spinofflive
Getty Images
Getty Images

OPINIONMoneyDecember 10, 2020

Bitcoin’s surprising resilience during a tumultuous year

Getty Images
Getty Images

It’s been touted as the best performing asset of 2020, so what’s been driving Bitcoin’s recent success amid a global pandemic? Janine Grainger from Easy Crypto has a few ideas.

The fact that Bitcoin has survived the stress-test of Covid-19 has been indisputable. Not only did it recover much quicker when compared to the other asset classes, such as the US stock markets and gold prices, but it’s also been the best performing asset class year-to-date. Perhaps it’s due to this resilience that we’re seeing not only increased attention given to this asset class but also a phenomenal growth in institutional adoption. Recent institutional investors include ARK investments, which is well known for its strategy in investing in disruptive innovations, and Square, which has committed 1% of its total assets (US$50 million) into Bitcoin. So why hasn’t Bitcoin followed the trajectory of other assets despite the chaos brought by Covid-19? 

In 2007, just before the GFC, The Economist wrote: “Institutional investors have been looking for ‘uncorrelated’ assets ever since the equity bear market of 2000–2002. They realised that they made too big a bet on the stock market and wanted to diversify. But neither government bonds nor cash offered the level of returns they desired.” 

Perhaps it’s this desire to look for “uncorrelated” assets that led to a growing number of savvy investors to include Bitcoin in their investment portfolio. An uncorrelated asset moves independently of major stock market indices, and investors typically look to such an asset as a hedge to reduce the risk of their overall investment portfolio. 

Within the cryptoverse and now the wider financial markets, there’s a mix of evidence either supporting or refuting the claim of Bitcoin’s association with traditional assets. A recent study observed a positive coupling effect between Bitcoin and the stock markets. This means that during shock-like situations when the stock markets are declining, Bitcoin also sees a fall in value. 

When we dived into the price data of Bitcoin and other financial assets in the last 90 days, we also found a similar observation with Bitcoin correlating with most stock markets with the exception of Germany’s DAX. On the other hand, Bitcoin still performs differently to gold with the two assets negatively correlated.

90 day rolling correlation between Bitcoin and other financial assets such as international stock markets and gold – August to November, 2020 (Image: Supplied)

Given that Bitcoin is still a very young asset, it seems logical that it’s affected by what’s going on in major stock markets. After all, the world’s stock markets are valued at US$89.5 trillion dollars while the cryptocurrencies’ market capitalisation was just US$244 billion at the beginning of this year, but has since surged to over US$500 billion by November 2020.

Image: Supplied, adapted via Visual Capitalist

More recently, however, Bitcoin is showing signs of divergence from the rise and fall trajectory of the stock markets’ price actions. During the first week of November, the signs of Bitcoin’s decoupling from the stock markets became more prominent. While major stock market indices fell week on week due to the uncertainties of the US Presidential election, Bitcoin witnessed a new 2020 high. How is this possible? 

Increasing demand certainly plays a role. Commentators have pointed to the new adopters of Bitcoin (particularly institutional investors) surging in to purchase the digital asset that prevented its price from dropping. 

However, Bitcoin’s supply (or lack of) is also at play here. There will only ever be 21 million Bitcoin. This fixed supply is in stark contrast to central bank-issued money that we are used to, such as the New Zealand dollars. Currently, there are just over 18 million Bitcoins in circulation, with the supply of new “virgin” Bitcoins being released diminishing over time. 

In a world where quantitative easing of currency is a common tool for many governments, driving fear of the devaluation of government-issued currencies, Bitcoin’s fixed and tightening supply render it a more appealing alternative. New Zealand, like many other countries, also resorted to quantitative easing, where the reserve bank has pledged $128 billion dollars of stimulus. A recent report by PwC revealed that the number of hedge funds with digital assets, such as Bitcoin, continue to rise. The total assets under management worldwide doubled from 2018 to the end of 2019 to USD 2 billion, and this number is expected to triple by the end of this year, as more investors look to digital assets such as Bitcoin as a hedge. It is likely that New Zealand investors behave in a similar manner. 

It is scarcity that led some to know Bitcoin as the “digital gold”. Furthermore, in the decade where Bitcoin’s value went from under a dollar to US$18,000, Gold, although a safe haven, hovered between the US$1,200-$1,700 price in the same period. 

