Getty Images
Getty Images

The BulletinMarch 27, 2024

China rifles through our digital drawers

Getty Images
Getty Images

Accusations that China-backed hackers accessed MPs’ data come as the UK and US make allegations of their own – and issue arrest warrants, writes Catherine McGregor in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.

Chinese hackers accessed MPs’ data

Chinese state-sponsored cyber-spies targeted New Zealand’s parliament in 2021, accessing data on MPs, GCSB minister Judith Collins revealed on Tuesday. The hack has been identified as the work of Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) 40, a group allegedly linked to China’s Ministry of State Security. Collins said NZ’s Parliamentary Counsel Office and the Parliamentary Service were targeted, and while the accessed data wasn’t strategically sensitive, the incident underscores the threat to cybersecurity posed by hostile foreign actors. It’s not the first such incident. “In 2021, former GCSB Minister Andrew Little condemned the Chinese Ministry of State Security for its malicious cyber activity, in a separate incident to the revelations from Collins today,” the Herald reports. “APT 40, the same group named today, was said to be responsible for the incident.” Then, just six months ago, a SIS threat assessment warned about “ongoing activity in and against New Zealand and our home region that is linked to the [China’s] intelligence services”.

A diplomatic minefield for Luxon

China has denied the most recent allegations. The embassy said NZ was “barking up the wrong tree”, and suggested it was influenced by similar claims made recently by the US and UK. While key ministers condemned China’s actions yesterday, they didn’t speak as strongly as they could have, writes BusinessDesk’s Pattrick Smellie (paywalled). It “spoke volumes” about how NZ seeks to straddle its trading relationship with China and the growing need to push back on Chinese intelligence and influence campaigns, he says. In the Herald (paywalled), Audrey Young says PM Chris Luxon judged the response perfectly. “It required delicate diplomacy and he delivered.” The Post’s Luke Malpass calls the government’s decision to go public “brave and risky”, noting it could have decided to stay quiet about the attack instead. Stuff’s Tova O’Brien, on the other hand, thinks it shows up our “co-dependence” on our allies. “Two and half years it sat on this information that China had attacked our democracy. And it only chose to go public after the United States and United Kingdom had gone first… Coincidence? No.”

 

Election candidates targeted by foreign actors

Coincidentally enough, yesterday also saw the annual select committee appearance by the heads of NZ’s two spy agencies, the GCSB and SIS. Incidents of foreign interference discussed by the spy chiefs included “deceptive, covert, corruptive” actions by state actors attempting to influence candidates in last year’s election, Stuff’s Glenn McConnell reports. SIS boss Andrew Hampton said in some cases the SIS had worked with candidates to help them become aware of these interference attempts, and it was “highly unlikely” that the election result had been impacted in any way. He also said the SIS had discovered that seven NZ pilots had been involved in training Chinese army aviators. “Such activity clearly poses a major national security risk and it is not in New Zealand’s interests to have former military personnel training another military who does not share the same values as our own.”

UK and US impose sanctions, make arrests over own hacking claims

The revelations about espionage inside the NZ parliament came just hours after the UK and US imposed sanctions against a Chinese company linked to the hacking group nicknamed APT 31 (APT names are used by Western security officials to identify hacking groups linked to foreign governments, the Guardian explains). The UK alleges that Chinese state-sanctioned hackers targeted the Electoral Commission, potentially gaining access to information on tens of millions of UK voters, and conducted cyber “reconnaissance activity” against British parliamentarians who were critical of Beijing in 2021. Meanwhile the US government accused China of perpetrating an elaborate state-backed hacking programme for more than a decade, and charged six hackers with conspiracy to commit computer intrusions and wire fraud as a result.

Keep going!
The aftermath of Cyclone Gabrielle in Hawke’s Bay. (Photo: Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence. Design: Tina Tiller.)
The aftermath of Cyclone Gabrielle in Hawke’s Bay. (Photo: Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence. Design: Tina Tiller.)

The BulletinMarch 26, 2024

Why Civil Defence was under-prepared and overwhelmed by Cyclone Gabrielle

The aftermath of Cyclone Gabrielle in Hawke’s Bay. (Photo: Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence. Design: Tina Tiller.)
The aftermath of Cyclone Gabrielle in Hawke’s Bay. (Photo: Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence. Design: Tina Tiller.)

A review of the Hawke’s Bay cyclone response finds officials were hampered by communications failures, lack of data and ‘the speed, severity and extent’ of the disaster, writes Catherine McGregor in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.

Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence unable to cope, review says

Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management (CDEM) officials were under-prepared for Cyclone Gabrielle, and overwhelmed by its speed and severity when it hit. Those are the topline findings of an independent review of Hawke’s Bay’s CDEM’s response to the cyclone made public on Monday. While officials did many things right, the review found that the region’s control centre “lacked situational awareness and intelligence about much of the danger and damage until too late” and as a result struggled to direct and coordinate first responders, partner agencies and volunteers. The review didn’t just focus on the local response. The national emergency management system “is not currently fit for purpose”, says former police chief Mike Bush, who led the review. “It actually sets up good people to fail.”

Local Civil Defence promises ‘a complete overhaul’

The 117-page review contains 75 recommendations – nine ‘Tier 1’ priority recommendations, and 66 in ‘Tier 2’, RNZ reports. Among the Tier 1 recommendations are that Hawke’s Bay CDEM should develop new regional disaster reduction and readiness plans, and push for central government to revamp the entire civil defence emergency management system. Hawke’s Bay CDEM says it “fully accepts” the review’s findings, and is committed to doing the mahi needed. “To be clear, this is not about incremental change – we see this as a complete overhaul of how we approach emergency management in Hawke’s Bay,” the committee wrote. What they won’t do is sack those in charge last February, a decision that is infuriating some locals. “It’s not satisfactory, you’re there to protect us and you didn’t do that. End of story,” one resident tells Newshub.

Reviews and reports, reports and reviews

If you’re confused by news of another Cyclone Gabrielle review, you’re not alone. At least 10 reports into the disaster have either been published or are underway, including the government’s formal Inquiry into the Response to the North Island Severe Weather Events, led by Sir ​​Jerry Mateparae. That report is due to be delivered to emergency management minister Mark Mitchell today, however it’s not clear when it will be released to the public. Lianne Dalziel, who was elected mayor of Christchurch two years after the 2011 earthquake, writes in Newsroom that the various reviews all have one thing in common: a focus on emergency preparedness and response, rather than more systemic issues such as land use rules and the “business-as-usual activities of councils”, particularly those relating to the management of land drainage systems and infrastructure.

How long would your food supplies last in a natural disaster?

The many system failures and pressure points revealed by Cyclone Gabrielle include those affecting food distribution in a crisis. The Spinoff’s Shanti Mathias looks at how the cyclone has impacted food supplies and highlighted the urgent need for better food security policy.

“Let’s put it this way,” says researcher Jo Fountain. “If all the roads to your town were cut tomorrow, where would you go for food?”

To Fountain, writes Mathias, the question is an urgent one. Living in Lincoln, just outside of Christchurch, Fountain thinks frequently about what might happen if the alpine fault, along the spiny centre of the South Island, has an earthquake – and there is a 75% chance that will happen in the next 50 years. “The whole South Island will be in a state of chaos,” she says. “You can’t expect people to sweep in with food resources.”

Read more