spinofflive
Fisherman holding his catch, Tikina Wai, Fiji.  Tikina Wai villagers catch fish just outside the Marine Protected Area (MPA) area,  a WWF Project. (Image: Brent Stirton / Getty Images)
Fisherman holding his catch, Tikina Wai, Fiji. Tikina Wai villagers catch fish just outside the Marine Protected Area (MPA) area, a WWF Project. (Image: Brent Stirton / Getty Images)

BusinessJune 3, 2018

Blockchain: the new frontier in the battle against slavery for sushi

Fisherman holding his catch, Tikina Wai, Fiji.  Tikina Wai villagers catch fish just outside the Marine Protected Area (MPA) area,  a WWF Project. (Image: Brent Stirton / Getty Images)
Fisherman holding his catch, Tikina Wai, Fiji. Tikina Wai villagers catch fish just outside the Marine Protected Area (MPA) area, a WWF Project. (Image: Brent Stirton / Getty Images)

How can we be sure catching the tuna we’re eating hasn’t also harmed humans? At the moment we can’t. But could new technology bring transparency to the fishing industry, and help stamp out unsafe conditions?

Sushi. We Kiwis love it. Incredible to think that in the 1980s it was still something many of us baulked at – raw fish?

Then, sushi was a high-end restaurant meal for the movers and shakers of our biggest cities only. But now we find sushi being eaten right across this country: in school lunch boxes, regional food courts, big city restaurants, takeaway joints and even at a drive-through restaurant in Auckland. No wonder sushi now rivals fish and chips for title of New Zealand’s National Meal.

It’s no surprise that it’s taken off, though. Most Kiwis love fish, and as we’ve started to focus more on our health and wellbeing in the last twenty years, the shift away from fried takeaway treats to a lighter meal like sushi that usually includes rice and often vegetables too seems logical, and delicious. 

But while we Kiwis love sushi, and love fish too; we also like to think of ourselves as living in the land of the fair go. Many of us like to believe the story that ours is a country founded on egalitarian principles of ‘mateship’. And that’s where, for many of us, the discomfort with one of the main ingredients in our beloved sushi – tuna – comes in.

(Image: Pixabay)

With the release of the excellent Stuff Circuit ‘Caught’ report; and the Greenpeace investigation into the use of modern-day slavery in the tuna fishing industry, there is no denying that purchasing some kinds of tuna is supporting people who are doing the wrong thing. 

How can we be sure of the origin of the tuna we buy for lunchbox nori rolls; or for our takeaway sashimi plates? Can we be sure the tuna we’re eating has been caught ethically, sustainably and professionally? Were the fishing crew paid a fair wage and treated respectfully?

While there is some canned tuna on the market in New Zealand that is certified sustainable seafood from the Marine Stewardship Council; when it comes to fresh tuna, as the media is reporting, the answer is no. No, we can’t be sure of the origin of our tuna. No, we don’t know anything about whether it has been caught ethically or sustainably. No, we don’t have enough information to make a good decision. Not yet.

As Greenpeace note in their chilling Misery at Sea report, “What we discovered onboard some of these fishing vessels, which often operate on the high seas and don’t come into port – sometimes for years at a time – is nothing less than modern-day slavery. We’re talking abuse, rape, starvation and even murder – and it’s all for tuna.”

Now we’ve seen the hard evidence in the Caught report, and read Greenpeace’s document, we can’t ignore it. As decent human beings, we seem to have no option but to put aside our beloved fresh tuna until we can be sure that we’re not supporting an industry that is hurting, even killing people.

Reef fish displayed in a fishermens boat in Suva harbour. (Image: Brent Stirton/Getty Images)

It doesn’t have to be like this.  As seems to be so often the way in 2018 – blockchain technology is a key step in the process of change for good.

To put it simply; blockchain allows data to be attached to every step of the fishing process. This data allows tuna to be tracked throughout the process, and provides transparency along the way.

For the last few years here at WWF-New Zealand, we’ve been working with our partners in the Pacific region to help bring transparency and traceability to the tuna fishing industry. We’ve proved that together, it is possible work with the tuna fishers who want to prove they are doing the right thing – acting ethically by paying staff a fair wage, and fishing using sustainable methods in appropriate waters, at the right time of year and season.

Blockchain helps them prove it, because at each step of the process, data is plugged into the system to confirm the origin of each fish; the route the fish takes through the processing system and how it has reached the retailer. This then allows consumers to know where fish has come from, who caught it, and how it has reached them before they decide which tuna product to buy, or not to buy.

Last month, we were part of the first trial to trace a yellowfin tuna fish via blockchain all the way from the deck of a boat in Fiji to sushi platters in San Fransisco. The technology is there, and it works.

