spinofflive
a red background with ripped paper showing crosses and quote marks
Image: The Spinoff

SocietySeptember 16, 2024

Most people approve of compensating survivors – and more findings from new polling on the abuse in care inquiry

a red background with ripped paper showing crosses and quote marks
Image: The Spinoff

Polling conducted for The Spinoff shows that a majority of the public supports financial compensation for survivors – even if they don’t know much about what is in the final report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care.

An estimated 200,000 children and adults were abused in state and faith-based care between 1950 and 1999, with the details laid out in a harrowing 3,000-word final report from the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care in late July. New polling from Talbot Mills, conducted for The Spinoff between August 7 and 19, shows that a slim majority of New Zealanders are aware of the report. The polling also reveals that most people, especially those aware of the report, support financial compensation for survivors.

While the inquiry was widely covered in the media, and more than 1,500 witnesses gave evidence to the commission during the multi-year process, the polling found that public knowledge was limited. The key period of the inquiry, as set out in the terms of reference, was between 1950 and 1999; because much of the abuse happened further in the past, perhaps it’s unsurprising that older people knew more about the report – or because older people watch more linear TV and listen to broadcast radio, and so may know more about local news.

Only 31% of 18 to 29-year-olds had heard of the report, while 78% of those 60-plus knew about it. Overall, more than half of people polled had heard of the report, reflecting the greater awareness from older groups.

The interim and final reports of the inquiry make for harrowing reading, describing in detail how many thousands of vulnerable people were abused by institutions that should have protected them. The polling found, however, that while a majority of people had heard of the inquiry, most people didn't know much about its details. When people who had heard of the report were asked how much they knew about it, only 7% of people said they knew "a lot". Twenty-one percent of the 1,201 people surveyed as a whole thought they knew a fair amount about the inquiry, with the majority of people who were aware of the report saying they knew "not that much" about it.

While older people were more aware of the abuse in care inquiry as a whole, younger people were more likely to support financial compensation for survivors. Overall, a majority of people thought that financial compensation was needed. When told to ignore how much they did or didn't know about the inquiry, 65% of 18 to 29-year-olds polled in favour of compensation, while only 47% of those 60-plus supported compensation.

Left-leaning voters were also much more in favour of financial compensation. The polling asked people who they had voted for at the last election, meaning that people's opinions about whether survivors should be compensated by the government could be cross-referenced against their political leanings. The results fell distinctly along party lines; just 21% of Act voters thought victims should be compensated, while 79% of Te Pāti Māori voters thought compensation was in order.

Keep going!
Image: Tina Tiller
Image: Tina Tiller

SocietySeptember 16, 2024

‘It was quite baffling’: Police call driver on motorway to say ‘stop using your phone’

Image: Tina Tiller
Image: Tina Tiller

A roadside police officer spotted a driver allegedly on his phone – so searched his number plate, found his details and called him up. Stewart Sowman-Lund has the details in this special report for The Bulletin.

An Auckland motorist was surprised to receive a phone call from a police officer telling him to stop using his mobile phone – while he was still driving.

The driver, who The Spinoff has agreed not to name, admits interacting with his dash-mounted phone to check the navigation on a recent journey, but said it was counterintuitive to then be called up. 

“I was headed down state highway 16 city bound. I passed a [highway patrol] car, and 15 or 30 seconds later I got a phone call from an unknown number,” the driver explained. He answered, with the phone still mounted on the dash and on speaker. “They identified themselves as ‘the police’ [and asked] ‘why are you on your phone’.” 

The driver’s response? “Well, I’m talking to you.”

He presumed the stationary police car spotted him as he drove past, then searched the car’s number plate to find his details, including phone number, as registered owner.

The driver said the phone call was received while he was still travelling on the motorway at more than 80km/h. He’d never been called by a police officer before. “It was quite baffling, being startled by having the police phone you while still driving. It was quite a shock.”

The police officer allegedly verified the driver by reading out his number plate and home address. “I admitted it, yes, I did use my phone – it was in my line of sight, but where it is on my dash, it’s as much in my line of sight as the air con. It was confronting to say the least, but I gave my details.” A $150 fine arrived in the mail a few days later.

In comments to The Spinoff, a police spokesperson initially said that calling a motorist to discuss their driving was not standard practice. However, they later added that it was “not common” but, under certain circumstances, “police will occasionally contact registered vehicle owners to discuss driving behaviour”.

The spokesperson added: “In this instance, the officer involved would have been concerned enough to have contacted the driver via phone, as part of immediate follow-up actions.”

In response, the driver told The Spinoff it was more dangerous answering the phone and having a conversation with the officer than it had been adjusting his navigation. “[It’s] incredibly counterintuitive to potentially replicate a dangerous behaviour that they are trying to discourage,” he said.  

Given the public messaging around distracted driving, the driver said he was “shocked that they would ring me while driving”.

The police spokesperson said they made “no apology” for targeting “high-risk driving behaviours”. According to the transport agency, it is permitted to use a mounted phone while driving – though the official advice is that it’s safer not to use it at all.

In follow-up comments, police claimed the driver had been holding his phone, and said the officer had mouthed to the driver to “get off the phone” when he passed them on the motorway. The driver disputed this and questioned how he would have been expected to see what a police officer was mouthing on the side of the motorway as he drove past.

Asked for further details on when a police officer might choose to interact with a motorist in this way, police declined to answer. “Appreciate that you have further questions, but we have said everything we are going to say on this matter.”

Both police and the government have in recent months signalled a tougher crackdown on drivers using their mobile phones. In February, prime minister Christopher Luxon said he was willing to consider higher penalties for motorists. “People should not be on their phones while driving,” he told TVNZ’s Breakfast. Currently, the fine for being caught is $150 – the same penalty for driving more than 51 metres in a bus lane.

The number of drivers fined by police for using their phones rose by 25% between 2022 and 2023, with nearly 60,000 tickets handed out last year.

So far, the government has not announced any changes to how distracted drivers are penalised. Transport minister Simeon Brown told The Spinoff that distracted drivers are “a danger to themselves and others”. He reiterated that the government was open to raising the cost of a fine and said that this year’s government policy statement on land transport (GPS) included a commitment to review penalties for traffic offences, including consideration of indexing the value of infringements to inflation. “I am expecting to undertake this work over the GPS period,” Brown said.

Transport minister Simeon Brown (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

In 2022, a pilot programme saw Waka Kotahi roll out cameras capable of detecting when a driver was using their phone. In the first two months of the six-month trial, more than 50,000 “potential mobile phone use offences” were detected. Police were not involved in the trial and the findings did not lead to enforcement action or warning letters.

A Waka Kotahi spokesperson confirmed no cameras are currently being used to detect distracted drivers, and those used in the 2022 trial need “further trials and a law change before they can be used to detect offences”.

It’s expected that more intelligent cameras will eventually be rolled out as police hand over responsibility of the road camera network to the transport agency. Earlier this year, reported the Herald, the first “smart cameras” were installed on a dangerous stretch of Northland highway. However, at this stage they are only being used to catch speeding drivers. Given the cameras can read number plates and scan body heat, there have been concerns raised about privacy.

Data from the Ministry of Transport shows that between 2020 and 2022, 287 drivers were involved in fatal or injury crashes caused by cell phone distraction. 

To receive The Bulletin in your inbox every weekday morning, sign up here.