spinofflive
Pedestrians walk past a person rough sleeping on High Street in central Auckland in October 2020 (Photo: Lynn Grieveson/Getty Images
Pedestrians walk past a person rough sleeping on High Street in central Auckland in October 2020 (Photo: Lynn Grieveson/Getty Images

OPINIONSocietyApril 29, 2021

Youth homelessness is a crisis – stop the finger-pointing and fix it  

Pedestrians walk past a person rough sleeping on High Street in central Auckland in October 2020 (Photo: Lynn Grieveson/Getty Images
Pedestrians walk past a person rough sleeping on High Street in central Auckland in October 2020 (Photo: Lynn Grieveson/Getty Images

Our young people experiencing homelessness don’t care about whose fault it is – they care about what those in power now are going to do about, writes youth development worker Aaron Hendry.

Over the past week or so, there’s been increased attention on how much motel owners are charging to house our homeless whānau, as well as the conditions they’re being forced to live in.

Some well-timed articles by RNZ reporter Jane Patterson, combined with National’s housing spokesperson Nicola Willis getting a bit vocal, drove the conversation to the forefront last week.

It was highlighted again that the environments in some of these motels are unsafe and unfit, with reports of violence and abuse. Some of our youngest and most vulnerable people experiencing homelessness are saying that in some cases, they felt safer on the street than in the motels.

The main response from the government has been to say that it’s better than the streets. Nicola Willis has argued we can do better.

She’s right – the options aren’t the street, or an unsafe motel, and yet, the response to this critique from many Labour Party supporters has genuinely surprised me.

There has been significant pushback from supporters of the government, with some arguing that National created the housing crisis, and others parroting the now well-worn “nine years of neglect” rallying cry that has become the go-to in the face of any criticism.

But to say we can do better shouldn’t be controversial; we were saying this back when John Key was leading the government. The conditions people are living in were unacceptable when National was in power. They are no more acceptable under Labour.

Distracting from the issue by trying to attribute fault to one side or the other, or this “it’s better than the street” mentality – as if people experiencing homelessness should just be grateful and should not expect to live with dignity – is the height of privilege. 

To be honest, our people, the ones experiencing homelessness, don’t care about the last nine years. They don’t care about who should hold ultimate responsibility for the complex set of factors that led to the housing crisis. What they care about is what those in power are going to do now. What they care about is being safe, being warm, being dry. Fighting over who should hold the blame distracts from what really matters. Getting justice for our people. 

Right now there is no safe, secure and supported immediate accommodation for a rangatahi who is in urgent need of housing. This means that if they’re unsafe, if they’re at risk of homelessness, their options are either to remain in the situation in which they are endangered, attempt to gain emergency accommodation (in accommodation that is often unfit for rangatahi), or couch surf among friends and acquaintances (which can make them equally vulnerable, as they’re often exposed to further risk of abuse and exploitation). If those options are not available or have been exhausted, they may end up sleeping rough on our streets, in our parks, or in a car if they can find it.

If you’re 16 or 17, your choices are limited further as many moteliers funded by the government for emergency accommodation will not take a rangatahi of that age. This can lead to a situation like we had during level four lockdown last year, where our youngest rough-sleeping rangatahi were turned away from emergency housing while the nation rolled out the stops to house our adult whānau.

Lifewise, alongside Manaaki Rangatahi, a collective working to end youth homelessness, has been calling on the government since the level four lockdown last year to provide an immediate accommodation solution for rangatahi experiencing homelessness, with services and 24/7 support on site. This would give them the support they need to access long-term housing as swiftly as possible. It would also, in the long run, be significantly cheaper than the reported $1 million a day being spent on emergency housing currently.

Yet, despite numerous calls to action, conversations across the relevant ministries and collective agreement at both government and community level that a solution is needed and that motels are failing our people, we are yet to see any sign of decisive action – and our rangatahi continue to experience oppression at the hands of this system.

This is a crisis. 

Young people, teenagers, kids are being traumatised, abused, neglected and significantly harmed due to our national failure to respond adequately to this housing crisis. It is one thing to talk about the stress and strain the housing crisis is having on first home buyers or property investors, but we need to recognise that more important than whether you’ll be able to own your first home is the question of whether you have the right to live in one at all. 

The persistence of youth homelessness, and the lack of decisive action in addressing it, is demonstrating that the right to housing is not being upheld within Aotearoa. In a country lauded internationally for our values of kindness, justice and progress, we allow children to grow up in motels, young people to live on our streets, and we deny our rangatahi their right to safe, stable, secure accommodation, choosing to ignore their cries for justice rather than make the tough decisions needed to keep them safe. 

We have failed. We have accepted homelessness as a social class within our society. As a fixture of our broken and dysfunctional communities.

And yet, homelessness does not need to exist. We can end it, but not if we get distracted by pointing fingers at each other. Tribalism is not going to bring us equality. Protecting your party from a valid critique, just because it comes from the “other side”, does nothing to advance justice.

