spinofflive
An antigen test (rapid test device) showing a negative result (Photo Illustration: Marcos del Mazo/LightRocket via Getty Images)
An antigen test (rapid test device) showing a negative result (Photo Illustration: Marcos del Mazo/LightRocket via Getty Images)

ScienceSeptember 24, 2021

What is rapid testing and when is it coming to New Zealand?

An antigen test (rapid test device) showing a negative result (Photo Illustration: Marcos del Mazo/LightRocket via Getty Images)
An antigen test (rapid test device) showing a negative result (Photo Illustration: Marcos del Mazo/LightRocket via Getty Images)

DIY Covid-19 tests are all the rage overseas but how do they work and are they any good? Mirjam Guesgen finds out.

What is rapid testing?

Rapid tests are also called antigen tests, RATs (rapid antigen test), at-home tests, lateral flow tests, or self tests.

Rapid tests look and work a lot like a pregnancy test. Except it’s to see if you have the Covid-19 virus in your body, not a baby.

You take a swab from your nose and/or throat, swish the swab around with a buffer mixture, squeeze that buffer onto a test strip and watch for the result. The test strip will show a line that says the test has worked, and two lines if your test is positive, ie, that it’s detected Covid.

You can get results in about 15 to 20 minutes, without the need for sending your swab off to the lab.

How do rapid tests work?

Rapid tests work by looking for bits of the virus protein in a sample. That might be the spike protein or proteins that make up the capsule surrounding the virus’s genetic material.

A section of the rapid test strip is loaded up with antibodies labelled with a coloured marker. Those antibodies are designed to cling to whatever protein the test is trying to detect. The liquid you drip on runs along the paper and then hits this section and, if there are Covid proteins in the sample, they’ll stick to the antibodies and show up as a line.

That’s why it’s sometimes called a lateral flow test, because the sample flows along the test paper.

There’s another section that has a different set of antibodies in it that stick to some other, non-Covid protein in your sample. This shows up as a line to tell you the test has worked.

A German pharmacy worker hold up rapid antigen test kits. (Photo: INA FASSBENDER/AFP via Getty Images)

How is that different to the tests we hear about in New Zealand?

In New Zealand the main form of testing we have is Rt-PCR or viral tests.

Like rapid tests, Rt-PCR tests also tell you if you have the virus in your body now. But instead of looking for proteins of the virus, like rapid tests do, Rt-PCR tests look for genes that are specific to the virus. The tests could be looking for genes that make the spike protein of the virus, the capsule it sits in or its outer shell.

Rt-PCR tests can be done on swabs from someone’s nose or throat or from someone’s spit (saliva).

Rt-PCR tests need to be done in a lab, by trained people, and take 24 to 48 hours to process.

Then there’s a similar-sounding rapid PCR test, available in some parts of New Zealand. This is essentially the same as an Rt-PCR test, except that more of the process is done by a machine so you can get results quicker. It’s still done in a lab.

There’s also antibody testing, or serology testing.

Antibody testing tells you if your body has been exposed to the Covid-19 virus before, either by being infected or through vaccination. That may or may not mean you’re immune to the virus, that is, that you’re unlikely to be reinfected.

It works by looking for the number of disease-fighting molecules a person has and/or how well they block the virus’s spike protein. Someone can get results the same day or a couple of days later.

Antibody testing isn’t publicly available in New Zealand but is in the UK and US.

What are the benefits of rapid testing?

Because rapid tests are exactly that, fast, the time between getting tested and getting a result is shorter and there’s potentially less chance of spreading the virus around. That is, if a person isn’t self-isolating in that window.

They’re also easy to use and understand. You don’t need years of lab training to do one or figure out what it means.

They’re also cheap to make and therefore cheap to buy. Some governments overseas, like Germany and the UK, are funding rapid tests so people can get them for free – although both countries are looking at stopping those initiatives as a way to pressure people to get vaccinated. Otherwise the tests cost around $15 to $20.

For those reasons, antigen tests are great if you want to be able to test quickly and often, according to applied and molecular immunologist James Ussher. “The ability to potentially do it at home before coming to work or before going to a large concert or sports event is an advantage,” the University of Otago associate professor says.

What are the drawbacks?

They may not be as sensitive as Rt-PCR tests, meaning the tests might miss some people who are infected with Covid-19.

