spinofflive
Flowers and tributes left near Al Noor mosque on March 18 (Photo: Carl Court/Getty Images)
Flowers and tributes left near Al Noor mosque on March 18 (Photo: Carl Court/Getty Images)

SocietyMarch 15, 2021

Two years on, there are still pockets of hate. And there are beams of light

Flowers and tributes left near Al Noor mosque on March 18 (Photo: Carl Court/Getty Images)
Flowers and tributes left near Al Noor mosque on March 18 (Photo: Carl Court/Getty Images)

I’m asking New Zealand not to forget, and not to brush this aside, writes Anjum Rahman.

It’s been a long two years since our world was torn apart. So often I think about the countries that live with these kinds of events on a weekly basis, and how they might deal with the trauma, the constant fear and not knowing when the next attack might happen. I can’t even imagine what it’s like to be present, to lose someone, in a deliberate attack with such horrific consequences.

Yet in our country, it’s striking how quickly some people want to forget. There are a few who express the feeling that we’ve heard about it enough, why do we have to go through this again? Over the last couple of weeks, as we continue to advocate for our community and push for the support needed, it’s hard to avoid the hate-filled social media commentariat.

The latest attack lines are that we’re too whingy and whiny – words that are rarely used for men, but are used by people who would be the first to tell us that Muslim women are treated like second class citizens in Muslim communities. We have the usual requests to go back to our own country, told that we should be grateful to even be here. They gleefully tell us we wouldn’t have a voice in our own country (yeah, that would be Aotearoa) while complaining loudly when we use our voice here.

I know the toxic social media space is not representative of the country. There have been many people who have shown their support in various ways. The everyday kindness is what keeps any community going, especially one that is still dealing with such an awful event.

It’s an event that will necessarily have long-term and ongoing consequences, both in terms of mental, physical and economic wellbeing. Putting it behind us would be easier if there weren’t ongoing threats, and fears for our safety. As well as the everyday acts of discrimination that have never stopped.

Back in 2015, when the Islamic Women’s Council of New Zealand wrote to the government detailing the issues faced in our community, the root cause of those issues was the negative perception of Muslims. This came through media, online and offline commentary, as well as deliberate misinformation. It was affecting Muslim women’s ability to gain employment or rental properties, to be taken seriously by health providers and to go about their daily business in public spaces.

As a response to this, and to set our own narrative about the wonderful Muslim women in our community, Aliya Danzeisen started a project to create a resource for secondary schools. Work on the project had started prior to the attacks but had to be put on hold as the organisation struggled under the weight of supporting and advocating for our communities after the attacks.

Finally this year, the resource is ready, and it features amazing women such as Zubeda Shariff who manages a women’s refuge, or Fazilat Shah, a barrister who runs her own law practice. There’s a life coach, a dentist, a dairy owner. Women from different ethnic backgrounds including some who were born here, others who grew up here, and those who are more recent arrivals. They are all Kiwi women living their lives and wanting the best for their families.

This is a huge contribution from our community, but a small part of the work that needs to be done within our country. Necessary work is being done to bring Te Reo Māori and a telling of our history into schools. There are amazing projects such as the Stories of Tainui being brought to life. It’s not just our children, we all need to learn more about our neighbours and their varied experiences.

Another contribution is a children’s book written by Dr Maysoon Salama. She wrote it for her young granddaughter, Aya, who lost her father in the attacks. It’s also for other children dealing with loss and trauma. The death of Aya’s father is implied and not the focus of the story. Aya and the Butterfly is part of a four-book series to support, reflect and celebrate the Muslim community.

We hope that it is not only schools that pick up these resources. It’s still clear, two years on, that there are strong pockets of hate out there. It’s clear that people are being swayed by misinformation campaigns in way that are harmful to their wellbeing.

It’s easy to have a day of remembrance, but to really honour the victims of the Christchurch attacks and other victims of violence, colonisation and discrimination, I go back to what I said in the days after March 15, 2019. We all need to put the effort to create a society where hate can’t flourish, where people feel valued. That takes commitment at a policy level, at a legislative level and at the grass roots, in our homes and communities.

I’m asking New Zealand not to forget, and not to brush this aside. We’re working as hard as we can, so are others. Please join in, you’re needed right now.

