spinofflive
Image: Tina Tiller
Image: Tina Tiller

SocietyOctober 2, 2021

Is it time to keep our cats at home?

Image: Tina Tiller
Image: Tina Tiller

Cats, both feral and domestic, are killing our native fauna. We need to keep them confined, writes Anna Yeoman.

A couple of weeks ago, on the outskirts of the Central Otago town of Alexandra, a pile of 28 dead native lizards was found. They’d been regurgitated by a cat, which had caught and eaten all 28 in just several hours.

As a science communicator living in Alexandra, I took on the job of making a short video and article for Stuff about the find, and about how scientists responded. Very quickly, the issue of pet cats came up. Dr Grant Norbury, an ecologist with Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, who has spent 38 years researching predator-prey dynamics, said while it was unclear whether the culprit in this case was a feral cat or a pet cat, he had a clear message for cat owners.

“Many people think their pet cats aren’t a problem. They think feral cats do that damage, and their pet cats don’t. But they do. They’ve got the same instincts, they’re hunters,” Norbury said.

Professor Yolanda van Heezik, an urban ecologist from the University of Otago, said it wasn’t unlikely that this cat was someone’s pet. “It’s only 400 metres from the housing,” she explained. Cat tracking studies she’s done show pet cats can roam up to 28 hectares, much to the surprise of their owners.

“We’re not saying don’t have a cat. But it’s about how you manage your cat to reduce harm to vulnerable wildlife,” said van Heezik. “Ideally people should be confining their cats 24/7.”

Dr James Reardon, a herpetologist and science advisor at the Department of Conservation, was also consulted in response to the find. “New Zealand is unusual in that we let our cats roam.” He explained that in Australia, and in large parts of America, it’s much more the norm to keep cats indoors, rather than have them out hunting.

And from van Heezik, “It’s like we’re a decade or two behind those other parts of the world in terms of our cat regulations. So we need to move in that direction.”

So is it time for New Zealand to change the way we keep our cats, and start confining them indoors? And why, if it’s the norm in North America, Japan and Australia, do we not already do it?

In 2013, Gareth Morgan brought the cat issue blazing into the spotlight. The stated goal of his campaign was to ensure cats were registered and kept indoors, yet he named his campaign ‘Cats to Go’, a move guaranteed to do more for media attention than for diplomacy. And he certainly raised attention.

Cats are beloved companions for so many people. One in three New Zealand households have at least one cat. So to talk about our moggies as problem predators, or to challenge their right to roam, is difficult. Yet maybe the solution isn’t as hard as it seems. Already in New Zealand we keep our most valuable cats confined. Pedigree cats aren’t allowed to roam freely in case they get injured, lost or impregnated by a non-pedigree Tom. They’re very well looked after and kept in peak health. Could we not make this the norm for all cats?

A major barrier to containing cats on their home property is that it would entail a hassle, and likely an expense, for cat owners. If an owner wasn’t comfortable confining their cat indoors 24/7, they’d need to build an outdoor cat enclosure. This is what’s meant by the term “catio” – a patio for cats.

In this scenario, all cats would also be micro-chipped and registered, so that they could be returned home if found straying. So to justify the effort of doing this, there would need to be a seriously good reason.

Reardon sees our native lizards as a major part of that reason. We’ve got one of the most diverse and fascinating lizard faunas on the planet. “We’ve got over 120 species of native lizards. That’s more lizard species for our land area than Australia.” Yet most are in serious conservation trouble.

Reardon explains why cat predation is such an issue for New Zealand lizards. “Our lizards evolved in a land without mammals, where birds were the major predators. Birds generally hunt by sight, not smell, so our lizards protect themselves by being hard to see.”

It was humans who brought rodents, cats and other predatory mammals to New Zealand, which all hunt by scent. So when these mammals hunt our native lizards, birds and invertebrates, it’s not a natural part of a food chain. And it explains why they decimate our native populations so quickly.

Small mammals like mice and rats, which evolved alongside cats, breed incredibly quickly, and so can easily keep up with cat predation. But our native lizards can’t, nor can most of our birds. While mice can give birth to up to ten babies every six weeks, our skinks have two-to-six young once a year. Our geckos have even less, only one or two young after a pregnancy that can last up to 14 months.

So when 21 skinks and 7 geckos were found in one regurgitated pile, that’s at least four years’ worth of breeding wiped out in a matter of hours. Schist geckos are extremely long lived, and the adults could have been 40 or 50 years old. “And that’s why we have vanishingly small numbers of our rare lizards left,” says Reardon.

Yet surely most pet cats aren’t killing 28 native lizards for breakfast?

Van Heezik agrees this will be at the higher end of predation, but explains that many cat owners are unlikely to have an accurate impression of just what their cat is killing. “Recent studies using miniature cameras, ‘kitty-cams’, show that what cats bring back is on average only a quarter or a third of what they actually catch and kill,” says van Heezik. Some cats don’t bring back any of the things they kill.