But those estimates of sensitivity vary depending on whether someone’s showing symptoms of Covid-19, the type of test, when it’s done and how it’s done. They can catch anywhere from 34% to 88% of the virus according to independent healthcare review journal Cochrane Library.

Antigen tests work best when someone has a lot of virus in their body, like in the first week of infection. “Rt-PCR will detect an infection earlier and it will detect a longer tail after infection. [Antigen tests] tend to be good in the first week but they don’t tend to be good later down the track,” Ussher says.

That issue can be overcome somewhat by testing more often, according to Ussher.

A British student takes a swab for a rapid (antigen) test in a Covid-19 testing centre at St Andrew’s University, Scotland, to determine if students are able to travel home for the Christmas 2020 break. (Photo: ANDY BUCHANAN/AFP via Getty Images)

So are they any good?

Yes, they could be.

For one, it comes down to the exact type or brand of test. “Some are rubbish and some are very good,” Ussher says. The FDA in the US recently recalled a bunch of at-home tests because of their “risk of false results”. But not all rapid tests are useless.

Plus the tests don’t need to be highly sensitive to be effective, more experts are now arguing.

Deciding whether to use them depends on a country’s tolerance for missing a case and the whole purpose for testing.

Contact tracing or testing someone who’s coming into hospital with symptoms? You probably have a low tolerance for missing a case. Mass screening of people without symptoms at schools, workplaces, concerts or sports events? Probably useful.

“Under the elimination strategy, we’ve got zero tolerance for missing cases so… you’ll still be doing PCR testing because you don’t want to miss someone,” Ussher says.

“But once we move to a suppression strategy then the game changes. You’re trying to dampen down opportunities for transmission so you probably don’t mind the occasional case. Instead you’re wanting to maximise the range of people you’re testing or minimise disruption to workplaces.”

How are rapid tests being used overseas?

Rapid tests seem to be everywhere overseas. You can find them at the dairy, the supermarket or the pharmacy. You can find them sitting in between Kinder Surprise eggs and gummy bears.

In some places, like Germany, the government is paying for pop-up centres close to nightclubs and cafes and tests are available for free outside the local pool or sports centre. Germany’s policy is you need to be one of the three G’s to get into public places: genesen, geimpft or getestet (recovered, vaccinated or tested). Rapid tests let people show they don’t have virus swirling around in them if they haven’t yet been vaccinated.

In the UK, you can order a couple of tests for free from the government and have them sent to your house, although they plan to phase this out by early next year. It’s part of their plan to get people tested regularly (like three times a week) to pick up if someone is infected before they spread the virus around.

And it’s a similar story in France, with pop-up testing tents outside of pharmacies. The tests allow people to travel out of France to places like the UK.

What’s happening in Aotearoa?

According to a release by the Ministry of Health, New Zealand has imported one kind of rapid test in preparation for the country’s next phase of its Covid-19 response. That is, once the country achieves high vaccination rates (it doesn’t specify in the release what those rates are).

It is currently trialling the test to screen people coming into the Middlemore Hospital Emergency Department and at the border.

The ministry says the goal is to see “what role it could play in our future border arrangements, including supporting self-isolation”.

Keep going!
Image: Getty Images/Tina Tiller
Image: Getty Images/Tina Tiller

ScienceSeptember 21, 2021

Why improving air quality is key to preventing Covid outbreaks in schools

Image: Getty Images/Tina Tiller
Image: Getty Images/Tina Tiller

New Zealand classrooms are often crowded, damp, mouldy and poorly ventilated – prime conditions for Covid to spread. And with new strains affecting children more than ever, making our schools safer should be an urgent priority, writes public health researcher Julie Bennett. 

Children in most parts of the country have returned to school, but as Covid remains within our borders, it’s critical the classrooms they occupy keep them as protected as possible against its potential spread.

Recently, worldwide attention has turned towards the impact Covid-19 is having on children, with significantly more contracting the virus now than earlier in the pandemic. This increase is probably the result of several factors, including the higher infectiousness of new variants (notably delta); high proportions of children unable to be vaccinated; a return to in-person learning in several countries with high community transmission; and greater numbers of children being tested.

While it was initially thought that children were less likely than adults to experience severe disease, outbreaks have sadly led to large numbers of children being hospitalised, including admissions to intensive care, and there are growing concerns about the long-term effects of Covid-19 illness on children.