Fisherman at Nasese foreshore, sorting out the catch of the day, Fiji. (Image: Brent Stirton/Getty Images)

Here in New Zealand, we are very close to being able to buy tuna that can be traced via blockchain in our supermarkets. Our partners in Fiji are already using blockchain to track the yellow fin tuna that is caught on their boats, and negotiations are underway with retailers right now to bring this product to market.

The last step of the project is now up to us. As Kiwis, we have to decide whether we want to continue to support those in the fishing industry who choose to participate in non-sustainable or unethical operations.

Or, we can stand up for what’s right, stand in solidarity with our fellow human beings caught in misery on modern day slave ships, and refuse tuna that is not proven to have come from the best fishing boats with the highest standards and using only the most sustainable, ethical methods of operations. 

And we can ask our retailers when they will have blockchain traceable tuna available for sale, and refuse tuna products that we’re not sure of, both at the supermarket shelf and in the food court.

So at WWF-New Zealand, we take our hats off to Greenpeace and the investigators who have shined the light on this critical issue. We want to celebrate the individuals facilitating the implementation of blockchain technology in this industry to give consumers a real choice.

And we ask our fellow Kiwis: will we be complicit in crimes against our fellow human beings; or will we stand up for what’s right and support those in the industry who are striving to do the right thing, by demanding and purchasing blockchain tuna?

I know what I’ll be doing. And I look forward to the day when we can enjoy our tuna sushi with a clear conscience, knowing that no-one has been harmed* in the making of our lunch.

*Except the fish

Livia Esterhazy is the CEO of WWF-New Zealand


The Spinoff’s business section is enabled by our friends at Kiwibank. Kiwibank backs small to medium businesses, social enterprises and Kiwis who innovate to make good things happen.

Check out how Kiwibank can help your business take the next step.

Keep going!
a collection of housing with price tags
Airbnb hosts earned a median income of $4,400 from their listings in 2017. Over 70% of hosts were women and the average age of hosts was 48-years-old. (This hillside is actually in Wellington but you get the gist)

BusinessJune 2, 2018

Airbnb marches on, as Auckland prepares for a ‘bed tax’ for hosts

a collection of housing with price tags
Airbnb hosts earned a median income of $4,400 from their listings in 2017. Over 70% of hosts were women and the average age of hosts was 48-years-old. (This hillside is actually in Wellington but you get the gist)

Phil Goff’s 10-year ‘build it’ budget finally got the green light on Thursday, with one of the provisions being that the infamous ‘bed tax’ is now set to be extended to homes listed on sites like Airbnb. What does this mean for hosts? And are other regions set to follow? (PLUS, other things you should know about the peer-to-peer platform’s contributions to New Zealand.)

If you think Airbnb is still small fry in New Zealand, then think again. According to a recently released report outlining the effects of Airbnb in New Zealand, visitors spent a massive 1.5 million nights at properties booked via the platform. And while the traditional accommodation sector still remains dominant – more than 14 million nights were booked at hotels, 12 million nights at motels, 8 million nights at holiday parks, and 5 million nights at backpackers* – Airbnb has grown in just a few years to become a credible challenger in today’s industry, one that many of its rivals argue have an unfair advantage.

That unfair advantage has mainly been in the form of tax exemptions, because not only are Airbnb hosts not required to pay business taxes in the same way hoteliers or moteliers do – something which has come up as a particular sticking point when it comes to ‘superhosts’ that pocket millions of dollars each year – but they’ve so far avoided ‘bed taxes’ as well. Passed by Auckland Council last year, the introduction of a targeted accommodation rate/bed tax proved controversial with providers at the time for spurring unbudgeted cost increases, not to mention the exemption Airbnb hosts were being afforded. But at the launch of the Airbnb report earlier this week, Auckland mayor Phil Goff said that’s set to change.

(Source: Deloitte Access Economics)
(Source: Deloitte Access Economics)

“Our budget provides for an extension of business rates where appropriate to Airbnb and the targeted rate on accommodation,” he said. “It will vary, so if you’ve got a single room you’re letting out, [those taxes] won’t apply to you. If you’re letting out your whole house or apartment then they will. If it’s for less than four weeks you’re not covered [to pay the business tax] – that’s too small to worry about. If it’s over 180 days then you’ll be paying the full business rate, with gradations in between.”

Traditional operators have obviously welcomed the change, with rates potentially dropping by up to 55% if applied to all online providers like Airbnb and Bookabach. But some have argued they don’t go far enough. Tourism Industry Aotearoa, for example, discredited the ‘room only’ exemption as such rentals make up almost half of Auckland’s Airbnb properties.

Airbnb’s head of public policy Brent Thomas, however, welcomed Goff’s proposal at the launch event, noting that the company already collects tourism taxes or ‘bed taxes’ in many of its locations around the world. Thomas also added that he didn’t believe a proposed ‘bed tax’ would discourage people from renting out their properties on Airbnb.