A cat (Image: Getty)

There have certainly been other records of thirty or more native lizards being found in the stomachs of feral cats. And in Ruapehu in 2010, 102 short-tailed bats were found to have been killed by one cat within a week. Norbury explains that it’s the scale of the issue that’s so alarming. “When you multiply a day’s hunting by 365, and then by all the cats in the landscape, you get an understanding of why it’s a real problem,” says Norbury.

It can certainly seem strange to consider the enormous amount of work and expense going into the Predator Free 2050 campaign when we have cats roaming freely in towns, cities and countryside. The issue is becoming especially obvious in Wellington. The city is leading the way in rat and stoat eradication, while at the same time kakariki/red-crowned parakeets, which are spreading out from Zealandia sanctuary, are being eaten by people’s pet cats.

While ideas like colourful bird-scaring collars, bells, keeping your cat well fed, or keeping it in at night might help reduce predation a little, Norbury and van Heezik both explain that these things have limited effectiveness, and are at best only partly reducing the problem. Containing cats 24/7 is the only thing that really works.

Van Heezik also raises the issue of toxoplasmosis, a disease spread by cats. “I’m surprised more people aren’t freaked out about it!” she says. “Once you’re infected by the toxoplasma parasite it essentially lodges in your brain forever, and it’s linked to an increase in impulsive, aggressive behaviours,” she explains. If our cats were contained, it would reduce the spread of toxoplasmosis.

So there are some strong conservation and human health reasons for keeping our cats at home. But is it fair on our cats to do so?

It turns out that the major animal welfare groups are also calling for cat registration and containment. In the January 2021 edition of New Zealand Geographic, Hayden Donnell observes that, “the most surprising thing about the cat management debate in New Zealand isn’t the division it inspires, but the consensus.” He goes on to quote the chief science officer at the SPCA, Arnja Dale, as saying, “It’s a very emotional issue, but it’s not a controversial issue.”

A National Cat Management Strategy Group (NCMSG) was formed in 2014 and consists of all the major animal welfare groups – the New Zealand Veterinary Association, the Royal New Zealand Society for the Protection of Animals, and Local Government New Zealand, with the Ministry for Primary Industries and the Department of Conservation involved as technical advisors.

The strategy group calls for new laws around responsible cat ownership to be legislated in a National Cat Management Act. Their long term goal is that in New Zealand there would be no feral or stray cats. That all companion cats would be micro-chipped and desexed. And that all companion cats would be contained on the owner’s property, either indoors or in an outdoor enclosure.

The New Zealand Veterinary Association website already provides guidelines for how to keep your cat healthy and happy if it spends its whole time inside, specifying that “If a cat is confined indoors, suitable enrichment should be provided to enhance the environment, such as climbing frames, scratching posts and toys.”

It sounds a long way from the current situation. But van Heezik recalls how far we’ve come with dogs. When she was a child her pet duck, rabbits and guinea pigs were all killed by wandering dogs coming onto their property. “We just accepted it as bad luck, whereas nowadays of course it’s completely unacceptable. Our attitudes have changed with regards to what dogs should be able to do, and hopefully we’ll get there with cats too,” she says.

The Dog Control Act was enacted in 1996, but so far we don’t have anything similar for cats. Which is why the NCMSG is calling for a National Cat Management Act. With such a strong consensus among conservation, public health and animal welfare groups, there is still one thing missing. There needs to be action on the issue in Parliament. And because the emotional charge of the issue is so high, it’s seen as too politically risky for a leader to touch. Despite calls to bring in tighter cat controls, so far Jacinda Ardern has remained quiet on the subject.

Finding 28 dead native lizards is just a reminder that delaying the necessary change is costing the country’s vulnerable wildlife. Containment works overseas, and it works for our pedigrees. Is it really too hard to imagine that it could work for all our cats?

Keep going!
Boarded up social housing in Hamilton. (Photo: Jaycie O’Connor)
Boarded up social housing in Hamilton. (Photo: Jaycie O’Connor)

OPINIONSocietyOctober 2, 2021

A delta health crisis thrives when it meets a crisis in housing and poverty

Boarded up social housing in Hamilton. (Photo: Jaycie O’Connor)
Boarded up social housing in Hamilton. (Photo: Jaycie O’Connor)

Ashley Bloomfield confirmed this week that many people affected by the current outbreak are living in transitional and emergency housing. Decades of neglect have created the conditions where an infectious disease like Covid can flourish. For the sake of our most vulnerable and the country as a whole, we have to get serious about providing people with the means and the shelter to live with dignity, writes Innes Asher, professor emeritus at the University of Auckland and a spokesperson for the Child Poverty Action Group.

Highly infectious diseases thrive in substandard living conditions. It was true in the 19th century, and as Covid-19 stubbornly continues to spread through the community in our biggest city, it is true here and now.

