spinofflive
Screen Shot 2015-10-17 at 4.07.54 pm

SocietyOctober 17, 2015

Why #Stepforward Might Be a Step Backward For Mental Health

Screen Shot 2015-10-17 at 4.07.54 pm

Jess McAllen says that the #stepforward campaign to end mental health discrimination, while well-intentioned, doesn’t seem likely to actually achieve anything.

It’s hard to knock an attempt to open up conversation around destigmatising mental illness. But, as a long-term user of mental health services, #stepforwardnz has been bothering me since it launched in June.

I have a lot of time for the  Mental Health Foundation, who are involved with this campaign, and think the work they do is incredibly valuable. However, just because I love them 90% of the time doesn’t mean I can let something that sits uneasy with me slide. Especially given that at least ten other people I’ve talked to with mental health issues have raised concerns with me in private.

Stoppress.co.nz interviewed Jane Wardlaw the group account director of the campaign’s ad agency FDC, who says writing #stepforward on your hand is the third step of the campaign.

Screen Shot 2015-10-17 at 4.07.54 pm

“She says in the current variation phase one was convincing the nation there’s a problem, phase two was to re-evaluate and enable, showing video in relevant environments and getting people to step forward, and the last phase is curtailing the movement, broadcasting content on TV using influencers and getting others to ‘Step Forward’ as well.”

According to Katherine Ryan from the Mental Health Foundation, the campaign, run by the Ministry of Health’s ‘Like Minds Like Mine’ programme, is set to run for three years. Ryan says #stepforward: “aims to encourage people to reflect on and change their behaviour towards people with experience of mental illness. Step Forward is the call to action for people to ‘step forward to end mental illness discrimination’ by taking action to ensure New Zealand is an inclusive society.”

But precisely what action that entails hasn’t been made clear.

So, like any person terrified of putting the fact they have mental health issues on the internet for future employers to see, I composed a listicle explaining why the $1.5 million Government-funded campaign seems unlikely to make much of a difference.

  1. It’s vague. Writing #stepforward on your hand isn’t exactly illuminating. Step forward for who? Why – and where to? The website doesn’t say what kind of mental health discrimination they are hoping to combat. The videos interview people who agree that discrimination = bad. It would be great for there to be some guidelines on discrimination in employment law and interviews with Real Life People With Mental Illness. And I’m talking someone other than John Kirwan, who has thoroughly repped the white, middle-aged man field of mental health. He’s done great work, sure – but is there no one else who can front this? 
  2. Pledging to end “mental illness discrimination” – hot tip: most advocates prefer the term “mental health” – is all very well on social media but what about real life? How about pointing out some examples of what discrimination looks and feels like? Are you there when your friend needs someone to talk to? Or are you the manager that asks an employee if they’re an alcoholic after they vomited in the toilet from a panic attack? (The manic pixie dreamgirl is a trope that needs to disappear; this stuff isn’t glamorous).
    There’s those who put a label like Bipolar or Schizophrenic (ht: John Key
    referring to Labour’s policy flip flopping) as a synonym for crazy. You can be high-functioning and stable on medication, want to tell people your diagnosis but such language leads to the common reaction of “wow, you don’t seem like you’re Bipolar!” We’ve embarked into an era where we can count our friendships in likes, retweets, and hashtags, so one of the most infuriating things during my major depressive episode in 2014 was people being like “r u ok? sad emoji” and bailing when I told them I wasn’t. Funnily enough, some of the same people who slipped off my radar with astounding speed are also sprinting to #stepforward on Facebook.
  3. It’s the attitudes from those in charge of policy who are harming mental health folk more than public stigma. Does this campaign mean the Government is finally going to address the shocking wait times for actually getting treatment? In my seven years in and out of mental health services, getting help has been the biggest barrier, not the odd side-eye when a visitor sees my medication box. I haven’t had counselling since 15 (I’m 23 now). When I was at my worst I had a three month wait to get into Auckland District Health Board mental health care. My doctor stepped forward then, giving me her personal number and saying I could text her anytime. The catchment-based allocation of resources makes even moving house fraught with difficulty, because by moving out of one area you effectively start from scratch in another. I now have an amazing case-worker, but still face a six month wait for counselling. Maybe I’ll be depressed again in April 2016?
  4. Haven’t we been hit with enough goddamn awareness campaigns since the ‘90s? This campaign obviously isn’t aimed at people like me who are familiar with thinking the world is so dark they’d rather cocoon themselves into a blanket. Instead it’s for the general public who don’t give mental health a second thought aside from the odd media story. But I think we’re underestimating them.
    The intentions are well-meaning but it comes across as naive, disingenuous and downright annoying to those who have mental health problems and are constantly on the receiving end of stigma and service cuts. I’m blunt about my issues – if I cancel on a friend because I’m in the throes of depression, I’ll say so. It took a while but I’ve learnt the people who run when mental health issues come up aren’t the people I want in my life anyway. Now my declaration is a Litmus test of sorts. I revel in your awkward pause. And my flatmate still invites me as a plus one to comedy shows, despite there being about a high chance of me not turning up because of the crowds (sorry Joseph).
    Most people know someone who has mental health issues – after-all one in five New Zealanders do – and are understanding. At one restaurant where I waitressed, when I opened up about the reason I was there and not following my freshly minted journalism degree (debilitating depressive episode after graduation) 6 out of 10 bright, breezy staff revealed they too had mental health issues – from suicide attempts, to Schizophrenia.
  5. There are way better places for this money to go. Take Mike King and his Key to Life trust. He visits high schools, relaying his experience with depression and suicide, but in a funny way that connects with kids. I’ve been in contact with him for the past year, watching his progress and seeing the effect his talks have had. When I was waiting for someone, anyone to answer my cries for help – literally, I once phoned a suicide helpline and was told “go for a walk” – King gave me his personal cellphone number. This was before I was a journalist.
    Yet recently DHBs warned schools against having him talk for fear of “suicide contagion”. This attitude seems very much at odds with trying to “end mental illness discrimination”. Stigma feeds out of ignorance. Raising the next generation to be comfortable with talking about mental health – King likens it to his generation not being comfortable with the Maori national anthem and how this generation doesn’t care – seems likely to do more for awareness than a cosy PR campaign ever could.


