spinofflive
Prime minister Jacinda Ardern with Australian prime minister Scott Morrison (Photo: Getty Images)
Prime minister Jacinda Ardern with Australian prime minister Scott Morrison (Photo: Getty Images)

PoliticsApril 6, 2019

If Australia’s PM is more than empty talk on Christchurch, here’s what he must do

Prime minister Jacinda Ardern with Australian prime minister Scott Morrison (Photo: Getty Images)
Prime minister Jacinda Ardern with Australian prime minister Scott Morrison (Photo: Getty Images)

Following a terrorist attack targeting NZ’s Muslim community, Scott Morrison has been keen to hug his NZ counterpart, and talked of a ‘bright stream of light to come from the darkness’. Until he overhauls Australia’s immigration and deportation policy, it’s nothing but platitude, writes Janet McAllister

Ostensibly, the Aussies were there to support the Kiwis, particularly the terrorism survivors. But it’s hard to avoid concluding Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison was at last Friday’s Hagley Park remembrance service for his own cynical reasons, and he was there on sufferance.

Back home, he has failed to rebuke Islamophobia in any meaningful way, even refusing to admit Pauline Hanson is racist. New Zealand’s gun laws are unusually lax and us Pākehā are appalling racists but, as Jacinda Ardern herself has not shied away from noting, the alleged terrorist was an Australian. Ergo, Australia shares our shame. If New Zealand had been attacked by an anti-white, anti-Christian terrorist, what would we think of a leader from the terrorist’s country of origin who did little to check such hatred? Morrison has yet to prove he deserves proximity to anyone – anyone at all – negatively impacted by 15 March.

But Morrison clearly sees Ardern’s politics of love as a useful brand, and he was keen to cosy up to it – quite literally so. He launched into a hug when she reached for a handshake at their Friday post-service meeting. He has also previously suggested giving the Muslim community a “big hug”; someone needs to tell him that cuddling privileges are to be asked for, not imposed.

What someone – preferably Winston Peters as minister of foreign affairs and trade – also needs to tell Morrison is that in spite of all his self-humiliating non-consensual hugging, he can still earn the respect of the world and even New Zealand. He can still show himself to be a genuine friend.

In a word: reparations. Not official ones, of course. Unlike the Rainbow Warrior bombing, this wasn’t officially state-sanctioned terrorism. But basic humanity – and good PR, a more persuasive source of advice for ScoMo – both strongly indicate that his country owes a grand gesture of goodwill to both New Zealand and the global Muslim community. I cannot comment on what the global Muslim community may wish to request but New Zealand has been asking for the same reasonable things for years:

  • Send us 150 refugees currently either on Manus Island and/or Nauru, as soon as our government thinks is possible. Hell, make it 250.
  • In fact, find genuine homes for all your other off-shored refugees. Dismantle your wall of unwilling human bodies.
  • Stop deporting unofficial Australians who are officially New Zealand citizens, and release those you have incarcerated in immigration  detention centres back to their Australian homes. Peters has called these Australian deportations a “festering sore”; Ardern has called them “corrosive”. (We should also pledge to stop deporting New Zealanders who are officially citizens of smaller Pacific nations).
  • In fact, close all your immigration detention centres. Stop these human rights abuses.
  • Let those Aussie New Zealanders who have already been deported go home, to Australia.
  • Honestly, stop your generally shabby treatment of New Zealanders living in Australia entirely – such as stalling on them becoming Australian citizens. It’s racist – aimed at a community which includes many Māori and Pacifica people.

These actions will not heal Australia of its fear of others – that would take genuine, ongoing acknowledgement of its genocide of indigenous peoples on which the country was founded. But these actions would be a real way for “a bright stream of light to come from the darkness” to use Morrison’s own platitudes.

They would be a way to rebuke violent white supremacy, to show that while the Christchurch attacks have emboldened racists in New Zealand and elsewhere, that the hate is far outweighed by significant acts of compassion, unity, and respect for cultural difference. New Zealand politicians should be twisting the screws on Morrison to make his platitudes a reality. This is where the politics of love needs to show its backbone of steel, lobbying successfully for Australia itself to become a nicer place.

Recent history has shown that we have little in the way of economic power to make Australia do anything – but if our politicians can’t turn our current global popularity into diplomatic power, then they are less capable than they look. Does Morrison really want to be known as that guy whose inaction is welcomed by white supremacists and not by Ardern?

In the words of Al Noor mosque imam Gamal Fouda: “We call on governments around the world, including New Zealand’s and its neighbouring countries, to bring an end to hate speech and the politics of fear.”

