spinofflive
Tamatha Paul
Tamatha Paul

OPINIONWellingtonMarch 7, 2024

Tamatha Paul: Wellington can enable tens of thousands of new houses overnight

Tamatha Paul
Tamatha Paul

My message to council is this, writes the former city councillor and current MP for Wellington Central: A majority of people support densification. Don’t be scared of a vocal, privileged minority who seek to protect their own interests.

In one week’s time, the Wellington City Council could make a major decision to enable tens of thousands of new homes in our city. This is what I would consider a historic, mokopuna decision. Mokopuna decisions are those decisions which prioritise the needs of future generations above and beyond the interests of people who are here right now.  

A few years ago, when I was a brand new city councillor, we had to make a big, mokopuna decision on the Spatial Plan, the precursor to the proposed District Plan. It was the first time that Wellington City Council would breakaway from its tradition of restricting housing development and protecting the mouldy, old heritage homes that our generation flat in. 

I was told that I would pay for my decisions, to the extent where people distributed anonymous flyers about me throughout my council ward. I was invited to public meetings and ambushed by heritage lobbyists. The most powerful people tried to pressure me, and all of us, into changing our minds and giving in to the same old power-brokers who have had their way with our city for a long time.  

But this is the thing – I was always prepared to lose my job to do the right thing. I took a risk and I went all in for housing in Wellington. Not only was I re-elected as a city councillor with one of the largest margins in the history of Wellington City Council, but I was elected as the local MP with a 6,000 vote majority. Densification popular in Wellington. The crazy idea that everyone should have a safe, warm and healthy home is one that we embrace. 

My message, and word of caution, to city councillors is this: you represent a city where a majority of people support densification. You have seen pro-density representatives at all levels be elected and re-elected because the mood of our city is overwhelmingly that we want more housing and we want it now. Do not be scared of a vocal, privileged minority who seek to protect their own interests. I promise you that the voice and the power of the people – real people – is so much stronger. Be bold, be good tīpuna (ancestors) and make the boldest, most ambitious mokopuna decision that you have made yet.  

Wellington is in a state of housing emergency, and it has been allowed to snowball, because political decision makers have been slow to treat the issue with the urgency it requires. Just ask any of the majority of people who rent in our city, or look at the increasing number of people who are rough-sleeping on the street. This far-too-common experience has been well-documented in the media, in the tenancy tribunal, in books and popular culture. The shameful and embarrassing housing market in Wellington has become the butt of many jokes, except those of us who are living in it are not laughing.  

Tamatha Paul (Photo: Facebook)

Without bold, mokopuna decisions which move us towards the city that we deserve, future generations stand to inherit a city where they have no place to stand and no place to call home.  

It has been pretty special for me to represent our city as a councillor and now as the local MP, as a renter. I’ve found that home-owning decision makers at all levels tend to be out of touch with the realities of renting in this day and age.  

When the previous government put in place the National Policy Statement on Urban Development, it was welcomed as a clear step directing councils to let our cities grow up, with urban environments that provide new homes close to city centres and good transport links. Wellington Council has an opportunity to bring in a plan that achieves this potential. Unfortunately, the independent hearings panel has taken the draft District Plan backwards, but next Thursday on March 14, councillors can put that right. In my view, the council needs to bring Wellington more in line with Auckland, which has seen a boom in development leading to stable rents since their Unitary Plan shifted the dial on density. 

If you’re into the technical detail, the things to be looking out for are council’s decisions about density zoning, walkable catchments, character precincts, height limits, and enabling development where people most want to live.  

Getting this plan right is crucial to the future of our city. If the plan enables more housing in areas where people can walk, bike or bus to work, that means lower costs for our transport system, lower emissions, and a lower cost of living. If the plan prioritises density in existing urban areas, it means lower infrastructure costs, and a more vibrant city. If we think of character as the vibe of a community – things like the street festivals, the cafes, the community centres – rather than the homes built a century ago, then we can build thousands of new homes. And building new homes means people can stay in their communities or find a place easily in the area they want to live in, instead of being pushed out by gentrification 

If Wellington does this, it will mean more neighbourhoods that are safe and easy to walk around, from home, to school or work, or the shops. It will mean cheaper housing development, using existing infrastructure instead of having to build new roads and pipes. It will mean prioritising the character that people bring to their communities, not the supposed character embodied in colonial-era buildings. It will mean enabling more homes to be built near where people work, like the central city, the universities, and the hospital. 

This is the city that we not only want, but also deserve. 

Keep going!
Image: Tina Tiller
Image: Tina Tiller

OPINIONWellingtonMarch 5, 2024

If Wellington won’t allow new housing, should we all move to Upper Hutt?

Image: Tina Tiller
Image: Tina Tiller

The case for moving to the region’s fast-growing and unfairly maligned northern city, according to an urban planner and sustainable transport advocate who lives there.

A few years ago, a friend of mine who grew up in the Wellington suburb of Brooklyn was looking to buy a house. After months of going to open homes and finding nothing she could afford that was worth buying, she was giving up hope. When I encouraged her to look in Upper Hutt she responded, aghast, “I would NEVER buy a house in Upper Hutt.”

Well, if Wellington’s independent hearings panel and their favoured rogue economist have their way, many young and low-to-medium-income people will have no choice but to ditch Wellington for more affordable neighbouring cities. Is Upper Hutt ready for the potential boom in population? And do you really want to move there? 

‘Like a thousand-piece jigsaw puzzle, each member is vital to the whole picture. Join today.’
Calum Henderson
— Production editor

Upper Hutt’s urban area is sardined between a railway line and the river. It’s the dream sustainable urban form, allowing walking or biking to public transport and the city centre. The Upper Hutt City Council completed its District Plan changes to enable intensification last December. Most of the city has been upzoned to allow six- to nine-storey buildings within walking distance of the city centre and train line. The rest of the valley floor is mostly zoned for three-storey townhouses. Sensibly, Upper Hutt’s independent hearings panel considered the Hutt Valley train service to be mass rapid transit; a service with slightly less peak frequency than the Johnsonville line (which Wellington’s equivalent panel do not consider rapid transit).

Upper Hutt’s District Plan acknowledged the past but recognised that housing people is more important than keeping things exactly as they are. “It is important to recognise that the past character, densities and styles of residential development currently enjoyed by the community will develop and change over time in response to the diverse and changing needs of the community and future generations,” the plan states. Take notes, Wellington. 

So, Upper Hutt has opened up land for housing, which the conventional economic evidence suggests will support greater supply and better affordability. But will there be enough demand? 

Despite my friend’s disdain, Upper Hutt is a wonderful city to live in, particularly with children. We are at the more pristine end of Te Awa Kairangi (sorry, Lower Hutt) where river swims and cool trail walks in summer are a delight. There’s a covered farmers market that I suspect will soon rival the Wellington Waterfront market for size. We have Brewtown, where it’s socially acceptable to take your kids to the pub. Plus, it is hotter and less windy than Wellington. 

Many Wellingtonians have already realised these perks and made the move. Upper Hutt has had stronger population growth rates than Wellington City almost every year since 2014. If Upper Hutt residents need to visit the Museum of Wellington Villas, it’s only 38 minutes by train. And as more people move to our compact but leafy city, we’ll see more businesses shift here, where their employees can afford to live. Maybe one day we’ll even get a place that makes decent roti chanai