spinofflive
Jewish boys look at anti-semitic graffiti which was sprayed on the walls of a synagogue March 5, 2006 in Petah Tikva in central Israel. (Photo by Uriel Sinai/Getty Images)
Jewish boys look at anti-semitic graffiti which was sprayed on the walls of a synagogue March 5, 2006 in Petah Tikva in central Israel. (Photo by Uriel Sinai/Getty Images)

SocietyNovember 16, 2017

Invisible violence: Why we need a hate crime law in New Zealand

Jewish boys look at anti-semitic graffiti which was sprayed on the walls of a synagogue March 5, 2006 in Petah Tikva in central Israel. (Photo by Uriel Sinai/Getty Images)
Jewish boys look at anti-semitic graffiti which was sprayed on the walls of a synagogue March 5, 2006 in Petah Tikva in central Israel. (Photo by Uriel Sinai/Getty Images)

How many hate crimes occur in New Zealand each year? Good question. Joe Higham explains why, to stop crimes motivated by prejudice, we first need to start recording them.

On the 23rd June 2016, the United Kingdom voted to leave the EU. The consequences of the Brexit decision, both positive and negative, are yet to fully play out. But one effect is already clear.

UK hate crimes, defined as crimes “motivated by racial, sexual, or other prejudices, typically one involving violence”, rose 44% in July 2016, the month following the Brexit vote, in comparison with the same month the year before.

But how many hate crimes have been committed in New Zealand over the last twelve months? How many victims have there been? The answer is… we don’t know, because we don’t collect those statistics.

While we may not have the exact figure, what we do know is that for many New Zealanders being the victim of a hate crime is not as rare an experience as we might think, or hope. In the past year there were 325 complaints to the Human Rights Commission on the basis of “unlawful discrimination on the basis of consolidated Race (Colour, Race, Ethnic or National origins)”. This number is probably just the tip of the iceberg; many more likely never bothered to come forward, knowing that their prospects of obtaining justice were slim.

Jewish boys look at anti-semitic graffiti which was sprayed on the walls of a synagogue March 5, 2006 in Petah Tikva in central Israel. (Photo by Uriel Sinai/Getty Images)

Addressing the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination in August this year, Race Relations Commissioner Dame Susan Devoy said that “Unless these events are captured and analysed, the day to day victimisation experienced by people because of their ethnicity is largely invisible… The thing about living in a country that ranks highly on the Global Peace Index is that often many of us end up believing our own hype.”

And that’s exactly it; those of us not affected by the day to day prejudicing and discrimination often overlook its effect. We buy into our own bullshit about how lovely (and safe) it is to live in New Zealand.

What we don’t know we can’t effectively address, and what we can’t address tends to only become an increasingly invisible problem, a normalised way of life affecting some of society’s most vulnerable. Put simply, by not collecting data we’re sweeping the issue under the carpet, to be addressed by someone else at a later date.

Ricardo Menendez March stood for the Green Party in the most recent election and was the first Latino candidate to ever run for parliament in New Zealand. He sees the lack of data collection as just “one of the ways which allows the political system to turn a blind eye to the reality that racism and misogyny are a source of violence.”

Another way we are falling short is legislatively. “Inciting racial disharmony” is one of the main legislative measures available as a charge when someone perpetrates a racial hate crime, but from 2012 to 2017 no prosecutions were made, though clearly not because crime of this kind is non-existent. Another option is for judges to include race-related hostility as an aggravating factor when sentencing criminals in court, but that doesn’t equal to the task of addressing crimes that insult our society in the way a hate crime does.

The Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination agree. In response to Devoy’s submission, they outlined their concern that “existing legislation may be inadequate to effectively combat acts of racial hatred.”

We clearly need to work on our approach. Collecting data on hate crime and making it publicly available is the first step. When 325 New Zealanders are being targeted, often violently, by virtue of their skin colour, religion or sexuality then the onus is on those with a voice to come to their aid rather than sit back and allow them to suffer. Hate crimes are a far more pressing issue than we admit, especially for the societal groups who are most frequently their victims. Perhaps the solution is a legislative one. Or maybe, like the UK after its spike in hate crimes post-Brexit, there should be a governmental plan to address the issue.

Just because hate crime is not as big a problem here as in the UK doesn’t mean we should simply ignore it. Now it’s up to Jacinda Ardern and her new government to show they care.

 

Keep going!
Sing it Sister-15

SocietyNovember 14, 2017

Celebrating 10 years of LATE at Auckland Museum

Sing it Sister-15

2017 was the 10th year of Auckland Museum’s popular panel discussion series, LATE. The person behind LATE, Dina Jezdic, looks at the events’ role in giving the museum a modern, provocative voice.

The creation of ‘museum’ as a public space, open to anybody, is a very radical concept. Today it is something we take for granted and we feel completely entitled to. Prior to public museums, collections were solely accessible to individuals of wealth and aristocratic birth (mostly they were both). The collections were private by nature.

Now, the radical responsibility of museums lies in the prospect of healing. Healing from violence of colonisation and actively engaging in decolonising ourselves and our communities. Museums’ responsibilities also lie in the enrichment of individuals and communities by having honest and open dialogues. This is what LATE at Auckland Museum is.

LATE is collaborative, participatory and socially responsible, focused on highlighting and celebrating those that were, or continue to be marginalised. There is a great interest in understanding potential barriers that perpetuate discrimination and what we need to overcome them. Equally we are all fascinated by and love to celebrate those that have, in spite of these barriers, achieved enormous success. 

