spinofflive
The alcohol rehab centre at Rotoroa Island in the 1960s
The alcohol rehab centre at Rotoroa Island in the 1960s

BooksJune 13, 2018

The drinkless isle: Why I set my novel at the rehab centre on Rotoroa Island

The alcohol rehab centre at Rotoroa Island in the 1960s
The alcohol rehab centre at Rotoroa Island in the 1960s

Christchurch writer Amy Head on the setting for her new novel – Rotoroa, an island near Waiheke, where the Salvation Army ran a rehab centre for alcoholics.

When I first learned about Rotoroa, an island east of Waiheke where the Salvation Army ran a rehabilitation facility between 1911 and 2005 (known early on as an “Inebriate’s Retreat”), it seemed rich with potential for fiction. Newspaper articles of the early 20th century detailed some of the inmates’ more inventive escapades. It turned out the men who were committed to the island showed staggering resourcefulness over the decades. They rowed out to trade fish for beer. They found psychotropic plants. They distilled pretty much anything they happened to have to hand, including raisins, pumpkins, parsnips, even sugar and water. Newspaper headline: “Drunkenness at Rotoroa: how the dry was made wet: industry promptly suppressed”.

Even better, until the 1940s, women were sent to the island next door, Pakatoa. In several accounts of the early days, men who hankered after female company either rowed or attempted to swim from one island to the other. In keeping with the 1920s, my mental image was in black and white – a desperate man struggling through dark waters. They’d be two estranged lovers, perhaps. How fraught. These excursions to Pakatoa became such a problem that eventually the police made the trip from the mainland. When they got there, they dressed up in — well — dresses, and paraded around before the windows of the women’s facility to lure the Rotoroans out.

My 1920s drunk emerged from the swells of frustrated love and took on a slapstick attitude. The tone of the reporting seemed to egg me on. Newspaper headline: “Slept among flowers” – a man on temporary leave from the island was found asleep in a flowerbed in Albert Park with a bottle of whiskey. “It was not a bed of roses”, the magistrate was reported to have wisecracked. How harmless and cartoonish was this scene in my mind’s eye, how silky and springy his outdoor bed.

There were also the stock associations that accompanied Victorian institutions — places such as Seacliff in Otago, a Gothic behemoth attended by a grim history. Janet Frame’s portrayals brought Seacliff into a colourised 1950s, but didn’t do much for our opinions of institutional treatment. Starting out, I was well and truly siding with the rebels. How many prison films feature protagonists who actually deserve to be there? Aren’t they usually wronged and misunderstood?

Like those deluded men on Pakatoa, who had braved the waters to crouch, peering out through the leaves at what were actually burly cops in skirts, I’d been drawn in by anecdotes that dressed up a hard, hairy reality. The more I read, the more the stories contradicted each other. Some men busted a gut trying to escape and others did their disorderly best to get sent back. Yes, one of the founders of Alcoholics Anonymous was recorded in 1960 telling the tale of “The day he lost his pants”, but all this comedy was an attempt to offset what is a heavy psychological burden. During my research, I saw mothers who were terrified that their children would become drinkers. I heard someone who’d waited for months to be admitted to a treatment programme only to encounter people using drugs the first night they were admitted. There were stories of generosity, too. It wasn’t unusual for recovering alcoholics to open their homes up to others who needed help.

A lot changed in the almost 100 years that Rotoroa operated, and it was this change that held my interest. The Habitual Drunkards Act of 1906 became the Alcohol and Drug Addiction Act in the 1960s, which just last year was replaced by the Substance Addiction Act. “Inmates” became “patients”, then “clients”. Today, treatment has diversified to include both day and residential programmes. It tends to be more community-based, and aims to better acknowledge the individual. As before, patience and boundaries help. As before, it’s preferable if the people running the programmes have a good understanding of what people with addictions go through.

But it was the 1950s I kept coming back to, around the time when they first began holding AA meetings on Rotoroa. Men on the island, many of them veterans of the First and Second World Wars, now “hit rock bottom”, “worked the steps” and got “sick and tired of being sick and tired”. A new manager was appointed to the island, who was a recovering alcoholic himself. Not just Rotoroa, but the rest of the country and perhaps the world seemed to be emerging out of something and moving towards something else, though they didn’t yet know what.