    As we prepared to publish, The Spinoff noted the brilliant Beck Eleven with a piece on a similar topic and campaign – also highly recommended reading.

Keep going!
Screen Shot 2015-10-07 at 6.38.58 pm

SocietyOctober 8, 2015

Video – What the Hell is Boobs on Bikes Really About? Punters and Protestors Weigh in

Screen Shot 2015-10-07 at 6.38.58 pm

The Boobs on Bikes paraded down Auckland’s Queen Street yesterday. Alex Casey and José Barbosa talked to crowd members to get their questions answered. 

The sun was beating down as the clock struck 12 on Auckland’s Queen Street. It was too hot and I had to keep my jacket on because I had forgotten that my new top had shoulder pads in it that made me look like a quarterback. I was laughably over-thinking my appearance in the face of what was about to come careening down Queen Street.

Peering through the crowd, it was tough to detect who was in town to see Boobs on Bikes, and who was just going about their daily business. All of the Queen Street classics were out in force – tourists with selfie sticks, meandering toddlers in tutus, that excellent window washer who always wears a flame-print cowboy hat and no shirt. He wasn’t the only one going shirtless today.

The parade itself whizzed by faster than you could say “hmm, nah this is objectification.” There was a man nearby eating sushi with his hands, who barely got halfway through one piece before the lady buffet had sped past. “Those were nice,” another man whispered to his friend in front of me. Behind me, an aggrieved teen spat “you can’t even see shit from here!” He threw his Burger King cup on the ground.

Milling around in the aftermath of the Boobs on Bikes crowd, it was difficult to process what I had just seen. The women themselves looked like they were having a nice time, so why did everything still feel so sad? Myself and The Spinoff’s producer José Barbosa had a chat to both the punters and protestors, to see how other people felt post-parade and get some of our questions answered:

The Boobs on Bikes parade has been running for over ten years now, and was founded by New Zealand’s premiere (and basically only) pornography baron Steve Crow. Each year that it runs, the topless motorbike-driven cavalcade makes its way down Queen Street several days before the start of the Erotica expo. It’s certainly a more aggressive and controversial form of promotion than any other annual expo. You wouldn’t see this kind of display from the Auckland Doll and Teddy Fair.

Civil injunctions, protests and petitions from various groups have failed to stop the parade year upon year. Crow says it’s a statement about freedom of expression, the right for a woman to bare her chest in public just like a man.

I agree that this is a longstanding and very bullshit double standard that needs changing. I just wonder what he’s doing for the cause on the other 364 days of the year, not to mention that his Freedom Parade for Equality appears to largely exclude breastfeeding mothers, women who have had mastectomies, trans women and women who don’t look like pornstars. Possibly because these aren’t the women who make him the most money.

On the walk back from the parade, a bewildered delivery man bumped into me. He was so distracted by the crowds that he had lost control of his trolley. He asked me what he had just missed, and I gingerly told him.

“Oh, so nothing then.”