Having sat down kanohi ki te kanohi with several ministers within the government charged with taking on this issue, I know that no one thinks this is OK. We are blessed to have leaders in our government who genuinely care for our people. 

But despite all the best intentions, something within the system is blocking progress. And when the system blocks progress, and people are harmed as a result, then sometimes the problem needs to be named so we can fix it. 

If we want this government to make the transformational progress they promised us, we cannot shy away from giving productive and worthy critiques, regardless of how uncomfortable or challenging they may be.

At the end of the day, it does not matter who is in government. The goal is not a Labour or National government, the goal is liberation, the goal is equality, the goal is enhanced wellbeing for our people, communities, and whenua. The goal is justice.


In the latest episode of Gone By Lunchtime, Toby Manhire, Annabelle Lee-Mather and Ben Thomas discuss health reform, foreign policy and Selena Gomez. Subscribe and listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or your favourite podcast provider.

Keep going!
Western Springs Forest, razed (Photo: Steve Abel)
Western Springs Forest, razed (Photo: Steve Abel)

OPINIONSocietyApril 28, 2021

Western Springs Forest isn’t being ‘restored’. It’s being wantonly destroyed

Western Springs Forest, razed (Photo: Steve Abel)
Western Springs Forest, razed (Photo: Steve Abel)

In Auckland, a rich inner-city native ecology is being destroyed and most people have no idea. Climate and tree protection activist Steve Abel makes the case for the Western Springs Forest being much more than a nuisance.

It’s only April, but 2021 is already shaping up as Auckland’s year of the chainsaw.

The poisoning, ring barking and finally cutting down of the native grove at Canal Road in Avondale; the beheading and grinding of the giant 130-year-old macrocarpa, also in Avondale; and the killing of another mature native tree cluster in Epsom are just some of the more prominent and decried losses. But another gratuitous tree destruction exercise is under way at Western Springs. The number of trees that have already perished and the volume of living biomass that will be rendered to wood chips will exceed all the others combined.

We’re used to seeing Auckland Council wring its hands and blame greedy developers, private property rights, or the failure of central government to reinstate general tree protection for the city’s critical tree loss. However, in the case of the Western Springs Forest, it is Auckland Council itself that is doing the damage.

Because public knowledge and understanding of ecology and trees is low, and there is a longstanding dislike of pine trees in particular, cutting down some ageing and unsafe pines and replacing them with a native forest sounds like a good idea to most people. Until you learn an important detail: Western Springs Forest is already a native forest.

When I first encountered it up close in 2019 I felt the sense of awe you only really feel in a wild place. Gnarled vertigo-tall Monterey Pines stalked the hillside, standing sentinel over a burgeoning Gondwanan sub-canopy dominated by decades-old tree ferns.

The logging track at Western Springs Forest from above (Photo: Supplied)

Western Springs Forest is designated a significant ecological area because of the richness of its native ecology. Thirty-year-old karo trees interspersed with red matipo and a dense variety of native tree ferns including ponga (silver fern) and māmaku form an understorey that is home to tūī, pīwakawaka, kōtare, ruru and spoonbills. It is habitat to copper skinks, pūriri moths, giant centipedes, wētā and a host of other native insects. The canopy of this forest is a stag-horned stand of 200 Monterey pines – planted in the 1920s to hold the hillside up around the time the stucco and brick workingmen’s cottages were built along West View and Garnet Roads. These trees are now nearly 100 years old.

Around 80 years ago, silver ferns were the first native vegetation to begin reclaiming the gullies under the then-youthful pines. Those same ferns are now tall elders with black cut-bristle trunks assembled alongside the lowest part of the public track. There are native plants that are rarely seen in urban settings, such as sickle spleenworts (petako) and drooping spleenworts (makawe), growing from the base of pine trunks, houndstongue (kōwaowao/paraharaha) clambers happily over long-fallen logs, and all manner of weird and colourful fungi sprout in the autumn from the rich decaying biomass supplied by the pines. Kōtuku (white heron) peruse the lake from the high pine canopy.

While there has been patchy management, including random felling of trees, and occasional planting programmes of specimen natives in the last few decades, this forest is primarily a product of organic regeneration. Western Springs Forest sprouted from the wild seedstock and the deep wisdom of ecological self-selection. That makes it much more interesting and original than anything we (or Auckland Council) could dream up to replace it with. Far more than Jaggers Bush or the Domain, this ragged stand feels like a wild forest.

The hole cut in the forest, as seen from Western Springs’ playing field (Photo: Steve Abel)

A few years ago, on the pretext of safety, it was determined that every last one of the pines must be felled. This has been strongly contested. Chris Benton is the only arboricultural expert to study and make an industry-standard safety assessment of each and every one (in 2019) of the 200 pines. Benton is scathing of the council’s conclusion to fell them. He cites only three pines that need to be removed and a further six that require urgent pruning or some other management. Another respected arborist, Craig Webb, peer reviewed the Benton report and assessed that “the vast majority of pine trees in the forest pose a low or very low risk of harm” and all trees were within what is considered “tolerable” risk. Even the most recent council-commissioned arboricultural risk report suggests that only 26% of the trees need some degree of management for safety.