The 1950s was the when of my novel, then, but I needed a who. I wanted a range of perspectives, but it wouldn’t be easy; there were different sets of implications for youth and age, women and men, religious beliefs. One of the female characters has a career? That’s another set again. Political scientist Robert Chapman was sympathetic to women in his essay “Fiction and the Social Pattern” in 1953. They were facing a more complicated family life, he said, which they must manage “without readily available help in family planning and guidance and allied matters, and without crèches, kindergartens and home aides, which the mother often does not know how to ask for even where they do exist.”

The jetty at Home Bay, Rotoroa Island

But he was a product of his times. He continued, “Meanwhile, the attitude which the New Zealand writer takes to his society, and which informs his work [my italics], will continue to be based on…” These instances, of giving with one hand and taking with the other, seemed like dead ends, but the tension gave my characters depth, ultimately.

One character was an actual person who I met time and time again in my research. She was a journalist who wrote articles about the island under the name Elsie K Morton for something like 50 years. What a perfect observer, I thought; she’s worldly, she witnesses the island’s evolution over a sustained period. But her perspective, too, is shaped by her time. Unlike the nudge-nudge coverage I’ve already mentioned, her stories about Rotoroa were full of praise and vigorously optimistic.

Another character, Lorna, is a teenager. As such, she’s impressionable — as likely to be influenced by religious groups as by rock and roll. Her experiences during the novel would be considered by society at large to be beyond her years, but in a time when people don’t talk about their “shameful” experiences, who’s to know how normal or abnormal she really is?

The last character, Jim, is one of the island’s alcoholics, which means no more or less than that he’s become trapped by his particular means of escape. After all, by itself addiction is nothing. Its best trick is convincing its host of its own authenticity. On the one hand, there’s what’s going on physically, in the chemical processes of the brain. How that translates into thoughts and emotions—what it feels like for the addicted person—is another thing altogether: like easing pain, like trying get back to an inner life that’s rich and noble, a process that puts a great deal of distance towards themselves and others. As James K Baxter put it, in a letter to a friend, “When the octopus had me down under a rock, its name looked to me like life rather than booze.”


Rotoroa by Amy Head (Victoria University Press, $30) is available at Unity Books.

Keep going!
We have very much ran out of ways to illustrate the Surrey Hotel
We have very much ran out of ways to illustrate the Surrey Hotel

BooksJune 12, 2018

Inside the Surrey Hotel: a writers-residency award winner reports (Plus: YA fiction writers now allowed to enter!)

We have very much ran out of ways to illustrate the Surrey Hotel
We have very much ran out of ways to illustrate the Surrey Hotel

As the deadline fast approaches for entries to the 2018 Surrey Hotel Steve Braunias Memorial Writers Residency In Association With The Spinoff Award, Wairarapa essayist and 2017 winner John Summers presents his diary of the prize – a five-night stay in Grey Lynn’s Surrey Hotel.

I arrive overdressed. I got up at 5:30am, and wore my overcoat against an almost frosty Wairarapa morning. And now here I am, the same country, except that it’s hot and seamy. The coat is entirely unsuitable, a wool monster. For the next five days it will stay in the Surrey Hotel’s bright white wardrobe, the only thing I bother to hang up. It floats there black and mocking, a reminder of the need to eventually go back to cold old Wellington.

*

The Surrey is later than late Tudor. There are Dickensian sitting rooms with wingback chairs, brass doodads, and toffee-stained wood. Two plaster bulldogs guard an electric fire. There are signs to warn of highwaymen and signs that point out the spa. The ye olde thing continues in the upstairs bar, the sort of cosy nook where you’d enjoy an ale in a pewter tankard, smoke a clay pipe after a long coach ride, content now the horses have been fed and stabled, the Mazda parked away.

Someone has been let loose with this idea, and they’ve succeeded. The hotel is a work of folk art.

*

I’m a cheapskate, always intent on making the most of things, not missing out. I use the little sachets of tea, chocolate and coffee that come with the room, drinking the coffee with the complimentary milk and sugar even though I prefer it black.

After a day of attempted work, I run the bath and soak while drinking one of the beers I chilled in the in-room fridge. Beneath the sink I discover an electric frying pan. It has a dial labelled “self control” and I imagine turning it up to five and stirring a bright mess of eggs in its non-stick pan. I buy a dozen at Countdown and manage to eat three that night. I eat three for lunch the next day. By day four I can’t face another and I head out in search of food.

Stinginess goes part and parcel with indecision. It’s a way to decide – choose cheap. I duck into a bakery for a sausage roll and sandwich. Bending for a paper bag I see that the place is filthy, the floor splattered with bird shit, but it’s too late, I’m committed. The staff are watching, waiting with tongs ready. Back in my room, I discover the sandwich is egg.