Covid-19 outbreaks in schools

Other countries are reporting that most Covid-19 outbreaks are now in schools. Here in New Zealand, children (under 19 years of age) in the most recent outbreak represent the largest proportion of Covid-19 cases (40% of cases to date). There have also been large outbreaks in school communities, with the Marist College cluster generating 96 cases last year. The August 2021 outbreak has seen thousands of students from multiple schools required to self-isolate because they were close contacts of cases and now, two students from a primary school in Waikato’s Mangatangi have tested positive.

A case study reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has described an outbreak at a primary school (ages 5-14 years) in California earlier this year, where an unvaccinated teacher tested Covid-19 positive, two days after experiencing a stuffy nose and fatigue. During those two days, the teacher continued to work, attributing the symptoms to allergies. By the end of the outbreak, 12 of the 22 students in the teacher’s classroom had tested positive. The sick students then infected 14 siblings and parents. The majority of students infected sat in the front rows near the teacher, with a staggering 80% of the students in the two front rows testing positive. While both students and teachers wore masks inside the classroom, the teacher allegedly took off their mask while reading aloud to the class. 

The spread of the delta variant after one teacher got sick (Image: courtesy of the CDC)

The CDC case highlights the importance of using a layered approach to prevent the spread of Covid-19. That is using masks, cohorting, staying home when unwell, and vaccinating staff and students 12 years and above. Another layer that can be added to these prevention strategies is through the improvement of indoor air quality, which can be achieved through ventilation (bringing in as much outdoor air as possible) and air filtration.

Ventilation and Covid-19 transmission

It is well known that poor indoor air quality in schools can fuel community-wide disease transmission of other common viral illnesses such as colds, influenza and gastroenteritis. In New Zealand, classrooms are typically more crowded than houses or offices and they are often damp, mouldy and poorly ventilated. Such environments allow virus-laden particles to accumulate in the air, facilitating transmission.

When spaces are poorly ventilated, the levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) rise as people breathe. These CO2 levels are frequently used as a proxy to estimate the stuffiness in classrooms and measure if a building has adequate fresh air. High CO2 levels have been directly correlated to low productivity and low school attendance, as breathing in high levels can result in headaches, poor concentration, restlessness, nausea and sleepiness. 

Adequate ventilation is critical to creating successful learning environments. In New Zealand, most classrooms normally rely on opening windows for ventilation. However, surveys have shown that windows in schools are rarely opened and ventilation rates are well below what the Ministry of Education recommends. In Auckland and Wellington, CO2 levels in classrooms have been reported to exceed the Ministry of Education recommendations around 40% of the school day, while in Christchurch, students have been trying to learn in very poorly ventilated classrooms, with CO2 levels recorded at double the recommended limit over a week-long period. 

While some ventilation improvements will require structural alterations to school buildings, there are strategies that schools can implement, especially with the arrival of spring. The responsibility for ventilating classrooms should not fall on teachers alone, whose workloads are already overburdened. Some measures schools can take to help improve ventilation are to open windows to get across-room airflow. If it’s too cold to leave the windows open, opening up all available doors and windows for 15 minutes of every hour is recommended for full air exchange (purge ventilation). Child-safe fans can also be used to increase the effectiveness of open windows by safely securing fans to blow potentially contaminated air out and pull in outdoor air, especially on hot days. Schools could also consider having activities, classes and breaks outdoors when circumstances allow.

There are also measures that would be beneficial for the Ministry of Education to implement, with priority given to primary schools, as children under the age of 12 will be the last group to be vaccinated, and not all students are able to wear masks. These include revising the recommended average CO2 level to align with the CDC recommendations, which are considerably lower, and installing CO2 monitors in all classrooms to indicate when to take action, such as opening windows or moving outside. Where natural ventilation isn’t possible or effective and in high-risk areas such as sick bays, portable air cleaners – high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration units – should be installed. Buildings that consistently have CO2 levels above the Ministry of Education recommendations should be upgraded.

Schools do far more than provide formal education, which is why it is so important that we do everything we can to make sure they stay open safely. Indoor air quality has always been important for children’s health and learning, and optimising ventilation in schools has multiple co-benefits aside from Covid-19 prevention, including prevention of other respiratory infections that circulate in schools and improving children’s learning and concentration. The new Covid-19 variants, like delta, make improving indoor air quality in schools more urgent.