spinofflive
Jenny Condie and her family Credit: The Opportunities Party
Jenny Condie and her family Credit: The Opportunities Party

ParentsJuly 26, 2017

We need a Mother’s Union: how society is failing to support parents

Jenny Condie and her family Credit: The Opportunities Party
Jenny Condie and her family Credit: The Opportunities Party

Parenting, in particular motherhood, can be a really tough ride. The Opportunities Party’s Jennie Condie writes about why she’s entered politics to try to make a difference.

“How many times have you worked with co-workers you loved but hated the job?”

This question was raised by Amy Gray in a brave column recently about mums who regret motherhood. I hope Amy had lots of good friends around to moderate her comments and tell her what a great mum she is, because any mother who dares to talk publicly about the frustrations and challenges of motherhood better be prepared to be publicly shamed, insulted, humiliated, and bullied.

Or, as our own Emily Writes put it, be told to “be grateful.”

I’ve got two young boys; the oldest is four and the youngest is 18 months. I love my boys to pieces, and they are demonstrably the most wonderful children who have ever existed (fight me!). I’m so proud and yes, grateful, to be their mum. But motherhood, well, sometimes that’s pretty rubbish.

To paraphrase Emily, “We are grateful, now give us the support we need to do our damn jobs!”

If you worked somewhere where the employment pay and conditions were as terrible as they are for motherhood, you would join your union and fight for better support and conditions. No one questions whether police officers or teachers love their job when they strike for more support so they can do their job well. But when mothers complain about how hard motherhood is, suddenly it is the mothers who are at fault and not society. Sadly there is no “Mothers Union” to fight on our behalf.

People often say at this point that “if you didn’t want to be a mum, then you shouldn’t have had kids.” Look, I support the choice that many women make to not have kids. But let’s be realistic – without kids there would be no future adults. Parents provide society with an incredibly valuable resource: future citizens. And whether these kids grow up to lead successful lives as fulfilled and active citizens is largely determined by the care and teaching provided by parents in their child’s first three years.

And, increasingly, mothers are saying that those first three years are a lot harder than they need to be. Motherhood shouldn’t be like boot camp, where only the most resilient make the cut. Motherhood is not a test to weed out the unworthy. Mothers (and fathers) provide a valuable community service that benefits all of society and it is time we started acting like it.

In Amy Gray’s column she said that “anyone shocked by women who regret motherhood isn’t listening to women.”

Jenny Condie and her family Credit: The Opportunities Party

At The Opportunities Party we are listening to women. In fact, several of our candidates are mums with young kids, so we know first hand how hard it is for mums – like Jessica Hammond-Doube, who is standing in Ōhāriu. (And we’re pretty bolshy, so Gareth doesn’t really get a choice about whether he listens or not). We know that society is failing to support parents. And we know that this has a huge negative impact on mums, dads, and kids.

First off, we will make sure parents actually get paid for the important work they do caring for children and acting as first teachers. All parents with a child under three will receive $200 per week. We trust parents to know how best to spend that money to ensure their families thrive. Some women would rather stay home with their children, so they can use that money for rent and groceries. Others are excited to go back to work, so that money can be used to help with childcare costs. And hey, did you know that sometimes fathers might want to stay home with their kids?! (These crazy young people today, challenging traditional gender roles.) With this support, parents get to decide what works best for them and their family.

This money will be unconditional, meaning everyone will receive the full amount regardless of their income. This makes it easier for parents to work part time or casual jobs if they prefer, without worrying about the impact these extra hours will have on your Working for Families and other benefit payments.

Second, we will give extra support to lower income parents. These families are often the worst affected by the draconian work testing requirements that mean that, for example, solo mums can’t pick up a few extra hours of work without losing their benefit for weeks. These families will get an additional $72 a week without a work hours requirement, instead of the current in-work tax credit. They will also get free full-time childcare for their one and two year olds if they are in paid work (with no minimum hours).

Third, we will extend free Early Childhood Education (ECE) hours from 20 to 40 hours a week. We will also make sure that all ECE centres provide high quality education and care. Too many low income families have no choice but to leave their children in substandard care at the moment, and this cannot be allowed to continue.

We know there is a lot more to do for mums and dads, but we think that this is a great start.

This article is part of an ongoing Election 2017 series on the major parties’ family- and child-focused policies.

Jenny Condie is an academic with a PhD in accounting, a former public servant, mum of two delightful young boys (one who likes to sleep and one who doesn’t), and a list candidate for the new political party The Opportunities Party (TOP).

Follow the Spinoff Parents on Facebook and Twitter.


This content is entirely funded by Flick, New Zealand’s fairest power deal. In the past year, their customers saved $489 on average, which would buy enough nappies for months… and months. Please support us by switching to them right now.

Keep going!
One year baby isolated white series
One year baby isolated white series

ParentsJuly 25, 2017

#DearHuggies: Mums clap back at sexist toilet training manual

One year baby isolated white series
One year baby isolated white series

Huggies NZ just published a ‘helpful’ guide to toilet training for ‘girls‘ and ‘boys‘ and got a hell of a response to it. Angela Cuming hits back at the silly manual that seems like it’s straight out of the 1950s.

