harm from alcohol is about $7.8bn a year, compared with $1.8bn for illegal drugs.