Undoubtedly, Bitcoin’s reputation as a possible hedge against inflation or a portfolio diversifier is evident, and more and more people are awakening to Bitcoin’s potential.

Janine Grainger is the co-founder of Easy Crypto and deputy chair of Blockchain New Zealand.

Keep going!
Medicinal cannabis stocks took a dive after the cannabis referendum (Photo: Lazingbee/iStock via Getty)
Medicinal cannabis stocks took a dive after the cannabis referendum (Photo: Lazingbee/iStock via Getty)

MoneyDecember 7, 2020

Why medicinal cannabis suffered after the October cannabis referendum

Medicinal cannabis stocks took a dive after the cannabis referendum (Photo: Lazingbee/iStock via Getty)
Medicinal cannabis stocks took a dive after the cannabis referendum (Photo: Lazingbee/iStock via Getty)

Medicinal cannabis stocks took a dive in the aftermath of the cannabis referendum. Here’s why it happened.

In the aftermath of the cannabis referendum on October 17, stocks for the two NZX-listed medicinal cannabis companies both sold down. While the referendum concerned the recreational, not medicinal use of cannabis, medicinal cannabis companies say there may have been some confusion about the actual impact of the referendum on the medicinal market.

In September, one of those listed companies, Cannasouth, reached its all-time high on the NZX, trading shares for $1.21 each. After the election on October 17, prices declined, reaching a low of $0.54 one month later, after the cannabis referendum results were announced.

Mark Lucas, CEO of Cannasouth, says while it’s not possible to explain exactly why stocks drop when they do – it can be for a range of reasons – there is an argument that the eventual “no” vote did affect the way some investors perceived the brand’s growth potential.

“Some people may have made the assumption that a medicinal cannabis company would be in a good position if there was an adult use market. That’s not something as a company that we have articulated.”

Lucas says despite Cannasouth’s medicinal focus, there was a lot of confusion around what a “yes” vote would mean for the medicinal cannabis sector, which may have caused further confusion when the “no” vote became clear.

“[There was] a lot of confusion, a lot of people not understanding that medicinal cannabis is already legal, that there is a framework here and some people who felt that a business like ours actually depended on a ‘yes’ vote.”

The medicinal cannabis scheme, which came into effect on April 1, 2020, was put in place to improve access to quality medicinal cannabis products as medicine. Under the scheme, cannabis is only available under a prescription from a doctor and licenses need to be obtained for companies wanting to produce medicinal cannabis product – the Ministry of Health states this scheme is entirely separate from October’s cannabis referendum.

The cannabis referendum however sought to legalise recreational cannabis and allow designated dispensaries from which anyone over the age of 20 could purchase up to 14g of cannabis product per day. So why did investors get so confused?

Kristen Lunman, general manager of investment platform Hatch says it’s not uncommon that investors react to events not directly related to their investments. “It can have nothing to do with how that company, business, sector or industry is going. Share markets can be driven on emotion.”

She says in an industry like New Zealand’s medicinal cannabis market, people will be investing because of growth potential, and the referendum result would have scared some into selling shares. 

“With legalisation of cannabis over the last few years all over the world, there’s the sense that ‘this is an emerging industry and I’m going to get behind it and invest in its potential’.”

Investing is an emotional game, Lunman says, which means people often follow the crowd when they see a share price plummeting, often out of panic. 

“If you don’t have a really solid plan and a really solid reasoning as to why you’re backing something and a plan for that particular share then you’re going to react on emotion, and I think that’s what we saw in this case.

“People open their share portfolios and they see it’s gone into red and they panic because they’ve got into it without really thoroughly saying ‘regardless of what happens today or next year, I believe cannabis is going to grow over the next five years so I’m not going to panic.”

Lucas says the fundamentals of Cannasouth haven’t changed, and he’s not worried about the drop. The investors who have done their research won’t have reacted emotionally to the referendum result, he says.

“Medicinal cannabis is a large sector and growing rapidly globally, so anyone who was investing in a way that they had a good look at what they were investing in would understand that the fundamentals hadn’t changed for us.”

Cannasouth is only concerned with reaching goals it has set for itself, Lucas says, and share prices should rise when people can see these goals being achieved. 

“The sand moves beneath your feet quite quickly in just about any sector, obviously this is a highly regulated sector and there’s a lot of interest around medicinal cannabis but fundamentally it’s the same as any other business and our focus is on trying to get the fundamentals right and building a sound business model.”