Dear Huggies,

I just wanted to drop you a line to say thank you for helping me toilet train my son, Charlie.

He’s three and a half and I’ve been trying to get him to use a ”big boy toilet” as you call them for a wee while now, but with not much luck.

Here I was, about to go all crazy and just let him do things at his own speed, in his own time, and not get all anxious and worked up about it, when I came across your super helpful and informative guide, ”Toilet Training for Boys”.

And thank goodness I did, because boy had I got things wrong!

For instance, I didn’t realise that boys are so competitive. ”Boys are traditionally more competitive than girls”, you say, so I guess it must be true.

Responses on the #DearHuggies tag on Twitter

Of course, Charlie’s never seemed to want to be the fastest or the quickest and he never tries to outdo his two little brothers on anything really (except maybe for our impromptu Bruno Mars ‘Uptown Funk’ dance-offs on the beds) but now I see the error of my ways.

As Charlie has a penis and so, as you say, is a boy, he must be – no is – competitive, I intend to turn his toilet training into one big steaming pissing contest. Because surely that is the absolute best way to help a little kid nervous about toilet time get over their anxiety. Good stuff!

I also noted with interest that you believe that, given his gender, Charlie must love superheros and to incorporate that into my toilet training routine.

This may be a little difficult as Charlie wouldn’t know Spiderman or Batman if he tripped over them in the street. But I’m sure that’s simply down to my crushing of his emerging masculinity by not having them on in favour of other shows he only pretends to like such as Peppa Pig and Princess Sofia the First.

Thinking about it though, he does watch the original Thunderbirds. I suppose his interest in Lady Penelope and Tin-Tin is part of some elaborate ruse and he really is just interested in watching the Men of Tracy Island do Superhero Men Stuff like blow up rockets and things.

I will also follow your advice and be ”positive and clear” with my advice to Charlie because, as you helpfully point out, ”boys respond best to direct instructions”.

Although, to be fair, again, Charlie is a boy and I can be very clear and direct and tell him ”Charlie, please sit on the toilet” and he will still look at me then run over to the little bed he’s made for his toy stuffed cat and then ask to watch Emma Wiggle do ballet.

Responses on the #DearHuggies tag on Twitter

And, dear Huggies, it’s a good thing I don’t have any daughters to toilet train because I just don’t seem to have any story books about princesses on hand to read to her. That’s one of your amazing super helpful tips for potty training girls. As you say, they love stories about princesses! If that doesn’t help, parents can always pop their little girl’s favourite teddy on the toilet to help their own little princess learn to poop in the loo. Why only girls like teddy bears is news to me – and my three little boys for that matter – but you guys are the experts and us parents have clearly got it terribly wrong.

I noted with interest your tips about helping, too: “Little girls, more so than boys, love to know when they’ve been helpful.”

Now of course that doesn’t explain the approximately 6473 billion times a day Charlie runs after me squealing “I want to help mama, I am helping mama, let me help you with that washing mama, I love to help.” But, again, I’ll take your advice on board and when Charlie next veers from his gender norm like that I will march him outside and get him to race his brothers around the clothesline while their mummy is a good grown up girl and hangs out their laundry. Girls love to help, after all.

Or, given the fact I rather like my three little boys just as they are and I am happy for them to do what makes them happy and let them be themselves: I may just IGNORE YOUR FREAKING BULLSHIT SEXIST ADVICE AND BE HAPPY KNOWING CHARLIE WILL SIT ON A GODDAMN TOILET WHEN HE IS GOOD AND READY.

Our children will inherit a world from us that is full of hurtful gender stereotypes and ridiculous notions about what it means to be a ”real man” and what is or isn’t ”ladylike behaviour”. Call me naïve but I kind of expected a company like Huggies would have seen enough children by now to know exactly what they are. Children. They are all different, and it’s an insult to parents, let alone our kids, to perpetuate god awful stereotypes like ”boys are competitive and girls like princesses”.

We deserve better. Our kids deserve better.

So tomorrow, I will watch Charlie practise his ballet in front of his audience of stuffed toys, watch him give away all his stickers to his brothers, let him vacuum the floors and fold the laundry with me, and then take him grocery shopping so we can buy any brand of pull-up nappies other than Huggies.

Unless you start doing Lady Penelope pull-ups for boys that also feature teddy bears and Charlie’s favourite two colours of pink and purple. Then we are here for that.

There has been no response from Huggies to the queries from mothers on Facebook and Twitter.

EDIT: Huggies have responded to a mother on Facebook with the following message: “Thanks for getting in touch and bringing this to our attention. We appreciate your concerns and apologise for any offence caused. We agree that this content on our website is not appropriate and needs to be updated. We have now removed the content and are currently in the process of reviewing the entire website.”

Angela Cuming is a mum of three and a columnist for The Spinoff Parents.

Follow the Spinoff Parents on Facebook and Twitter.


This content is entirely funded by Flick, New Zealand’s fairest power deal. In the past year, their customers saved $489 on average, which would buy enough nappies for months… and months. Please support us by switching to them right now.