spinofflive
Getty Images
Getty Images

The Bulletinabout 1 hour ago

Will next summer be just as intolerable for townhouse dwellers?

Getty Images
Getty Images

Around 70% of New Zealanders find their homes too hot at least some of the time in summer. Those in townhouses are suffering much more than most, writes Catherine McGregor in today’s extract from The Bulletin.

To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.

A summer of broiling indoor temperatures

As temperatures begin to feel more autumnal over the next few weeks, the sweaty, sleepless nights of summer will fade into memory – for a while at least. Before we know it, the summer temperatures will be back, and so will the complaints about uncomfortably hot homes. New research from the Building Research Association of New Zealand (Branz), based on a survey of New Zealanders in summer 2023/24, finds that 70% of people experience indoor temperatures warmer than desired for at least some time during the summer. Interestingly, more Wellingtonians than Aucklanders say their homes are too hot always or often (29% vs 24%), despite lower temperatures recorded in capital city homes, reports BusinessDesk’s Greg Hurrell (paywalled).

Townhouses a key culprit

Only 14% of Cantabrians report being too hot at home always or often, a perhaps surprising result given the type of housing that is most associated with Christchurch. The garden city is now the townhouse capital of New Zealand, reports Stuff’s Brianna McIlraith, with townhouses making up 24% of its housing market, the highest proportion in the country. Townhouses are hot property in more ways than one. In December, as the summer heat began to take hold, a Christchurch townhouse resident told 1News that temperatures in his bedroom sometimes exceeded an inhumane 50C. In Auckland, a heat pump installer said his company had changed from a “winter heating business to a summer cooling business”, with up to a half of summer installations going into high density housing.

Insulation not the issue

The high summer temperatures inside many NZ homes were among the issues under discussion in the recent consultation on reverting new-build insulation rules back to their less strict, pre-2021 settings. While building and construction minister Chris Penk says he’s focused on lowering build costs, he also cited concerns that the stricter insulation requirements were contributing to overheating and dampness risks in new housing. That’s a myth, say industry experts. “Large windows, a lack of eaves or other shade, no consideration of a property’s direction towards the sun, and poor ventilation” are the real culprits, the Green Building Council’s Matthew Cutler-Welsh tells Raphael Franks of the NZ Herald. The Branz survey found “no significant correlation between the householder reporting their home warmer than they would like in summer and the level of roof space insulation”.

Stricter rules on townhouse design needed, says industry

As the government mulls lowering insulation standards – to the dismay of many in the industry – experts are calling for tighter rules on high density design to be added to the Building Code. Writing in The Spinoff, Kasey McDonnell says the solutions are relatively simple. “It’s stuff like adding overhangs above windows to shade them, or not pointing giant windows north, or improving ventilation.” McDonnell, who lives in a north-facing Wellington apartment that gets “really hot” in summer, says high density homes are a key weapon in the fight against the climate crisis – so it’s vital we get their design right. “Apartments aren’t inherently unliveable in a warmer world,” he writes. “Badly designed housing is the problem.”

Health minister Simeon Brown. (Image: Getty / The Spinoff)
Health minister Simeon Brown. (Image: Getty / The Spinoff)

The BulletinYesterday at 7.15am

Brown not backing down on bowel cancer screening

Health minister Simeon Brown. (Image: Getty / The Spinoff)
Health minister Simeon Brown. (Image: Getty / The Spinoff)

News that the health minister went against official advice will likely only amplify the calls for lower screening ages for Māori and Pasifika, writes Catherine McGregor in today’s extract from The Bulletin.

To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.

Brown went against official advice

Health minister Simeon Brown rejected official advice to lower the bowel cancer screening age to 56 for Māori and Pacific people and 58 for the general population, RNZ Checkpoint’s Jimmy Ellingham reports. Documents released late last week show officials had recommended a lower age for the two groups, but Brown decided to instead set a universal age of 58, two years earlier than it is currently. The move is the first stage in the government’s plan to eventually align with Australia’s age, which was 50 when Christopher Luxon made the pledge during a pre-election debate in 2023 but has since been lowered to 45.

Projections estimate that the decision will result in 111 more preventable deaths over 25 years compared to the preferred option. However Brown says his plan will prevent 176 deaths over 25 years compared with keeping the age at 60 for the general population and lowering it to 50 for Māori and Pacific people. The government has also allocated funds to raise awareness and participation among Māori and Pasifika, which Brown says will also save lives.

Are Māori and Pasifika at higher risk?

The controversy rests on whether or not Māori and Pasifika should get ‘special treatment’ when it comes to screening. Defending his decision, Brown rightly says all ethnicities have the same risk of developing bowel cancer. However it is also true that some ethnic groups are more affected, at a lower age, than others.

As Rachel Thomas explains in The Post (paywalled), when assessing the statistics, the younger median age of Māori and Pasifika is key. There are fewer people in these groups living past 60, which makes their rate of bowel cancer at younger ages a major concern. Half of bowel cancer cases in Māori and Pacific people occur before the age of 60, compared with a third for other groups, according to oncologists. “Māori don’t live long enough to get the old age increase of bowel cancer. We don’t have a lot of older Māori getting it, because we don’t have a lot of older Māori,” says Dr Rawiri Jansen, former chief medical officer for Te Aka Wahi Ora, the Māori Health Authority.

Focus limited budgets where they’ll do most good, say doctors

When Brown announced his intention to lower the universal age for screening, he likely expected at least a few positive headlines in return. That wasn’t exactly the case. Doctors and cancer experts have lined up to condemn Brown’s decision as shortsighted, damaging and “driven by ideology, not facts”.

Writing in the Sunday Star-Times (paywalled), Dr Ros Pochin and Dr John Mutu-Grigg of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons say the plan to lower the screening age to 50 for Māori and Pasifika “wasn’t about preferencing some Kiwis over others, it was about making an evidence-based decision backed by clinical recommendations”. They’re in favour of lowering the age to 45 or 50 for all, “but we recognise that healthcare budgets are finite. That’s why it’s crucial to focus limited resources where they will make the most impact – on the communities most at risk.”