spinofflive
Xiaole Zhan (Image: Archi Banal)
Xiaole Zhan (Image: Archi Banal)

BooksJune 7, 2023

Muscle Memory: winner of the 2023 Charles Brasch Young Writers’ Essay Competition

Xiaole Zhan (Image: Archi Banal)
Xiaole Zhan (Image: Archi Banal)

Xiaole Zhan’s vivid, award-winning essay about how music can shape the perception of one’s own body was originally published in Landfall 245.

I am seventeen with naked knees hacking into the trachea of a dead sheep. The smell will stain me, like bloodshot snow, or the taste of cigarettes and alcohol from somebody’s lips the night before on my toothbrush in the morning. I am one of the teenagers on a science camp in a white laboratory at Auckland University. I am dissecting a pluck—the heart, trachea and lungs of a carcass. The noun ‘pluck’ is derived from the act of plucking the viscera from a body after it is killed. It makes sense to me—I think of the gut strings of baroque instruments, cords prepared from the walls of intestines. I think of what it means to play a passage in pizzicato; to pluck the string. I begin to dissect the heart, approximating the lines of the left ventricle, scissoring through the discoloured fat. I breathe through my teeth, my head spinning. I am

there again, fifteen, a groundling at the Pop-up Globe. I am looking up into the stage lights at Lady MacBeth’s hands, blood-splattered. My vision narrows, my breathing is shallow. Half-conscious, I stumble past bodies onto the wet grass outside. I am drowning; the horizon is at my throat. My body wants me to escape but forgets that I can’t escape my body. Somebody appears above me and I look up. I smile, sheepishly. Yeah, I’m fine. Oh, this happens at every show? Thanks, yeah, I’ll take the sugar. My hands are pale as they unwrap the orange lozenge. The sweetness draws my body back toward myself. No, I didn’t feel stressed at all. No, this hasn’t happened to me before. I’m usually fine with seeing blood. It’s like my body did its own thing, and I suddenly realised that I was seeing in tunnel vision. It’s like I sometimes

see myself beside myself, as if I’m not entirely a part of my body. As if I could approximate my own heart apart from myself, the size of a fist hovering from an arm that happens to belong to me. When I was fourteen, I started learning to play the cello. Playing never became easy for me. Every movement was body-heavy; each note carried with it the abdomen, the back, the shoulders, the length of the arm, the joints of each finger. The curve of the wooden body bit into my sternum and thighs, leaving red rashes. In the winter, my fingers stung with blisters oozing yellow pus. The blisters hardened into calluses, which I would bite off mindlessly when I was anxious. The shape that music takes within the body is different for every instrument. Sometimes I close my eyes

This essay was first published in Landfall 245.

and I can feel the music in my hands. The curve of a palm against somebody’s forehead becomes an open fifth upon the piano. The opening E minor chord of the Elgar Cello Concerto stings against the pointer finger of the left hand. Learning music made me realise that I am not a genius of the body. Musicality and physicality are one and the same muscle. Knowing how the music moves is not enough; you also have to know how to move the body in a way that follows. The genius of knowing one’s body can be seen even in childhood; in the prodigy dancer, in the small fingers that find a home on a quarter-size violin. You can learn to sing before you learn to speak. Sometimes you need the ease and the instinct of

screaming. When I was sixteen, I sang in my high school choir. My high school singing teacher always told me I thought too much before opening my mouth. I could never find a way to release the nervousness from my tongue and my jaw and my shoulders. My singing teacher told me that sometimes you must stop thinking altogether and trust what the body knows. He said that singing is just controlled screaming. I didn’t know until then that what happened in my mind would also bury itself in the tightness of my throat and the lump of my tongue. I remember singing Bruckner’s motet, Os Justi, as one of the first altos in the choir. The psalm is sung in Latin—the line, Lex Dei ejus in corde ipsius, translates into, The law of his God is in his heart. I learnt then that corde in Latin means both string and heart. The chordae tendineae, the connective tendons in the anatomy of a heart, are more commonly called the heartstrings. Every time the choir reached Bruckner’s repetition of the phrase, in corde, corde, corde, I couldn’t help but begin