THE SURREY HOTEL: QUITE LATE TUDOR STYLE

Antony Millen stayed here, as one of the 2016 winners, and afterwards he wrote that “the person you are at home is the same person you will be during the residency.” He’s right. Your writing personality is your personality and my parsimony extends to words. Too circumspect to put things on a page, too careful of wasting ink. I have my feints. I open a document for each new paragraph until my computer is shuddering with files. I switch from laptop to longhand. “You can’t work in shit,” a factory foreman once told me – he’d caught me standing shin deep in shavings to operate a lathe – and thankfully he can’t see me now, surrounded by crumbs and screwed up sheets of refill.

These tricks only take me so far though. I write a meagre paragraph. I stand up and walk around. I make a cup of coffee. I drink a glass of water. I stand at the balcony. A man walks past, singing to himself. I don’t catch the song but waste a minute listening.

*

Steve Braunias is in the bar. He talks like he writes. I imagine it’s a matter of dictation, putting a bucket beneath the tap. I’m convinced that it comes easier to everyone else.

Later that night I eat noodles in a food court with my friends Thom and Maree. It’s years since I was in Auckland, and they’ve been here for two years now. They are still noticing things. I say I’ve seen a higher proportion of older people dressed like very young people – a man in his 50s slinks by in pale jeans, a hipster’s glasses, with a beanie perched on his head.

“Also really young people who look really rich,” Thom says. He tells me about a bar where everyone was good looking, TV good looking.

“You were there,” I say, not an accusation, just curious whether he counted himself among the beautiful.

“Yeah, and I felt really uncomfortable about it.”

*

In the Surrey dining room, a group of older men at the table behind me are drinking and shouting their conversation. A family opposite gives them dirty looks. Both groups are there for a nice night out, but we all have our different ways of going about it. I’m just happy for the distraction. Back in the room I have 4000 words, lumpy and obvious. I’ll read it all again later and decide it’s not quite so bad, it could be something, but at this point I’d rather listen to someone else’s thoughts.

“The biggest bloody marijuana joint you ever saw,” one of the men says. He’s already been shushed, but quiet is physically impossible. He has a gut like a bellows. He roars. It must be tiring.

“I was rolling around on the floor trying to get fresh air,” he says. I’m sure it’s the same man who, a minute earlier, announced that, “I’ve never even seen marijuana in my bloody life.”

The family go and are replaced by a couple. “I think he liked the quirkiness of it,” one of them says. “Because he’s a quirky sort of character. He stayed here and finished his novel.”

HOW TO MAKE THE AUTHOR WHOM THE AWARD IS NAMED AFTER LOOK PERFECTLY FOOLISH

A man gets on the bus, stepping from the wet pavement in his socks. He jabbers at the bus driver, completely out of his mind. The only word I understand is GoldCard, but still the two of them argue. Eventually he’s turfed off. What a fucking mess, I think. Not him, but us, this place. I suspect he’s come from the boarding house Steve warned me about, a gothic horror where rooms are considered no better than homelessness. A little further down is a dealership of gleaming Maseratis, while right beside it is a brutalist church, the stained glass glowing at night in shards of blue, gold, red. This is a chance to feel smug about my town, so tidy and compact and quiet. It would disappear into this disorderly hulk. I love it here.

*

In St Kevins Arcade I pick up a copy of John Cheever’s journals. Someone drinks a martini on every page, and it’s full of the most incredible, well-turned prose, full of beauty, surprise and despair. I flick and flick, and my delight fades. I feel despair myself. These are just his jottings. Why do I bother? I look around the bus as if the other passengers should share my disbelief. Finally, flicking on, I take some slight hope from this entry: “Waking this morning, I think the book so poor that it should not be published. I think, an hour later, that it can’t be so bad. I shall scythe the orchard.”

*

I start writing the minute I get home.


John Summers worked on an essay about Norman Kirk which is published in the latest issue of North & South. It’s not exactly what we had in mind when we chose him as one of the runners-up – writers write books! – but it’s a jolly good essay.

Entries are open until June 21 for the 2018 Surrey Hotel Steve Braunias Memorial Writers Residency In Association With The Spinoff Award. In breaking news, writers of any discipline – including the formerly forbidden forms of YA fiction and screenplays; repeat, we have changed our minds, and are all good with writers of YA fiction and screenplays – are invited to email a brief outline of their project to madeleine@thespinoff.co.nz.

The Spinoff Review of Books is proudly brought to you by Unity Books.