“Neighbouring countries”. I’m going to take a punt and say he’s talking about Australia, right there. Heed the call, Mr Morrison. Your politics of fear are not welcome here.

Keep going!
NZ First MP Shane Jones. Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images
NZ First MP Shane Jones. Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images

PoliticsApril 5, 2019

A brave attempt to count every Shane Jones mini-scandal over 18 short months

NZ First MP Shane Jones. Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images
NZ First MP Shane Jones. Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images

With the possible exception of Phil Twyford, no minister has generated more headlines over the current government’s term than Shane Jones. And a lot of them aren’t good headlines at all. So how does he keep surviving? 

The charmed career of Shane Jones continued on breezily this week. Despite opening up yet another target around perceived conflicts of interest for the opposition to aim at, there has been no suggestion whatsoever that he could be on the verge of being sacked.

The full facts of this latest one are worth going through. On the face of them, they make up an interesting case. Shane Jones, the self-described First Citizen of the Provinces, has spoken up with concerns about a matter before the High Court. Semenoff Logging is facing loss of their license to operate trucks pending an appeal, based on a very large number of road rule breaches. And Jones is concerned that 1000 jobs could be lost as a result. So far, not a huge amount of drama.

Only, with every layer that gets pulled back, eyebrows get raised further. He’s the regional economic development minister, so mentioning an ongoing court case at all is questionable – he says he hasn’t commented on the working of it at all. Perhaps more importantly, he’s the associate transport minister, and the case is being brought by NZTA. Also, company owner Stan Semenoff has been a donor in the past, and they’re actually distantly related through his mother too for good measure. Finally, it’s in a region of the country where NZ First has heavily targeted both a large chunk of their electoral efforts, and big money from the provincial growth fund. Jones completely denies any conflict of interest, which makes it all an astonishing series of coincidences.

The opposition are utterly apoplectic about it, as they so often are when something seems to go wrong involving Shane Jones. But if this time is like the last dozen times something has happened that raises questions of competency or judgement, absolutely no consequences will be suffered. It might be because nothing untoward has actually happened. Or it might be because it remains politically impossible for the PM to get rid of him, whether she wanted to or not. NZ First is too powerful, and Shane Jones and Winston Peters are clearly very loyal to each other.

Does a dozen seem like an exaggeration? It’s a best guess figure for how many times Shane Jones has said or done something which might make you wonder if he’s bound by the same standards of discipline as the rest of the Cabinet. There have been enough that it’s easy to forget what most of them actually were. And in each case, there has been a rebuttal from Shane Jones.

Just in case you have forgotten any, here’s a handy list to keep track of them, from before the Semenoff saga started. Some feel scandalous. Others are just a bit sloppy. All of them have so far been survivable.

  • Declared a conflict of interest in a provincial growth fund (PGF) decision, then sat in on the meeting, “giving reassurances” about the governance of the project.
  • Later attacked the journalist who broke the story, Hamish Rutherford, making threats to reveal information about him.
  • Had an outburst against then-Fonterra chairman John Wilson, telling him to “take the next cab out of town”.
  • Also had an outburst against the decisions of Air NZ, in terms of shutting down regional routes, causing the airline to fire back that their independence would not be compromised.
  • Got into a war of words with Greenpeace’s Russel Norman over appearing to support Talley’s, the fishing giant that was facing a prosecution. Talley’s also donated $10,000 to Shane Jones’ campaign during the 2017 election.
  • Failed to disclose dozens of PGF meetings over an extended period of time, and had to correct 20 answers to questions from National.
  • Was involved in a triangle of lobbying around an exemption for a luxury development, with the other points of the triangle being economic development minister David Parker, and enthusiastic golfer Sir John Key.
  • Had to freeze a regional development initiative, around a waste to energy plant linked to someone who was in the sights of the Serious Fraud Office. Ministry officials took the rap for that one, even though they had actually warned him about serious flaws in the project.
  • Not necessarily Shane Jones’ fault, but there was that time that $160,000 worth of tree seedlings for the billion tree programme had to be mulched, because the land to plant them on wasn’t good enough.
  • Was attacked by National, when one of the really early things PGF money was spent on was a roundabout near Shane Jones’ house.
  • Presided over just 54 jobs being created by the PGF in a year of operation, though the number is understood to be higher now. Jones contends it’s actually over 500. But of course, that’s a three year allocation for the PGF and next year, 2020, the third year of this term, would be a great year to spend up large for no particular reason.
  • Boasted about plans for a “Work for the Dole” programme, making life difficult for his coalition partners.
  • Speaks in weird riddles and parables at every opportunity, though in fairness that one is funny.

Politics