to weep, secretly, in the tightness at the back of my throat so that I couldn’t continue to sing at all. My body betrays me again and again as a musician. My piano teacher joked in my first year of university that my unconscious movements at the keyboard made him seasick. I want to save the tears for the audience, but sometimes I can’t control my own body’s screaming. Tears, milk and blood—the emission of these fluids from the body led writers in the Renaissance to refer to women as ‘leaky vessels’. When I was nineteen, I read about how a woman’s self is split in two. She watches herself being watched; is at once the surveyor and the surveyed. I don’t remember if it seemed strange to me at the time for John Berger to write so authoritatively about being seen as a woman from his vantage point as a man seeing women. “The surveyor of woman in herself is male: the surveyed female.” What happens when women

see each other? When one isn’t entirely at home with the way their body is seen? When I was twenty, I realised that my body had always been symbolic against my will. The body cannot escape language as language cannot escape the body. We are lily-livered, cold-hearted, wrong-footed, hard-nosed, hawk- eyed, and ask day after day if we can offer each other a hand. When I looked at myself, all I could see was a collection of limbs articulated by a language that didn’t belong to me. My body would change and then change again and be claimed by words handed to me by the same culture that described bodies like mine as leaky vessels. When I was nineteen, I learnt that I had clinical depression. I stopped having my period for four months at a time due to physiological stress. When I started taking antidepressants, my body gained weight and my skin became covered with stretch marks like the lines left in sand by the tide. At twenty-one, I’ve stopped trying to escape my own body. I realise that bodies are fluid things that will keep on changing. The body

remembers, my high school counsellor told me. The body remembers the muscles it uses when you laugh so hard that your stomach hurts. You have to think of those muscles when you’re performing those giddy staccatos, my singing teacher told me. You have to imagine the sound keeps travelling even after your hand presses the key that moves the hammer that hits the string, my piano teacher told me. You have to imagine your bowing arm is like a pair of lungs helping you to breathe, my cello teacher told me. The body has to remember because the problem with music is that it disappears. I’m not sure where the music goes once the hands leave the keys. I’m not sure what it is that strings one second to the next second, on and on. I think a melody is the strangest thing—a row of ghosts holding hands across

the death of each second. At twenty-one, I’ve gotten used to slipping in and out of existence. Sometimes I feel like I’m dragging the weight of a body that belongs more to the continuation of systems of oppression than to myself as a person in my own right. Sometimes I’m just too tired to assert the existence of my body. Why do you want to make things difficult for yourself ? Isn’t the world already too divided? Why do you want to go on creating yet another category? My friend’s uncle grills them with these questions at a family wedding. I think of the boys’ school across the road that changed the pronouns of a love song so it wouldn’t be gay. Why do you want to make things difficult for yourself ? Sometimes I just want to leave the supermarket with my groceries, or agree with strangers so that I can step off the tram at the next stop and walk home. I am misgendered and forcibly defined by the violence of a colonial language more often than I am recognised on my own terms. There are moments, though, when I am surrounded by people who listen to the language I use for my body and speak it back to me. I am always articulating and rearticulating myself with a language that I’m still reaching compromises with—learning and adapting and destroying and creating. I think this articulation will change and change again as my body does. The body unfolds over time as music does. We need to be listening.

‘Muscle Memory’ by Xiaole Zhan was first published in Landfall 245: Autumn 2023, edited by Lynley Edmeades (Otago University Press, $30) which can be purchased at Unity Books Wellington and Auckland.

Keep going!
(Image: Tina Tiller).
(Image: Tina Tiller).

BooksJune 4, 2023

A balm for everyone who survived the misogyny of the 2000s

(Image: Tina Tiller).
(Image: Tina Tiller).

Claire Mabey reviews Josie Shapiro’s debut novel Everything is Beautiful and Everything Hurts, winner of the inaugural Allen & Unwin Fiction Prize.

The aggressive misogyny of the early 2000s is the skeezy world in which Josie Shapiro’s quietly magnetic character, Mickey Bloom, comes of age. As a reader of the exact same age as Bloom, the sinister environment of open slather on women, which Shapiro deftly recreates, struck me hard and it struck me deep. 

Which is not to say that Everything is Beautiful and Everything Hurts is not a feel-good novel, because it is, and unashamedly so. The journey of underdog competitive runner Mickey Bloom is one of ambition and catastrophe before it comes sweet with recovery and growth. There are even moments along the road where the trajectory prickles with rom-com energy (another signpost of the early 2000s). And yet, in this commercially appealing, carefully held book, the author is doing something subversive. I clung to this story in a way that both surprised and, at the risk of sounding schmaltzy, healed me.