These trees are 35-45 metres tall, placing them in the category of the tallest trees in Auckland. The bigger ones weigh as much as 15 tons each. If all the tree trunks in the stand were lined up end to end they would stretch six kilometres. Having razed a logging track through the dense heart of the forest this month, the council will not helicopter, or sectionally fell, but topple – logging style – every last pine down on top of the native understorey. As their full weight and stature crashes down with canopies intact they will smash and disintegrate the 80-year-old punga and other native trees below them. Thousands of native plants will be split, shattered and killed. Dozens of native birds, and countless lizards and insects will be homeless as winter sets in. Even according to the council’s own conservative projections, the plan will damage up to half of the existing native bush.

This process is being described as the Western Springs Native Bush Restoration Project. But restoration only describes what will be attempted following the destruction of the existing native forest and eradication of the pines. It is the twisted logic of killing a forest to make a forest. We only need to look at the council’s post-pine-removal restoration efforts at the Bullock Track and the lower section of Newmarket Park to know how bad they are at this – these are dry and moribund native plantations burdened by kikuyu and lacking any ecological complexity.

The scores of pine stumps and felled trunks will remain at Western Springs. Along the road sliced through the forest, fewer than 8,000 native plants are to be planted. More than a quarter of these plants are grasses rather than trees or shrubs. The death rate of such plantings can be as high as 80% as unwatered saplings wither over their first summer. With failures, the replacements amount to fewer than half of the around 15,000 native plants, including decades old trees, that will be smashed by the plan. In a climate emergency we don’t have the luxury of killing native trees just to plant some more. Without the shelter of the canopy and thick understorey, the heat of the sun and the constant westerly wind will burn off dozens more ferns and damp-loving species. It will require monumental effort to keep light-loving weeds and pests out of the steep incline. Mile-a-minute weed is already champing at the edges, waiting to invade the hillside.

What’s the alternative? Over the past two years in particular, the community assembled the case for a plan B based on the contemporary wisdom of “low-interference ecological management” – a term borrowed from celebrated botanist Hugh Wilson, who successfully restored Hinewai in Banks Peninsula. The principle is that you’re better to work with what you’ve got to achieve native restoration rather than the old-school ethos of smashing things down to build them up again from scratch. Low-interference management has a deeper respect for natural processes and pays attention to what is already there. It takes a humbler view of what humans are capable of when we mess with nature.

A silver fern crushed by a pine log at Western Springs forest (Photo: Supplied)

The case for development of such a plan was presented to the Waitematā Local Board on numerous occasions by community members and experts in ecology and arboriculture. When the board determined in September 2020 that it would work with the community on a plan B, the council charged on in spite of the voices of local residents, independent expert evidence, and community opposition. The logging plan was pushed through the relatively new local board by three votes to four late last year.

The institutional disdain that Auckland Council appears to have for the community it serves has shown itself at the Canal Road native grove in Avondale, around the Waiheke Island marina, and the Mataharehare pā pōhutukawa. Now it is also at work in the fate of Western Springs Forest.

The community plan was to look at the forest as an ecology rather than merely a stand of pines. It would have still involved thousands of supplementary plantings but only piecemeal removal of the unsafe canopy trees when necessary, while most would remain in recognition of their vital part in the structure and nourishment of the forest. Over many decades a gentle transition to entirely native vegetation would be complete. With this plan the character of Western Springs Forest would not be lost in the carnage that the children of West View Road, for whom the forest is a wild playground, are now witnessing from their bedroom windows.

On Friday April 9, the council contractors TreeScape began actively cutting down dozens of native trees. Among the casualties were a 10-15-year-old kauri tree and a 25-30-year-old pōhutukawa tree. Mature silver ferns (ponga), whekī, as well as over a dozen other self-seeded native trees including red matipo, coprosma, karo and pittosporum were also felled.

Despite hindrance from protesters sitting in trees and on diggers, the contractor’s logging track has continued to demolish everything in its path. It is over 30 metres wide in places. Pine logs are piled on top of native vegetation and cut ponga and pittosporum are slung onto the living bush. It will only get worse as more and more pines are toppled onto the understorey. This is not what the public imagined when they heard talk of a native bush restoration.

Like Canal Road, the character of the forest at Western Springs is of its place, has its own natural and human history, and is a unique part of our urban ngahere. The gangly pines have inherent value and amenity. They store carbon, calm the wind, temper deluges and – visible from kilometres away – are part of the visual heritage of many parts of the city. In our era of climate change and biodiversity collapse, Western Springs Forest should be something to be respected and treasured, not razed to mud.

Active publicly funded destruction of the forest is a crime against nature but, perhaps worst of all, it is committed against the wishes, wisdom and vision of the local residents. They knew the pines were not unsafe. They lived with their daily sway and heard the joy of tūī in their upper branches. They weeded and trapped pests, collected rubbish, and documented the native flora and fauna beneath. They knew how special it was. It is their homes right now that shudder as the forest is laid waste.