Keep going!
Could cannabis decriminalisation have positive outcome in New Zealand (Photo: Getty Images)
Could cannabis decriminalisation have positive outcome in New Zealand (Photo: Getty Images)

OPINIONSocietyMarch 15, 2021

The time to decriminalise cannabis is now

Could cannabis decriminalisation have positive outcome in New Zealand (Photo: Getty Images)
Could cannabis decriminalisation have positive outcome in New Zealand (Photo: Getty Images)

One of the big challenges to the decriminalisation of cannabis is that no-one really knows what it means. Kathy Errington of the Helen Clark Foundation explains what a decriminalised system could look like in New Zealand. 

Last year’s referendum was about legalisation, which would have seen adult cannabis use and possession made fully legal, regulated, and taxed. New Zealanders voted narrowly against this. Decriminalisation, on the other hand, sees cannabis use and possession remain illegal, but removes criminal penalties. 

As consensus builds that this option will work best for New Zealand, the question comes up as to how best to approach a decriminalised system? How are we going to keep something illegal while ensuring far fewer people are criminalised for it?  

The core problem that we need to solve is the unequal burden on the young, and on Māori, of criminalisation. Māori remain about 40% of those charged with cannabis offenses. The misuse of drugs amendment in 2019 tried to improve matters, but for Māori nothing has changed at all – the ratio has remained the same – and the impact on decreasing prosecutions overall has been lacklustre. An approach relying on police discretion has failed, and will continue to do so – after all, why shouldn’t police try to enforce the law as written? Cannabis possession and use is still illegal, and policing approaches reflect this fact.   

Police discretion is pushed to breaking point when the public simply no longer supports enforcement of the law, which is where we have come to as a country on this issue. 

So long as we remain clear on what the problem is we are trying to solve, we should be able to design a sensible system that avoids the commercial market which was narrowly rejected by voters in the 2020 referendum.

One sticking point though is how does decriminalisation deal with supply? Do we stick our heads in the sand and pretend cannabis comes from nowhere? Thankfully, that is not the only option.

A commercial market is not the only way to “non-criminally” supply cannabis – it can be grown at home. A decriminalised system that includes limited home growing would make a significant impact on how many people are dragged through the courts. 

A working model of decriminalisation can be found across the Tasman, in ACT. Key features of the ACT model are that it decriminalises limited home growing of two plants per person or four per household, possession of up to 50 grams of dried cannabis or up to 150 grams of fresh cannabis, and allows cannabis use in your home.

It remains an offence to smoke or use cannabis in a public place, to expose a child or young person to cannabis smoke, and to store cannabis where children can reach it. It is also an offence to drive with cannabis in your system, to sell cannabis to anyone, and for people aged under 18 to grow, possess, or use cannabis.

Research shows that reform of some kind (either decriminalisation or legalisation) has a large majority of support.

It is not perfect, but in drug law reform there is no perfect world, just a better world. An Aotearoa where fewer young Māori men and indeed fewer people of any age and background see their potential damaged by a cannabis conviction will be a better country. 

A proposal along these lines could be acceptable to a significant majority of New Zealanders, including a majority of supporters from every political party

It isn’t good enough to say that we have had a referendum already on this issue and put the cannabis issue away – we only voted on a specific proposal for a fully legal and regulated commercial market. Our research shows that reform of some kind (either decriminalisation or legalisation) has a large majority of support, and has had for years. 

When 70% of the country supports changing something, inaction will lead to cynicism. It is time for politicians to come to the party, and strike a bipartisan consensus about how to move forward. Seeing the deputy leader of National, Dr Shane Reti coming forward in favor of this sort of approach is a significant moment. It is fitting that the most senior Māori MP in the National Party is open to considering  how to forge a  consensus which most people can accept. 

While justice minister Kris Faafoi is clear that cannabis decriminalisation is not a proposal the government will prioritise, his comments have also indicated that a private members bill may have a real chance of passage as a conscience vote. His concern for the injustice of the status quo is genuine. There are MPs across the political parties who understand this issue and want to see something done.  

This is a relief because every day that goes by with another low-level conviction for cannabis creates a justified anger among those affected. How would you feel if you went to prison for something the PM herself has confessed on TV to doing? And something that probably many other politicians in NZ have done at some point? There are people, still, in that position in New Zealand. It has to stop.