spinofflive
Photo: Abbas Nasziri
Photo: Abbas Nasziri

OPINIONPoliticsJanuary 5, 2022

I remember 9/11. I’d just been rescued by an Australian frigate

Photo: Abbas Nasziri
Photo: Abbas Nasziri

Summer reissue: While the world recoiled, we we watched from an Australian frigate, Abbas Nazari wrote on the 20-year anniversary of that epochal event.

First published on September 11, 2021

We are here thanks to you. The Spinoff’s journalism is funded by its members – click here to learn more about how you can support us from as little as $1.

Everyone remembers where they were when 9/11 happened. I was on an Australian Navy frigate, the HMAS Manoora. We had just been rescued by the Tampa, and then transferred to the Manoora. An official from the International Organisation for Migration, who was in touch with the outside, gave us two updates. That on September 9, two Taliban militants posing as journalists had killed Ahmad Shah Massoud, a charismatic guerilla leader who was the last holdout against the Taliban. And that two days later, al-Qaida operatives committed the 9/11 attacks. We didn’t see the horrifying images or get a full sense of the gravity of the attacks until many weeks later, when we were in the Māngere Refugee Resettlement Centre in South Auckland. It was heartbreaking, and we wondered if the west would equate us, a group of Afghan refugees, with the same people who had committed the attacks.

In August 2019, I started my studies at Georgetown University. On the September 11 anniversary, I hopped on the DC Metro and stopped at the 9/11 Memorial at the Pentagon. Former President George W Bush laid a wreath, and spoke of how the event had impacted his entire presidency and shaped the course of the first two decades of the 20th century. Some weeks later, on a trip to New York, I stopped by the 9/11 National Memorial at the site of the World Trade Centre towers. It was an immersive, sombre, and perfectly fitting tribute to the victims and heroes of the attacks.

Staring at the reflecting pools,  I thought about how even though we were so far away from the actual attacks, my life was intertwined with that day nonetheless. We had fled from Afghanistan as refugees, leaving our village in the mountains of Afghanistan the week after the Taliban blew up the Buddhas of Bamiyan. When we were rescued by the Tampa, there were some in Australian civil society, even in parliament, who supported our asylum claim, but that support withered in the aftermath of the attacks. We were a boatload of military-aged males from the Middle East; a potential threat to national security, we couldn’t be trusted.

Family group photo taken inside a home, six children and Mum and Dad
The Nazari family a year after their arrival in Christchurch – Abbas’s older brother Hussein is not shown, having fled separately via Pakistan (Photo: Supplied)

One of the questions that emerged in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks was “Why do they hate us?” Numerous pundits and commentators posited that the entire Middle East was awash with a people and ideology that was simply incompatible with the liberty and ideals of a western democracy, and that the region needed some good old nation building. This sort of thinking, along with voracious lobbying by defence industry contractors, eventually convinced the neoconservatives in the Bush administration to go all in in Afghanistan. The mission statement changed from capturing those responsible for the attacks, to toppling the Taliban, to establishing an entirely new governance apparatus in Afghanistan, to then setting sights on Iraq. 

I fully agree that those who were responsible for the attacks needed be brought to justice. But it is abundantly clear that the mission evolved from capturing those responsible into a 20-year rudderless mission which collapsed spectacularly last month with the fall of Kabul. I often wonder what could have been achieved if the same amount of time, energy, and treasure was spent on using a non-military approach to nation building. Afghanistan desperately needs help, but the military presence, the drone strikes, the tsunami of foreign money (which enabled rampant corruption), and the shoddy advice and intelligence which underpinned efforts, ultimately built a house of cards which crumbled within three weeks in August. 

At Georgetown University’s Security Studies Program, many of my classmates were current or former US servicemen and women. Some whose bodies were intact, others who had lost limbs, and many whose minds had been altered completely. These men and women bore the brunt of the war effort, even when it was clear that it was unwinnable. They followed orders, and did their best, in the most pressing circumstances. I take my hat off to them. 

I do not know if the world is safer now than it was 20 years ago. Terrorism has changed. While Islamist-inspired terrorism is still active, ethno-nationalism is the new threat, as we saw on March 15 in Christchurch. 

Twenty years on from September 11, as a new chapter opens in Afghanistan, there remain many questions unanswered. 

Abbas Nazari has a Master’s in Security Studies from Georgetown University. His new memoir recently became a No 1 bestseller. After the Tampa: From Afghanistan to New Zealand, by Abbas Nazari (Allen & Unwin, paperback $36.99), is available from Unity Books Auckland and Wellington.

Keep going!
The machine upon which Hayden typed his opinion (posed by model). Photo: Getty Images
The machine upon which Hayden typed his opinion (posed by model). Photo: Getty Images

PoliticsJanuary 2, 2022

Opinion: My opinion on NZ’s Covid strategy is bold, unwavering and probably wrong

The machine upon which Hayden typed his opinion (posed by model). Photo: Getty Images
The machine upon which Hayden typed his opinion (posed by model). Photo: Getty Images

Summer reissue: When the government decided to move Auckland down to alert level three, Hayden Donnell was compelled to rise to the challenge that faced him, a human with a byline, and issue an opinion on elimination, lockdowns, and whether it’s possible to contain a delta outbreak.

We are here thanks to you. The Spinoff’s journalism is funded by its members – click here to learn more about how you can support us from as little as $1.

Originally published on September 21, 2021.


It’s official. The government has or hasn’t scrapped its elimination strategy. In deciding to move Auckland from alert level four to alert level three at 11.59pm tonight, its impossible or possible goal of eliminating a delta outbreak has been abandoned or retained. 

Ignore the spin. The fact is this: I have no idea what I’m talking about. Barry Soper says elimination is over. So does Heather du Plessis-Allan. Michael Baker says it’s still possible, though more difficult.

I ate instant coffee straight from the bag at 2am in order to get my essays in on time for my communications degree. I am simply unqualified to make a call on this matter. 

We’ve heard a lot of talk from the podium this lockdown about whether we can clamp down on Auckland’s remaining mystery cases of Covid-19 if we move down from alert level four. Yesterday, Ashley Bloomfield said his advice to the government was that eliminating Covid is still possible at level three. But it boils down to this: the decision to move Auckland down an alert level is purely political. Either that or it is a carefully considered response to official epidemiological advice. From now on we’re going to have to get used to Covid circulating in the community, or we should prepare for a return of zero Covid days. One thing’s for sure: I barely know what a “gene” is, and am flailing drastically out of my depth on this topic.

As for level four lockdown, it has or hasn’t been working. Jacinda Ardern said the government’s modelling showed that if lockdown had been a week later, we’d have 5,000 Covid cases by now, suggesting tough, early restrictions saved lives. That’s convenient, or just an accurate reflection of reality. I wouldn’t be able to make a confident call, as I’ve forgotten how to do long multiplication.

At this point, I’d like to devote 300 words to an anecdote from my personal life which supports my argument. On one hand, I saw two maskless groups talking within two metres of each other while I was out for a walk. On the other, I know someone who is missing an important event in order to stick to lockdown rules. Don’t be fooled, though: none of these experiences have any real statistical value, and extrapolating any wider meaning from them would be completely worthless.

Let me be clear: the government’s decision yesterday reflects the reality that lockdown was effective or wasn’t effective. Now we’re set for two weeks at level three. If we can’t get rid of Covid in that time, it will show our elimination strategy is no longer viable. Or it won’t. The truth is that I didn’t know what an “R number” was a year ago, and all of us would be better off if I stopped writing this opinion piece and ceded the floor to people who know what they’re talking about.

Politics