spinofflive
Golriz Ghahraman says Little’s Bill could end up targeting the wrong people. Photos: RNZ
Golriz Ghahraman says Little’s Bill could end up targeting the wrong people. Photos: RNZ

PoliticsNovember 28, 2018

Green Party calls on government to urgently repeal prisoner voting ban

Golriz Ghahraman says Little’s Bill could end up targeting the wrong people. Photos: RNZ
Golriz Ghahraman says Little’s Bill could end up targeting the wrong people. Photos: RNZ

On the 125th anniversary of women exercising suffrage for the first time in NZ, the support party has called for a change in the law that sees incarcerated people ‘unjustifiably denied the right to vote’.

The Green Party has added its voice to a growing call for a change in the law that denies people in prison the chance to vote, using parliamentary question time to urge Justice Minister Andrew Little to revisit an issue he has described as “not a priority”.

The party’s move follows a landmark decision in the Supreme Court earlier this month and the launch of a campaign today by JustSpeak.

In the house today, Green justice spokesperson Golriz Ghahraman will ask the Minister of Justice: “Will he concede that on the 125th anniversary of women first voting, there are still New Zealanders unjustifiably denied the right to vote, and commit to overturning the ban on voting for people in prison?”

People incarcerated in New Zealand have been denied the right to vote since 2010, when parliament passed a member’s bill put forward by Paul Quinn of the National Party. Between 1993 and 2010, prisoners serving less than a three year sentence were entitled to vote.

The ban excluded prisoners “from processes that engage them in society, making rehabilitation harder”, said Ghahraman.

“It undermines democracy and removes fundamental rights, which has been confirmed by the majority of the Supreme Court, who believe the ban should be overturned.

“Our justice system disproportionately targets Māori and lower socio-economic communities, this doubles down on existing prejudice and rights breaches.”

In a ruling earlier this month, the Supreme Court upheld a decision by the High Court that denying prisoners the right to vote is inconsistent with the Bill of Rights.

Justice Minister Andrew Little, who is leading a wide-ranging rethink of criminal justice in New Zealand, said at the time that while he personally opposed the ban on prisoner voting, the government had yet to determine its policy on the issue, adding: “It’s not that much of a priority.”

Even were Labour ministers to support such a change, there would be likely opposition from their coalition partners, New Zealand First. Winston Peters earlier this year embarrassed Little when his party blocked an effort to repeal the three-strikes law.

Writing on The Spinoff today as part of the series Aren’t Can’t Don’t, Tania Sawicki Mead and Ashlesha Sawant of the criminal justice reform lobby group JustSpeak explain why they’ve launched a campaign to change the law.

“Voting allows people to represent themselves, and their views, in our country’s political conversation – a right that all New Zealand citizens have, and should have. In order for our country to become a truly representative democracy, we must allow the voices of all New Zealanders to be heard,” they wrote.

In another piece in the series, formerly incarcerated person Awatea Mita wrote: “I know that denying the right to vote violates respect for human dignity, sending the message that absolute rehabilitation is impossible.”

Keep going!
China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi (R) and New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters shake hands in Beijing on May 25, 2018. –  (Photo by THOMAS PETER / POOL / AFP)        (Photo credit should read THOMAS PETER/AFP/Getty Images)
China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi (R) and New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters shake hands in Beijing on May 25, 2018. – (Photo by THOMAS PETER / POOL / AFP) (Photo credit should read THOMAS PETER/AFP/Getty Images)

PoliticsNovember 28, 2018

New Zealand wants to be a ‘bridge’ to China? Careful we don’t get walked over

China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi (R) and New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters shake hands in Beijing on May 25, 2018. –  (Photo by THOMAS PETER / POOL / AFP)        (Photo credit should read THOMAS PETER/AFP/Getty Images)
China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi (R) and New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters shake hands in Beijing on May 25, 2018. – (Photo by THOMAS PETER / POOL / AFP) (Photo credit should read THOMAS PETER/AFP/Getty Images)

When it comes to tension between the US and China, National and Labour are on the same side – the fence. Guyon Espiner examines a foreign policy that tries to have it both ways. 

We have the Five Eyes alliance with the US but have no free trade agreement with them. We have the FTA with China but little engagement on security and intelligence.

This was always a precarious position requiring some agile diplomatic gymnastics. Now, as US-China relations become strained – National Party leader Simon Bridges calls it a “virtual war” – New Zealand risks a dangerous fall.

Rather than scurrying away as the elephants stomp, Trade Minister David Parker wants his country in the middle of the fight, saying New Zealand could be a “bridge” between the two countries.

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern hasn’t been able to fully explain how we might fulfil this role but both she and Mr Parker will be hoping for signs of a ceasefire later this week, as China and the US meet at the G20.

With billions of dollars of tariffs fired off in a trade war, Presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping meet in Buenos Aires with the hope of a deal or at least a de-escalation.

Despite Mr Parker’s heroic talk of bridging the gap between the sparring super powers, it’s doubtful that assisting with this is within New Zealand’s sphere of influence.

It might be more productive for the government to focus on managing the issues directly at play between New Zealand and China. There are plenty of them and they’re gaining momentum.

A decision is imminent on whether to let Huawei roll out parts of New Zealand’s 5G network. The US is putting pressure on its allies to block the Chinese telco, citing security concerns. Or is it just trying to constrain China? Australia has sided with the US. GCSB Minister Andrew Little is going to upset one side whatever his decision.

And then there is the very curious case of Anne-Marie Brady. In September last year the Canterbury University academic published her paper Magic Weapons, claiming a campaign of corrupt and covert influence by China in New Zealand.

Since then she claims her office has been broken into twice, her home targeted in a suspicious burglary and also that her car may have been tampered with.

The government’s response has been to say as little as possible but that is becoming increasingly untenable.

Tiananmen square in Beijing, China. Photo: 123RF

This week 29 academics and authors wrote to Ms Ardern expressing alarm at the reports of intimidation and demanding assurances that attacks on academic freedom would not be tolerated.

Ms Ardern insists it’s a police matter and that the investigation continues. Prof Brady believes the police have actually finished their work and her supporters fear the government’s silence is a sign of weakness.

If indeed it can be shown that operatives in any way connected to the Chinese government were responsible for the actions Prof Brady describes then this will be a big challenge for the prime minister.

What does she do? How hard does she go? This comes at a time when talks to upgrade the FTA appear stalled. There’s plenty at stake. Two-way trade with China was $8.6 billion in 2007 when the pact was signed. It is now worth more than $26b.

While the public here may demand a strong response to any proof of intimidation, China will not take kindly to a scalding from New Zealand. Back in July when the government’s Strategic Defence Policy Statement was critical of China’s military build up in the South China sea, its diplomats were quick to register their displeasure.

Perhaps the cold shoulder is already being offered. Mr Parker was unable to secure a meeting with his counterpart, China’s Commerce Minister Zhong Shan, during a recent visit to Shanghai. Ms Ardern, invited to China a year ago, had expected to visit this year. But now the trip is off. “All capitals are busy approaching the end of the year and Beijing is no exception,” she explained.

If ‘we’re too busy to meet you’ sounds like a snub then perhaps it is.

Politics