The book begins by bringing us up to speed with Mickey’s formative years, which are drawn to show that Mickey is not a privileged kid. By the time she can walk (“late” by that cack-handed invisible rule book that all parents seem to inherit from the aether) her parents have split and her dad (a pompous journalist, disdainful of sport) is distant and disinterested, even cruel; at school it becomes clear that Mickey is dyslexic, can barely read and is bullied for it; money in a single-parent household with multiple children is always tight. Flailing at the edges, Mickey is pitiable, the anti-dynamic protagonist. But when she watches the women’s marathon at the 2000 Sydney Olympics on TV, Mickey’s mettle coalesces to drive the rest of the story.

Not since Tessa Duder’s Alex quartet has a character so vividly captured the experience of a young woman in possession of athletic power. For the runners among Shapiro’s readers, the evocations of the heady kind of freedom one can attain is intoxicating. It makes you want to put the book down, get your gear on and speed out the door: “I felt high, as though I was floating above the ground, my mind clear and crisp as a diamond.” 

Throughout, though, Shapiro’s eye remains true to the legacy of that sick naughties violence. The kind that hollers abuse before using the “defence” of “but it was only a joke”. You’ll recognise that sort of tiresome dickheadness in all-too-familiar scenes like this one: “Out of the corner of my eye I saw the man in the passenger seat, his fingers in a V over his mouth, his tongue slicing through the centre. Someone else let loose a whooping cry that seemed to stay in the air for a few seconds. Before draining away beneath the receding grunt of the double exhaust propped on the rear. I kept running.” 

The first implosions in the novel happen when teenage Mickey is drawn into a training methodology that works actively against her body. There is abuse from coaches in both an overt sense (sexual), and as a result of toxic ignorance about health and nutrition (over-training and under-eating). In both instances, Shapiro’s light, airy style shows the transgressions without lingering on the horror, which spares the reader from becoming stuck in the unjust nature of Mickey’s plight. After all, we’re already deep inside the mess of woman-hating that defined late 90s/early 2000s pop culture, with passing experiences like this: “On one training run in late June I overtook Nick, a boy from my biology class, and I head him say softly, ‘Fucking bitch.’”

Josie Shapiro (Photo: Supplied)

A couple of weeks after I finished Everything is Beautiful and Everything Hurts, with the story still echoing through me, I did a speaking event with athlete-cum-nutritionist Rosa Flanagan. She talked openly and generously about her experience of being an elite athlete in her teenage years, training so hard and eating so little that her bones splintered and she didn’t get her period until she was 20. After the event, I said to her: “That’s what happened to a friend of mine.” 

That’s how hard I fell for Shapiro’s Mickey Bloom: I grew so fond of the fictional character that she crystalised as a memory from the third dimension. It’s rare that a book comes along with such a sympathetic character that they become a touchstone for experience, but it happens. Still, it was an odd thing to do, to claim a character as a friend, and it forced me, against some long-suppressed part of myself, to ask why. 

“Young Women in Sport: Are we training them all wrong?” asks a 2019 article on the ACC website. It goes on to explain that because sports science is based on male physiology – and because of a general reluctance to discuss basic facts of women’s health, like periods – young women are trained into injury, nutritional deficit and scuppered potential. After reading Shapiro and talking with Rosa, I went down the rabbit hole of information that is so unsurprising to me that I couldn’t even get enraged by it. It’s simply no longer news that women’s health is chronically under-researched and under-educated (just think menopause, endometriosis, the autoimmune diseases that women are much more likely to have, etc, etc and so on and so forth). 

The exhaustion with which I responded to the article, I realised, comes from the same place as the bruised person who found a friend in Mickey Bloom. I’m yet another millennial who went through a high school elite sports training experience and didn’t have the appropriate time. At high school my friends and I – tender 13-year-olds – were rowers. A hairy skein of thick-skinned older men took on the task of making us run, and burpee, and hill sprint, and skull our hearts out at 5am every morning. So we could win medals and get abs like Britney, and so they could be coaches of svelte champions. There were training camps in which one of the coaches gave massages to topless 15-year-olds; where my friend got so dehydrated she hallucinated. There was a heady, hormonally charged competition between our crews and the boys (equally pliable, awkward and raw as baby birds) in the training sheds next door. Many of us stopped having our periods but it was never talked about with the adults. I lasted one season and never wanted to look too hard at the reasons why I fled. All I knew was that I wasn’t comfortable and I knew that one of the coaches appeared to loathe me: I was bookish, too small, quiet. Like Mickey Bloom, I didn’t present like an athlete.