An adequate standard of living has never been available for everyone in Aotearoa. A Māori Women’s Welfare League survey in 1952 reported that poverty, overcrowding, damp and unaffordable rental housing were key issues in Auckland. Seven decades on, the same is true. 

In the middle of the last century there were not enough state houses to meet the need. Until the late 1940s, Māori had been excluded from state housing. Due to sound government policies being put in place from the 50s to the mid-1980s things improved a lot, with proportionately more state houses, better incomes and the family benefit. It was a period of greater stability in people’s lives – having enough and reaching your potential was more likely to be achievable, although less likely for Māori than Pākehā.

Fast forward to September 2021 and we see the results of three decades of neglectful policy: fewer state houses to meet increasing need. At the same time, large numbers of people in private rentals face unaffordable rents and insecure tenancies. The overall impact of current government policy is increasing the need for emergency housing, with more people homeless. 

A low-wage economy leaves increasing numbers of people in paid work struggling, or failing, to make ends meet. It is even harder for those striving to live on inadequate benefits. The result is many leading desperate lives. Eyebrows no longer rise in surprise when we read about people, more commonly with disabled family members, living in garages or unsafe emergency accommodation, or young people dying from rheumatic fever. To our shame, it has become familiar.

The Working for Families package is meant to be the primary source of income support for children in low-income families. However when parents receive benefits they are denied a crucial payment for their children ($72.50 per week or more for larger families). This stark discrimination in favour of children of parents who were not on any benefit was introduced in 1996 and remains. New Zealand is an outlier among similar countries; in Australia for example, children’s income support is not tied to parents’ source of income. 

It is a tragic indicator that food banks provided by charities – some subsidised by the government – are now a routine feature in our country. This is a result of decades of market-driven policies that prohibit many families from receiving adequate incomes to cover basic needs (including housing, power, transport, shoes, doctors’ visits, and nutritious food); let alone enough to pay for school uniforms, sports gear and school trips. It doesn’t have to be this way.

Is it any wonder that delta should prove so difficult to eliminate among people left struggling to survive? Lack of online access to news and information as well as language barriers for many, mean public health messages may not be seen by people who are already feeling isolated from their community. For others, dire living conditions can bring on anxiety as well as mistrust of the government brought about by years of bitter experience. Who can blame people on the margins if they prioritise finding access to food supplies for hungry children ahead of finding a way to get to a Covid centre for testing or vaccination?

Overcrowding and temporary housing make social distancing at home difficult. Aaron Hendry, who works with homeless youth, puts it this way: “If we treated housing as a human right, we wouldn’t be in this situation. Blaming whānau living in third world conditions, with shared facilities and unable to isolate misses the bigger issue that is contributing to this problem.”

Since delta hit us, politicians have been asked what they will do to help people in severe need. In particular, how is the government able to support those on low fixed incomes who face unexpected lockdown bills including increased heating, cooking, water and internet costs, as well as rising grocery prices? There has been no satisfactory answer, beyond minimal support to food banks. Instead we watch that need grow.

There is so much that could be done. It is particularly difficult to understand why the Covid-related benefit increase and doubled winter energy payment of the 2020 lockdowns were not offered this time. Carmel Sepuloni, the minister of social development, when asked about alleviating immediate hardship at the social services select committee on August 25, more than a week into the lockdown, said: “it’s really a watch-this-space situation at the moment”. A week later, the deputy prime minister, Grant Robertson, said: “we continue to monitor the impact of this outbreak on our low-income households and we will respond accordingly.” 

Delta will not be eliminated by watching severe need grow. Isn’t it time to respond and address these urgent needs today?

On September 21, the minister for children, Kelvin Davis, said: “This government’s vision [for the welfare system] is to ensure that people have an adequate income and standard of living, are treated with and can live in dignity and are able to participate meaningfully in their communities.” 

That’s a great vision. So let’s just do it! The immediate solution is to actively improve living conditions for those in poverty. All low incomes need to be increased. A living wage for those in paid work, and implement the full increases in incomes urgently recommended by the government’s Welfare Expert Advisory Group nearly three years ago. Further increases in benefits now, and increases in Working for Families tax credits (properly indexed) making them available in full to all children in low-income families. 

Fixes for the increasing levels of homelessness and housing-related distress in New Zealand may not be quick, but bold meaningful change needs to start now so tangible progress can come soon. The state housing building programme must be accelerated to build 5,000 extra homes per year. Rapidly increase medium-term accommodation for those waiting for secure long-term housing, especially for young people. Regulate rents to stop excessive increases and increase security of rental tenure. The fuelling of property price inflation needs to be stopped by housing taxation as outlined in the Fair Economic Return policy and further controls on bank lending. 

Delta wants to thrive here, but we would rather that our tamariki and rangatahi did.

Innes Asher FRACP ONZM is Professor Emeritus in the Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, was a member of the Welfare Expert Advisory Group, and is a spokesperson for the Child Poverty Action Group