One Question Quiz
From top to bottom, Robert Schofield, Trevor Robinson, Jane Black, David McMahon, Heike Lutz, Rawiri Faulkner, Liz Burge and Lindsay Daysh, the independent hearings panellists for Wellington’s District Plan
From top to bottom, Robert Schofield, Trevor Robinson, Jane Black, David McMahon, Heike Lutz, Rawiri Faulkner, Liz Burge and Lindsay Daysh, the independent hearings panellists for Wellington’s District Plan

PoliticsMarch 1, 2024

Who are the members of Wellington’s independent hearings panel?

From top to bottom, Robert Schofield, Trevor Robinson, Jane Black, David McMahon, Heike Lutz, Rawiri Faulkner, Liz Burge and Lindsay Daysh, the independent hearings panellists for Wellington’s District Plan
From top to bottom, Robert Schofield, Trevor Robinson, Jane Black, David McMahon, Heike Lutz, Rawiri Faulkner, Liz Burge and Lindsay Daysh, the independent hearings panellists for Wellington’s District Plan

The independent hearings panel for Wellington’s new District Plan has attracted criticism from all sides for its controversial decisions to reduce housing capacity. But who are they?

What is an independent hearings panel?

First of all, the independent hearings panel is not elected. They are not councillors, nor are they council staff. That’s why they are “independent”.

IHPs are a specific requirement set out in the Resource Management Act when councils are making District Plan changes. It’s their job to listen to all the submitters, weigh up all the evidence presented, and make recommendations to the council based on that evidence.

Effectively, everyone who wants to have input on the District Plan presents to the IHP, who weigh up the evidence and act as judge and jury.

This is a good idea for a number of reasons. District Plan hearings take ages, and councillors simply don’t have enough time to sit through the whole thing. Many of the issues are really technical and require specific background knowledge. And, in theory, IHPs should be less biased than elected officials, who are elected with specific agendas and mandates.

What qualifications do you need to be on an independent hearings panel?

At a bare minimum, you need to be accredited as a commissioner under the Resource Management Act. To do that, you need to complete a course called “Making Good Decisions“. It takes two days, and costs $2,400+GST. Chairs need to need to take an additional one-day course that costs $1,768+GST. Most commissioners also have extensive experience in planning, architecture, law, or a similar field.

There are 1138 accredited commissioners in New Zealand. Commissioners don’t just act on IHPs, they can adjudicate pretty much any controversial land or water-related issue a council might face. Several of the IHP members have made decisions on behalf of Wellington City Council before.

How was the Wellington IHP hired?

Wellington City Council listed the job ad on the Government Electronic Tendering Service, GETS. The application asked for commissioners with expertise in resource management, urban design, heritage, with knowledge of tikanga Māori, and “a high degree of empathy and professionalism”.

The council received eight applications through the GETS process and hired six of them. Councillors appointed the panel in a public-excluded meeting on December 8, 2022. The council did not specify how it hired the other two members of the eight-person panel. 

There were three factors that were meant to be considered for hiring the IHP: capability (based on their CV), availability (they needed to commit to a 12-month process) and price (panellists had to provide an hourly or daily rate). The Spinoff asked Wellington City Council what the panel’s rate was, but the council was not able to confirm that information before publication.

What rules did the panel have to follow?

The council required the IHP to follow five principles:

  1. Act in a fair and transparent manner.
  2. Avoid unnecessary formality and allow all parties the opportunity to be heard, whether they are presenting written or verbal evidence.
  3. Be efficient, to minimise time and costs.
  4. Recognise tikanga Māori.
  5. Recognise New Zealand sign language.

Members of the IHP were also required to disclose any actual or perceived conflict of interest, including:

  1. If they have previously advocated for any position that would be affected by the District Plan.
  2. If they have previously represented anyone who has submitted on the District Plan or would be affected by it.
  3. If they have any personal financial interest, “including but not limited to an interest in property,
    which may result in an actual or perceived conflict of interest and/or bias”.