Shapiro’s book reflects back the harmful absurdity of that era. One of two recent novels to have done so (the other being Sprigs by Brannavan Gnanalingam, which summons the grotesque boys’ club mentality of the same period). The arrogance of those coaches and the complicit system – from school all the way to Hollywood – that backed them. Apparently it takes a good 20-odd years to unravel such behaviour: Rosa Flanagan is much younger than me; the ACC article is from 2019; this book just came out. 

What Shapiro does in part two of Everything is Beautiful is the healing bit. Mickey gives up running in order to recover from stress fractures that have formed up and down her skeleton. Life slows, she lives with her mum, she gets a job as a barista, she’s back to the butterfly touch of her baseline: almost invisible Mickey.

We learn that Mickey is 27 when she meets Joel, an electrician, who says things like: “‘If you were taller babe, with pins like that. Shit,’ he said shaking his head, ‘you’d be hot. … you could get a boob job.’” He is a basic 90s-style bro. A flinty drunk, and insecure, he is a product of the same misogyny that Mickey survived at the other end of the spectrum. He stirs her well of disappointment by jibing her about not being at the Rio Olympics (2021, bringing Mickey’s life in line with our present), suggesting “If you’d really wanted to go, you would have gone.” 

Because this novel follows the age-old transition from innocence to experience, the older and wiser Mickey shucks the shaming influence of a warped male ego. Even though the severance is catalysed by a heartbreaking personal catastrophe, Mickey’s break from the crappy boyfriend marks a turn in her life and the start of an upward swing in her luck.

In the end it’s a woman who edifies Mickey Bloom. Philippa is the most effervescent character in the novel and is the queer fairy godmother in sneakers that us millennial teenage athletes never had. When Philippa spies Mickey out on a jog one morning she sees the innate talent and offers to train her. By now we’re used to Shapiro’s steadfast style of prose, but when applied to Philippa the tone renders her immediately likeable and trustworthy. A relief. See how she puts Mickey’s insecurities, the past traumas, to rest by stating potential first and understanding next: “I remember watching you win the 10,000 metres. Your record still stands. … I know Bruce Madden and his bunch of clowns up at North Lynn. You aren’t the only one.”

In one fell swoop Philippa reveals to Mickey that her dealings with athletics so far isn’t a hopeless, private shame. From that moment on they train together, working with Mickey’s body to ensure that health and wellbeing is prioritised over ideas like racing weight and callipers pinching at body fat. 

Shapiro energises her spacious, clean prose (meaning really a scarcity of figurative language and a favouring of short sentences) with a useful structural tool: Mickey’s story is told in dual time. In between the life story are chapters in the present tense that track Mickey’s progress as she runs the Auckland marathon. The effect is to offer the reader hope from the get-go. Hope and pace. They are short interstices that build adrenalin in the reader, that push you ever closer to the edge of your seat, because as you come to learn about Mickey’s life you badly want her to win.

Everything is Beautiful and Everything Hurts gives its heroine a buoyant send-off, but it’s never about winning. At life or otherwise. As I read, I kept thinking about Eagle vs Shark, the 2008 movie starring Jemaine Clement as Jarrod and Loren Taylor as Lily. Like Mickey, Lily isn’t vivacious or academic or in possession of cultural or social capital. But she is steadfast and inspired and wise. There’s a moment in the movie when she tells Jarrod’s cruel father that life is full of bad bits and lovely bits and that Jarrod (Lily’s love interest) is a lovely bit. It’s plain, honest, love-based logic. A similar kind of framework exists in Shapiro’s world: there are bad bits and lovely bits and at the centre is a person upon whom, in the end, the lovely bits are allowed to flourish. 

Everything is Beautiful and Everything Hurts by Josie Shapiro (Allen & Unwin NZ, $37) can be purchased from Unity Books Auckland and Wellington.