Auckland Mayor Phil Goff (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

“We welcome the idea of an accommodation or bed tax, and I know that might be controversial with others in the industry, but we actually support it. Our community wants to pay their fair share and grow sustainably,” says Thomas. “Usually, when you look at the tourism tax, it’s only a very small percentage of a guest fee… so we don’t believe that puts people off.”

It’s not just in Auckland where conversations like these have been happening. In Christchurch, for example, where visitor numbers have jumped back to pre-earthquake levels, many have called for a more level playing field not just in terms of how rentals are taxed, but regulation around health and safety as well. Queenstown proposed last year of implementing tighter restrictions on homes rented out by absentee owners (a suggestion that was accused by Thomas at the time as “nanny state policies”), while Hawke’s Bay has also recently floated the idea of a ‘bed tax’ to help fund tourism in the region. With Auckland having taken the lead on this issue, it’s likely other regions will feel they have a greater mandate to pursue similar policies.

Despite all this, Goff was unequivocal in his support for Airbnb’s growth in the city, welcoming the competition it brought to the traditional hotel/motel industry and the more options it gives visitors on where they want to stay. He also waxed lyrical about Airbnb’s contribution to Auckland’s economy ($201 million in 2017) and the growth of almost 2,000 jobs it’s spurred in New Zealand’s biggest city. Although seeing as tourists have many reasons for visiting a certain place, it’s strongly arguable that this growth would’ve occurred without the help of Airbnb anyway.

The Hilton Hotel in Auckland. Photo: Percita/Flickr CC.2.0

What Airbnb has definitely helped with is providing additional accommodation for an overburdened tourism sector. We know there aren’t enough rooms to cater for the number of visitors flooding Auckland, and Airbnb – at least in the short-term – is alleviating some of that pressure.

“It’s not a zero-sum game, and for Airbnb to do well, nobody has to lose,” says Thomas. “If you look at the World Masters Games here last March, the hotels filled up and so did the Airbnbs. We see a real opportunity to collaborate with the traditional accommodation sector and see a real growth of the pie.”

Tourism, however, isn’t the only sector struggling, because while Airbnb enables the sector to flourish, that growth puts serious pressure on areas such as housing and transport. Research from earlier this year found that full-time Airbnb listings in most areas had very little impact on the private rental market, but in some popular tourist areas such as Waiheke Island, it found there was potential for Airbnb to have a negative impact for local renters.

“People say to me: ‘But doesn’t Airbnb put pressure on housing?’ Of course it does. Are we going to stop people using their houses for Airbnb? Of course we’re not. This is a free society and market economy,” Goff said while acknowledging the pressure short-term lets were putting on Auckland. “[But] tourism can be a major contributor to the provision of infrastructure in our city because of the income it provides.” Whether that cost-benefit ratio pans out of in Goff’s favour remains to be seen.

So, what else we know about Airbnb in New Zealand?

  • In 2017, Airbnb guests are said to have contributed $660 million in GDP and more than 6,000 full-time equivalent jobs.
  • Airbnb guests spent $781.4 million in 2017, representing 2.8% of all tourism expenditure across New Zealand. Approximately three-quarters of that spending were on things other than accommodation. The food service industry (restaurants, cafes, bars etc.) benefits the most, with a 22% share of Airbnb expenditure. Leisure activities (entertainment, museums etc.) follows a close second with a 20% share, while transportation (buses, taxis, car rentals etc) has a 14% share.
  • Airbnb encourages tourism beyond just the major cities. Auckland, for example, attracted a total of 144,000 bookings, 322,000 guests, and 509,000 nights booked. Meanwhile the rest of New Zealand (that’s anywhere that’s not Wellington, Queenstown or Christchurch) attracted a total of 272,400 bookings, 662,000 guests, and 542,000 nights booked.
  • Those using Airbnb the most in New Zealand are…New Zealanders. In 2017, 491,000 Airbnb guests were domestic, making up the biggest chunk of guests with 35%. Australia follows second with 17% of guests, the United States with 12%, and China at 8%.
  • Over 70% of Airbnb hosts are female and have an average age of 48 years old. In 2017, the additional median income earned by hosts was $4,400.

*CORRECTION: A previous version of this article incorrectly cited figures for hotel, motel, holiday park and backpacker stays from monthly March data instead of annual data as stated. This has now been amended with commercial accommodation figures (year to March) provided by Tourism Industry Aotearoa. 


The Spinoff’s business content is brought to you by our friends at Kiwibank. Kiwibank backs small to medium businesses, social enterprises and Kiwis who innovate to make good things happen.

Check out how Kiwibank can help your business take the next step.