Organisations must interrogate and dismantle the systems upholding barriers and creating challenges for those that are not in positions of dominance and privilege. In other words, if you examine something, it becomes less scary. 

Geneva Alexander-Marsters and Jessie Moss on the LATE panel: Sing it Sister – Sexism in the Music Industry (Photo supplied)

I see the last 10 years of LATE as diversity work from inception. We have done some big things and we have also had some major flops. But it was the ones when we didn’t ‘nail it’ that provided us with a learning framework as much as the ones where we did. Traditionally, we devoted the month of July to a Matariki LATE where our focus was on the tikanga and mātauranga Māori. Today, museums of Aotearoa assume that their very existence is rooted in the values of mātauranga Māori and acknowledgement of the Treaty of Waitangi. But can that be true while simultaneously upholding hegemonic knowledge, and in majority of cases, ensuring it is truly dominating? Yes, and we are aware of the pitfalls. Our Auckland Museum framework, He Kōrahi Māori, supported by Teu le Vā, the museum’s Pacific dimension, are our guiding principles consistently embedded in our every thought and action.

In some ways the idea of ‘diversity’ is the cultural capital for museums and art galleries. Sadly, the concept has also become too prevalent and too present, which in turn has manifested in a self-blockade, too encompassing, its net cast too wide and the meaning of it, well, meaningless. By reaching its own saturation point it also simultaneously reached the status of a buzzword.

With this in mind, LATE often gives us the opportunity to position the word diversity within the framework of te reo Māori words like mana wāhine and takatāpui. The 2016 LATE: ‘He Mana He Wahine’ was definitely one of those ‘right on’ moments that will continue to shape and guide us on many levels. It showed us the power of the Auckland Museum brand to be critical and bring large scale conversation on ideas like women of colour, intersectionality, and feminism into the mainstream. ‘He Mana He Wahine’ also prepared us for the last LATE of this year, ‘Sing it Sister: Sexism in the Music Industry’. It’s important to state that we had a lot of help from our friends at Equalise My Vocals. Those mighty shoulders, those brave shoulders!

Rosanna Raymond, Courtney Sina Meredith, and Dr. Ngahuia Te Awekotuku at 2016 LATE ‘He Mana He Wahine’, (Photo supplied).

LATE wasn’t always a success story. Earlier on, we were heavily criticised for the lack of gender diversity and we took that criticism very seriously. I believe that it helped us to get to where we are today. We wanted to go even further and work towards inclusion and respect of all races, cultures and genders. I think we’re getting there. Our first LATE for 2018 will be in collaboration with Auckland Pride Festival and it is something I am very excited about.

The act of consultation in creating content for LATE is heavy. We need a lot of support if we are going to unpack this revitalisation quest of social justice. Our own world views are intertwined with unavoidable blind spots and we will have to be checked and re-check ourselves along the way. That is why partners and collaborators are something we genuinely need and want.  

We are also lucky to have had enormous help with the moderators that supported us over the years helping us to be critical in our examination: Russell Brown and Noelle McCarthy to name only a couple, and we have made some really important friends this year that we can’t wait to play with again: Leonie Hayden and Rose Matafeo.

There are many museum institutions that are looking at understanding their role in the activist movements. The question for them is both how to and whether to participate in these movements, as well as how to provide their audiences with agency to pursue multiple paths of interpretation. By uncovering and illuminating the under-known stories and narratives of those ‘othered’ by the dominant Western hegemony (including: people of colour, colonial, migrant, female, queer, political, indigenous, censored, erased, and marginalised) there is a way to shift and rewrite the past.

LATE is an invitation to re-look, re-imagine and actively engage in reshaping the present, which will guide our future. The panel discussion is a portal where we re-open the possibilities and actively participate in a new imagination of us as a collective, giving new meaning for all.

LATE has also progressed into the political sphere. Not in the sense that we rub shoulders with the politicians, but we do tackle issues that are very political: ‘Invisible Privilege’, ‘Home Sweet Home?’, ‘Allied Values’ and ‘Sexism in the Music Industry’ this year. Last year our topics included ‘He Mana He Wahine’, ‘From #Slactivism to Activism’ and ‘Taste of Inequality’. We no longer need to state that LATE is a ‘safe space for dangerous ideas’ – we now make space for ideas that shouldn’t be labeled ‘dangerous’. It’s equally about making space for the contribution of and diversity of perspectives.  Contributors and knowledge holders such as Georgina Beyer, Sir Lloyd Geering, Ella Henry, Ngahuia Te Awekotuku, Laura O’Connell Rapira, Rosanna Raymond, Marianne Elliott, Courtney Sina Meredith, David Farrier…too many to name!      

If we focus back on institutional and museum contexts, there is a responsibility to educate ourselves. Museums must embrace their role as a catalyst towards a shift which goes beyond just the intellectual. They must facilitate ideas and concepts that need unpacking about and alongside the communities we serve, by making space for these communities.

LATE at Auckland Museum acknowledges our  2017 partners: RNZ National, Massey University and Paperboy Magazine. Dina Jezdic is the audience development and engagement specialist at Auckland Museum.


The Society section is sponsored by AUT. As a contemporary university we’re focused on providing exceptional learning experiences, developing impactful research and forging strong industry partnerships. Start your university journey with us today.