Who are the panellists? 

Trevor Robinson, chair 

Robinson is the trustee of a $2.13m house in central Kelburn, right on the edge of the walkable catchment. It is listed on the conflict of interest register.

A lawyer in the environment field focused mostly on resource management, he was previously partner at Buddle Finlay, and is now a barrister at Shakespeare Chambers. 

He listed two other conflicts of interest: Waka Kotahi, which he has acted both for and against, and the NZ Deerstalkers Association. He was also a member of IHPs for decisions by the Waikato Regional Council and the Queenstown Lakes District Council. 

Robert Schofield, deputy chair

Schofield owns a property in Brooklyn with an estimated value $1.57m. He did not list it on the conflict of interest register. He is employed by Boffa Miskel, the consulting firm which wrote the council’s main report on character areas. He recused himself from several hearings involving character areas and other clients of Boffa Miskel. 

He has 40 years of experience in planning, mostly in the Wellington area. He chaired the IHP for the Central Hawke’s Bay District Council. 

Heike Lutz

Lutz is a director of Building Conservation Consultants Ltd, which provides expert advice on heritage buildings. She holds a master’s degree in architecture. She listed conflicts of interest due to previous professional relationships with Wellington Heritage Professionals and property developer Argosy.

Liz Burge

Burge is employed by Tomlinson and Carruthers Surveyors in Masterton. She listed a conflict of interest to Muaūpoko Tribal Authority Inc, because she is a whāngai of Rangitāne o Wairarapa. She also listed a conflict to the NZ Motor Caravan Association, which she has represented previously. 

Lindsay Daysh

Daysh owns a property in Island Bay with an estimated value $1.29m. He did not list it on the conflict of interest register. 

He is a director of Incite, a resource management consultancy. He is accredited as a chair and acted as a commissioner for several other decisions in Wellington. He listed conflicts of interest with Wellington City Council, Centreport, Wellington International Airport, Meridian Energy, Vodafone, Chorus, KiwiRail, Waka Kotahi, and the developers of the former Mount Crawford prison site.

His brother and sister-in-law, Stephen and Lisa Daysh, are trustees of the same $2.13m Kelburn property as Trevor Robinson. 

Jane Black

Black owns a property in Mount Victoria with an estimated value of $1m. She did not list it on the conflict of interest register. The property is on a street where the panel recommended expanding character areas, though she was not directly involved in the decision. 

Black has 30 years’ experience in urban planning and design, is on the board of Wellington Waterfront Limited, and chairs the Community Reference Group for Kāinga Ora, a forum for neighbours to raise complaints or concerns about Kāinga Ora developments. 

Rawiri Faulkner

Faulkner is a director of Tū Taiao Limited which specialises in project and relationship management, planning, policy, strategy and facilitation.

He listed conflicts of interest to Kāinga Ora, which he had worked for previously, and Ngāti Toa, through whakapapa, though he had no involvement with the iwi’s submissions. 

David McMahon

McMahon owns a property in Island Bay worth $870k and an apartment in Te Aro (Victoria Lane). He did not list either of them on the conflict of interest register.

He is a director of RMG, a resource and environmental management consultancy.

He listed conflicts of interest with the Wellington City Council, the Wellington Waterfront, Gordon Wilson flats, and Go Media. He is the deputy chair of the Christchurch IHP.

What will happen next?

The recommendations of the independent hearings panel are not final. Wellington city councillors still have the chance to make changes to the District Plan in a meeting on March 14, as long as they can get a majority vote for their amendments. Any changes the council makes will need to be signed off by housing minister Chris Bishop.

How to follow along

If you want to stay on top of everything that happens throughout this process, subscribe to The Spinoff’s War for Wellington newsletter. Every week, we’ll send a roundup of the most important stories about the District Plan process and the future of housing in Wellington. It will include highlights from our own coverage, perspectives from experts and activists, and the best reporting from other media around Wellington.

Keep going!